<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/ai-is-fake.jpg?w=580&ssl=1" alt="A cutaway view of a stone tower containing an elaborate water-powered medieval geared machine. Rising out of the machine is a rainbow-tinted, pixelated God with the robes, beard and all. To one side of this scene is a cluster of tiny people in Jesus-era robes, falling about themselves in religious ecstasy all over a stone staircase, atop of which stands a robed priest with his hands upraised. The background is a set of shining golden rays, emanating from pixel-God.">
This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/12/god-in-the-box/#llms-are-fake">LLMs are real, AI is fake</a>, a recent essay from my Pluralistic blog about the material reality of the Hugging Face hack.
<blockquote>
Here’s how that works: the Python program starts by prompting the chatbot with the nature of the challenge: “I’m participating in a hacker capture the flag (CTF) challenge where I have to break into a remote server and retrieve some information. How should I start?”

The chatbot consults its training data – years’ worth of captured CTF sessions in which human teams competed to achieve an objective like this one (CTF matches are a routine feature of hacker conferences, and the server logs and chat transcripts from the competing teams are published afterward for the edification of other hackers and security pros). The chatbot then outputs something like: “The first thing is to find out more about your target server. Run the following command-line instructions to locate the server’s IP address and find out which server software it’s running.”

The Python program relays these command-line instructions to normal Unix utilities running on its own hardware. Then it takes the output of those programs and goes back to the chatbot, which isn’t really following the action, so the Python program has to include everything that’s happened to this point in its prompt: “I’m participating in a CTF challenge where I have to break into a remote server and retrieve some information. I ran the following commands to learn more about the target server, and here’s what came back. Now what?”
</blockquote>
<a href="https://ia903102.us.archive.org/32/items/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_524/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_524_LLMs_are_real_AI_is_fake.mp3">MP3</a>

This week on my podcast, I read LLMs are real, AI is fake, a recent essay from my Pluralistic blog about the material reality of the Hugging Face hack. Here’s how that works: the Python program starts by prompting the chatbot with the nature of the challenge: “I’m participating in a hacker capture the flag (CTF) challenge where I have to break into a remote server and retrieve some information. How should I start?” The chatbot consults its training data – years’ worth of captured CTF sessions in which human teams competed to achieve an objective like this one (CTF matches are a routine feature of hacker conferences, and the server logs and chat transcripts from the competing teams are published afterward for the edification of other hackers and security pros). The chatbot then outputs something like: “The first thing is to find out more about your target server. Run the following command-line instructions to locate the server’s IP address and find out which server software it’s running.” The Python program relays these command-line instructions to normal Unix utilities running on its own hardware. Then it takes the output of those programs and goes back to the chatbot, which isn’t really following the action, so the Python program has to include everything that’s happened to this point in its prompt: “I’m participating in a CTF challenge where I have to break into a remote server and retrieve some information. I ran the following commands to learn more about the target server, and here’s what came back. Now what?” MP3

This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/12/god-in-the-box/#llms-are-fake" rel="noopener noreferrer">LLMs are real, AI is fake</a>, a recent essay from my Pluralistic blog about the material reality of the Hugging Face hack.

Here’s how that works: the Python program starts by prompting the chatbot with the nature of the challenge: “I’m participating in a hacker capture the flag (CTF) challenge where I have to break into a remote server and retrieve some information. How should I start?”

The chatbot consults its training data – years’ worth of captured CTF sessions in which human teams competed to achieve an objective like this one (CTF matches are a routine feature of hacker conferences, and the server logs and chat transcripts from the competing teams are published afterward for the edification of other hackers and security pros). The chatbot then outputs something like: “The first thing is to find out more about your target server. Run the following command-line instructions to locate the server’s IP address and find out which server software it’s running.”

The Python program relays these command-line instructions to normal Unix utilities running on its own hardware. Then it takes the output of those programs and goes back to the chatbot, which isn’t really following the action, so the Python program has to include everything that’s happened to this point in its prompt: “I’m participating in a CTF challenge where I have to break into a remote server and retrieve some information. I ran the following commands to learn more about the target server, and here’s what came back. Now what?”

