Part 5 is where the conversation stops being theoretical and gets brutally practical.

The group circles back to a key question: if a card is reholdered years later, can a grading company responsibly “honor” the old grade when the card may have changed inside the slab. Sunlight, shifting, cracks, handling, even subtle edge impressions can all alter the card after encapsulation. The windowsill example becomes the perfect shorthand: you cannot blindly stamp the old number without confirming the card is still the same.

From there, the show pivots into the eye appeal debate. A chat comment calls I appeal stickers a joke, and the response flips the argument: the sticker is just a physical way of saying what collectors already say every day, strong for the grade, weak for the grade, or average. The deeper issue is that grading compresses endless nuance into a limited scale, and the sticker market exists because grading is inconsistent and the scale is restrictive.

Then the segment gets fun. Josh leans into his Purist identity, shows a beautifully ugly off centered vintage card, and the panel celebrates the whole idea of “honest cards” and how vintage should look like it lived a life. That naturally leads into a scorching vintage hot take about high grade 1952 Topps cards and what people are really chasing.

Finally, the show lands the plane with a blunt truth: the hobby is a business, there will always be bad actors, and nobody is quitting. The best protection is education, risk awareness, and knowing what you personally can tolerate.

Highlights in Part 5 include:

Reholder without regrade: why “honor the grade” falls apart in the real world

The windowsill problem: the card may not be the same card anymore

Why eye appeal stickers exist: not because cards have only 19 conditions

Strong for the grade vs weak for the grade, and why a sticker triggers people

Beckett’s scale, subgrades, and why nuance still gets flattened in the end

Josh calls grading “silly” and compares the hobby to a cult

The real “win”: low grade cards with high eye appeal at a fraction of the cost

Collecting miscuts, off center cards, and why charm beats perfection

The emotional attachment angle: why we keep “our” copy, even if it isn’t perfect

The hot take: skepticism around “natural” high grade vintage, especially 1952 Topps

“Honest corners” and uniform wear as a collecting preference

The closing message: this is a business, bad actors exist, education reduces regret

Wrap-up plugs: Fanatics Collect watch party, upcoming Saturday show, Hobby Spectrum waitlist

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices