Listening Post

Listening Post

Download on the App Store

Listening Post episodes

  • TPE and 16 other Pakistani channels banned in India - What does this mean?
    Podcast: The Pakistan Experience (LS 43 · TOP 1% what is this?)
    Episode: TPE and 16 other Pakistani channels banned in India - What does this mean?
    Pub date: 2025-05-04

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    The Pakistan Experience has been banned in India. What does this mean for us, Youtube and Indian democracy?The Pakistan Experience is an independently produced podcast looking to tell stories about Pakistan through conversations. Please consider supporting us on Patreon:https://www.patreon.com/thepakistanexperienceTo support the channel:Jazzcash/Easypaisa - 0325 -2982912Patreon.com/thepakistanexperienceAnd Please stay in touch:https://twitter.com/ThePakistanExp1https://www.facebook.com/thepakistanexperiencehttps://instagram.com/thepakistanexpeperienceThe podcast is hosted by comedian and writer, Shehzad Ghias Shaikh. Shehzad is a Fulbright scholar with a Masters in Theatre from Brooklyn College. He is also one of the foremost Stand-up comedians in Pakistan and frequently writes for numerous publications. Instagram.com/shehzadghiasshaikhFacebook.com/Shehzadghias/Twitter.com/shehzad89Join this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC44l9XMwecN5nSgIF2Dvivg/join



    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Pakistan Experience, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    17 min
  • India and Pakistan Agree Ceasefire
    Podcast: Newscast (LS 69 · TOP 0.05% what is this?)
    Episode: India and Pakistan Agree Ceasefire
    Pub date: 2025-05-10

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    Today, we look at the ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan.

    The US President Donald Trump announced the news to the world via social media and it was his secretary of state and vice president doing the mediation.

    International editor Jeremy Bowen joins Laura and Paddy to talk about how the agreement was reached.

    They also talk about a possible ceasefire in Ukraine, where European leaders including UK PM Keir Starmer are meeting today. They’re asking Russia to stop attacks for 30 days from Monday.

    You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast”. It works on most smart speakers.

    You can join our Newscast online community here: https://discord.gg/m3YPUGv9

    New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: https://bit.ly/3ENLcS1

    Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Laura Kuenssberg and Paddy O’Connell. It was made by Chris Flynn with Rufus Gray. The technical producer was Michael Regaard. The weekend series editor is Chris Flynn. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The editor is Sam Bonham.



    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC News, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    30 min
  • India launches strikes against Pakistan
    Podcast: Today with Claire Byrne (LS 38 · TOP 2% what is this?)
    Episode: India launches strikes against Pakistan
    Pub date: 2025-05-07

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    Shashank Joshi, Defence Editor for the Economist

    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from RTÉ Radio 1, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    7 min
  • The India–Pakistan conflict escalates.
    Podcast: Tangle (LS 53 · TOP 0.5% what is this?)
    Episode: The India–Pakistan conflict escalates.
    Pub date: 2025-05-08

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    On Wednesday, the Indian government said it conducted several airstrikes in Pakistan-controlled territory. While India called the strikes a success, at least two of its military aircraft were reportedly lost in the operation. Pakistani military officials said at least 31 people were killed in the strikes or by artillery fire. 



    Ad-free podcasts are here!

    Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!


    You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today’s “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.


    Take the survey: Do you think a war between India and Pakistan is imminent? Let us know!


    You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. 


    Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.


    This podcast was written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.


    Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Hunter Casperson, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. 

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Isaac Saul, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    33 min
  • Why is India bombing Pakistan?
    Podcast: James O'Brien Daily (LS 39 · TOP 2% what is this?)
    Episode: Why is India bombing Pakistan?
    Pub date: 2025-05-07

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    India launched air strikes on Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir last night, leaving many civilians dead, in the worst fighting between the two nations for decades. This has coincided with the near completion of a UK-India trade deal. What are the stakes here and what happens if the conflict escalates?

    Also, a new report into last summer’s far-right anti-immigrant riots has found that the police force is ill-equipped to tackle the impact of online misinformation - which fuelled the disorder. Why do people spread misinformation? Is the battle with the tech platforms that have the power to restrict such content already lost?

    And, James speaks with journalist Harry Shukman, author of “Year of the Rat: Undercover in the British Far Right”, to hear exactly what he learned while working undercover with various far-right groups.

    This episode was recorded on the 7th May. Catch James O'Brien weekdays from 10am on LBC.



    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Global, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    1 hr 3 min
  • India and Pakistan clashes
    Podcast: The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim (LS 47 · TOP 1% what is this?)
    Episode: India and Pakistan clashes
    Pub date: 2025-05-07

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    In a special extra episode, Yalda talks to Sky News' India reporter and producer Neville Lazurus in Delhi on the roots of the latest hostilities between the two nuclear-armed countries and asks if this has the potential to escalate into a global conflict.

    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Sky News, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    22 min
  • India-Pakistan Tensions
    Podcast: Let's Know Things (LS 54 · TOP 0.5% what is this?)
    Episode: India-Pakistan Tensions
    Pub date: 2025-04-29

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    This week we talk about British India, Kashmir, and water treaties.

    We also discuss the global order, sovereignty, and tit-for-tat escalation.

    Recommended Book: Power Metal by Vince Beiser

    Transcript

    When then British India was partitioned by the British in 1947, the country carved up by its colonialist rulers into two new countries, one Hindu majority, the Union of India, and one Muslim majority, the Dominion of Pakistan, the intention was to separate two religious groups that were increasingly at violent odds with each other, within a historical context in which Muslims were worried they would be elbowed out of power by the Hindu-majority, at a moment in which carving up countries into new nations was considered to be a solution to many such problems.

    The partition didn’t go terribly well by most measures, as the geographic divisions weren’t super well thought out, tens of millions of people had to scramble to upend their entire lives to move to their new, faith-designated homelands, and things like infrastructure and wealth were far from evenly distributed between the two new regions.

    Pakistan was also a nation literally divided by India, part of its landmass on the other side of what was now another country, and its smaller landmass eventually separated into yet another country following Bangladesh’s violent but successful secession from Pakistan in 1971.

    There was a lot more to that process, of course, and the reverberations of that decision are still being felt today, in politics, in the distribution of land and assets, and in regional and global conflict.

    But one affected region, Kashmir, has been more of a flashpoint for problems than most of the rest of formerly British India, in part because of where it’s located, and in part because of happenings not long after the partition.

    Formerly Jammu and Kashmir, the Kashmir region, today, is carved up between India, Pakistan, and China. India controls a little over half of its total area, which houses 70% of the region’s population, while Pakistan controls a little less than a third of its land mass, and China controls about 15%.

    What was then Jammu and Kashmir dragged its feet in deciding which side of the partition to join when the countries were being separated, the leader Hindu, though ruling over a Muslim state, but an invasion from the Pakistan side saw it cast its lot in with India. India’s counter-invasion led to the beginning of what became known as both the Indo-Pakistani war of 1947-1948, the first of four such wars, but is also sometimes called the first Kashmir war, the first of three, though there have been several other not-officially-a-war conflicts in and over the region, as well.

    Things only got more complicated over the next several decades; China seized the eastern part of the region in the 1950s, and while some Kashmiris have demanded independence, both India and Pakistan claim the region as totally their own, and point at historical markers that support their claim—some such markers based on fact, some on speculation or self-serving interpretations of history.

    What I’d like to talk about today is what looks to be a new, potentially serious buildup around Kashmir, following an attack at a popular tourist hotspot in the territory, and why some analysts are especially concerned about what India’s government will decide to do, next.

    —

    Early in the afternoon of April 22, 2025, a group of tourists sightseeing in a town in the southern part of Kashmir called Pahalgam were open-fired on by militants. 26 people were killed and another 17 were injured, marking one of the worst attacks on mostly Indian civilians in decades.

