Share Resist and Renew
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
By Resist and Renew
The podcast currently has 31 episodes available.
Season 2 episode 15 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we interview Aviah. A sneaky extra episode after the season closer! It took us a while to get back together.
Aviah is a lecturer at Birkbeck, University of London, and is a community organiser the rest of the time. She is involved in the East End branch of Sisters Uncut, a national direct-action collective fighting cuts to domestic violence services as well as state violence. She is also involved in Hackney Copwatch, London Renters Union and the Kill the Bill Coalition, a national movement resisting the Police, Crime and Sentencing Bill.
“Effectively, if you can organise enough people to [know their rights and intervene] in a coordinated way, then you can actually withdraw consent from policing altogether”
To find out about Copwatch, if you’re considering getting involved: either DM an existing group (accounts listed above) or email [email protected]!
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
SAMI:
AVIAH:
SAMI:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
ALI:
ALI:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
MUSIC BREAK
SAMI:
AVIAH:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
ALI:
SAMI:
AVIAH
ALI:
AVIAH:
ALI:
AVIAH:
AVIAH:
ALI:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
SAMI:
SAMI:
AVIAH:
ALI: Yeah it’s Y Pantherod, which is The Panthers in Welsh, or Cardiff Copwatch
But yeah, there’s there’s different groups like across the country and across the capital as well. So like, Yeah, get in touch. And, and, and get involved like there’s, there’s shit happening right now people there’s a lot of energy for this, and the pressure is really mounting and that’s you know that’s why they’re scrambling around for solutions like trying to get rid of Cressida Dick a year too late. You know, it’s like they’re feeling the pressure and now’s the time to like escalate.
SAMI:
ALI – Thanks once again for listening to this bonus episode of the Resist + Renew podcast. Thanks to Aviah from Sisters, Copwatch and many other things for being interviewed. Thanks to Katherine for doing the transcript on this episode and to Kareem and Klaus for their respective bits of music.
That is now it for this season, thanks for listening and supporting in whatever way you did. We’re going to take a good long break now and maybe we’ll be back with season 3, some time in the future.
Do follow us on social media, get in touch for the usual facilitation stuff and yeah, see you around. Byeee!
Season 2 episode 14 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where… we wrap up for season 2!
Sign up to our newsletter to hear about our future conflict courses!
And finally, some perennial resources:
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
SAMI:
SAMI:
ALI:
KATHERINE:
SAMI:
KATHERINE:
ALI:
SAMI:
ALI:
KATHERINE:
ALI:
KATHERINE:
ALI:
SAMI:
ALI:
KATHERINE:
SAMI:
ALI:
ALL:
SAMI:
Season 2 episode 13 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we talk about a few tools to respond when conflict is happening in a meeting.
‘The sad update that we have is, at least to our knowledge, there is no fancy Magic Bullet intervention.’
An outline of the VERA model:
Some of the other tools we mentioned:
Name, frame, pause.
Request a group pause.
Enhanced name, frame, pause — where you talk to someone else to explore a challenge and why your group isn’t already dealing with the problem. Pro = dealing with thornier problems is easier with support.
Some resources:
And finally, some perennial resources:
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
ALI
In this episode, we are going to look at tools and tips for handling conflict in the moment. In all the other episodes, we’ve given a lot of content around frames and ideas about conflict, and some tools for preventing it or handling it outside of the moment. And now we are going to get dive right into what to do if conflict is happening right now.
SAMI
And so we’re gonna, we’re going to put forward a few like, very high level scenarios, and then we’re going to talk through so like: Okay, so in this situation, what could you do about it?
So one scenario could be the classic one, which is that there is some form of like active beef in a meeting. We’ve made the distinction before about like when there’s forms of conflict that lie under the surface and forms of conflicts that like spiking up in a meeting. This is the spiking up in the meeting one. And to make this all purpose, you don’t have to imagine that you’re the facilitator of this meeting, you’re just the person who’s in this meeting, and is witnessing the beef playing out. So. What are some interventions that we could do in this scenario.
ALI
So, as an example intervention, in this case, you might just say something like, ‘It feels like there’s some kind of disagreement and heat here that’s not really being acknowledged. Is there something I’m missing here? Do you two, who seems to be raising your voices have different priorities about what is being discussed in this topic?’ And then people may respond in different ways. But you’ve named it and you’ve given an explanation. And then everyone else can chime in with agreement or disagreement. Whatever.
SAMI
And also, the reason that I really like this as a way, I guess it’s the minimal intervention is like, you don’t have to have any idea what could be done to resolve this as a situation, you just have to propose an idea for what you think is going on, and then be like, ‘Let’s talk about it.’ And then there’s a chance that especially if you’re in a group of people, of like, maybe five, six, or more then like, there’s a decent chance that somebody in the room will have an idea of something that could be done about it.
So you’re like, making sure that the group takes responsibility for this thing, which is happening in the group, which is nice.
ALI
SAMI
Okay, should we give another option? We’re doing a bit of a quick fire what this episode, people! Another potential option is: take a small pause. If it seems like the beef is kicking off. So maybe take like a five or 10 minute break.
So, what we mean by that is if things start to get heated in meeting, then it can be helpful to give people space to just like have a slight cooling off before maybe trying to address what’s happening. So rather than the previous one, which is: go straight in with, like, there’s beef happening, let’s know it this is a: maybe let’s take a slight pause before we, before we do something.
So an example intervention could be something like, ‘It feels like things are really starting to like, get a bit tense in this meeting. And it’s it’s impacting my ability to focus on what’s happening, because I’m starting to feel a bit tense as well. And maybe it would be good if we all take a maybe 10 minute break, go outside, have a little walk around, and then come back in 10 minutes, and then we can like, get back on talking about this as a thing.’
ALI
What you might want to think about is, in the break, people might want to use that break to talk to people, particularly if like, some individuals are getting a bit heated, maybe you want to take take some of those people aside and just like, see how they’re doing or whatever. It’s an opportunity to use, use that time. Maybe they just want to breathe, or you just want to breathe, and that’s fine. But if you don’t do that, maybe you might end up come back- coming back into exactly the same situation. Which could be fine. Or it could be easier if you’d done something differently.
And when you come back, maybe you want to try if you are the facilitator, or maybe you want to chat to the facilitator, you could ask people to talk to each other in pairs, just be like, ‘Maybe take five minutes to talk to your neighbour and be like, how are you feeling? What do you think’s going on in this meeting, that’s not really vibing for you at that moment?’ Because that, again, brings
SAMI
And one thing that I think is nice about that, about this as an intervention is like if if there is like a conflict happening, and then you go straight in with like, ‘I think maybe we should all like, just take like all chat to the person next to us about what we think is going on in this conflict,’ it can feel like a really jarring intervention. And people will be like, ‘No, I’m in the middle of making this point that I’m really passionate about,’ or whatever. And it can feel quite hard to do. Whereas if you just take an even a small break, it can be easier to transition back into a slightly different activity that’s not like, ‘Okay, let’s let’s reconvene the argument that we were having 10 minutes ago: Go!’
And so I think that’s a slight- you don’t even need that big a pause to be able to like, flick back into that as I think I think.
ALI
SAMI
So, another potential intervention in this situation, but maybe a bit more relevant for if someone said something that you that you disagree with in a meeting, which could just be like a one off thing, like or it also could be in the in the midst of conflict is that there’s a there’s a tool called VERA. V-E-R-A. So that’s a tool which is for responding to things which people have said that you don’t agree with. And VERA is an acronym. It stands for, Validate, Explain, Reframe, and Ask. So it’s a way of responding to something that someone’s saying without falling into the trap of reinforcing the thing which you don’t agree with. So if someone says something that maybe you deem, like, playing into societal bigotries, or something in a meeting, like, it’s a way that you can respond to what they’re saying, and like, acknowledge what they’re saying, but without being like, ‘Yeah, I also agree that it is the fault of the migrants that people don’t have council housing,’ or whatever it is. Ali, do you want to give an example intervention in the kind of VERA structure.
ALI
SAMI
And then you’d be like, ‘Unfortunately, they’re just a soft form of surveillance. And whilst they’re trying to be your friend, actually what they want to do is find out information about us. So if any of us get arrested, they can prosecute us. So for that reason, we don’t welcome police at our protests or talk to them at all. And then, you know, does that make sense with you? Like, am I, am I being clear here, and just ending with that ask part allows them to, like, ask more questions, or to say, like, ‘Actually, I disagree,’ or, like, challenge you a bit. And it can be, it can be a bit of a dialogue, it’s not like, ‘You’re wrong, we do it this way,’ kind of thing.
Maybe a consideration on this one is like, tools like this, especially with acronyms or like things with a few steps can sound kind of robotic and can feel like you’re being talked to through a tool. So it can be helpful to like, personalise it and just use it as a skeleton, but like, add your own personal touches to it.
SAMI
This is a thing that we do a lot on anti raids stalls, this form of response comes up a lot for the weird-ass stuff that people sometimes say to you, when you’re standing on the street for two hours.
ALI
SAMI
Go on Ali, it looks like you’re gonna say something.
