Clement Bonnet discusses his novel approach to the ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) challenge. Unlike approaches that rely on fine-tuning LLMs or generating samples at inference time, Clement's method encodes input-output pairs into a latent space, optimizes this representation with a search algorithm, and decodes outputs for new inputs. This end-to-end architecture uses a VAE loss, including reconstruction and prior losses.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments. Check out their super fast DeepSeek R1 hosting!

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. They are hiring a Chief Engineer and ML engineers. Events in Zurich.

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TRANSCRIPT + RESEARCH OVERVIEW:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/j7m0gaz1126y594gswtma/CLEMMLST.pdf?rlkey=y5qvwq2er5nchbcibm07rcfpq&dl=0

Clem and Matthew-

https://www.linkedin.com/in/clement-bonnet16/

https://github.com/clement-bonnet

https://mvmacfarlane.github.io/

TOC

1. LPN Fundamentals

[00:00:00] 1.1 Introduction to ARC Benchmark and LPN Overview

[00:05:05] 1.2 Neural Networks' Challenges with ARC and Program Synthesis

[00:06:55] 1.3 Induction vs Transduction in Machine Learning

2. LPN Architecture and Latent Space

[00:11:50] 2.1 LPN Architecture and Latent Space Implementation

[00:16:25] 2.2 LPN Latent Space Encoding and VAE Architecture

[00:20:25] 2.3 Gradient-Based Search Training Strategy

[00:23:39] 2.4 LPN Model Architecture and Implementation Details

3. Implementation and Scaling

[00:27:34] 3.1 Training Data Generation and re-ARC Framework

[00:31:28] 3.2 Limitations of Latent Space and Multi-Thread Search

[00:34:43] 3.3 Program Composition and Computational Graph Architecture

4. Advanced Concepts and Future Directions

[00:45:09] 4.1 AI Creativity and Program Synthesis Approaches

[00:49:47] 4.2 Scaling and Interpretability in Latent Space Models

REFS

[00:00:05] ARC benchmark, Chollet

https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04604

[00:02:10] Latent Program Spaces, Bonnet, Macfarlane

https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08706

[00:07:45] Kevin Ellis work on program generation

https://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ellisk/

[00:08:45] Induction vs transduction in abstract reasoning, Li et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02272

[00:17:40] VAEs, Kingma, Welling

https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114

[00:27:50] re-ARC, Hodel

https://github.com/michaelhodel/re-arc

[00:29:40] Grid size in ARC tasks, Chollet

https://github.com/fchollet/ARC-AGI

[00:33:00] Critique of deep learning, Marcus

https://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/2002/2002.06177v1.pdf

Prof. Jakob Foerster, a leading AI researcher at Oxford University and Meta, and Chris Lu, a researcher at OpenAI -- they explain how AI is moving beyond just mimicking human behaviour to creating truly intelligent agents that can learn and solve problems on their own. Foerster champions open-source AI for responsible, decentralised development. He addresses AI scaling, goal misalignment (Goodhart's Law), and the need for holistic alignment, offering a quick look at the future of AI and how to guide it.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments. Check out their super fast DeepSeek R1 hosting!

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. They are hiring a Chief Engineer and ML engineers. Events in Zurich.

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TRANSCRIPT/REFS:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yqjszhntfr00bhjh6t565/JAKOB.pdf?rlkey=scvny4bnwj8th42fjv8zsfu2y&dl=0

Prof. Jakob Foerster

https://x.com/j_foerst

https://www.jakobfoerster.com/

University of Oxford Profile:

https://eng.ox.ac.uk/people/jakob-foerster/

Chris Lu:

https://chrislu.page/

TOC

1. GPU Acceleration and Training Infrastructure

[00:00:00] 1.1 ARC Challenge Criticism and FLAIR Lab Overview

[00:01:25] 1.2 GPU Acceleration and Hardware Lottery in RL

[00:05:50] 1.3 Data Wall Challenges and Simulation-Based Solutions

[00:08:40] 1.4 JAX Implementation and Technical Acceleration

2. Learning Frameworks and Policy Optimization

[00:14:18] 2.1 Evolution of RL Algorithms and Mirror Learning Framework

[00:15:25] 2.2 Meta-Learning and Policy Optimization Algorithms

[00:21:47] 2.3 Language Models and Benchmark Challenges

[00:28:15] 2.4 Creativity and Meta-Learning in AI Systems

3. Multi-Agent Systems and Decentralization

[00:31:24] 3.1 Multi-Agent Systems and Emergent Intelligence

[00:38:35] 3.2 Swarm Intelligence vs Monolithic AGI Systems

[00:42:44] 3.3 Democratic Control and Decentralization of AI Development

[00:46:14] 3.4 Open Source AI and Alignment Challenges

[00:49:31] 3.5 Collaborative Models for AI Development

REFS

[[00:00:05] ARC Benchmark, Chollet

https://github.com/fchollet/ARC-AGI

[00:03:05] DRL Doesn't Work, Irpan

https://www.alexirpan.com/2018/02/14/rl-hard.html

[00:05:55] AI Training Data, Data Provenance Initiative

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/19/technology/ai-data-restrictions.html

[00:06:10] JaxMARL, Foerster et al.

https://arxiv.org/html/2311.10090v5

[00:08:50] M-FOS, Lu et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01447

[00:09:45] JAX Library, Google Research

https://github.com/jax-ml/jax

[00:12:10] Kinetix, Mike and Michael

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23208

[00:12:45] Genie 2, DeepMind

https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/genie-2-a-large-scale-foundation-world-model/

[00:14:42] Mirror Learning, Grudzien, Kuba et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.01682

[00:16:30] Discovered Policy Optimisation, Lu et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05639

[00:24:10] Goodhart's Law, Goodhart

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

[00:25:15] LLM ARChitect, Franzen et al.

https://github.com/da-fr/arc-prize-2024/blob/main/the_architects.pdf

[00:28:55] AlphaGo, Silver et al.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.01815.pdf

[00:30:10] Meta-learning, Lu, Towers, Foerster

https://direct.mit.edu/isal/proceedings-pdf/isal2023/35/67/2354943/isal_a_00674.pdf

[00:31:30] Emergence of Pragmatics, Yuan et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07752

[00:34:30] AI Safety, Amodei et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565

[00:35:45] Intentional Stance, Dennett

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/

[00:39:25] Multi-Agent RL, Zhou et al.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10091

[00:41:00] Open Source Generative AI, Foerster et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08597

Daniel Franzen and Jan Disselhoff, the "ARChitects" are the official winners of the ARC Prize 2024. Filmed at Tufa Labs in Zurich - they revealed how they achieved a remarkable 53.5% accuracy by creatively utilising large language models (LLMs) in new ways. Discover their innovative techniques, including depth-first search for token selection, test-time training, and a novel augmentation-based validation system. Their results were extremely surprising.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments. Check out their super fast DeepSeek R1 hosting!

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. They are hiring a Chief Engineer and ML engineers. Events in Zurich.

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

Jan Disselhoff

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jan-disselhoff-1423a2240/

Daniel Franzen

https://github.com/da-fr

ARC Prize: http://arcprize.org/

TRANSCRIPT AND BACKGROUND READING:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/utkn2i1ma79fn6an4yvjw/ARCHitects.pdf?rlkey=67pe38mtss7oyhjk2ad0d2aza&dl=0