    In 2019, Kashmir’s semiautonomous governance was revoked by the Indian government, which in practice meant the Indian government took more complete control over the region, clamping down on certain freedoms and enabling more immigration of Indians into otherwise fairly Muslim-heavy Kashmir.

    It’s also become more of a tourist destination since then, as India has moved more soldiers in to patrol Indian Kashmir’s border with Pakistan Kashmir, and the nature of the landmass makes it a bit of a retreat from climate extremes; at times it’s 30 or 40 degrees cooler, in Fahrenheit, than in New Delhi, so spendy people from the city bring their money to Kashmir to cool off, while also enjoying the natural settings of this less-developed, less-industrialized area.

    Reports from survivors indicate that the attackers took their time and seemed very confident, and that no Indian security forces were anywhere nearby; they walked person to person, asking them if they were Muslim and executing those who were not. Around 7,000 people were visiting the area as tourists before the attack, but most of them have now left, and it’s unclear what kind of financial hit this will have on the region, but in the short-term it’s expected to be pretty bad.

    In the wake of this attack, the Indian government claimed that it has identified two of the three suspected militants as Pakistani, but Pakistan has denied any involvement, and has called for a neutral probe into the matter, saying that it’s willing to fully cooperate, seeks only peace and stability, and wants to see justice served.

    A previously unknown group calling itself the Kashmir Resistance has claimed responsibility for the attack, and Indian security forces have demolished the homes of at least five suspected militants in Kashmir in response, including one who they believe participated in this specific attack.

    The two governments have launched oppositional measures against each other, including Pakistan closing its airspace to Indian airlines and shutting down trade with its neighbor, and India shutting down a vital land crossing, revoking Pakistani visas, and suspending a 1960 treaty that regulates water-sharing along the Indus River and its tributaries—something that it’s threatened to do, previously, and which could devastate Pakistan’s agricultural sector and economy, as it basically regulates water that the country relies on for both human consumption and most of its crop irrigation; and for context, Pakistan’s agricultural sector accounts for about a forth of its economy.

    So if India blocks this water source, Pakistan would be in a very bad situation, and the Pakistani government has said that any blockage of water by India would be considered an act of war. Over the past week, a Pakistani official accused the Indian government of suddenly releasing a large volume of water from a dam into a vital river, which made flooding in parts of Pakistan-held Kashmir a real possibility, but as of the day I’m recording this they haven’t closed the taps, as Pakistan has worried.

    For its part, India wouldn’t really suffer from walking away from this treaty, as it mostly favors Pakistan. It serves to help keep the peace along an at times chaotic border, but beyond that, it does very little for India, directly.

    So historically, the main purpose of maintaining this treaty, for India, has been related to its reputation: if it walked away from it, it would probably suffer a reputational hit with the international community, as it would be a pretty flagrantly self-serving move that only really served to harm Pakistan, its weaker arch-nemesis.

    Right now, though, geopolitics are scrambled to such a degree that there are concerns India might not only be wanting to make such moves, whatever the consequences, but it may also be hankering for a larger conflict—looking to sort out long-term issues during a period in which such sorting, such conflict, may cause less reputational damage than might otherwise be the case.

    Consider that the US government has spoken openly about wanting to take, by whatever means, Greenland, from the Danish, a long-time ally, and that it’s maybe jokingly, but still alarmingly, said that Canada should join the US as the 51st state.

    These statements are almost certainly just braggadocio, but that the highest-rung people in the most powerful government on the planet would say such things publicly speaks volumes about the Wild West nature of today’s global order.

    Many leaders seem to be acting like this is a moment in which the prior paradigm, and the post-WWII rules that moderated global behavior within that paradigm, are fraying or disappearing, the global police force represented by the US and its allies pulling inward, not caring, and in some cases even becoming something like bandits, grabbing what they can.

    Under such circumstances, if you’re in a position of relative power that you couldn’t fully leverage previously, for fear of upsetting that global police force and tarnishing your reputation within that system they maintained, might you leverage it while you can, taking whatever you can grab and weakening your worst perceived enemy, at a moment in which it seems like the getting is good?

