Open to Debate

Open to Debate

Download on the App Store
  • Favorites

    1,106

    Followers

  • Typical duration

    53 min

    per episode

  • If it hooks

    46%

    finish an episode

Based on Podcast App listening data

Open to Debate episodes

  • #185 - Is It Time to Redistribute the Wealth?

    Robert Reich, Yanis Varoufakis, Lawrence Summers and Allison Schrager join us for a debate on economic inequality in the premiere episode of “That’s Debatable," our new series presented in partnership with Bloomberg Media and sponsored by IBM. As nations around the world grapple with the financial impacts of the pandemic, we ask: Is it time to redistribute the wealth?


    A note from our sponsor:

    There’s nothing to lose from gaining a fresh perspective. IBM Watson® was built to help us look at an issue from all sides—from cultural debates to customer reviews. Using advanced natural language processing, Watson is making sense of data from a range of topics to help give us more informed perspectives, so we can make more informed decisions. See how Watson informs a human debate at ibm.com/debatable

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    52 min
  • #184 - Unresolved: American Policing

    Historic protests calling for police reform have erupted across the nation. But just what could these reforms mean? And how should we see the criminal justice system today? Staged in our “Unresolved” format, this debate brings together five experts to tackle pressing questions on the history and future of policing in the U.S. including: Should we defund the police? Do police unions do more harm than good? And has policing become too militarized? 

    Cast your vote: https://smarturl.it/AmericanPolicing


    A Message from Our Sponsor

    Subscribe to The Jordan Harbinger Show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen or at jordanharbinger.com/subscribe

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    54 min
  • #154 - Has Globalization Undermined the American Working Class?

    This Episode Originally Aired on August 3rd, 2018

    MOTION: Globalization Has Undermined America's Working Class

    Globalization ushered in an era of free trade, fluid borders, and unparalleled corporate profits. For its proponents, the global integration of states and their economies was a political and economic win that created a wealth of opportunities for workers and consumers around the world. But in the United States, jobs are disappearing. From construction zones to clerical offices to coal mines, the American working class is losing ground. Is globalization to blame? Did the push toward global integration leave our most vulnerable populations behind, making them the losers of this grand experiment? Or is globalization being used as a scapegoat for a wider range of failed public policies and unprecedented advances in technology? 

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    55 min
  • Newt Minow on the Presidential Debates

    What does the father of American presidential debate think about modern electoral politics? In this episode, Newt Minow offers a first-hand account of some of the nation’s biggest political moments and just what role debate should play in our future. 

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    54 min
  • Agree to Disagree: Should Washington Break Up Big Tech?

    Is Big Tech having its own "big tobacco moment"? As Apple, Facebook, Google, and Amazon face antitrust probes from state and federal investigators alike, we dive into the debate that will shape the tech industry for generations. Join John Donvan and two esteemed debaters for this special episode of our new series, "Agree to Disagree."

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    54 min
  • Agree to Disagree: Broadband for All?

    Introducing "Agree to Disagree," a new series from Intelligence Squared U.S. In this episode, two guests join John Donvan to debate Broadband for All, the internet as a public utility, and just who should make sure you have the connection you need.


    A message from our sponsor:

    Get an extra 3 months Free on a one year package. Expressvpn.com/debate

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    44 min
  • #183 - Is Nationalism a Force for Good?

    From Brexit to “America First,” Modi in India, Erdoğan in Turkey, and Bolsonaro in Brazil, nationalism – or allegiance to a nation-state over other group affiliations – has been on the rise. Now, borders around the world are closed and the coronavirus pandemic is sparking staunch debate about the future of global governance and political identity. The nation-state has been praised for securing the needs of its citizens and serving as the most efficient form of political organization, while also criticized for being insular and inciting anti-immigration policies. Nationalism has been credited for both uniting disparate communities under a common culture and identity, as well as promoting violence based on race and ethnicity. As global problems continue to mount, does the 21st century require international leadership, or is nationalism a force for good?