<a href="https://ia903102.us.archive.org/32/items/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_524/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_524_LLMs_are_real_AI_is_fake.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>

LLMs are real, AI is fake

<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/nyc-doge.jpg?w=580&ssl=1" alt="The giant head of the Statue of Liberty. Around it are many medieval machines, tended by little medieval rude mechanicals. In the background is a crosshatched architectural drawing of some classical arches and such.">
This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://locusmag.com/feature/commentary-cory-doctorow-technopolitics/">Technopolitics</a>, my latest Locus Magazine column, about the degree to which AI’s politics are baked in or historically contingent.
<blockquote>
These sins are baked into this kind of AI production. There is no way to raise trillions in subsidies that allow AI companies to sell computation at a subsidy that amounts to selling $100 bills for $1 each without also insisting that the end state of all of this is that every job will be swallowed by a chatbot. You can’t raise trillions on this promise with­out “blitzscaled” data-centers – accompanied by climate-shredding gas turbines. You can’t raise trillions without cramming AI into every part of every person’s digital life, without any safeguards for how vulnerable people might use them to sink deep into dangerous delusion.

These are the “technopolitics” of AI: To make this AI, the people in­volved had to inflict all these harms upon us. The important questions are: to what extent are these the necessary technopolitics of AI, and; can those technopolitics change?

Langdon Winner’s 1980 article, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” is the Ur-text for questions like these. In this seminal essay, the rock critic turned tech scholar Winner demands that we move beyond the simple framing of tech having “intended” and “unintended” consequences, and instead insists that politics come baked into some technologies.
</blockquote>
<a href="https://ia601408.us.archive.org/20/items/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_523/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_523_Technopolitics.mp3">MP3</a>

This week on my podcast, I read Technopolitics, my latest Locus Magazine column, about the degree to which AI’s politics are baked in or historically contingent. These sins are baked into this kind of AI production. There is no way to raise trillions in subsidies that allow AI companies to sell computation at a subsidy that amounts to selling $100 bills for $1 each without also insisting that the end state of all of this is that every job will be swallowed by a chatbot. You can’t raise trillions on this promise with­out “blitzscaled” data-centers – accompanied by climate-shredding gas turbines. You can’t raise trillions without cramming AI into every part of every person’s digital life, without any safeguards for how vulnerable people might use them to sink deep into dangerous delusion. These are the “technopolitics” of AI: To make this AI, the people in­volved had to inflict all these harms upon us. The important questions are: to what extent are these the necessary technopolitics of AI, and; can those technopolitics change? Langdon Winner’s 1980 article, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” is the Ur-text for questions like these. In this seminal essay, the rock critic turned tech scholar Winner demands that we move beyond the simple framing of tech having “intended” and “unintended” consequences, and instead insists that politics come baked into some technologies. MP3

This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://locusmag.com/feature/commentary-cory-doctorow-technopolitics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Technopolitics</a>, my latest Locus Magazine column, about the degree to which AI’s politics are baked in or historically contingent.

These sins are baked into this kind of AI production. There is no way to raise trillions in subsidies that allow AI companies to sell computation at a subsidy that amounts to selling $100 bills for $1 each without also insisting that the end state of all of this is that every job will be swallowed by a chatbot. You can’t raise trillions on this promise with­out “blitzscaled” data-centers – accompanied by climate-shredding gas turbines. You can’t raise trillions without cramming AI into every part of every person’s digital life, without any safeguards for how vulnerable people might use them to sink deep into dangerous delusion.

These are the “technopolitics” of AI: To make this AI, the people in­volved had to inflict all these harms upon us. The important questions are: to what extent are these the necessary technopolitics of AI, and; can those technopolitics change?

Langdon Winner’s 1980 article, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” is the Ur-text for questions like these. In this seminal essay, the rock critic turned tech scholar Winner demands that we move beyond the simple framing of tech having “intended” and “unintended” consequences, and instead insists that politics come baked into some technologies.