ALI
SAMI
But as we’ve talked about, in other episodes, like that’s not the structure of all conflict, sometimes a conflict can be more something that’s bubbling under the surface or a conflict can be more something to do with like, a clash between different values playing out in how people are operating within the group, rather than like, a pitched a pitched argument in a meeting.
So, imagine a scenario where you’re in a meeting and like, the vibe of the meeting is just a bit off. It’s a bit weird, like you feel a little bit uncomfortable in space, but there’s no like, there’s no argument that’s happening. And this isn’t the first time the vibe has been off. The last meeting, the vibe was also a little bit off. And like, there’s just some there’s something going on, that feels like there could be some kind of like, an unsaid conflict happening under the surface.
And so what we suggested, what we suggest could be a good intervention in this scenario, is something going back to that ‘name, frame, pause’ idea that maybe a slightly enhanced version of like named frame pause. Which we’ve written in our notes as, ‘enhanced name-frame-pause’, so please, if you do have a, if there’s a name for this, please let us know because this is a terrible name.
So that could be because often the, the challenge with the name-frame-pause, like we said before, is the bringing, bringing a framing can be quite difficult when there is a problem where it’s a little bit vague or what’s going on. And it’s a little bit harder to grasp, like what are the dynamics that are at play here? And so what we’re suggesting that you could enhance in a situation like this is find a way of enhancing that naming and framing by potentially talking to somebody else and trying to talk through and work through this problem.
Because it could be for example, there’s – when there’s less individualised problems, like for example, there’s a disagreement around what how the group allocates resources to certain things, like it’s come up in a meeting where people haven’t really addressed it or whatever. Like, that’s a lot harder to conceptualise what’s happening than like, these two people are arguing because like this person wants the flyer to be red and the other doesn’t want the flyer to be red or whatever, which is a lot more simple.
So what’s what could what could what could an intervention be of this form? Ali?
ALI
So an intervention might be, as Sami said: find someone else who you think might be sympathetic and share your feelings to explain why it keeps happening. Maybe you want to reflect on a question like, why is our group not are already dealing with this issue. And some examples might be not enough time, not enough people, different priorities to this particular thing. And then together, you could think of a way to bring it up in another meeting, in a meeting,
So be like, oh, yeah, I feel like the vibes were a bit weird in the last meeting, when we postponed the chat about care once again. It feels like we’re worried about how much capacity we have to do this. And I think we should have an explicit chat about this. What do you think? And then have that as like a, you know, big point on the agenda or even a meeting on its own for that kind of that topic. Yeah.
SAMI
So, for example, we talked in the last episode around that question of: when do you intervene? Do you intervene in the moment? Do you intervene with a conversation with the person afterwards? Like, do you decide not to intervene, because you think it’s not worthwhile etc.
And a lot of these interventions like name, frame and pause, or like using VERA in a discussion would also work and like talking to somebody one on one after the meeting, that’s not the scenarios we gave.
And similarly, this like, kind of enhanced name, frame and pause could work in other scenarios where like, maybe you took somebody in the break of a meeting and like, use them to like help flesh out what is like a name and frame that you could bring as an intervention, when you come back from the break, or whatever it is. They’re all relatively multipurpose.
ALI
SAMI
And I think we kind of touched on this before, but like, often people, when it comes to there being situations of like conflict, whether like, active or under the surface in groups, what people really, from our experience, seem to want is like, what is the magic bullet intervention? What is the one thing that you can do, which means that everything’s magically fine and not difficult to deal with.
And the sad update that we have is, at least to our knowledge, there is no fancy Magic Bullet intervention. And all of these things are basically just different forms of: ‘note that the conflict is happening, and create space to try and process it and deal with it as a group.’ They’re all just different variants of that as a as an approach.
And so there’s probably loads of other ways that you maybe naturally through your lived experiences of like having disagreements with people or like managing conflict in like family dinners, or whatever it is. Maybe you’ll have lots of other ways that you can also like approach these kind of situations. This is not to say that these are the only limited ones.
But everything, probably when it comes to conflict in groups, the TL;DR is like, try and, try and hold whatever conflict it is as a group rather than individually.
And maybe that doesn’t mean everyone’s spending all time on it all the time. Like, it doesn’t necessarily mean having a whole group meeting, and everyone talking about it for every scenario, but it shouldn’t be individuals where possible, if like, unless that is part of a pre agreed group process. If that makes sense.
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
If you want to find out more about Resist+Renew as a training and facilitation collective, check out our website, resistrenew.com or on all the socials.
And if you want to support the production of this podcast, you can do so at patreon.com/resistrenew.
That’s it for this week. Thanks for listening and catch you next time. Bye bye!
Season 2 episode 12 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we talk about how to deal with conflict in the moment where it spikes up, using a frame called an “OODA loop”.
‘Conflict doesn’t have to be fighting or loud. It can be a stickiness, or a tenseness that our body is picking up on.’
Why this is a useful frame: intervening in conflict situations can feel difficult; it is easier when you do these steps first!.
In the “Observe” step, a few things to look for:
In the “Orient” step, a few questions to reflect on:
In the “Decide” step, a few areas to consider:
In the “Act” step… good luck! More on potential interventions next week…
Other resources on OODA loops as a model:
And finally, some perennial resources:
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
But yeah, so the this like this OODA Loop, like to imagine it, as like a circle with Observe, Orient Describe Act as like a set of steps that you’ll go through when deciding to do something in some kind of like conflictual situation or other type of situation. And so and I think just breaking out those distinct steps is probably quite helpful.
Like, often when there is a conflict, you will have a step of, like, trying to work out what’s going on, which is like maybe an observation step; which maybe has a question around it, like how do you know that there is a conflict happening? Like, what is the signal that tells you that?
There’s something about orienting, which is like, kind of digesting what you’re observing. And like, thinking about how to structure that information. So having a bit of think about like, what is the information that you want to try and, like, pay attention to and like, all those kinds of questions.
So: Decide is the next one which is… So like, this one’s probably the one the least relevant to this, because deciding and acting probably for this kind of equivalent. And then so like, then the question is like, so what, How are you going to act? Now? How exactly is that going to take shape? So like, when are you going to act? How are you going to act? What you’re going to say? And questions like that.
So what we’re going to do in this episode is probably less, because this is more of like, this is a frame like a way of thinking we’re not suggesting you should use this as a tool in your group. But it’s more: this is a useful frame, maybe, to help think of what some questions, what some areas that will generate some questions around are some things that you can reflect on, when there is a conflict happening, that you’re participating in, witnessing, etc.
So, first question is maybe is so like, how would you know that there is a conflict happening? Who wants to take that one?
ALI
But it could be also completely the opposite. And people go really silent, go quiet, might leave, might never come back to your group or meeting. So yeah: both ends of the spectrum there could be a signal.
KATHERINE
ALI
ALI
SAMI
So there are some a few questions that you could think of around some like I guess frames or lenses you could use to analyse what’s happening. So for example, like who is involved in this, like spark, and who isn’t? And thinking about what it means to be involved. Like, who’s visibly involved? Does it seem like there are people that are like not visibly involved in that they’re maybe not in this spark that’s happening, but maybe you think they’re, they have some kind of involvement, maybe outside of this discussion, space, whatever.
Thinking about, like, what the different kind of like roles people occupying are, maybe in like a formal sense in a group. You know, like, if they’re the treasurer, and it’s an argument about money or whatever, like, maybe the roles will be relevant. And but also, like, in a more general sense, like, what kind of like positions they’re taking, like rank and power and questions like that in the space.
And there’s maybe some, like more meta, there’s sort of like quite practical ones, of like, things you may be noticing, but there’s probably also some, like meta conversations around that, which is around like, like, having a think about like, Why do you think this information’s coming out now? Like, is, do you have a space to process conflict? And that didn’t go to that one? In which case why? Or do you feel like this is erupting now, because people don’t have another place to mention it? Things like that. So there are some thoughts. Any other ones that are relevant under that?
ALI
So: that is a few different questions around orienting and organising the information, and then thinking about what you need to know, to decide what to do. So I guess next comes like, how are you going to decide?
KATHERINE
So, one option is never: you’re never going to address it. And thinking about like, what’s good or bad about engaging or not engaging, and that sometimes it can be good to not engage. So although you might automatically feel like well, never addressing a conflict is awful. Sometimes, actually, it’s a good idea not to, and there can be some reasons for that.
So one might be because you’d mess up an existing process, like if there’s already an ongoing conflict process, intervening in that moment, could disrupt that other process that’s being held separately. Potentially because it’s very low consequence. And if we dealt with every, every spark that emerged, potentially, in some groups, we would never do anything else.
And then I guess there were some less good, but maybe understandable reasons why you might not address it at all, potentially, because you’re scared in that situation. You might be fearful for yourself or for others in the group. And potentially, because you hope that someone else who knows the people involved better would deal with it. So it’s almost a sense of like, ‘Am I the best person?’ and wanting to pass it on. So there are other options in terms of when you might want to deal with it. I’m just wondering if someone else wants to speak to, to those?
