We break down Michael Proctor’s 20/20 interview, the fallout from the Karen Read trial, and raise questions about juror misconduct and the long-term damage to public trust in law enforcement. Proctor defends his investigation into John O'Keefe’s death despite being vilified during Karen Read’s trial. We examine how the defense weaponized his words, why Juror #11’s statements raise red flags, and how conspiracy-driven narratives erode trust in law enforcement. When public opinion turns into courtroom strategy, justice becomes collateral damage—and real accountability is lost.

CHECK OUT OUR MERCH STORE

https://thecommcenter-2.creator-spring.com/?page=2