D4vd finances Celeste Rivas Hernandez — Burke's former financial manager testified at a preliminary hearing to earnings between ten and eleven and a half million dollars from recording contracts, merchandise, and publishing.

He also testified he advised Burke to transfer two Texas properties into his mother's name to shield assets. Those transfers happened in October 2025, weeks after fourteen-year-old Celeste's remains were discovered.

On September 8, 2026, Celeste's parents filed a twelve-count wrongful death lawsuit naming Burke, his mother Colleen Burke, manager Josh Marshall, security guard Sheldon Jacques, and business entities. The family alleges Burke used his wealth to gain access to a minor and surrounding adults failed to intervene.

Burke fired his legal team and requested a public defender. He is held without bail.

Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down the financial trail.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #WrongfulDeath #Lawsuit #JusticeForCeleste #DavidBurke #Murder #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers

The holdout in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial told the room he didn’t know whether the prosecution or the defense had proved their case. Under the instructions Judge Sullivan read that jury, the defense had no burden to prove anything.

Nick Dargie, a 25-year-old military veteran and the most recent juror to speak publicly, said the holdout couldn’t point to any evidence supporting his position and scrolled his phone while other jurors deliberated. He described the holdout pulling an exercise band from the evidence bag, tying it around a water bottle, and pulling it tight — an apparent reenactment Dargie called disgusting.

The foreperson signed three verdict forms after the holdout admitted reasonable doubt. He reversed himself in the same breath. The jury split 11-1 after about 38 hours of deliberation.

Reddington has filed a motion asking the court to enter an acquittal. Cruz has not announced whether he’ll retry. A hearing is set for September 29.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HoldoutJuror #Mistrial #ReasonableDoubt #JuryInstructions #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

JP Miller timeline — Mica Miller met the man who would become her husband when she was a teenager at his youth ministry in Myrtle Beach. Netflix's Death of the Pastor's Wife exposed the timeline.

JP led youth worship at Solid Rock Church. Mica was among his congregants. He was fifteen years her senior. When she married her first husband, Jeremy, JP officiated. After that marriage ended, Mica worked for JP. In 2015, when she was twenty and JP was thirty-five, he confessed from his pulpit to "a moral failing." Both marriages ended. JP set the terms. They married in November 2017.

Mica died at Lumber River State Park on April 27, 2024, at thirty. JP faces federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges.

Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down the methodology.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #CoerciveControl #SolidRockChurch #Pastor #RedFlags #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime

JP Miller true crime — the former Solid Rock Church pastor from Netflix's Death of the Pastor's Wife faces federal charges for allegedly cyberstalking Mica Miller and lying to the FBI. Trial is set for October 2026.

The indictment alleges Miller used GPS surveillance, deployed a tire deflation device, and made over fifty calls to Mica in one day. Prosecutors also allege he posted an intimate image without consent.

Miller told investigators he hired a PI to prevent Mica from buying firearms. The government says that was a lie.

Mica died on April 27, 2024, at Lumber River State Park. She had reported harassment to local police. The case stalled until the Robeson County Sheriff's Office requested FBI involvement.

Miller pleaded not guilty and posted $100,000 bond.

Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer analyzes the federal case.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #FBI #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #SolidRockChurch #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime

A mistrial usually resets a case. Lindsay Clancy’s left prosecutors with a reported 11-1 split and a public statement from DA Tim Cruz defending the theory jurors could not unanimously accept. Cruz described the deaths as the “cruel and calculated killing of three innocents” and said the evidence suggested to his office that Clancy was in control. 

Judge William Sullivan declared the mistrial September 4 after jurors deliberated for more than 38 hours across seven days. Kevin Reddington says eleven jurors favored acquittal. That figure comes from the defense, and no verdict was returned. The underlying legal divide remains the same: the defense attributed Clancy’s actions to postpartum psychosis and lack of criminal responsibility, while the prosecution argued she understood the wrongfulness of her conduct and could choose differently. 

Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski with experience on both sides of a criminal courtroom. He examines how prosecutors evaluate a failed first trial, what juror feedback can reveal, when expert testimony needs rebuilding, and how a district attorney weighs retrial against a plea or another resolution. Cruz has authority to try the case again. The first jury still gave his office a result it has to evaluate before choosing that path. 