    A message from our sponsor:

    Get an extra 3 months Free on a one year package. Expressvpn.com/debate

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    54 min
  • #164 - Should Social Media Companies Honor the First Amendment?

    MOTION: Constitutional Free Speech Principles Can Save Social Media Companies from Themselves

    President Trump posted similar content on Facebook and Twitter. Twitter flagged it. Facebook did not. Both have come under fire for those decisions. Just how should social media companies police user content? Revisit our debate on social media content moderation policies and whether the U.S. Constitution should be the guiding light in a new era of political speech. 


    FOR THE MOTION:

    David French - Senior Writer, National Review

    Corynne McSherry - Legal Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation

    AGAINST THE MOTION:

    Nathaniel Persily - Professor, Stanford Law

    Marietje Schaake - International Policy Director, Stanford's Cyber Policy Center & Fmr. Member, European Parliament


    We're funded by our listeners. To support our debates, donate online at iq2us.org/support


    A message from our sponsor:

    Get an extra 3 months Free on a one year package. Expressvpn.com/debate

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    58 min
  • #182 - Will Coronavirus Reshape the World Order in China's Favor?

    How might coronavirus reshape geopolitics? For some, the answer is clear: China is on the rise. While Washington embraces “America First” and abdicates its global leadership role, they argue, Beijing is stepping up to fill the void. But others see a global future where Beijing’s standing is diminished, not bolstered. Panelists Kurt M. Campbell, Kishore Mahbubani, Minxin Pei, and Susan Thornton. 

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    54 min
  • #181 - Has The Electoral College Outlived Its Usefulness?

    DEBATE: Has The Electoral College Outlived Its Usefulness?

    Five American presidents — two in the last 20 years — have assumed office without winning the popular vote. As the nation gears up for another contentious presidential election, some are calling for an end to the Electoral College. They argue that the college subverts the will of the American people by unfairly prioritizing rural and swing states over the nation’s majority. But others say the Electoral College, which the Founders established in the Constitution, is necessary to ensure voters in less populous states have a voice in picking our president. Has the Electoral College outlived its usefulness?

    This debate is presented in partnership with the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law as part of the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series.  

    Motion: The Electoral College Has Outlived Its Usefulness


    For the Motion:

    Jamelle Bouie - Columnist, New York Times

    Kate Shaw - Law Professor & Supreme Court Contributor, ABC News


    Against the Motion:

    Tara Ross - Author, "Why We Need the Electoral College"

    Bradley A. Smith - Law Professor & Former Chairman, Federal Election Commission


    A note from our sponsor:

    Get an extra 3 months Free on a one year package. Expressvpn.com/debate

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    54 min

About Open to Debate

From the publisher's feed

America is more divided than ever—but it doesn’t have to be. Open to Debate offers an antidote to the chaos. We bring multiple perspectives together for real, nonpartisan debates. Debates that are…

Best of Open to Debate

Ranked by our users in the last 21 days

More shows like Open to Debate

Freakonomics Radio by Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Freakonomics Radio

32,046 Listeners

Planet Money by NPR

Planet Money

30,701 Listeners

Hidden Brain by Hidden Brain, Shankar Vedantam

Hidden Brain

43,359 Listeners

Left, Right & Center by KCRW

Left, Right & Center

5,101 Listeners

The Gray Area with Sean Illing by Vox

The Gray Area with Sean Illing

10,731 Listeners

Intelligence Squared by Intelligence Squared

Intelligence Squared

772 Listeners

Making Sense with Sam Harris by Sam Harris

Making Sense with Sam Harris

26,249 Listeners

EconTalk by Russ Roberts

EconTalk

4,275 Listeners

Conversations with Tyler by Mercatus Center at George Mason University

Conversations with Tyler

2,451 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,104 Listeners

Radio Atlantic by The Atlantic

Radio Atlantic

2,387 Listeners

Interesting Times by New York Times Opinion

Interesting Times

7,120 Listeners

Throughline by NPR

Throughline

16,365 Listeners

The Munk Debates Podcast by Munk Foundation / iHeartRadio

The Munk Debates Podcast

35 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

15,882 Listeners