    It’s been argued that Russia’s violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty may have helped kick-off this new paradigm, but Israel’s behavior in Gaza, the West Bank, and increasingly Syria, as well, are arguably even better examples of this changing dynamic.

    While the Democrats and Joe Biden were in the White House, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu seemed to be mostly playing ball, at least superficially, even when he very clearly wasn’t—he did what he could to seem to be toeing rules-based-order lines, even when regularly stepping over them, especially in Gaza.

    But now, post-Trump’s return to office, that line-toeing has almost entirely disappeared, and the Israeli government seems to be grabbing whatever they can, including large chunks of southwestern Syria, which was exposed by the fall of the Assad regime. The Israeli military launched a full aerial campaign against the Syrian army’s infrastructure, declared a 1974 disengagement agreement with Syria to be void, and though it initially said it would hold the territory it has taken temporarily, it has more recently said it would hold it indefinitely—possibly permanently expanding its country’s land mass at the expense of its neighbor, another sovereign nation, at a moment in which it felt it could get away with doing so.

    It’s not clear that India has any ambitions on Pakistani territory, beyond what it holds in Kashmir, at least, but there’s a chance it sees this moment the same way the Israeli government does: as a perhaps finite moment during which the previous state of things, the global rules-based-order, no longer applies, or doesn’t apply as much, which suggests it could do some serious damage to its long-time rival and not suffer the consequences it would have, reputationally or otherwise, even half a year ago.

    And India’s leader, Narendra Modi, is in some ways even better positioned than Israel’s Netanyahu to launch such a campaign, in part because India is in such a favorable geopolitical position right now. As the US changes stance, largely away from Europe and opposing Russia and its allies, toward more fully sidling up to China in the Pacific, India represents a potential counterweight against Chinese influence in the region, where it has successfully made many of its neighbors reliant on its trade, markets, and other resources.

    Modi has reliably struck stances midway between US and Chinese spheres of influences, allowing it to do business with Russia, buying up a lot of cheap fuel that many other nations won’t touch for fear of violating sanctions, while also doing business with the US, benefitting from a slew of manufacturers who are leaving China to try to avoid increasingly hefty US tariffs.

    If India were to spark a more concentrated conflict with Pakistan, then, perhaps aiming to hobble its economy, its military, and its capacity to sponsor proxies along its border with India, which periodically launch attacks, including in Kashmir—that might be something that’s not just tolerated, but maybe even celebrated by entities like China and the US, because both want to continue doing their own destabilizing of their own perceived rivals, but also because both would prefer to have India on their side in future great power disagreements, and in any potential future large-scale future conflict.

    India is richer and more powerful than Pakistan in pretty much every way, but in addition to Pakistan’s decently well-developed military apparatus, like India, it has nukes. So while there’s a chance this could become a more conventional tit-for-tat, leading to limited scuffles and some artillery strikes on mostly military installations across their respective borders, there’s always the potential for misunderstandings, missteps, and tit-for-tat escalations that could push the region into a nuclear conflict, which would be absolutely devastating in terms of human life, as this is one of the most densely populated parts of the world, but could also pull in neighbors and allies, while also making the use of nuclear weapons thinkable by others once more, after a long period of that fortunately not being the case.

    Show Notes

    https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20250427-indian-pakistani-troops-exchange-fire-for-third-night-in-disputed-kashmir

    https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250422-at-least-24-killed-in-kashmir-attack-on-tourists-indian-police-source

    https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20250424-india-will-identify-track-and-punish-kashmir-attack-perpetrators-modi-says

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/27/world/asia/india-pakistan-kashmir.html

    https://archive.is/20250426143222/https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-pakistan-exchange-gunfire-2nd-day-ties-plummet-after-attack-2025-04-26/

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/24/world/asia/india-pakistan-indus-waters-treaty.html

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/23/world/asia/kashmir-pahalgam-attack-victims.html

    https://apnews.com/article/india-pakistan-kashmir-attack-829911d3eae7cfe6738eda5c0c84d6ae

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-11693674

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_India

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_conflict

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_war_of_1947%E2%80%931948



    This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit letsknowthings.substack.com/subscribe

    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colin Wright, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    17 min
  • India strikes Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir
    Podcast: Global News Podcast (LS 73 · TOP 0.01% what is this?)
    Episode: India strikes Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir
    Pub date: 2025-05-06

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    India says it has targeted nine sites in Pakistan in response to a deadly attack on Indian tourists in Kashmir two weeks ago. Also: Canada's new PM tells Donald Trump his country will never be for sale.



    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC World Service, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    27 min
  • Are India and Pakistan about to go to war? - The aftermath of the Pahalgam Incident - #TWIP 015
    Podcast: The Pakistan Experience (LS 43 · TOP 1% what is this?)
    Episode: Are India and Pakistan about to go to war? - The aftermath of the Pahalgam Incident - #TWIP 015
    Pub date: 2025-04-28

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    In today's episode we discuss the terrorism in Kashmir, the aftermath of the Pahalgam incident, sensationalism on Indian and Pakistani media, how India will retaliate, are India and Pakistan going to war?Uzair Younus and Shehzad Ghias do the round up of this week's news in our new show 'This Week in Pakistan. Watch all episodes of This Week in Pakistan:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzTU8aQikWU&list=PLlQZ9NZnjq5rCn6IgBjTRXnRjsS03Ty8OThe Pakistan Experience is an independently produced podcast looking to tell stories about Pakistan through conversations. Please consider supporting us on Patreon:https://www.patreon.com/thepakistanexperienceTo support the channel:Jazzcash/Easypaisa - 0325 -2982912Patreon.com/thepakistanexperienceAnd Please stay in touch:https://twitter.com/ThePakistanExp1https://www.facebook.com/thepakistanexperiencehttps://instagram.com/thepakistanexpeperienceThe podcast is hosted by comedian and writer, Shehzad Ghias Shaikh. Shehzad is a Fulbright scholar with a Masters in Theatre from Brooklyn College. He is also one of the foremost Stand-up comedians in Pakistan and frequently writes for numerous publications. Instagram.com/shehzadghiasshaikhFacebook.com/Shehzadghias/Twitter.com/shehzad89Join this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC44l9XMwecN5nSgIF2Dvivg/joinChapters:0:00 Introduction0:30 India=Pakistan standoff after Pahalgam3:30 Initial reports were wrong5:00 The Resistance Front7:50 Local Support and local grievances12:00 Security Failure17:00 Pakistani Media and Indian Media sensationalism24:22 Misread on General Asim Munir29:10 How will India retaliate?39:00 Najam Sethi's claim about Chittisinghpoora40:30 Where will America stand?46:00 Indus Water Treaty51:30 News Wrap up



    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Pakistan Experience, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    58 min
  • Why is India ahead of Pakistan? Dealing with Uncertainty - Qasim Ali Shah with Syed Sarfraz Shah
    Podcast: Syed Sarfraz Ahmad Shah (LS 26 · TOP 10% what is this?)
    Episode: Why is India ahead of Pakistan? Dealing with Uncertainty - Qasim Ali Shah with Syed Sarfraz Shah
    Pub date: 2024-05-31

    Get Podcast Transcript →
    powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization



    Why is India ahead of Pakistan? Dealing with Uncertainty - Qasim Ali Shah with Syed Sarfraz Shah

    Subscribe to Syed Sarfraz Ahmad Shah Official YouTube Channel ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/@syed-sarfraz-a-shah-official

    Visit Syed Sarfraz Ahmad Shah official website to read and listen all books for free 👉 https://kahayfaqeer.org



    The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Syed Sarfraz Ahmad Shah, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
    33 min

About Listening Post

From the publisher's feed

A curated playlist of podcasts. For educational purpose only and views expressed are not endorsements.