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the social fallout that followed the same trial. She focuses on the fear underneath the public argument over postpartum psychosis and why people reach for labels that create distance from severe mental illness. Scott also considers what the public spectacle may communicate to mothers who are afraid to disclose disturbing symptoms. 

Patrick Clancy’s attorney has said another trial would be extraordinarily painful for him and his family. Cruz has not announced his decision. Both sides are scheduled to return to court September 29, where the legal consequences of the mistrial begin taking shape. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#LindsayClancy #TimCruz #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #Mistrial #Retrial #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeNews 

The Lindsay Clancy holdout controversy centers on what the jury foreperson allegedly reported to the court, not simply on a juror voting differently. Kevin Reddington said the foreperson identified one juror who acknowledged doubt but would not apply Judge William Sullivan’s instruction on reasonable doubt. 

That distinction mattered because jurors are allowed to disagree, including as a minority of one. Sullivan questioned jurors about their ability to follow the law and repeated the legal standard, but he declined Reddington’s request to remove the holdout. Seven days and more than 38 hours of deliberations ended with a September 4 mistrial. 

The legal fallout did not stay inside Plymouth Superior Court. On September 8, Howard Cooper, attorney for Patrick Clancy, said online creators had spread false claims accusing Patrick of involvement in the deaths of his children. Cooper warned that appropriate legal measures would be pursued and said law enforcement had been notified. 

Robin Dreeke, former FBI counterintelligence behavioral expert, joins Tony Brueski to separate the observable group dynamics from speculation about what a single juror believed. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, explains why judges protect the secrecy and independence of deliberations even when other jurors report a problem. 

Faddis then turns to the accusations involving Patrick and the legal exposure that can arise when commentary makes provably false factual claims about an identifiable person. The combined discussion follows two lines courts guard carefully: the independence of a juror and the boundary between protected speech and actionable defamation. Lindsay Clancy’s next scheduled court date is September 29 while prosecutors consider whether to retry the case. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #JuryDeadlock #ReasonableDoubt #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #DefamationCase #CourtroomCoverage #TrueCrimePodcast 

Lindsay Clancy's mistrial ended one jury fight and immediately opened several others, including Kevin Reddington's public request for President Donald Trump to help his client. A president cannot pardon a defendant on Massachusetts state charges, but Reddington has said he made the appeal because any help could matter while prosecutors decide whether to retry her. 

The pressure campaign is tied to the defense's view of how the first trial went wrong. Medical witnesses described Clancy's neck and wrist cuts as superficial. Her fall from the home caused a spinal injury that left her paralyzed, and Reddington argued the state had tried to minimize the seriousness of the overall attempt. 

After seven days and roughly 38 hours of deliberation, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4. Reddington has said the jury was divided 11-1 in favor of acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility, a split later echoed by jurors speaking publicly. District Attorney Timothy Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. An emergency Supreme Judicial Court request over the holdout juror was denied, and a spectator was arrested after allegedly filming jurors outside the courthouse. 

The defense is also asking Sullivan for a required finding of not guilty under Rule 25. The September 29 hearing is scheduled to address that request along with status and trial assignment. If the motion fails and prosecutors continue, both sides will have to decide how much the first jury's reported split changes the next trial or any negotiation. 

Bob Motta of Defense Diaries and defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis join Tony Brueski to work through the fallout. They examine the disputed injury strategy, the mistrial record, the Rule 25 standard, and Reddington's refusal to accept a resolution requiring jail time. They also explain why the defense sought presidential attention while the charging decision remains with a Massachusetts district attorney. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #EricFaddis #ClancyMistrial #Rule25 #MassachusettsCourt #LegalBreakdown #TrueCrimePodcast

The Dan Markel murder-for-hire case turned a jailhouse notebook into evidence against Donna Adelson. Drina Bernhardt testified that Donna wrote a question-and-answer script meant to feed Bernhardt false testimony about Katherine Magbanua, and a state handwriting analyst testified that the writing belonged to Donna. Donna had been arrested one week after Charlie's 2023 conviction as she and Harvey prepared to travel to Vietnam on one-way tickets. 

Bernhardt said Donna promised $10,000 and a grand piano if she helped. Donna's attorneys challenged the witness and argued Bernhardt pushed Donna to write the material so Bernhardt could help herself. A second jailhouse witness also testified that Donna confessed and discussed false testimony, while the defense highlighted inconsistencies in that account. At sentencing, Donna maintained her innocence and told Judge Stephen Everett she had never received a parking ticket. 

