In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, new ways of understanding America emerged. Scientific observation, supported by measuring instruments and new forms of visual representation, transformed the ways in which nature was studied and depicted. Yet these images did not reveal the world in its entirety: they made certain aspects of the territory visible while leaving others beyond the frame.
The Royal Botanical Expedition to the New Kingdom of Granada (1783–1816), led by José Celestino Mutis, brought together artists and naturalists to study the region’s flora. Classifying nature also meant making it intelligible for economic and political control. Much of the knowledge about plants came from Indigenous peoples, yet scientific descriptions rarely incorporated the meanings and relationships that these communities had developed around them.
During his journey through America, Alexander von Humboldt developed an approach to studying nature based on the relationships between climate, altitude, vegetation, and life forms. In his Essay on the Geography of Plants, Humboldt represented these connections in the Physical Tableau of the Andes, an illustration showing the distribution of vegetation according to altitude across the profile of Mount Chimborazo. A translation of this essay was later published in the Semanario del Nuevo Reino de Granada.
These forms of representation influenced painting and the construction of images of national identity in the early twentieth century. Measuring and drawing not only made it possible to understand nature but also to transform it into an intelligible, ordered, and governable object.
What do we fail to see when we look at the world only through images?