TOC

1. Solution Architecture and Strategy Overview

[00:00:00] 1.1 Initial Solution Overview and Model Architecture

[00:04:25] 1.2 LLM Capabilities and Dataset Approach

[00:10:51] 1.3 Test-Time Training and Data Augmentation Strategies

[00:14:08] 1.4 Sampling Methods and Search Implementation

[00:17:52] 1.5 ARC vs Language Model Context Comparison

2. LLM Search and Model Implementation

[00:21:53] 2.1 LLM-Guided Search Approaches and Solution Validation

[00:27:04] 2.2 Symmetry Augmentation and Model Architecture

[00:30:11] 2.3 Model Intelligence Characteristics and Performance

[00:37:23] 2.4 Tokenization and Numerical Processing Challenges

3. Advanced Training and Optimization

[00:45:15] 3.1 DFS Token Selection and Probability Thresholds

[00:49:41] 3.2 Model Size and Fine-tuning Performance Trade-offs

[00:53:07] 3.3 LoRA Implementation and Catastrophic Forgetting Prevention

[00:56:10] 3.4 Training Infrastructure and Optimization Experiments

[01:02:34] 3.5 Search Tree Analysis and Entropy Distribution Patterns

REFS

[00:01:05] Winning ARC 2024 solution using 12B param model, Franzen, Disselhoff, Hartmann

https://github.com/da-fr/arc-prize-2024/blob/main/the_architects.pdf

[00:03:40] Robustness of analogical reasoning in LLMs, Melanie Mitchell

https://arxiv.org/html/2411.14215

[00:07:50] Re-ARC dataset generator for ARC task variations, Michael Hodel

https://github.com/michaelhodel/re-arc

[00:15:00] Analysis of search methods in LLMs (greedy, beam, DFS), Chen et al.

https://arxiv.org/html/2408.00724v2

[00:16:55] Language model reachability space exploration, University of Toronto

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bpgloy1dDn0

[00:22:30] GPT-4 guided code solutions for ARC tasks, Ryan Greenblatt

https://redwoodresearch.substack.com/p/getting-50-sota-on-arc-agi-with-gpt

[00:41:20] GPT tokenization approach for numbers, OpenAI

https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation/tokenizer-examples

[00:46:25] DFS in AI search strategies, Russell & Norvig

https://www.amazon.com/Artificial-Intelligence-Modern-Approach-4th/dp/0134610997

[00:53:10] Paper on catastrophic forgetting in neural networks, Kirkpatrick et al.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1611835114

[00:54:00] LoRA for efficient fine-tuning of LLMs, Hu et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685

[00:57:20] NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU specs, NVIDIA

https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-hopper-architecture-in-depth/

[01:04:55] Original MCTS in computer Go, Yifan Jin

https://stanford.edu/~rezab/classes/cme323/S15/projects/montecarlo_search_tree_report.pdf

Sepp Hochreiter, the inventor of LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) networks – a foundational technology in AI. Sepp discusses his journey, the origins of LSTM, and why he believes his latest work, XLSTM, could be the next big thing in AI, particularly for applications like robotics and industrial simulation. He also shares his controversial perspective on Large Language Models (LLMs) and why reasoning is a critical missing piece in current AI systems.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments. Check out their super fast DeepSeek R1 hosting!

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. They are hiring a Chief Engineer and ML engineers. Events in Zurich.

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TRANSCRIPT AND BACKGROUND READING:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/n1vzm79t3uuss8xyinxzo/SEPPH.pdf?rlkey=fp7gwaopjk17uyvgjxekxrh5v&dl=0

Prof. Sepp Hochreiter

https://www.nx-ai.com/

https://x.com/hochreitersepp

https://scholar.google.at/citations?user=tvUH3WMAAAAJ&hl=en

TOC:

1. LLM Evolution and Reasoning Capabilities

[00:00:00] 1.1 LLM Capabilities and Limitations Debate

[00:03:16] 1.2 Program Generation and Reasoning in AI Systems

[00:06:30] 1.3 Human vs AI Reasoning Comparison

[00:09:59] 1.4 New Research Initiatives and Hybrid Approaches

2. LSTM Technical Architecture

[00:13:18] 2.1 LSTM Development History and Technical Background

[00:20:38] 2.2 LSTM vs RNN Architecture and Computational Complexity

[00:25:10] 2.3 xLSTM Architecture and Flash Attention Comparison

[00:30:51] 2.4 Evolution of Gating Mechanisms from Sigmoid to Exponential

3. Industrial Applications and Neuro-Symbolic AI

[00:40:35] 3.1 Industrial Applications and Fixed Memory Advantages

[00:42:31] 3.2 Neuro-Symbolic Integration and Pi AI Project

[00:46:00] 3.3 Integration of Symbolic and Neural AI Approaches

[00:51:29] 3.4 Evolution of AI Paradigms and System Thinking

[00:54:55] 3.5 AI Reasoning and Human Intelligence Comparison

[00:58:12] 3.6 NXAI Company and Industrial AI Applications

REFS:

[00:00:15] Seminal LSTM paper establishing Hochreiter's expertise (Hochreiter & Schmidhuber)

https://direct.mit.edu/neco/article-abstract/9/8/1735/6109/Long-Short-Term-Memory

[00:04:20] Kolmogorov complexity and program composition limitations (Kolmogorov)

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02478259

[00:07:10] Limitations of LLM mathematical reasoning and symbolic integration (Various Authors)

https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2502.03671

[00:09:05] AlphaGo’s Move 37 demonstrating creative AI (Google DeepMind)

https://deepmind.google/research/breakthroughs/alphago/

[00:10:15] New AI research lab in Zurich for fundamental LLM research (Benjamin Crouzier)

https://tufalabs.ai

[00:19:40] Introduction of xLSTM with exponential gating (Beck, Hochreiter, et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04517

[00:22:55] FlashAttention: fast & memory-efficient attention (Tri Dao et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14135

[00:31:00] Historical use of sigmoid/tanh activation in 1990s (James A. McCaffrey)

https://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2015/06/01/alternative-activation-functions.aspx

[00:36:10] Mamba 2 state space model architecture (Albert Gu et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00752

[00:46:00] Austria’s Pi AI project integrating symbolic & neural AI (Hochreiter et al.)

https://www.jku.at/en/institute-of-machine-learning/research/projects/

[00:48:10] Neuro-symbolic integration challenges in language models (Diego Calanzone et al.)

https://openreview.net/forum?id=7PGluppo4k

[00:49:30] JKU Linz’s historical and neuro-symbolic research (Sepp Hochreiter)

https://www.jku.at/en/news-events/news/detail/news/bilaterale-ki-projekt-unter-leitung-der-jku-erhaelt-fwf-cluster-of-excellence/

YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u2pW2zZLCs

Professor Randall Balestriero joins us to discuss neural network geometry, spline theory, and emerging phenomena in deep learning, based on research presented at ICML. Topics include the delayed emergence of adversarial robustness in neural networks ("grokking"), geometric interpretations of neural networks via spline theory, and challenges in reconstruction learning. We also cover geometric analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs) for toxicity detection and the relationship between intrinsic dimensionality and model control in RLHF.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

Randall Balestriero

https://x.com/randall_balestr

https://randallbalestriero.github.io/

Show notes and transcript: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3lufge4upq5gy0ug75j4a/RANDALLSHOW.pdf?rlkey=nbemgpa0jhawt1e86rx7372e4&dl=0

TOC:

- Introduction

- 00:00:00: Introduction

- Neural Network Geometry and Spline Theory

- 00:01:41: Neural Network Geometry and Spline Theory

- 00:07:41: Deep Networks Always Grok

- 00:11:39: Grokking and Adversarial Robustness

- 00:16:09: Double Descent and Catastrophic Forgetting

- Reconstruction Learning

- 00:18:49: Reconstruction Learning

- 00:24:15: Frequency Bias in Neural Networks

- Geometric Analysis of Neural Networks

- 00:29:02: Geometric Analysis of Neural Networks

- 00:34:41: Adversarial Examples and Region Concentration

- LLM Safety and Geometric Analysis

- 00:40:05: LLM Safety and Geometric Analysis

- 00:46:11: Toxicity Detection in LLMs

- 00:52:24: Intrinsic Dimensionality and Model Control

- 00:58:07: RLHF and High-Dimensional Spaces

- Conclusion

- 01:02:13: Neural Tangent Kernel

- 01:08:07: Conclusion

REFS:

[00:01:35] Humayun – Deep network geometry & input space partitioning

https://arxiv.org/html/2408.04809v1

[00:03:55] Balestriero & Paris – Linking deep networks to adaptive spline operators

https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/balestriero18b/balestriero18b.pdf

[00:13:55] Song et al. – Gradient-based white-box adversarial attacks

https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14965

[00:16:05] Humayun, Balestriero & Baraniuk – Grokking phenomenon & emergent robustness

https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15555

[00:18:25] Humayun – Training dynamics & double descent via linear region evolution

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12977

[00:20:15] Balestriero – Power diagram partitions in DNN decision boundaries

https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08443

[00:23:00] Frankle & Carbin – Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for network pruning

https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03635

[00:24:00] Belkin et al. – Double descent phenomenon in modern ML

https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11118

[00:25:55] Balestriero et al. – Batch normalization’s regularization effects

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.14778

[00:29:35] EU – EU AI Act 2024 with compute restrictions

https://www.lw.com/admin/upload/SiteAttachments/EU-AI-Act-Navigating-a-Brave-New-World.pdf

[00:39:30] Humayun, Balestriero & Baraniuk – SplineCam: Visualizing deep network geometry

https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2023/papers/Humayun_SplineCam_Exact_Visualization_and_Characterization_of_Deep_Network_Geometry_and_CVPR_2023_paper.pdf

[00:40:40] Carlini – Trade-offs between adversarial robustness and accuracy

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.20099

[00:44:55] Balestriero & LeCun – Limitations of reconstruction-based learning methods

https://openreview.net/forum?id=ez7w0Ss4g9

(truncated, see shownotes PDF)

Nicholas Carlini from Google DeepMind offers his view of AI security, emergent LLM capabilities, and his groundbreaking model-stealing research. He reveals how LLMs can unexpectedly excel at tasks like chess and discusses the security pitfalls of LLM-generated code.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

Transcript: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/lat7sfyd4k3g5k9crjpbf/CARLINI.pdf?rlkey=b7kcqbvau17uw6rksbr8ccd8v&dl=0

TOC:

1. ML Security Fundamentals

[00:00:00] 1.1 ML Model Reasoning and Security Fundamentals

[00:03:04] 1.2 ML Security Vulnerabilities and System Design

[00:08:22] 1.3 LLM Chess Capabilities and Emergent Behavior

[00:13:20] 1.4 Model Training, RLHF, and Calibration Effects

2. Model Evaluation and Research Methods

[00:19:40] 2.1 Model Reasoning and Evaluation Metrics

[00:24:37] 2.2 Security Research Philosophy and Methodology

[00:27:50] 2.3 Security Disclosure Norms and Community Differences

3. LLM Applications and Best Practices

[00:44:29] 3.1 Practical LLM Applications and Productivity Gains

[00:49:51] 3.2 Effective LLM Usage and Prompting Strategies

[00:53:03] 3.3 Security Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code

4. Advanced LLM Research and Architecture

[00:59:13] 4.1 LLM Code Generation Performance and O(1) Labs Experience

[01:03:31] 4.2 Adaptation Patterns and Benchmarking Challenges

[01:10:10] 4.3 Model Stealing Research and Production LLM Architecture Extraction

REFS:

[00:01:15] Nicholas Carlini’s personal website & research profile (Google DeepMind, ML security) - https://nicholas.carlini.com/

[00:01:50] CentML AI compute platform for language model workloads - https://centml.ai/

[00:04:30] Seminal paper on neural network robustness against adversarial examples (Carlini & Wagner, 2016) - https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04644

[00:05:20] Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) – primary U.S. federal law on computer hacking liability - https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-48000-computer-fraud

[00:08:30] Blog post: Emergent chess capabilities in GPT-3.5-turbo-instruct (Nicholas Carlini, Sept 2023) - https://nicholas.carlini.com/writing/2023/chess-llm.html

[00:16:10] Paper: “Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment” (Yue Wu et al., 2024) - https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00675

[00:18:00] GPT-4 Technical Report: development, capabilities, and calibration analysis - https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

[00:22:40] Historical shift from descriptive to algebraic chess notation (FIDE) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_notation

[00:23:55] Analysis of distribution shift in ML (Hendrycks et al.) - https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16241

[00:27:40] Nicholas Carlini’s essay “Why I Attack” (June 2024) – motivations for security research - https://nicholas.carlini.com/writing/2024/why-i-attack.html