ALI
It might be a good idea to do that if dealing with it in the moment might actually cause more escalation and you want you don’t want to encourage that. Might also be less shaming. I guess it’s like, using the frame of using the term like ‘calling out,’ like calling someone out and saying like, ‘That wasn’t a good thing you just did’ in front of everyone can be quite embarrassing for people and cause people to get defensive or even double down and say ‘No, actually, what I’m doing is fine.’ And you might have a more dialogue, if you do it outside the space.
It might also be good if like, there might be consequences to not addressing it, but it’s not super urgent and doesn’t feel like the consequences are, need, it just doesn’t feel like it like needs addressing right now. And it can still be dealt with later.
And then another one might be just related to the shaming one. Like if someone is new to the group, it can be, it can be really like alienating to be ‘told off’ in your first or few first few interactions with a group. So like, having a more gentle conversation with someone outside of that space could be much more welcoming and make people feel like they can can get involved, can make mistakes, but still stick around. What about some less good ideas about doing it later? Anyone got something the want to bring in there?
SAMI
And yeah, so some reasons why it could be less of a good idea to address stuff later and separately, could be when you think it would be useful to it’ll be more useful to not do that, i.e., for example, to discuss stuff all as a group together rather than like later in, in separate conversations.
So, kind of links that question of like, does it feel like this is like kind of a separate not core to the group type thing when based on your observations? Or does this feel like kind of a fundamental one that actually needs to be like a discussion with everybody? Could be, for example, if you think it is really like relevant to the chat at hand. So it’s not something that’s like, oh, we can postpone this conversation to later because it does feel like for example, a fundamental values challenge that would block us from being able to make the decision that we’re trying to make, and that’s where the conflict is happening. So like, we kind of need to address address it now to be able to do the things we want to do.
Or maybe another one is that it could be if it’s something where like, it could derail the meeting, if you don’t address it, because the problem could keep coming up. Maybe an example being like, people getting people’s pronouns wrong in a meeting. Yeah, maybe it would be preferable for the person who’s used someone’s pronouns incorrectly in a meeting. But if your meeting’s two hours long, and they’re gonna keep doing it, it’s probably less embarrassing to mention it to them now, even if it is in front of everyone, rather than be like, You made this mistake seven times in the last two hours at the end of the meeting, which could kind of feel worse.
And so, so, so how, how could you – So I guess we’re talking within the context of like, maybe having separate chats with people later. So if we do if you do decide it is more of a good idea than not a good idea, how could you do that? What could you do to take that forward?
KATHERINE
And potentially just seeing how they are, seeing if they need anything, seeing what what might be a next step. One question that I’ve heard asked to someone who’s maybe being harmed in the space is like, ‘What does justice look like for you next?’ and then seeing what arises from for that person.
And if a process does exist for the group around conflict more generally, that might be a moment to be able to point people towards a pre existing process. So those are some of the things that you could do if you’re wanting to address a conflict after after it’s happened. Yeah, so I think then, we’re sort of sort of starting to point towards, what what would you do in in the moment, as it were, if you wanted to address it there and then I’m just wondering if people have thoughts on, on what you would do if you didn’t do it later or never: you do it now.
SAMI
KATHERINE
So then we move on to the: What do you say or do if you want to go beyond naming it? And it feels like this is, there are a few options here that we could kind of share.
One would be taking a pause, figuring out how you want to move forward, potentially, based on if there was a group agreement, if there is a conflict process that exists, whatever that might be. It could be checking in with the group about what’s going on for people and kind of asking some questions and eliciting feedback from the group around what’s happening and maybe what people need.
And then I think there’s also something around hearing what people need and then trying to respond to that in the moment. So an example from a session that I was in a few years ago was that the group wanted an accountability process in the space there and then to react to the harm that had happened in that space. We didn’t have a pre existing accountability process. So it was working with the group, live, to try and work out: well, what does accountability mean in this space? It means hearing from everybody. It means acknowledgement of harm. It means apologising. It means sharing: ‘what next?’ and what, what kind of consequences might need to be taken, which we kind of riffed on the spot. But it was a response to what was emerging in the group.
So these are just some of the options of things that you could do in the moment, if you’re wanting to try and deal with conflict now. But all of these things feel like quite a lot bigger chat, than we have time for. So we decided that we’re gonna add an additional episode, where we’ll go into these what you do in the moment in a lot more depth.
ALI
And then that’s like, offering a bit of a reflection back to people. And then they can confirm or challenge what your interpretation is. So that’s like an opportunity to let the whole group or let other people like, come in and give perspectives on it. But yeah, more of that in the next episode! But shall we, shall we have some top takeaways on our loops of OODA?
SAMI
KATHERINE
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
If you want to find out more about Resist+Renew as a training and facilitation collective, check out our website, resistrenew.com or on all the socials.
And if you want to support the production of this podcast, you can do so at patreon.com/resistrenew.
That’s it for this week. Thanks for listening and catch you next time. Bye bye!
Season 2 episode 11 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we talk about a model to understand some different positions that exist in conflicts.
‘This tool forces you to think about what it would be like for you to be in any of these different roles: having caused harm, having been harmed and having witnessed harm. We often don’t want to think about the possibility of ever causing harm.’
Why this is a useful frame: these different positions have different needs; all of us could occupy any of these positions at any one time.
Some links to things mentioned in the episode:
And finally, some perennial resources:
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
And this is a way of like thinking about conflict in general, but also like a tool that you can use. So, like always, we’re going to think about some pros and cons and like, do a little summary at the end. So, Katherine, what are we talking about?
KATHERINE
So the purpose of the tool is to highlight that there are a range of needs, they’re not all going to be the same whatever role you’re in. So for example, if you are the person who has witnessed harm, you might need to have someone check in with you. Or you might need to have some time to process what you’ve seen, or you might need something else.
And then it also highlights the specific needs specific people might have in a group. So if conflict does emerge, you have a bit of a sense as a facilitator, what people in your group might need. Also just want to name that this idea of a triangle in conflict is often used in other scenarios. So the idea of a ‘Drama Triangle’ in maybe more specifically abusive settings, where you have the perpetrator, the rescuer, and the victim roles, is something that this this kind of model is drawing on. So I think, at this point, it’d be really helpful to maybe ground this in an example. So Ali, do you want to talk to us about a time when you’ve used this tool?
ALI
So the course was called Exploring Collective Liberation. It was kind of all weekend exploring ideas around anti oppression, and specifically around anti racism. And at the beginning of the weekend, we did that whole thing of like saying, kind of, the intention for the space, kind of went into some variation of like, group agreements. And we also wanted to talk about how we would, what we would want if conflict did emerge in the space. And I don’t think it did, but it was a space for thinking about what we’d want.
So basically, at the beginning of the other weekend, we just got people in groups, and each group had a piece of paper. And it said, What would you need if you were dot, dot, dot, and that dot, dot dot might be followed by ‘someone who caused harm,’ ‘someone who witnessed harm,’ or ‘someone who was harmed.’ And then we just rotated those bits of paper around. And it was just a good way to Yeah, as, as we’ve said already about this, this tool is just about thinking, like, what needs are there, everybody in these positions will have needs. And it’s helpful to like, surface them from the beginning and think, what might what might we want to do about conflicts if it were to happen. So that’s what we did.
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
ALI
SAMI
KATHERINE
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
And, yeah, related to like that depth of where you want to go, like Katherine share- shared at the beginning, a little minute ago. Maybe if you’re in a longer standing group, maybe you want to be more specific and talk about particular kinds of harm. And that could be more helpful.
SAMI
KATHERINE
So it could be that when harm happens, some people really need there to be a pause, and for there to be a break and a breather, whereas other people really need it to be dealt with and named and framed in the moment. And for there not to be a pause. And there has to then be a choice point.
So I think this tool to deal with that challenge needs maybe a bit of an additional stage around a decision or an agreement among the group around if harm of some kind maybe specifically named levels of harm are happening in the group. ‘This is the path that we’re going to follow and why.’ Otherwise, you’re kind of in the moment as a facilitator having to make a snap judgement across however large the group is number of needs, which can be very challenging if they are divergent from each other.
SAMI
I guess, whilst also acknowledging the point that we’ve made before, around how like, which I think we talked about the safest places policies, things (there’ so many links between the episodes this season!) and around the difficulty for making like, rules that are totally ungrounded from specificities and context, and how that can be a challenge. And how often stuff does need to be a little bit reactive.
KATHERINE
SAMI
KATHERINE
SAMI
So I think for me, the top takeaway is that like, I think especially when you’re talking about like quite general, like notions of harm, I think it can be a bit limiting. And that can be like a challenge. So I think for example, it’s if you’re planning an event, then talk about like, what if people like, say shitty things like harass each other at the event. If you’re talking like if you work in something like domestic violence, then like being really specifically talking about like, interpersonal abuse, things like that. So like, make sure that it’s matches the context that you’re working in, and isn’t too general.
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
KATHERINE
ALI
If you want to find out more about Resist+Renew as a training and facilitation and collective check out our website, resistrenew.com, or on all the socials. And if you want to support the production of this podcast, you can do so at patreon.com/resistrenew. That’s it for this week. Thanks for listening and catch you next time. Bye bye.