Prosecutors paired the jailhouse evidence with 44 checks Donna signed to Magbanua after the murder. They argued the payments connected Donna to the conspiracy. The defense said Donna was following Charlie's instructions because he claimed Magbanua and others were extorting him. The jury convicted Donna after roughly three hours of deliberation. 

Wendi Adelson remains uncharged, and Jeffrey Lacasse's testimony creates a separate factual conflict. Lacasse said Wendi told him five days before Markel was shot that Charlie had considered "all options" for the "Danny Markel problem," including hiring a hitman for about $15,000. Wendi denied making that statement. 
Lacasse also testified that Wendi questioned him about his Friday route in the days before the killing and later asked him not to contact her for a week. Wendi testified that the television being repaired at her home on the morning of the murder was not code. She also acknowledged seeing police tape near Markel's home without calling Markel or the children's daycare. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. 
https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#DanMarkel #DonnaAdelson #TrueCrimeToday #WendiAdelson #JeffreyLacasse #AdelsonFamily #MurderForHire #TrialEvidence #Florida #TrueCrime 

Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy are now sharing space in the same public argument: when does mental illness explain conduct, and when does the evidence still point toward criminal responsibility? Their cases reach that question through very different records. 

Reiner faces two murder charges for the deaths of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, and has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors also allege special circumstances for multiple murders and lying in wait. Reiner had spoken publicly for years about addiction and recovery, describing repeated treatment, homelessness, relapses, and destructive behavior during drug use. Those statements provide history, but they do not establish his state of mind at the time of the charged killings. 

Clancy's state of mind was the central issue at her Massachusetts trial. Her lawyers argued postpartum psychosis made her not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. The prosecution presented experts who disputed that conclusion and argued she could understand that her actions were wrong. The jury deadlocked, producing a September 4 mistrial. Jurors later described an 11-1 split in favor of an insanity verdict. 

The public response has moved beyond legal standards. A TikTok creator claimed he called off a $200,000 wedding after his fiancee disagreed with him about Clancy and called her a monster. The dispute turned a murder trial into a test of whether compassion for a defendant reveals something unacceptable about the person expressing it. 

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to examine that leap. They compare what addiction can do to judgment with what psychosis can do to a person's perception of reality, while keeping the legal allegations separate. They also examine why audiences reach for simple labels when the actual question is whether a specific defendant had the capacity required for criminal responsibility at a specific moment. 

Reiner is scheduled to return to court September 15. Clancy still faces charges after the mistrial. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#NickReiner #LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #MentalHealthDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility

Patrick Clancy's lawyer says there may be consequences for people spreading false claims that Patrick was involved in the deaths of his children. Howard Cooper's September 8 statement said law enforcement had been notified and described an escalating defamation campaign that had produced threats to Patrick's reputation, livelihood and life. The public record has not implicated Patrick in the deaths of Cora, Dawson and Callan. 

The warning arrived after Lindsay Clancy's trial ended in a mistrial on September 4. Patrick had testified as the Commonwealth's first witness and described Lindsay's decline, the errands that took him away from the house, his return home and the 911 call. Lindsay's lawyers acknowledged that she killed the children while arguing that severe mental illness left her without criminal responsibility. The prosecution argued the acts were deliberate. 

Outside court, another case was being built without charges, rules of evidence or a judge. Patrick's move to New York, his remarriage and his decision to forgive Lindsay were picked apart online. Kevin Reddington was then asked about the conspiracy theories and said Patrick had not been accused by him. He also said he did not dismiss internet investigators and praised social-media users for finding facts and doing investigations. 

Tony Brueski is joined by retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott to examine why unsupported accusations can feel persuasive once a community decides someone looks suspicious. Dreeke focuses on the behavioral shortcuts that make a theory self-reinforcing. Scott examines the expectation that grief must look permanent and publicly recognizable before strangers will accept it as genuine.
 
Patrick rebuilt parts of his life after losing three children. His attorney is now challenging people who turned that survival into suspicion. Where does true-crime discussion end and a real-world campaign against a private person begin? 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #TrueCrimePodcast #OnlineConspiracies #Defamation #LindsayClancyTrial #TonyBrueski