
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


By Real Story Media
4.2
571571 ratings
The podcast currently has 14,198 episodes available.
The most played episodes among Podcast App listeners.

Nine women and three men had to decide whether Lindsay Clancy chose to kill her children or whether her doctors broke her brain with medications. The prosecution held up a CVS receipt as proof of planning. The defense rattled off prescriptions one by one until the chart ran off the page. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat in the gallery for every day of it. Bob joins Tony Brueski for the full conversation covering all three parts of the interview. He starts with what the cameras missed — the grief in the gallery, the jury's reactions during the worst testimony, Lindsay's in-person appearance, and the moment the room shifted. He moves to the prosecution's strongest evidence: the twenty-minute window, the takeout timing, and ADA Jennifer Sprague's argument that Lindsay resented her life. He examines the defense's medication cascade and Kevin Reddington's closing. Bob closes with the question everyone is asking: what happens to Lindsay Clancy? She has been inside Tewksbury Hospital since 2023, paralyzed from the waist down. Andrea Yates has been committed for twenty years. Whether the verdict is guilty or not criminally responsible, Lindsay's life is inside a locked building. Bob explains the commitment process, the annual evaluations, and whether any realistic scenario involves her walking out. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

A commenter on this channel claimed Lindsay Clancy searched "Andrea Yates" before the killings to build herself an alibi. Her former coworker testified to something else entirely. Margaret Hamp worked nights with Lindsay on the labor and delivery floor at Mass General, and during Lindsay's first year there, she asked Lindsay if she knew the Yates case after a pregnant patient came in planning to hurt herself. Lindsay didn't know it. Hamp had to explain it to her. That gap between online claims and courtroom testimony runs through this entire trial. Every expert who examined Lindsay, on both sides, came back with bipolar disorder or major depression. Not one called her a sociopath or a psychopath, even though a text pulled from her phone on January 20 asks whether a sociopath can be treated, a line prosecutors lean on hard. Messages from the day before describe hallucinations and postpartum psychosis symptoms. Same phone, same week, two different stories. The prosecution's own psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, testified Lindsay described a male, laughing voice telling her it was her last chance, the same account she gave a hospital chaplain in the first week after her arrest. One popular claim online insists she only ever told her own psychologist about that voice. The record says otherwise: she told the state's own witness too. Judge Sullivan's instructions to the jury lay out two separate prongs: whether she could appreciate that what she was doing was wrong, or whether she could control what she did. Knowing right from wrong only answers one of those questions. Tony Brueski checks the loudest theories about this case against what actually got said under oath. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #MargaretHamp #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #AndreaYates #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Duxbury #MurderTrial

Twelve jurors. Five weeks of testimony. Not one verdict. Lindsay Clancy's murder trial ended the way a lot of people watching this case predicted it might — in a deadlock. The Duxbury, Massachusetts mother, 34, was charged with three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation in the January 24, 2023 deaths of her children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — allegedly strangled with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home. She pleaded not guilty. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington built his case on an insanity defense, arguing severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. After the killings, Clancy allegedly tried to take her own life by jumping from a second-story window; she's been paralyzed from the waist down since. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan, where he's spoken openly about her mental health. The jury — nine women, three men — deliberated more than 39 hours across seven days and told Judge William F. Sullivan three times they were deadlocked. Reddington tried to pull a holdout juror off the panel at the eleventh hour, then took the fight to the state's highest court when Sullivan wouldn't budge. The court denied it. Sullivan had no choice left — he declared a mistrial. Now it's on Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz to decide whether Massachusetts tries this case again with twelve new people in the box. He's not deciding today. What's already on the books: a status and motion hearing September 29. The case isn't closed. It's on pause. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #Mistrial #HungJury #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCounty #KevinReddington #JudgeSullivan #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime

The Lindsay Clancy jury has three options and none of them sends her home. Guilty of first-degree murder means life without parole. Guilty of second-degree means life with eventual parole eligibility. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility means commitment to a psychiatric facility with no time limit. Each path has a legal fight attached to it that outlasts the verdict. Eric Faddis, a defense attorney and former prosecutor, walks through all three outcomes and the deliberation that precedes them. In Massachusetts, the prosecution carries the burden of proving criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. The two-prong McHoul test requires the Commonwealth to prove Clancy could appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions and could conform her conduct to the law. Both must be met. The prosecution's rebuttal psychiatrist told this jury Clancy had a severe depressive episode but would not call it psychosis. The legal test does not require that label. On the not-guilty path, commitment under MGL Chapter 123 allows indefinite hospitalization. Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity twenty years ago and remains in a state psychiatric facility. She declines her annual release hearing every year. Reddington's role as Clancy's attorney continues through the periodic review process. On the guilty path, the SJC automatically reviews the conviction. The trial record includes the mental health testimony the jury rejected. Clancy would also transfer from Tewksbury Hospital to the corrections system — paralyzed and on 24-hour suicide watch, entering a facility not designed for her level of need. If the jury cannot agree, the judge can issue a Tuey-Rodriguez charge. If it fails, the result is a mistrial and the case starts over. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JuryVerdict #CriminalResponsibility #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #MassachusettsLaw #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime

Dr. Phillip Resnick examined two women who killed their own children in the exact same way, decades apart, and reached the same conclusion both times. He evaluated Andrea Yates before her 2001 case ended in a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, and he told Lindsay Clancy's jury she was following a command voice too, the same finding, one expert, two mothers. That comparison sits at the center of a defense case that's now rested. The record shows Lindsay in session with her psychiatrist on January 23, 2023, one day before the killings, on top of two nurse practitioners, a therapist, two December calls to a suicide hotline, and a five-day inpatient stay at McLean Hospital that ended nineteen days before. The planning theory, built on errands and timing, runs into Resnick's testimony that the Commonwealth's own testing found no evidence of faking, and that Lindsay downplayed her symptoms rather than exaggerated them. The staged-jump theory runs into the fact that she's paralyzed for life and remains on suicide watch at Tewksbury Hospital. Prosecutors have their own expert. Dr. Avram Mack, who interviewed Lindsay in April 2026, testified she could tell right from wrong, and told the jury she said "go to God" to her children during the killings, a statement she reportedly framed very differently to a hospital chaplain a week later and to Resnick himself months after that. Closings are next. Lindsay's plea is not guilty on three counts of murder, on the ground that she lacked criminal responsibility, and a conviction would mean life without parole starting at age thirty-six for a woman already paralyzed and under suicide watch. Tony Brueski asks what it means when the same doctor who helped clear one mother says the same thing about another. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #PhillipResnick #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #AvramMack #TrueCrime #MurderTrial
The podcast currently has 14,198 episodes available.

8,624 Listeners

862 Listeners

1,263 Listeners

46,920 Listeners

1,069 Listeners

1,571 Listeners

10,428 Listeners

2,477 Listeners

138 Listeners

1,180 Listeners

2,188 Listeners

491 Listeners

94 Listeners

907 Listeners

23 Listeners

92 Listeners

10 Listeners

62 Listeners

226 Listeners

610 Listeners

7 Listeners

9 Listeners

6 Listeners

17 Listeners

5 Listeners

12 Listeners

6 Listeners

5 Listeners

8 Listeners

827 Listeners

4 Listeners

103 Listeners