Season 2 episode 10 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we interview Elio. They organise with SWARM (a UK-based collective founded and led by sex workers who believe in self-determination, solidarity and co-operation) and are a branch organiser for United Voices of the World (UVW, a grassroots trade union of low paid, migrant & precarious workers and we fight the bosses for dignity and respect through direct action on the streets and through the courts!).
“Our focus is less on convincing the outside world that sex workers deserve dignity, and [more on] providing dignity to sex workers”
SWARM: community building, community resourcing
UVW sex worker organising: helping to organise sex workers as workers
Decriminalised Futures: popular education, arts
Some other projects:
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
So, let’s get into the let’s get into the chat. Elio, what is that political contexts that like sex workers, and the groups that you’re linked in with are organising within like in the UK today?
ELIO
So selling the act of selling sex and buying sex, for the most part is you’re allowed to do it, it’s legal, it’s fine. No one’s gonna stop you from doing it. But a lot of the, I guess, the infrastructure around those things is criminalised. So, brothel keeping, which can you know, range from someone who owns a building and they have lots of people that work there and you don’t have to give them a percentage to work there or could be just two workers working together for safety in the most part, you know, so you’re not working alone, that counts as ‘brothel keeping’ and it’s criminalised.
There’s laws around ‘control for gain’ which are criminalised, which is you know, meant to stop like, what is kind of understood as the ‘evil pimp’, with the workers that they’re exploiting, and they’re ‘controlling them for gain’; but often ends up affecting people like if a sex worker has a flat and they have a cleaner, or if they have a security guard or if they have a driver. Or if they have a partner whose rent they’re paying. All of these things kind of are criminalised under the laws affecting sex workers in the UK.
So I think for most sex worker organisations and groups, the things that they’re really concerned with on there kind of the, in terms of an organising or political activity is around those laws and how they affect affect sex workers in a day to day way. And so that’s why the kind of key movement for sex workers is the movement for full decriminalisation: the removal of any criminal laws relating to the sex industry or to sex workers.
Which just you know, give the addendum isn’t mean that like, exploitation is suddenly like, ‘Let’s go!’ Or like that rape is suddenly like, you know, legal; or like that violence towards sex workers is fine. It just says that for most sex workers, their day to day lives at work are going to be better if you remove the laws that criminalise their labour, and their work practices.
So yeah, I don’t know, I think for me, that’s the main political context and sort of the broader, the broader scheme of things. And then I think in like a kind of more like, talking about the left or something-level, it’s, the political context is trying to like, over the last, I don’t know, few years? SWARM have, like, SWARM who are group I’m involved in, I think we said that the beginning, you know, have been around for over 10 years now. And over that time, you’ve seen a shift in like, I wasn’t involved 10 years ago, but you’ve seen a shift in how people think about and talk about sex work and sex workers on the left, and there used to be an increased level of hostility. And now you’re seeing that sex workers are welcomed into more political groups, understood as being part of movements, often understood as being like at the sharp end of like, a lot of criminalization and a lot of laws and the ways in which sex workers are impacted is, you know, a bit of a ‘canary in the coal mine’ as people like to say, of how other groups and other networks and other people are going to be affected.
And so there’s a I think, a lot stronger connection to sex work and to sex workers, as being movements to like, organise around. So I think in terms of the political context that sex workers are organising in, that’s really key: this like shifting attitude towards recognising sex workers as comrades rather than as like, ‘victims out in the cold who kind of we try and ignore because it’s a complicated issue.’ Yeah, and that’s my answer.
SAMI
And so it sounds, so I think, what’s what’s coming across to me in that is that, like, sex work is like the like the sex worker struggle, I guess, for want of a better way of phrasing it, is like really embedded, and like linked to a lot of the other struggles that like the left is more recognised as organising within.
And, and so like, I think part of the reason (this is my take, and maybe not necessarily that useful) but like, part of the reason that I think there has been a lot of like a larger increase in sex worker solidarity on like ‘the left’, I think it’s partly to do with the work that like SWARM and its previous instantiation, or whatever of like, Sex Workers Open University did in terms of like, doing a lot of like, link building with a lot of other groups.
But I think is also because people are like seeing sex work as like, in a really practical sense, just linked in with other struggles, like I do a lot of stuff around like immigration raids, and it’s hard to talk about immigration rates without like thinking about like, like high profile immigration raids on brothels, because like, it’s just so often one of the most visible aspects of like, immigration enforcement. And I think that’s true of loads of stuff. Like if you work on homelessness, if you’re work on drug use, if you work on migration, if you work on whatever. Like, there’s just such clear links with, like, the struggles that like sex workers are living within, and so much of that is linked to criminalisation.
ELIO
But for me, sex work, sex worker organising is such a, as a central site for the ways in which so much of that stuff all connects up. And it’s why it’s so important to organise on those issues, or to centre sex workers of, you know, various different experiences in the kind of organising or politics that you do. Because if you establish better conditions for sex workers in the world, then that will like, you know, that’s going to establish better conditions for a lot of people. There was something else you said as well, that made me think of something, but I just don’t remember what it was.
SAMI
ELIO
And something that we’re doing at the moment, we’re recording in October. So we’ve been doing this series called Lady of the Night School as part of Decriminalised Futures, which is like an education course. And you can sign up and there’s lectures and seminars and readings. And it’s a way of kind of trying to focus in on issues that are related to sex worker struggles, and sex worker organising. But other things that maybe we don’t always get to go as deep into, because I think a lot of sex worker, public facing political work has to be very introductory, has to be trying to convince people like ‘this is why you should be interested in this. This is, here’s some basic arguments, here’s the legal models internationally. And this is why you should think about it,’ and Decriminalised Futures are kind of try to take the opportunity to be like, let’s really get into some specific stuff.
But the first session is talking about a history of criminalization in the UK in terms of in relation to sex work. And it was a lecture that we had a lecture that was done by this woman called Dr. Julia Laite, who’s really amazing. She’s at Birkbeck, and she talked about some of the history of how sex work was criminalised.
And she has quotes from 1922. So like 100 years ago, talking about the conditions that sex workers were facing, and also the political struggles that surrounded it. And what you see at the time is loads of like suffragettes loads of like early feminist organisers, were like, you know, you need to decriminalise sex work, because even though we’re like morally against it, that’s what’s gonna make the conditions for these people better and this is what should happen. And so the people that were the feminists who were the ‘saviours’ who were there, like well offs, not always, but sometimes, like wealthy women like this is their cause that they’re taking up. They’re on the side of decriminalisation and they’re in that fight.
Whereas nowadays, what you see is those people who tend to fit into that category are the ones who are arguing in favour of the Nordic model, which is, you know, a legal model that sex workers argue is very harmful to their working conditions. And who, are tend to be kind of in the opposition, opposition opposition, but they kind of present that oppositional position as being like their ‘natural position’ like, “Oh, we’ve always been against this. And like, you know, being in favour of sex worker rights is like the brand new thing,” but actually supporting decriminalisation and supporting sex workers is the position that has has been the longer term one. It’s the one that like people have, like, you know, changed from because of, you know, changing understandings of what it means to be a feminist.
Anyway, I’m kind of going off on one, but just what I mean is that like this connection, and like, this understanding of criminalization is something that people who are engaged in political movements have had for a long time; and then it kind of dips and wanes, how people know and understand it. And in the UK, particularly over the last 10, 20, 30 years, it’s groups like the English Collective of Prostitutes, who have done amazing political campaigning work to really fight for the rights of sex workers and to really push like that being important and central and maintaining that as being a like an integral part of like leftist organising.
SAMI
ELIO
ALI
ELIO
ALI
You mentioned stuff around how SWARM and other sex worker organisations are fighting for, like better, better conditions. Do you want to elaborate a bit more on like, what are these organisations about what you’re trying to achieve? And how are you going about it?
ELIO
And so SWARM have kind of had a little bit more space to be like, we’re not having to constantly just do policy work and fight to be like, get basic, like legal dignity, we’re able to turn a little bit more to focus purely on community and building up our community and doing services and resources for that are, you know, for the community who are, who are connected to SWARM and most impacted.
And, you know, doing that in a way that is focused on mutual aid. So it’s not like, oh, like, it’s a just a bunch of, you know, SWARM is very much a mixture of people who are sex workers and non sex and allies, non sex working allies who are kind of supporting that work to happen.
And creating, not kind of imagining the sex worker as this abstract person who no one’s ever really met, but you know they’re really victimised and they just need support and resources. And these people have decided what they’re going to be, and they’re going to provide them. But it’s very much led by sex workers knowing what they want, saying what they want, and putting that stuff in place, in a very much the context of mutual aid, where it’s not just, Oh this organisation gives you things, and now you have done but it recognises that as being part of a wider sex working community, or supporting sex workers. That it’s an exchange of like, this is a community that supports itself and supports each other.
I’m not sure if I’ve said that very well. But hopefully, like, you kind of get the idea of what I’m trying to say of like this, this SWARM is kind of focused on building community and supporting sex workers of all different kinds across the UK in lots of different ways.
And I’m gonna just talk a little bit about maybe just about, I guess, how we imagine doing that, I guess, or what the organisation is about is that it’s kind of the right moment to do that?