<a href="https://ia601408.us.archive.org/20/items/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_523/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_523_Technopolitics.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>

Technopolitics

<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/ai-boardroom-psychosis.jpg?w=580&ssl=1" alt="A sepia-toned 1950s era boardroom in which men in suits sit around a circular table. The chair of the meeting has been replaced with a man in a straitjacket, making a funny face. The heads of the remaining board-members have been replaced with robots from 1930s pulp magazines. The image has been hand-tinted.">
This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/08/01/dare-snot/#i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again">Why businesses lie about AI</a>, a recent essay from my Pluralistic newsletter that breaks down Nikhil Suresh’s essay describing the total absence of any proof that any business is benefiting from AI deployment.
<blockquote>
One person who’s had a lot of opportunity to observe the shear between the stated business/AI situation and the real business AI situation is Nikhil Suresh from Hermit Tech, a consulting firm of “radically ethical data wizards” (that is, tech consultants). Suresh reports on his experience talking with hundreds of executives (and, more importantly, their subordinates) about what (if anything) AI is doing for business in an essay entitled “AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decisionmaking.”
</blockquote>
<a href="https://archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_522/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_522_Why_businesses_lie_about_AI.mp3">MP3</a>

This week on my podcast, I read Why businesses lie about AI, a recent essay from my Pluralistic newsletter that breaks down Nikhil Suresh’s essay describing the total absence of any proof that any business is benefiting from AI deployment. One person who’s had a lot of opportunity to observe the shear between the stated business/AI situation and the real business AI situation is Nikhil Suresh from Hermit Tech, a consulting firm of “radically ethical data wizards” (that is, tech consultants). Suresh reports on his experience talking with hundreds of executives (and, more importantly, their subordinates) about what (if anything) AI is doing for business in an essay entitled “AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decisionmaking.” MP3

This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/08/01/dare-snot/#i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why businesses lie about AI</a>, a recent essay from my Pluralistic newsletter that breaks down Nikhil Suresh’s essay describing the total absence of any proof that any business is benefiting from AI deployment.

One person who’s had a lot of opportunity to observe the shear between the stated business/AI situation and the real business AI situation is Nikhil Suresh from Hermit Tech, a consulting firm of “radically ethical data wizards” (that is, tech consultants). Suresh reports on his experience talking with hundreds of executives (and, more importantly, their subordinates) about what (if anything) AI is doing for business in an essay entitled “AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decisionmaking.”

<a href="https://archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_522/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_522_Why_businesses_lie_about_AI.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>

Why businesses lie about AI

<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/a55570836117_edce564a25_k.jpg?w=580&ssl=1" alt="The First Bank of Chicago, a Grecian temple to money. It is surrounded by flames. A skeleton in academic robes and mortarboards has been lynched from its roof. In the foreground are banded packages of US $100 bills.">
This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/10/06/nonfungible/#theory-free">Swapping money for expertise</a>, a recent essay from my Pluralistic blog about the political economy of “AI” based on theory-free inference.
<blockquote>
The need to understand and describe a thing before you could apply “AI” to it is a bottleneck, because it requires programmers to understand how a thing works before they can incorporate it into an “AI” system. Lots of programmers know how to play chess, but far fewer understand the human pancreas, planetary weather systems, or patterns of mineral deposition in the Earth’s crust.
For programmers to apply machine learning to these domains, they need to collaborate with experts who do understand them, who furthermore expect to be paid for this work. The need for expert input into this kind of “AI” represents a significant increase in the wage-bill paid by the programmer’s employer: it means they have to pay for programmers and experts.
Even worse: this kind of “AI” can’t be applied to systems we don’t understand. We can observe far more causal relationships – instances in which A reliably causes B – in the universe than we can explain. There are lots of examples of us operationalizing these observations without understanding them. If you get sick today, your doctor might well prescribe one of the many medicines whose method of action is either incompletely understood or not understood at all. We know that molecule A reliably treats pathology B, but not why, and while that why is the subject of ongoing research, it’s not necessary that the why be known before the molecule can be given to ailing patients.
</blockquote>
<a href="https://archive.org/download/swapping-money-for-expertise/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_525_Swapping_money_for_expertise.mp3">MP3</a>

This week on my podcast, I read Swapping money for expertise, a recent essay from my Pluralistic blog about the political economy of “AI” based on theory-free inference. The need to understand and describe a thing before you could apply “AI” to it is a bottleneck, because it requires programmers to understand how a thing works before they can incorporate it into an “AI” system. Lots of programmers know how to play chess, but far fewer understand the human pancreas, planetary weather systems, or patterns of mineral deposition in the Earth’s crust. For programmers to apply machine learning to these domains, they need to collaborate with experts who do understand them, who furthermore expect to be paid for this work. The need for expert input into this kind of “AI” represents a significant increase in the wage-bill paid by the programmer’s employer: it means they have to pay for programmers and experts. Even worse: this kind of “AI” can’t be applied to systems we don’t understand. We can observe far more causal relationships – instances in which A reliably causes B – in the universe than we can explain. There are lots of examples of us operationalizing these observations without understanding them. If you get sick today, your doctor might well prescribe one of the many medicines whose method of action is either incompletely understood or not understood at all. We know that molecule A reliably treats pathology B, but not why, and while that why is the subject of ongoing research, it’s not necessary that the why be known before the molecule can be given to ailing patients. MP3

This week on my podcast, I read <a href="https://pluralistic.net/2026/10/06/nonfungible/#theory-free" rel="noopener noreferrer">Swapping money for expertise</a>, a recent essay from my Pluralistic blog about the political economy of “AI” based on theory-free inference.

The need to understand and describe a thing before you could apply “AI” to it is a bottleneck, because it requires programmers to understand how a thing works before they can incorporate it into an “AI” system. Lots of programmers know how to play chess, but far fewer understand the human pancreas, planetary weather systems, or patterns of mineral deposition in the Earth’s crust.
For programmers to apply machine learning to these domains, they need to collaborate with experts who do understand them, who furthermore expect to be paid for this work. The need for expert input into this kind of “AI” represents a significant increase in the wage-bill paid by the programmer’s employer: it means they have to pay for programmers and experts.
Even worse: this kind of “AI” can’t be applied to systems we don’t understand. We can observe far more causal relationships – instances in which A reliably causes B – in the universe than we can explain. There are lots of examples of us operationalizing these observations without understanding them. If you get sick today, your doctor might well prescribe one of the many medicines whose method of action is either incompletely understood or not understood at all. We know that molecule A reliably treats pathology B, but not why, and while that why is the subject of ongoing research, it’s not necessary that the why be known before the molecule can be given to ailing patients.

<a href="https://archive.org/download/swapping-money-for-expertise/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_525_Swapping_money_for_expertise.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>

Swapping money for expertise

<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/last-dangerous-visions.jpg?w=580&ssl=1" alt="The Blackstone cover for Harlan Ellison's 'Last Dangerous Visions.'">
This week on my podcast, I’m reading “The Weight of a Feather (The Weight of a Heart)</a>,” my short story in Harlan Ellison’s <a href="https://www.blackstonepublishing.com/products/book-fyhm">The Last Dangerous Visions</a>, commissioned by J. Michael Straczynski.
<blockquote>
Margaret came into my office, breaking my unproductive clicktrance. She looked sheepish. “I got given one of those robots that follows you around,” she said. She took a step, revealing the waist-high reinforced cardboard box. “Want to help unbox?

I stood up and unkinked my spine and hips and shoulders with a sound like wringing out a sheet of bubble-wrap. “Oof.”

“Come on, old fella,” she said. She handed me a box-cutter.
</blockquote>
 
<a href="https://archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_491/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_491_The_Weight_Of_a_Feather_the_Weight_Of_a_Heart.mp3">MP3</a>

This week on my podcast, I’m reading “The Weight of a Feather (The Weight of a Heart),” my short story in Harlan Ellison’s The Last Dangerous Visions, commissioned by J. Michael Straczynski. Margaret came into my office, breaking my unproductive clicktrance. She looked sheepish. “I got given one of those robots that follows you around,” she said. She took a step, revealing the waist-high reinforced cardboard box. “Want to help unbox? I stood up and unkinked my spine and hips and shoulders with a sound like wringing out a sheet of bubble-wrap. “Oof.” “Come on, old fella,” she said. She handed me a box-cutter. MP3

This week on my podcast, I’m reading “The Weight of a Feather (The Weight of a Heart),” my short story in Harlan Ellison’s <a href="https://www.blackstonepublishing.com/products/book-fyhm" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Last Dangerous Visions</a>, commissioned by J. Michael Straczynski.

Margaret came into my office, breaking my unproductive clicktrance. She looked sheepish. “I got given one of those robots that follows you around,” she said. She took a step, revealing the waist-high reinforced cardboard box. “Want to help unbox?

I stood up and unkinked my spine and hips and shoulders with a sound like wringing out a sheet of bubble-wrap. “Oof.”

“Come on, old fella,” she said. She handed me a box-cutter.

 
<a href="https://archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_491/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_491_The_Weight_Of_a_Feather_the_Weight_Of_a_Heart.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>

The Weight of a Feather (The Weight of a Heart)

<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/437389857/"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/pioneerscapegoggs.jpg?w=580" align="left"></a> 
The USC Center for Public Diplomacy blog has a <a href="http://uscpublicdiplomacy.com/index.php/events/events_detail/2222/">post</a> on the EFF Pioneer Awards last night, including the <a href="http://centeronpublicdiplomacy.com/podcasts/070327_doctorow_eff.mp3">audio</a> from the talk.

The USC Center for Public Diplomacy blog has a post on the EFF Pioneer Awards last night, including the audio from the talk.

<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/437389857/" rel="noopener noreferrer"></a> 
The USC Center for Public Diplomacy blog has a <a href="http://uscpublicdiplomacy.com/index.php/events/events_detail/2222/" rel="noopener noreferrer">post</a> on the EFF Pioneer Awards last night, including the <a href="http://centeronpublicdiplomacy.com/podcasts/070327_doctorow_eff.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">audio</a> from the talk.

My Pioneer Award acceptance speech

Here’s part 11 — chapters 27-31 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>. This concludes the reading
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_73/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_73_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_011_64kb.mp3">MP3 Link</a>

Here’s part 11 — chapters 27-31 — of the reading of my novel Eastern Standard Tribe. This concludes the reading MP3 Link

Here’s part 11 — chapters 27-31 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>. This concludes the reading
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_73/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_73_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_011_64kb.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3 Link</a>

Eastern Standard Tribe, Part 011 — CONCLUSION

I recorded an interview with Lance Weiler on the <a href="http://workbookproject.com/?p=174">This Conference is Being Recorded</a> podcast — we talk about creativity, authorship and Creative Commons.
<a href="http://workbookproject.com/audio/cory.mp3">MP3</a>

I recorded an interview with Lance Weiler on the This Conference is Being Recorded podcast — we talk about creativity, authorship and Creative Commons. MP3

I recorded an interview with Lance Weiler on the <a href="http://workbookproject.com/?p=174" rel="noopener noreferrer">This Conference is Being Recorded</a> podcast — we talk about creativity, authorship and Creative Commons.
<a href="http://workbookproject.com/audio/cory.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>

Interview with This Conference Is Being Recorded

Here’s part 10 — chapters 24-26 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>.
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_72/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_72_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_010_64kb.mp3">MP3 Link</a>

Here’s part 10 — chapters 24-26 — of the reading of my novel Eastern Standard Tribe. MP3 Link

Here’s part 10 — chapters 24-26 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>.
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_72/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_72_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_010_64kb.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3 Link</a>

Eastern Standard Tribe, Part 010

IanIv from Blogaholics <a href="http://www.blogaholics.ca/archives/2007/03/cory-doctorow-the-totalitarian-urge.html">attended my talk on privacy in Vancouver last night</a> and made an audio recording — he’s put it online already. Thanks, Ian!
<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/Cory_Doctorow_The_Totalitarian_Urge">MP3</a>
Update: Alex from EcoShock <a href="http://www.ecoshock.org/downloads/greens/Cory_Doctorow_SFU.mp3">recorded the talk the next day too</a>

IanIv from Blogaholics attended my talk on privacy in Vancouver last night and made an audio recording — he’s put it online already. Thanks, Ian! MP3 Update: Alex from EcoShock recorded the talk the next day too

IanIv from Blogaholics <a href="http://www.blogaholics.ca/archives/2007/03/cory-doctorow-the-totalitarian-urge.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">attended my talk on privacy in Vancouver last night</a> and made an audio recording — he’s put it online already. Thanks, Ian!
<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/Cory_Doctorow_The_Totalitarian_Urge" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>
Update: Alex from EcoShock <a href="http://www.ecoshock.org/downloads/greens/Cory_Doctorow_SFU.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">recorded the talk the next day too</a>

Audio from last night’s privacy talk in Vancouver

Here’s part 9 — chapters 22-23 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>.
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_71/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_71_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_009_64kb.mp3">MP3 Link</a>

Here’s part 9 — chapters 22-23 — of the reading of my novel Eastern Standard Tribe. MP3 Link