[00:34:05] Google Project Zero’s 90-day vulnerability disclosure policy - https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/p/vulnerability-disclosure-policy.html

[00:51:15] Evolution of Google search syntax & user behavior (Daniel M. Russell) - https://www.amazon.com/Joy-Search-Google-Master-Information/dp/0262042878

[01:04:05] Rust’s ownership & borrowing system for memory safety - https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-00-understanding-ownership.html

[01:10:05] Paper: “Stealing Part of a Production Language Model” (Carlini et al., March 2024) – extraction attacks on ChatGPT, PaLM-2 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06634

[01:10:55] First model stealing paper (Tramèr et al., 2016) – attacking ML APIs via prediction - https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02943

Join Prof. Subbarao Kambhampati and host Tim Scarfe for a deep dive into OpenAI's O1 model and the future of AI reasoning systems.

* How O1 likely uses reinforcement learning similar to AlphaGo, with hidden reasoning tokens that users pay for but never see

* The evolution from traditional Large Language Models to more sophisticated reasoning systems

* The concept of "fractal intelligence" in AI - where models work brilliantly sometimes but fail unpredictably

* Why O1's improved performance comes with substantial computational costs

* The ongoing debate between single-model approaches (OpenAI) vs hybrid systems (Google)

* The critical distinction between AI as an intelligence amplifier vs autonomous decision-maker

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TOC:

1. **O1 Architecture and Reasoning Foundations**

[00:00:00] 1.1 Fractal Intelligence and Reasoning Model Limitations

[00:04:28] 1.2 LLM Evolution: From Simple Prompting to Advanced Reasoning

[00:14:28] 1.3 O1's Architecture and AlphaGo-like Reasoning Approach

[00:23:18] 1.4 Empirical Evaluation of O1's Planning Capabilities

2. **Monte Carlo Methods and Model Deep-Dive**

[00:29:30] 2.1 Monte Carlo Methods and MARCO-O1 Implementation

[00:31:30] 2.2 Reasoning vs. Retrieval in LLM Systems

[00:40:40] 2.3 Fractal Intelligence Capabilities and Limitations

[00:45:59] 2.4 Mechanistic Interpretability of Model Behavior

[00:51:41] 2.5 O1 Response Patterns and Performance Analysis

3. **System Design and Real-World Applications**

[00:59:30] 3.1 Evolution from LLMs to Language Reasoning Models

[01:06:48] 3.2 Cost-Efficiency Analysis: LLMs vs O1

[01:11:28] 3.3 Autonomous vs Human-in-the-Loop Systems

[01:16:01] 3.4 Program Generation and Fine-Tuning Approaches

[01:26:08] 3.5 Hybrid Architecture Implementation Strategies

Transcript: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d0ef4ovnfxi0lknirkvft/Subbarao.pdf?rlkey=l3rp29gs4hkut7he8u04mm1df&dl=0

REFS:

[00:02:00] Monty Python (1975)

Witch trial scene: flawed logical reasoning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

[00:04:00] Cade Metz (2024)

Microsoft–OpenAI partnership evolution and control dynamics.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/technology/microsoft-openai-partnership-deal.html

[00:07:25] Kojima et al. (2022)

Zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting ('Let's think step by step').

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.11916

[00:12:50] DeepMind Research Team (2023)

Multi-bot game solving with external and internal planning.

https://deepmind.google/research/publications/139455/

[00:15:10] Silver et al. (2016)

AlphaGo's Monte Carlo Tree Search and Q-learning.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature16961

[00:16:30] Kambhampati, S. et al. (2023)

Evaluates O1's planning in "Strawberry Fields" benchmarks.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.02162

[00:29:30] Alibaba AIDC-AI Team (2023)

MARCO-O1: Chain-of-Thought + MCTS for improved reasoning.

https://arxiv.org/html/2411.14405

[00:31:30] Kambhampati, S. (2024)

Explores LLM "reasoning vs retrieval" debate.

https://arxiv.org/html/2403.04121v2

[00:37:35] Wei, J. et al. (2022)

Chain-of-thought prompting (introduces last-letter concatenation).