ALI
ELIO
And you saw a lot of people who, you know, like, oh, it was like, Oh, go on Universal Credit. But a lot of sex workers, you know, were already on Universal Credit. And that wasn’t sufficient for like their living needs. And so doing sex work was a way to like top up, and suddenly, they kind of lost that top up. And were having to survive on an amount of money that was insufficient, or, like, just didn’t have their lives or their whatever, together enough to be able to deal with Universal Credit and deal with those kind of like logistical practicalities, or people who have no recourse to public funds, for whatever reason. And so sex work was how they survived. And now suddenly, that was gone, and they had no other way to have any money.
So there were a lot of ways in which people were affected, particularly like sex workers were affected by the pandemic. And so SWARM set up a mutual hardship fund, which basically fundraise money and gave it away to individual sex workers. So that they had like a little bit of a cushion to be able to get through a lot of the time that was like, going towards just putting like gas on the metre, so you can get through the rest of the month, or like just quite, you know, simple things that were just all that people needed just to get through that month, where they kind of dealt with the sudden change to their circumstances, either because they ran out of the tiny bit of savings they had or they were like, Okay, I’ve got no money now, and I need to do this.
So we raised and gave away like, I’m gonna say it wrong, because I looked at them in a while, about like, a quarter of a million pounds to like sex workers across the UK. And it was like, over 1000 sex workers, like got a payment. And all of that money was raised through private donations. So just people being like, Yeah, this is important to do, I’m going to give money towards it. And that was like a really amazing thing to do.
It was quite a lot of work for everybody who was involved in it, but it was, you know, really, really important because I think it sustained so many people. Like, it was a lifesaver for people just to get that little bit of money right when they needed it. And you also had like talking on the phone to sex workers across the UK who would, you know, be a bit suspicious like: ‘Why are you giving me this money?’ Because sex workers are not used to someone helping them out just because they’re a sex worker. They’re used to people being like, a lot more negative because they’re a sex worker. And so being like, ‘Oh, you’re like, one of me, and you’ve arranged this stuff, and you’re giving me money so that I can get by?’
Like, you know, it was just kind of an interesting, like, community building exercise of like really connecting with people who had never really spoken to other sex workers that much, or had only spoken to people about being a sex worker in the context of getting a service from people who were like, that’s their paid job. So actually speaking to people who are in community with them, who have been like, ‘No, we want to make sure you’re okay,’ was like quite a powerful thing.
And it made us think a lot about like, how do we keep building these strong community networks? So that when things happen, that people feel connected up in these ways? And how do we keep creating spaces where sex workers can meet with other sex workers and feel connected? And how do we do that in a way that’s like, where our work is voluntary, it’s reciprocal, you know, it prioritises exchanges of support and resources, while understanding that support and resources looks different depending on who the person giving or taking or, you know, receiving, maybe it’s a nice way to say that. You know, we’re really against the idea of one way giving, but also not like you have to jump through these hoops in order to get something from us. It’s about: by being a member of this community you are giving. And just like really focusing on, like, kind of building some of those connections, building solidarity, so supporting each other in the work that we do. And doing that, because we support the movement for our collective liberation, and that we’re dedicated to creating a better world for sex workers, and thinking still about public messaging and education. But our focus is less on convincing the outside world that sex workers deserve dignity, and providing dignity to sex workers who are connected to swarm and wider sex worker communities.
And using some of the funding that we’ve gotten through donations, and the ongoing funding that we get from people to do that work, because now there’s less need for the hardship fund, you know, people aren’t, there aren’t as many people in that kind of immediate crisis, which is good, which is what we want! We don’t want people to be in crisis. But then how do we build towards being able to respond to when there’s another crisis? Because there’s always another crisis.
And so thinking about building up like, grants to using that money and giving it to sex workers, not just because, oh, you’re in a crisis, and so you’re having a difficult moment, but being like, ‘Oh, you have a creative project that you want to do, or you have a zine that you want to make, or you have a thing to do, that’s going to like connect up the community. And that’s going to talk about your experiences of sex work in the UK and connect with other sex workers’ and kind of putting some of the funds towards stuff that builds community, doesn’t just like rescue community. And doing it in ways that are based around like, shared geographic locations, shared identities, shared experience, and just really thinking about how we can think about the different types of sex workers that are in the UK and how we can support them doing like… is this, kind of, am I meant to kind of talk a bit about some of the stuff we do? Am I going into too much detail? I love a bit of detail. So if I’m like, going to into the nitty gritties –
ALI
ELIO
And just doing the stuff to be like, what knowledge do we have in this wider community? What knowledge do we have in people who are like supportive of the community and want to share it in ways that are like really respectful and supportive rather than like condescending? And how can we build up this up?
We’ve had to connect a project, the Dial Tone project, which is like phones, for sex workers, you need them, you know, sex workers often need a second phone so that their clients don’t have their private or personal number. Particularly, you know, sex workers might only want to, might only end up doing sex work for a year. And they don’t want in two years, some guy to be calling them because he still has that private number. You know, it’s just like, it’s both like a short term thing of like, oh, that helps to work and also like a long term thing of like thinking about how you get to navigate through the world.
And so kind of providing these resources that are direct to the work. And we’ve done you know, this healthcare project, with doing vaccines for sex workers through the pandemic, where sex workers, you know, kind of need a priority vaccine because they have that direct contact with people more often. But can’t necessarily go on to the government website and be like, there’s no category that says, ‘Oh, are you a prostitute? Thus you get to like book your vaccine earlier.’ So being like, oh, we’ll create these networks where that there are confidential, that places that people can go and get access to these things that they need, without having to necessarily have it written on their NHS record like something that they maybe don’t want people to know. Or they don’t want their GP, like in five years or 10 years to be able to see because that’s not what they do. And because they like it, you know, like maybe you can think of all the reasons why people who are like in certain positions might need access to a vaccine programme that’s aimed specifically at them.
Anyway, we do lots of other stuff like in terms of SWARM, like research papers, and like continuing the hardship fund, trying to create these projects, and I guess, like, what was the original question? What was your organisation about like SWARM as an organisation is very much about that community support community building, community resourcing kind of not in contrast.
But like slightly different to that is: so I’m a branch organiser for the United Sex Workers branch in UVW. And I just support the members of that branch to organise around issues that affect them. And that’s slightly different to SWARM because SWARM is very much about that community connection. Whereas UVW and USW is about workers rights.
And so what issues people are facing at work, whether it be the strip club they work in, or potentially brothel they work in or as a full service, sex worker who works independently or privately, or maybe someone who works online, you know, there’s all these kind of different sectors of sex work and different workplace issues that can come up. And it can be like a very unique thing, because some of those issues are ones that are really hard to navigate.
Because if you have an issue with your boss at your brothel, there’s no like that, that’s a criminal workplace. So you can’t go to tribunal and be like, my boss did this. But you also probably like can’t go to the police because the police would come – in like an ideal world – the police would be like, “Oh, I’ve never I never knew there was a brothel here, can you believe it? Who would have who would have thunk that this like workplace existed, we better go and like rescue those poor women!” and then they would shut it down. And so your issue with your boss then becomes a closure of your workplace and then no way to earn income.
So like, how do you kind of support sex workers in those situations with those workplace issues within the context of what is criminal and what their legal rights are? And in strip clubs, you know, the UVW won a case to say that strippers dancers in strip clubs are workers. You know, it was recognised that that is that person that is a category of worker and that, just because, you know, people have these stigmatised attitudes, it doesn’t mean that that person isn’t a worker in a workplace with who deserves workers rights.
And so often it’s responding to issues around that. So I think that’s kind of different because it’s very much like people will join UVW or USW because they’re, they understand themselves as a worker who maybe has workers issues or who wants to be in solidarity with other workers in a really specific way.
And a lot of our cases are around unfair dismissal or people needing to be able to claim sick pay or holiday pay. Sometimes people get fired because of like union organising because, like, even more than other industries, sometimes bosses who employ sex workers or strippers or dancers or other types of sex workers are like kind of outraged that they would dare unionise because they see them as like a group that can be taken advantage of because of the like social attitudes towards sex workers.
So there’s all these different ways that sex workers are impacted at work, and UVW does organising around that. And also there’s a lot of organising around licencing for sexual entertainment venues in the UK. Over the last like three to four years, we’ve seen this big uptickin so called feminist campaigners trying to get sexual entertainment venues so strip clubs around the UK closed down because they say it’s like causes violence, and it’s exploitation and it’s bad for women.
And you see all these people who work in strip clubs being like, why are you trying to close my workplace, I mean, make it so that I can’t earn any money? Like, what they want is for those vendors to be able to stay open, but for the workers rights that they have, and for the the conditions in those workplaces to be improved. And it’s hard to fight your boss to have the conditions in your workplace improved when you’re having to fight with your boss to keep your workplace open. And then to even feel like all like you’re kind of grateful to your boss that they’ve kept employing you rather than like actually you’re a worker who’s able to advocate for your rights.
So UVW kind of has a slightly different angle in terms of like, how it’s supporting and connecting with like sex worker rights movements in the UK, and I think those are very complementary because it creates space for each other. The more organisations you have advocating around sex workers’ rights and more space that you have for those organisations to focus on what feels really important to them. Yeah, that’s fine as an answer.
