True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

By Real Story Media

🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases

True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast... more

4.2

571571 ratings

FAQs about True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews:

How many episodes does True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews have?

The podcast currently has 14,141 episodes available.

Best of True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The most played episodes among Podcast App listeners.

Number 1: What Lindsay Clancy's Nurse Saw Coming In 2022
TikTok creators are calling Patrick Clancy the real killer. Lindsay Clancy's own defense team has already told a courtroom she did it. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down what Patrick can do about online accusations reaching millions of people — and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott digs into a warning that came months before the deaths and never changed the treatment plan. Lindsay has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder over the deaths of five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan. Her defense argues severe postpartum illness removed her criminal responsibility. Prosecutors argue she acted with intention. In 2022, nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta raised the possibility of bipolar disorder with Lindsay and her husband, partly based on a reported forty-eight hours without sleep on a new antidepressant. She prescribed an antipsychotic used for bipolar disorder and insomnia, while the antidepressant regimen continued. Dr. Jennifer Tufts testified she weighed bipolar disorder that December and set it aside for lack of mania. Staff at McLean Hospital discussed sleep loss tipping a patient hypomanic before discharging her with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Shavaun explains why bipolar disorder often takes years to diagnose correctly, why depression is usually the first label clinicians reach for, and whether the criteria taught in training even apply to a new mother. Faddis then returns to Patrick — creators dissecting his remarriage, analyzing his testimony for signs of guilt, and building narratives the trial evidence doesn't support. He lays out what the Alex Jones and Sandy Hook verdicts established, and why suing anonymous creators with no assets may not be worth the fight regardless of the law. LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #RebeccaJollotta #ShavaunScott #EricFaddis #BipolarDisorder #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis
August 17, 202634min
Number 2: Lindsay Clancy's Coworker Revealed WHAT About Her Past?
A commenter on this channel claimed Lindsay Clancy searched "Andrea Yates" before the killings to build herself an alibi. Her former coworker testified to something else entirely. Margaret Hamp worked nights with Lindsay on the labor and delivery floor at Mass General, and during Lindsay's first year there, she asked Lindsay if she knew the Yates case after a pregnant patient came in planning to hurt herself. Lindsay didn't know it. Hamp had to explain it to her. That gap between online claims and courtroom testimony runs through this entire trial. Every expert who examined Lindsay, on both sides, came back with bipolar disorder or major depression. Not one called her a sociopath or a psychopath, even though a text pulled from her phone on January 20 asks whether a sociopath can be treated, a line prosecutors lean on hard. Messages from the day before describe hallucinations and postpartum psychosis symptoms. Same phone, same week, two different stories. The prosecution's own psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, testified Lindsay described a male, laughing voice telling her it was her last chance, the same account she gave a hospital chaplain in the first week after her arrest. One popular claim online insists she only ever told her own psychologist about that voice. The record says otherwise: she told the state's own witness too. Judge Sullivan's instructions to the jury lay out two separate prongs: whether she could appreciate that what she was doing was wrong, or whether she could control what she did. Knowing right from wrong only answers one of those questions. Tony Brueski checks the loudest theories about this case against what actually got said under oath. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #MargaretHamp #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #AndreaYates #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Duxbury #MurderTrial
August 30, 202637min
Number 3: Why Bryan Kohberger's Psych Eval Turned Against Him
A defense evaluation built to protect Bryan Kohberger became the clearest window into how he processes the world. Dr. Rachel Lawson Orr tested Kohberger, interviewed his family, and cataloged behavioral patterns consistent with a lifetime of diagnoses. Those include autism spectrum disorder, OCD, ADHD, ARFID, developmental coordination disorder, depression, anorexia, and opioid use disorder from a heroin addiction he developed as a teenager. Orr documented a man with restricted facial expression, poor social reciprocity, impulsive rule-breaking, and what she called "overall poor" insight. His family confirmed the patterns and told Orr they had been coaching him through social interactions for years without success. Internet forum posts attributed to Kohberger at age sixteen describe the same gap between how he experienced himself and how others experienced him. He wrote about feeling no emotion, acting without remorse, and seeing the world like a video game. He framed his disconnection as making him "smarter." The evaluation puts clinical language to a pattern visible in every public moment since his arrest. A man on rails, cycling through the same fixed positions, unable to see what everyone around him can see. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #BryanKohberger #Kohberger #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #IdahoMurders #PsychEval #KohbergerPetition #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #HiddenKillers
August 19, 202619min
Number 4: What Every Possible Verdict Means for Lindsay Clancy
The Lindsay Clancy jury has three options and none of them sends her home. Guilty of first-degree murder means life without parole. Guilty of second-degree means life with eventual parole eligibility. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility means commitment to a psychiatric facility with no time limit. Each path has a legal fight attached to it that outlasts the verdict. Eric Faddis, a defense attorney and former prosecutor, walks through all three outcomes and the deliberation that precedes them. In Massachusetts, the prosecution carries the burden of proving criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. The two-prong McHoul test requires the Commonwealth to prove Clancy could appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions and could conform her conduct to the law. Both must be met. The prosecution's rebuttal psychiatrist told this jury Clancy had a severe depressive episode but would not call it psychosis. The legal test does not require that label. On the not-guilty path, commitment under MGL Chapter 123 allows indefinite hospitalization. Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity twenty years ago and remains in a state psychiatric facility. She declines her annual release hearing every year. Reddington's role as Clancy's attorney continues through the periodic review process. On the guilty path, the SJC automatically reviews the conviction. The trial record includes the mental health testimony the jury rejected. Clancy would also transfer from Tewksbury Hospital to the corrections system — paralyzed and on 24-hour suicide watch, entering a facility not designed for her level of need. If the jury cannot agree, the judge can issue a Tuey-Rodriguez charge. If it fails, the result is a mistrial and the case starts over. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JuryVerdict #CriminalResponsibility #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #MassachusettsLaw #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime
August 29, 202657min
Number 5: Dr. Resnick Examined Lindsay Clancy And WHAT Other Mother?
Dr. Phillip Resnick examined two women who killed their own children in the exact same way, decades apart, and reached the same conclusion both times. He evaluated Andrea Yates before her 2001 case ended in a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, and he told Lindsay Clancy's jury she was following a command voice too, the same finding, one expert, two mothers. That comparison sits at the center of a defense case that's now rested. The record shows Lindsay in session with her psychiatrist on January 23, 2023, one day before the killings, on top of two nurse practitioners, a therapist, two December calls to a suicide hotline, and a five-day inpatient stay at McLean Hospital that ended nineteen days before. The planning theory, built on errands and timing, runs into Resnick's testimony that the Commonwealth's own testing found no evidence of faking, and that Lindsay downplayed her symptoms rather than exaggerated them. The staged-jump theory runs into the fact that she's paralyzed for life and remains on suicide watch at Tewksbury Hospital. Prosecutors have their own expert. Dr. Avram Mack, who interviewed Lindsay in April 2026, testified she could tell right from wrong, and told the jury she said "go to God" to her children during the killings, a statement she reportedly framed very differently to a hospital chaplain a week later and to Resnick himself months after that. Closings are next. Lindsay's plea is not guilty on three counts of murder, on the ground that she lacked criminal responsibility, and a conviction would mean life without parole starting at age thirty-six for a woman already paralyzed and under suicide watch. Tony Brueski asks what it means when the same doctor who helped clear one mother says the same thing about another. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #PhillipResnick #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #AvramMack #TrueCrime #MurderTrial
August 30, 202650min