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.11903

[00:42:35] Barbero, F. et al. (2024)

Transformer attention and "information over-squashing."

https://arxiv.org/html/2406.04267v2

[00:46:05] Ruis, L. et al. (2023)

Influence functions to understand procedural knowledge in LLMs.

https://arxiv.org/html/2411.12580v1

(truncated - continued in shownotes/transcript doc)

Laura Ruis, a PhD student at University College London and researcher at Cohere, explains her groundbreaking research into how large language models (LLMs) perform reasoning tasks, the fundamental mechanisms underlying LLM reasoning capabilities, and whether these models primarily rely on retrieval or develop procedural knowledge.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TOC

1. LLM Foundations and Learning

1.1 Scale and Learning in Language Models [00:00:00]

1.2 Procedural Knowledge vs Fact Retrieval [00:03:40]

1.3 Influence Functions and Model Analysis [00:07:40]

1.4 Role of Code in LLM Reasoning [00:11:10]

1.5 Semantic Understanding and Physical Grounding [00:19:30]

2. Reasoning Architectures and Measurement

2.1 Measuring Understanding and Reasoning in Language Models [00:23:10]

2.2 Formal vs Approximate Reasoning and Model Creativity [00:26:40]

2.3 Symbolic vs Subsymbolic Computation Debate [00:34:10]

2.4 Neural Network Architectures and Tensor Product Representations [00:40:50]

3. AI Agency and Risk Assessment

3.1 Agency and Goal-Directed Behavior in Language Models [00:45:10]

3.2 Defining and Measuring Agency in AI Systems [00:49:50]

3.3 Core Knowledge Systems and Agency Detection [00:54:40]

3.4 Language Models as Agent Models and Simulator Theory [01:03:20]

3.5 AI Safety and Societal Control Mechanisms [01:07:10]

3.6 Evolution of AI Capabilities and Emergent Risks [01:14:20]

REFS:

[00:01:10] Procedural Knowledge in Pretraining & LLM Reasoning

Ruis et al., 2024

https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12580

[00:03:50] EK-FAC Influence Functions in Large LMs

Grosse et al., 2023

https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03296

[00:13:05] Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Core of Cognition

Hofstadter & Sander

https://www.amazon.com/Surfaces-Essences-Analogy-Fuel-Thinking/dp/0465018475

[00:13:45] Wittgenstein on Language Games

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein/

[00:14:30] Montague Semantics for Natural Language

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/montague-semantics/

[00:19:35] The Chinese Room Argument

David Cole

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/

[00:19:55] ARC: Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus

François Chollet

https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547

[00:24:20] Systematic Generalization in Neural Nets

Lake & Baroni, 2023

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06668-3

[00:27:40] Open-Endedness & Creativity in AI

Tim Rocktäschel

https://arxiv.org/html/2406.04268v1

[00:30:50] Fodor & Pylyshyn on Connectionism

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0010027788900315

[00:31:30] Tensor Product Representations

Smolensky, 1990

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/000437029090007M

[00:35:50] DreamCoder: Wake-Sleep Program Synthesis

Kevin Ellis et al.

https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse599j1/22sp/papers/dreamcoder.pdf

[00:36:30] Compositional Generalization Benchmarks

Ruis, Lake et al., 2022

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.10745

[00:40:30] RNNs & Tensor Products

McCoy et al., 2018

https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08718

[00:46:10] Formal Causal Definition of Agency

Kenton et al.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.08345v2

[00:48:40] Agency in Language Models

Sumers et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02427

[00:55:20] Heider & Simmel’s Moving Shapes Experiment

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-65532-0

[01:00:40] Language Models as Agent Models

Jacob Andreas, 2022

https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01681

[01:13:35] Pragmatic Understanding in LLMs

Ruis et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14986

Jürgen Schmidhuber, the father of generative AI, challenges current AI narratives, revealing that early deep learning work is in his opinion misattributed, where it actually originated in Ukraine and Japan. He discusses his early work on linear transformers and artificial curiosity which preceded modern developments, shares his expansive vision of AI colonising space, and explains his groundbreaking 1991 consciousness model. Schmidhuber dismisses fears of human-AI conflict, arguing that superintelligent AI scientists will be fascinated by their own origins and motivated to protect life rather than harm it, while being more interested in other superintelligent AI and in cosmic expansion than earthly matters. He offers unique insights into how humans and AI might coexist.