ALI
ELIO
ALI
You’ve used the word like organising a few times and I’m wondering if like is there a specific way that you mean that in those different contexts? Like, for SWARM is organising is building the community organising in itself, and that’s where it goes and in UVW is organising a different thing? Like, I feel like it’s a word that people throw around in groups and can mean quite specific things and I think you’re pointing to different aspects of it.
ELIO
You know, I think a lot of organising and certainly organising and other organisations, I’m a part of is about: someone comes who knows things and gathers people who care about a thing to get them to achieve something in relation to that, whether it’s like around housing, or their workplace or their whatever.
But SWARM is not that kind of top down. You know, there isn’t someone who’s the organiser, who knows there’s people who are like, being led by the community saying things that they want and need. And people are being organised to be able to spend time together to build community. You know, sex work for a lot of sex workers is a very isolating industry, people feel very alone. The political context means people feel very alone. And it’s really powerful for people to be able to spend time together and to share information, share resources, and just share a sense of like, ‘Oh, I understand what your experiences is like.’ And that can often look very different to what is publicly facing, you know, what people have to say in public is different from what they’re able to say in private to each other, particularly in a political context where like, there’s this very anti-sex worker sentiment. What I would call anti sex worker sentiment. If a sex worker expresses publicly like that they’ve experienced violence at work, they don’t know if that’s just going to be used by someone to say, “well see, that’s why the industry should be abolished.” So this is real kind of policing, on what people are able to say publicly about their conditions and their experiences. And so creating those private spaces where people can, can share about what those experiences are, and how they feel about them, and what they think should be done about them is, is really important. But it’s not organising people to be like, ‘okay, you’ve, you’ve thought of this, and now you have to go and do this.’ And, you know, me, Elio, or something, as the organiser is gonna come and help you do that. It’s literally just kind of like being responsive to what people say, and trying to create things that are sex worker led and sex worker supportive.
In UVW, it’s very different because my job is, you know, to organise this branch and to be like, Okay, there’s these workplace issues that come up, and I’m gonna, you know, turn to other people who are within the union who have knowledge about workplace issues. And I’m going to turn to members who have knowledge about sex worker issues, and sex worker workplace issues, you know, they are the experts in what a sex worker workplace looks like.
Even though there’s amazing people and UVW who have incredible knowledge of the law of how unions work of what workers rights are, they don’t always know how that applies in a sex worker workplace, or to sex work issues. So often my job is kind of being the hinge between those two pieces of knowledge and bringing them together in order to be able to like fight cases.
And we also have the benefit of caseworkers within UVW who can like kind of take on specific cases. And then maybe we can turn them into disputes and turn them bigger. But that’s definitely a situation in which I, my perspective on organising is that I try not to go into the branch and be like, ‘Okay, this is what’s going on, and this is what everybody needs to do.’ But to be like, ‘Okay, this seems like the things that you want to achieve. Here’s some ways that maybe we could achieve that. How does that sound? Okay, I’m going to get on with making sure and supporting those things to happen and connecting us up and with these different like resources and knowledge.’ So I think those are two very like different models.
And then you kind of have, I’ll just like kind of refer to it. But Decriminalised Futures, which is another project I run, which isn’t to me organising it’s a project. It’s an art project. It’s a political education project. But part of that political education is to make resources and knowledge and information available both to sex workers and non sex workers, so that they understand the political conditions of sex workers, but also in which sex work is happening. So that they are informed and knowledgeable and confident in being able to to do that work in the wider world.
So it’s kind of like that’s not really organising people to like, do something with the political education they get, but it’s providing it to be available, which I think is again, a different, a different angle on how what organising might look like? Yeah.
SAMI
Like around like, where is the focus around, like trying to support a group, and to achieve whatever it is the group’s objective is type thing, versus how much it is like being the person that has the knowledge that comes in to deliver some knowledge type thing. And like how, like the different tensions and like the pros and cons of those different approaches.
Like I think it’s always a live chat, right? There’s definitely, it’s definitely the feel like organising chat is in the zeitgeist you’d like? Oh, Jane McAlevey. That kind of stuff. I feel like it’s definitely a it’s a series of chats. Right?
ELIO
And I think it’s the same with like unions, in some ways, like a union organiser is that like, if, if workers aren’t being exploited, then what’s the point in, in having a union organiser? I still think it’s a point in having a union and having people connected, but having these professional organisers who go and like help the ‘damaged’ workers, like, take a stand and stuff like that, like, it’s kind of a weird thing, right?
Maybe this is like quite a bad analysis of how unions work or something. And like, obviously, I’m a union, like, you know, I’m talking about experience I have, and I’m not definitely not being like, ‘I’m gonna make sure this dispute goes badly so that workers stay exploited so I keep having a job!’ But like, it is like a kind of weird thing that this this structure of the organiser, where we see it repeated in these different places is kind of like that sort of doesn’t make sense.
SAMI
ELIO
And if you bring in someone, they might be like the best union organiser in the world. But if you put them in a situation with sex workers, where they don’t understand the context of criminalisation for sex workers in the UK, then what they do might not be as effective because they don’t have that knowledge. And they can build that knowledge over time, but it’s because they’re being led by the people rather than they’re leading those people.
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
Like, regardless of what one thinks about it, and like my position has definitely changed over the years, like, I something I said a few years ago, I wouldn’t say any more. But like I think this attitude towards compensation being essential in order to do things and and how that shapes how we think about organising is, you know, good conversation.
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
So for SWARM, we kind of had this list of things that we want, which is, I’m going to just like, say a couple of them, which is: sex workers to feel connected to a national and international community of other workers; sex workers to be able to access spaces of support, action, exchange and learning; to feel supported by accessible resources and services that are relevant and reflective of their needs and lives; the sex worker movement to be one that is closely connected to other movements.
So I think those are sort of like, they’re not quite values, because they’re kind of more like goals, but they reflect the organisation’s values. And I think, like, in thinking about, like, how do you live the values of your outward facing work in your organisation? It’s like, well, we we try and embed this stuff into it.
Like, are you kind of talking about me personally? Or you’re talking about the organisa- like, how did the organisation of the values? Or like, how do we within the organisation as the way we interact with each other? How do we live those values?
SAMI
ELIO
We, you know, if people are like, Oh, I feel fucked this week, and I can’t do this thing. It’s like, oh, that’s fine. Let’s reschedule you know, and it’s not trying to be like, “No, but the funding that we got from whatever organisation says that this has to be done by March 2023. And, you know, you agreed to this.” Like, we’re not trying to be each other’s like, bosses or managers. Sometimes we’ll be like, “dude, like you said, you’d do this,” but like, in a kind of mutual aid, like we’re trying to cooperate and get stuff done and support each other way. But if people have stuff that means things take longer or stuff needs time, or it takes longer to do, like, we’re all humans, animals, it’ll be annoying, but like, it’s about supporting ourselves as to organise in ways that are accessible.
And to be like, actually, if we want this to be an organisation that is sex worker centred, sex workers often have quite chaotic lives, they might need to take a booking without very much notice. Or they might have had a really difficult booking and need to take a week off from having like responsibility, or a cost has come up. And so this week, they need to work flat out as much as they can, and trying to pick up bookings in order to like fund their lives.
And so if you think those are the people that are at the centre of the organisation, the organisation has to reflect those needs, by changing its working and organising practices to take that kind of stuff into consideration. And if the point of the organisation is to build a community of people who are sex workers, and people who are close to or love or care about or are invested in sex worker lives, then our aim isn’t to like get through the task list. Our aim isn’t to make sure that emails are responded to (although, I mean, it’s great when the emails are responded to), but like our aim isn’t to like, get work done. Our aim is to create space for people to feel in community with each other.
And if people feel like, constantly like aggro with each other, then that’s not going to do that. And what’s things that create like that aggro feeling? Stress. And what creates stress? Like, too much work and too much expectation and too much pressure.
So I think in terms of SWARM, like, some of the ways in which working together we try and reflect those values is to kind of remember what it is that we’re prioritising in terms of having this organisation and thinking about that, in terms of the work that we do.
I think in UVW, it’s, I mean, it’s not like different, it’s just there’s maybe different priorities. And I think it’s different in the United Sex Workers than it is in the wider union, you know, because the branch is very specific. And people have really specific relationships to each other, and connections with each other and a different basis for connections to each other. Whereas the wider union, you know, there’s different branches, there’s different relationships, there’s different structures, and there’s different stuff going on. So I feel like I can’t really speak to UVW, and how UVW lives those values.
But I think very much it’s that like, sex work is work, work is bad. Like, the reason we go to work and we’re workers is because, you know, capital wants to exploit our labour in order to create capital. I’m probably saying it wrong, some Marxists are gonna listen to this and be like, “No, no, no, that’s not how it goes.” But you know, like, basically, workers are exploited in order for, and like, we’re kept in a state of exploitation, we have to keep working, so that other people can make money from us.