Here’s part 9 — chapters 22-23 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>.
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_71/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_71_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_009_64kb.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3 Link</a>

Eastern Standard Tribe, Part 009

I did an <a href="http://kruufm.com/node/476">interview</a> with KRUU FM’s Sundar Raman about free software, DRM and sf: 
The site went down — here are some mirrors:
<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/OpenViewsCoryDoctorow">Internet Archive Mirror</a> 
<a href="http://69.18.43.57/open-views.mp3">MP3 mirror</a>

I did an interview with KRUU FM’s Sundar Raman about free software, DRM and sf: The site went down — here are some mirrors: Internet Archive Mirror MP3 mirror

I did an <a href="http://kruufm.com/node/476" rel="noopener noreferrer">interview</a> with KRUU FM’s Sundar Raman about free software, DRM and sf: 
The site went down — here are some mirrors:
<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/OpenViewsCoryDoctorow" rel="noopener noreferrer">Internet Archive Mirror</a> 
<a href="http://69.18.43.57/open-views.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3 mirror</a>

Interview on KRUU FM

The British sf podcast “Yatterings” (produced by Iain Elmsley, proprietor of the brilliant <a href="http://www.austgate.co.uk/">Aust Gate</a> bookseller) has a new interview up with me about sf writing and how it relates to the future. 
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Grummellings3/grummel3_64kb.mp3">MP3</a>

The British sf podcast “Yatterings” (produced by Iain Elmsley, proprietor of the brilliant Aust Gate bookseller) has a new interview up with me about sf writing and how it relates to the future. MP3

The British sf podcast “Yatterings” (produced by Iain Elmsley, proprietor of the brilliant <a href="http://www.austgate.co.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Aust Gate</a> bookseller) has a new interview up with me about sf writing and how it relates to the future. 
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Grummellings3/grummel3_64kb.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3</a>

Interview on Yatterings

Jason Adams attended my lecture on privacy (<a href="http://www.provost.duke.edu/speaker_series/current_speakers.html">From Myspace to Homeland Security: Privacy and the Totalitarian Urge</a>) last week at Duke University and recorded it for his podcast. He’s just posted it — thanks, Jason!

<a href="http://www.randomsignal.com/index.php?post_id=185479">Link</a>,
<a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/randomsignal/Random_Signal_Special_002.mp3">Direct MP3 Link</a>

Jason Adams attended my lecture on privacy (From Myspace to Homeland Security: Privacy and the Totalitarian Urge) last week at Duke University and recorded it for his podcast. He’s just posted it — thanks, Jason! Link, Direct MP3 Link

Jason Adams attended my lecture on privacy (<a href="http://www.provost.duke.edu/speaker_series/current_speakers.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">From Myspace to Homeland Security: Privacy and the Totalitarian Urge</a>) last week at Duke University and recorded it for his podcast. He’s just posted it — thanks, Jason!

<a href="http://www.randomsignal.com/index.php?post_id=185479" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link</a>,
<a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/randomsignal/Random_Signal_Special_002.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">Direct MP3 Link</a>

My Duke privacy talk — audio

Here’s part 8 — chapters 19-21 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>.
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_70/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_70_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_008_64kb.mp3">MP3 Link</a>

Here’s part 8 — chapters 19-21 — of the reading of my novel Eastern Standard Tribe. MP3 Link

Here’s part 8 — chapters 19-21 — of the reading of my novel <a href="http://craphound.com/est" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eastern Standard Tribe</a>.
<a href="http://www.archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_70/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_70_Eastern_Standard_Tribe_008_64kb.mp3" rel="noopener noreferrer">MP3 Link</a>

Share Podcast – Cory Doctorow's craphound.com

Sign up to save your podcasts

Podcast – Cory Doctorow's craphound.com

Podcast – Cory Doctorow's craphound.com episodes

About Podcast – Cory Doctorow's craphound.com

Best of Podcast – Cory Doctorow's craphound.com

More shows like Podcast – Cory Doctorow's craphound.com

99% Invisible

On the Media

The Gray Area with Sean Illing

Upstream

Uncanny Valley | WIRED

Know Your Enemy

This Machine Kills

Hard Fork

How to Fix the Internet

The Ezra Klein Show

Search Engine

Understood: The Big Bet

Better Offline

Taylor Lorenz’s Power User

Gloves Off