Professor Yoshua Bengio is a pioneer in deep learning and Turing Award winner. Bengio talks about AI safety, why goal-seeking “agentic” AIs might be dangerous, and his vision for building powerful AI tools without giving them agency. Topics include reward tampering risks, instrumental convergence, global AI governance, and how non-agent AIs could revolutionize science and medicine while reducing existential threats. Perfect for anyone curious about advanced AI risks and how to manage them responsibly.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?

They are hosting an event in Zurich on January 9th with the ARChitects, join if you can.

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

Interviewer: Tim Scarfe

Yoshua Bengio:

https://x.com/Yoshua_Bengio

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=kukA0LcAAAAJ&hl=en

https://yoshuabengio.org/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshua_Bengio

TOC:

1. AI Safety Fundamentals

[00:00:00] 1.1 AI Safety Risks and International Cooperation

[00:03:20] 1.2 Fundamental Principles vs Scaling in AI Development

[00:11:25] 1.3 System 1/2 Thinking and AI Reasoning Capabilities

[00:15:15] 1.4 Reward Tampering and AI Agency Risks

[00:25:17] 1.5 Alignment Challenges and Instrumental Convergence

2. AI Architecture and Safety Design

[00:33:10] 2.1 Instrumental Goals and AI Safety Fundamentals

[00:35:02] 2.2 Separating Intelligence from Goals in AI Systems

[00:40:40] 2.3 Non-Agent AI as Scientific Tools

[00:44:25] 2.4 Oracle AI Systems and Mathematical Safety Frameworks

3. Global Governance and Security

[00:49:50] 3.1 International AI Competition and Hardware Governance

[00:51:58] 3.2 Military and Security Implications of AI Development

[00:56:07] 3.3 Personal Evolution of AI Safety Perspectives

[01:00:25] 3.4 AI Development Scaling and Global Governance Challenges

[01:12:10] 3.5 AI Regulation and Corporate Oversight

4. Technical Innovations

[01:23:00] 4.1 Evolution of Neural Architectures: From RNNs to Transformers

[01:26:02] 4.2 GFlowNets and Symbolic Computation

[01:30:47] 4.3 Neural Dynamics and Consciousness

[01:34:38] 4.4 AI Creativity and Scientific Discovery

SHOWNOTES (Transcript, references, best clips etc):

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ajucigli8n90fbxv9h94x/BENGIO_SHOW.pdf?rlkey=38hi2m19sylnr8orb76b85wkw&dl=0

CORE REFS (full list in shownotes and pinned comment):

[00:00:15] Bengio et al.: "AI Risk" Statement

https://www.safe.ai/work/statement-on-ai-risk

[00:23:10] Bengio on reward tampering & AI safety (Harvard Data Science Review)

https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/w974bwb0

[00:40:45] Munk Debate on AI existential risk, featuring Bengio

https://munkdebates.com/debates/artificial-intelligence

[00:44:30] "Can a Bayesian Oracle Prevent Harm from an Agent?" (Bengio et al.) on oracle-to-agent safety

https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05284

[00:51:20] Bengio (2024) memo on hardware-based AI governance verification

https://yoshuabengio.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/FlexHEG-Memo_August-2024.pdf

[01:12:55] Bengio’s involvement in EU AI Act code of practice

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/meet-chairs-leading-development-first-general-purpose-ai-code-practice

[01:27:05] Complexity-based compositionality theory (Elmoznino, Jiralerspong, Bengio, Lajoie)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14817

[01:29:00] GFlowNet Foundations (Bengio et al.) for probabilistic inference

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.09266

[01:32:10] Discrete attractor states in neural systems (Nam, Elmoznino, Bengio, Lajoie)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.06403