And so when we’re organising together, when I’m organising with people from the branch, we’re not trying to exploit each other in that way. Like, I’m arriving as a person who’s paid to be in that space, the members of the branch are not paid to be there, they’re paying money. So I’m being respectful of the fact that I kind of work for them and take leadership and guidance from them. But at the same time, they’re respectful of the fact that like, I’m there as a worker, and if I’m like, I can only do this for four hours today. They’re like, okay, like, they’re not going to be like, wait, no, but we need you to do 70 things. Because we, like, you know, there’s that kind of mutual respect and an understanding, you know, an understanding that sex work is work, work is work, work is bad. But, you know, how do we get along? I mean, I think that’s kind of how there’s how the values fit in within the organisations. In terms of how we related to each other, at least.
SAMI
ELIO
But if you just never come to work, then like, that’s not me being like, “Yeah, I’m gonna fight the power by like, never working!” That’s me taking the piss out of people who are trying to organise around, like, quite important issues to them. And so I think there’s also a responsibility that comes with being like, “I’m not a member. So I don’t just get to decide about how much I give, I’m paid. This is my job, and my job is being paid by these people going to work.” And so if sex workers are going to work to earn money to give me to help them get organised, then I have to respect that they’re workers as well. But their work is like how I survive and so I need to, you know? I’m kind of, I just said the same thing three times in a circle, but like, it just feels kind of important, right? Like if you’re in that position of being paid to organise people that you have to be respectful to them and be led by them, including in thinking about what it is that your job is.
ALI
But the way that you were framing that in the community, in the way of like a community of people coming together around the issue of sex work, to take care of each other, to support each other within that. It felt like the way that you were framing it, that it would be harder to do that, it probably still happens, because we all like focus on getting stuff done. And like, have lots of projects and like, want to make sure the stuff happens. But the way that you’re framing it felt like that might be harder. I don’t know if that resonates as well.
ELIO
ALI
ELIO
ALI
ELIO
ALI
ELIO
But I think also part of the reason that care is important is like we’re doing the hardship fund, like, you know, there were sex workers who had also faced loads of hardship as a result of COVID, making phone calls to other sex workers who have faced hardship because of COVID. And are hearing, really, you know, like, really difficult stories of people’s, like desperation and destitution and really difficult things. And it started to you know, you’d get to a point and be like, “Okay, shall we… You’ve been, you’ve been reading the emails every day for six months, do you want somebody else to take the emails over?” And people were like, “No, I’m gonna read the emails, no, I’m gonna make 60 calls today.” And you’d be like, “Oh, like you can…” Sometimes caring for each other was being like, at least for me, sometimes caring for other people in the collective was being like, “You need to stop doing the thing that you’re doing. Because you feel like you have to do it.” Because of this, you have secondhand trauma. And you need to take a break and be able to feel like a different relationship to this urgency, because every single case is urgent, every single situation is urgent, that urgency will never end. But what might end is your capacity to be able to respond. And so we need to preserve that and preserve you. Even if it feels like I’m being horrible to you by saying maybe you shouldn’t do so many phone calls or something.
And so I think it’s also important to think about care as being not just like, “Oh, we’re nice to each other, it’s fine if things don’t take time,” but we’re encouraging each other to do a little bit less, while recognising the context that we’re in, you know, like, I’m in the London Renters Union and sometimes you can’t do less because loads of people are getting evicted, and then needs to be responded to and dealt with and stuff like that. But you also need to be able to preserve people to be able to keep responding to those evictions by not being like massively burnt out and traumatised, and just in deep distress constantly, because all they can think about is how many people are being made homeless all the time. You know.
ALI
ELIO
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ALI
ELIO
But in terms of sex worker organising or supporting sex worker movements: Give money is always the first one. Give SWARM money and do it via regular donation, like, you’re better giving five pounds every month, then you are giving like 25 pounds once. So I think set up, you know, set up recurring donations to SWARM I mean, other groups as well, but I’m going to say SWARM’s the one to give money to at this point.
And I think advocate like again, if you’re in a union advocate in your union or community group to like pass motions in favour of decrim, or to support sex workers Decrim Now, which is decrimnow.co.uk, maybe? .org.uk?, You know, they
SAMI
ELIO
And then I think, again, coming back to workplaces, and I guess I’m on the workplace thing a little bit in this conversation, but advocate in your workplaces, for provisions for disabled people and for trans people. So that those people who are often pushed out of more traditional workplaces have the ability to stay in those traditional workplaces if they want to, so they don’t have to do sex work through lack of any other option. I think particularly for people who have disabilities and who can’t stay in work because of those disabilities, having workplaces that can be flexible and responsive to them is really important. And if you have any ability to, like, push for that kind of stuff in small or large ways, then that’s actually like quite a good way to kind of support sex workers even if you can’t get involved in any kind of direct sex work or organising or if you don’t have any money. Yeah, I think those would be the first ones I thought of.
ALI
ELIO
ALI
ELIO
SAMI
ELIO
SAMI
ALI
Thanks as always to Kareem Samara for the backing music as well as Klaus and thanks to Rowan for doing all the transcriptions this season. If you want to find out more about Resist + Renew as a training and facilitation collective, go to resistrenew.com Or we’re on all the socials.
And you can support the production of this podcast on our Patreon if you want to, which is patreon.com/resistrenew.
That’s all for this week. Thanks again for listening and catch you next time. Bye bye
Season 2 episode 9 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we talk about safer spaces policies, as a tool that groups use for a variety of reasons.
‘Safer spaces policies can create a void that people will then fill with punitive approaches to difficulty, difference and conflict’
After a callout for safer spaces agreements, a few groups kindly offered to have their agreements shared, to give you some examples:
A few other resources that we mentioned in the episode:
Perennial resources:
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
There are variations: some people have come up with the term braver spaces, which is, again, about showing up and dealing with things as they arise rather than creating safety.
So a bit about why we are talking about safer spaces, safer spaces policy in a season about conflict. That’s because often conflicts within groups relate to both societal oppressions and how they are replicated in our spaces. And/or conflict can stem from the uses of policies and bureaucracy. E.g. people will say, “you did this thing, and that’s against the rule, therefore, we’re going to punish for you, or make you do this thing because of that.” And so policies might end up replicating punitive justice.
But, Sami, do you want to tell us an example of a safer spaces policy that you’ve been around?
SAMI
And so what we thought that it would be useful to do is so – people, people started that process of like writing what is maybe what you could think of like a ‘standard’ safer spaces policy, where it’s like, ‘here are some versions of societal oppression, we think these are bad, and we don’t think people should replicate those in our space.’ And then we were like, ‘I don’t actually think this is very useful for people. Like, I don’t think this is actually going to help anyone do anything. And I don’t think this is really going to provide much to actually resist the sight of societal oppression.’
So what we tried to do was shift it a little bit into more of like a process, we were like, what did we think people would actually need to be able to resist those oppressions and so and then use that to identify what some interventions could be. So we were like, maybe if you don’t want to raise something in a group don’t in a in a in a in a workshop directly, but you want it to be raised, maybe that’s one you can tell and they can raise stuff for you. Or like maybe we should have specific spaces to support people to be able to raise stuff at different points throughout the day. And so, like, added these different things in so that people could actually try and solve stuff.
And we did that because we thought that maybe just having a safer space is for policy on its own, which is kind of a quite a common thing, felt quite limited. And, and I guess that’s gonna lead into when we think about strengths and weaknesses, and things like that. Because I think probably, TL;DR these are the kind of things which when done well are good. And when done not well probably aren’t good, probably like all things. So who, who wants to start with some strengths?
KATHERINE
ALI
So there is a bit of a holding for that, that, you know, you can turn to and as Katherine said, this, like, named that this is the values and intentions of the space. And we’re going to do something about it.
SAMI
And or, for example, what we what counts as, when we talk about we want to do stuff to like, repair harms, what do we mean by harm, so they can provide a space that really have clarity of terms, which can smooth future conversations about stuff.
ALI
SAMI
And so you can create a void that people will then fill with punitive approaches to difficulty, difference and conflict. And so I think that can create difficulties. And those can be amended by making sure that you don’t provide that vacuum by trying to be clear about like, what are the ways that you will actually deal with stuff? And how, what kind of outcomes do you want, if you don’t want punishment to be the default response. What are the responses that you want? What are the kind of values you want to embed it into space, and things like that.
And then I guess that suggests that maybe it’s not all about policies: it’s also about processes, it’s also about group culture and things like that. So not to say they’re not a good tactic, but that can be a real limitation of them when done unideally.
ALI
And if implying that a group is has all these values and implying that there might be something done about things when harms happen, and then they don’t, it can feel like a real letdown and can feel like: yeah, it was like an expectation gap of they said they had these values. I was hoping when something I was hoping nothing would happen bad. Something bad did happen. And then if there wasn’t the backup of the policy process to deal with it, or hold it. Or if even worse, like, punishment is the way you deal with it, then that can feel, like, extra harmful or extra like hurtful in comparison to like going to a space where you’re like, these people could be alright, but they haven’t said that they’re ‘Ultra-radical’ people. And, yeah, it just sets set things up for a bit of a failure sometimes.
KATHERINE
And I feel like that’s not always the case, but I’ve definitely seen in groups use the safer spaces policy to centre the comfort of the mainstream. And by saying, ‘we’re having a safer space here,’ not allowing conflict, disagreement into that space, because it’s not making it ‘safe.’ But actually, what that usually means is not making it feel comfortable to the people who are in the mainstream.
And that mix, mixing and matching of those terms can get quite tricky and sticky, quite quick, and lead to quite oppressive dynamics in this mainstream/margin dynamic.
SAMI
KATHERINE
And I guess, like, what I want to say is that these things are often complex, they’re often interpersonal, they’re often relational, they’re often relating to the values and politics of the group. And that can change over time. And the way we want to deal with that probably isn’t going to be in a rigid, static policy document. It will be in an iterative conversation about what is okay and not okay, in that space. And usually, that will always include saying, ‘We don’t think it’s okay to be racist’. And what that looks like in terms of how a group deals with that will be different context-to-context based on: Is that a full group accountability process? Is that pulling someone aside and having that chat outside the room? Is it sending someone on a training process, like whatever it might be? It’s context specific And a rigid document doesn’t always get into the nuances of, of all of this complexity.
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
If you want to find out more about Resist+Renew as a training and facilitation and collective check out our website, resistrenew.com, or on all the socials. And if you want to support the production of this podcast, you can do so at patreon.com/resistrenew. That’s it for this week. Thanks for listening and catch you next time. Bye bye.
Season 2 episode 8 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we interview Nell, Martha and Naomi from Youth 4 Climate Leeds. We talk about shifting tactics from just strikes, working in solidarity with other groups, “de-diversification”, and navigating being a group during a pandemic!
“Both the cause and the effects of climate change is interlinked with racial justice”
“There is sometimes an ethic within activist circles like, ‘I can change the world by myself.’ And then you end up just taking on so much work and it just becomes ridiculous. Like, I remember like, it must have been early 2020 and I was going to three meetings a week all in different places”
Youth 4 Climate Leeds Twitter (@yleedsuk), Instagram (@youth4climate_leeds) and Facebook. You can find links to school strike groups across the country on the UK Student Climate Network website.
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
We are here today with a number of people from Youth 4 Climate Leeds. Youth 4 Climate Leeds was a group that was founded in early 2019 as part of the Global Youth Strike for Climate, and Fridays For the Future movement, and is run by young people.
And why don’t you introduce yourselves? Martha, do you want to go first?
MARTHA
SAMI
NAOMI
SAMI
NELL
SAMI
MARTHA
And we, we strike about every few months, and we tried to put pressure on the government to make policy that deals with climate change, and to empower young people within Leeds within that context as well.
SAMI
MARTHA
I mean, if you look at the facts in terms of climate change, and where we are now, I mean, we are currently in the sixth mass extinction, a third of coral reefs have have died out already. It’s an incredibly important issue. And our lives depend on it. So we’ll strike and we’ll carry on striking until the government decide to really take it seriously.
And that’s in the context also of COP26 happening later this year. And with wanting to really get something material out of that, because the agreements made so far like the Paris 2015 Accord, they didn’t go far enough. So we’ll keep on pushing until we get what we want.
ALI
NELL
But, you know, in the, in an ideal world, we would, we’d still be happy and healthy and have the things that we need, we just have less of these luxuries that we have today because they should be given to people who don’t have anything to sort of, like, even at the playing field.
And the other thing I think is – I can’t remember what the question was. I was gonna go on about the media, though. Like how, like a cause of the climate crisis, I think, is that people are being kind of, I don’t know, people don’t believe it. Because, like, I don’t know, like tabloid media, controlled by I dunno Rupert Murdoch and stuff like that, and also Facebook. Have part, they’ve invested like billions in sort of, like, sort of, you know, creating questions and quite, you know, creating phrasing and wording that makes people question the climate crisis. And so they could, you know, they, I think they came up with the term ‘global warming’, because warming’s like a nice word has nice connotations, they put a lot of money into sort of psychological stuff. And using wording that makes people question its legitimacy as a scientific fact. So even today, people think, you know, they think there’s a scientific debate. I’ve thought that people who think, Oh, well, it’s not proven, you know, scientists or, you know, they don’t they don’t agree on it. And it’s like, no, they do, like 99% of them agree. So those are the two things, I think: the media, and then just like this sort of selfish attitude that we have.
MARTHA
Because the environment: you cannot put a price on it. But that is the that’s the exact issue, that you can’t put a price on cutting down the tree, but you can make a profit from it. So when you’re when you’re in this economy that rewards irresponsible behaviour, you’re going to end up in a climate crisis and here, and here we are. And we’ve been, and then they talk about how they can balance solving the climate crisis with, with neoliberalism, as if we haven’t been trying to do that for the last 30 years and completely failed. We’ve com-, we’ve completely failed, our emissions are set to rise by 12% in the next 10 years. So this, this, you cannot have solving the climate crisis and, and capitalism, unfortunately. Because if it has a constant desire for growth on a lim- on a planet with limited resources, then you can’t balance the two. So it’s, the issue is based around around an economic system that just does not coincide with ecological justice, unfortunately.
SAMI
ALI
NAOMI
But like the Leeds Youth Strike 4 Climate has kind of changed over the past years with lockdowns and COVID and everything. So it’s changed from, like, less of a ‘youth strike’ movement to like this Youth 4 Climate movement, which, you know, gives people the option of striking if they want to, and being involved in civil disobedience, but also putting like at the heart of our work, like improving education, climate, education, racial justice, education and things like that.
We do have, like, key, like, principles. So obviously, we believe in youth voices, and that they’re vital for young people. And then, like, we want to use our experience in climate activism, and youth empowerment, just to just move that on to not only just like climate change, but kind of this whole climate justice movement, and racial justice, which I think is definitely more clear in some of our more recent actions as we’ve come out of lockdowns.
I mean, on the 24th of September, we had a strike, which was co-hosted by Black Lives Matter Leeds. So you can definitely see in our work like a change in focus from this kind of like, climate change, we want to strike, but also like this empowerment of young people, and making sure that everything’s accessible and safe for people to share their youth voices and things like that. Yeah, that’s all,
ALI
NAOMI
ALI
NELL
And then the other huge link between racial injustice and climate injustice is like, what, who climate change will affect. So you’ve seen with COVID, that big issues like this, but you know, COVID has impacted the most vulnerable people already. But if you’ve looked at how COVID affected, say, India, compared to the UK, and it’s always the poorest people who are hit the hardest. And it’s often the poorest people all the most, like, disadvantaged that they’ve not caused any of this, like it’s not my fault at all. So climate change is going to displace people from the coasts, you know, it’s gonna affect people who don’t have access to health care, and stuff like that. So yeah, it’s like the causes the cau-both the cause and the effects, basically, of climate change is interlinked with racial justice is what I’m trying to get at.
ALI
But what you were saying before colonialism and capitalism and the people who are going to be affected by things, a lot of that is about, like, who counts as people who ‘people’, which people do revalue. And like, if we valued all people the same, we wouldn’t be able to like, exploit them, when we valued nature as much as we valued ourselves, then we wouldn’t be able to exploit nature either. And like, I feel like those those things are really, really interlinked. So yeah, thanks for for sharing that. Sami, do you want to come in with the next one?
SAMI
NELL
And yeah, structurally, we’re also trying to sort of improve ourselves about safeguarding stuff because we were all under 18. But obviously, now that we’ve got people ranging, I’m 19. And my friend who still in, sort of will be continuing you for climate for longer than me, which will be like 20. But we’ll be working with 15 year olds. So we kind of got to start looking into safeguarding and things like that.
And also start looking into some protective measures in place as well to make sure that people who come into the space, yeah, have a bit of a protection and someone to go to if something goes wrong. If someone says something racist to them, someone says something sexist, or ableist this, we have, like some structural, something structural in place, so there’ll be repercussions.
But at the moment, it’s, we’re a little bit chaotic, you know, like everyone is these days.
Yeah, in terms of our focus, we’re kind of focusing on improving accessibility at the moment, which is why we teamed up with BLM for our last strike. And we really tried to sort of like, sort of talk about each other’s messages and try and like combine the two because we were saying that they’re such like interlinked causes, we kind of want to spread the idea.
And other things we do to increase accessibility: we have this idea that if you’re just striking then you’re just gonna get the same people striking because if somebody can’t strike for whatever reason, they won’t be able to come, they won’t be able to get involved. So we’re trying to do like, slightly more of a range of actions. So we did like guerilla gardening, which is where you sort of spread greenery into concrete places, like with plant pots and stuff. And it was really cute it’s a really fun day. And like craftivism as well: banner making, arty stuff. We did like an online letter writing workshop for the Kill the Bill campaign. We tried to support that by yeah, doing like a letter writing, like an MP letter writing workshop, and did a little bit of research into: how you can, you know, how to best, like, persuade an MP, how to do it politely. Did a bit of research into their campaign. And so hopefully that means that, like, more people can join in, because they have something that suits them, if that makes sense. So yeah, that’s, that’s our focus at the moment.
MARTHA
And that was also in reaction to kind of our frustration with the lack of youth oriented places for people to go. And how, for example, say with austerity measures, the amount of youth centres have really, really closed and for youth to be able to do things nowadays they have to pay a huge amount of money and that really impacts people so negatively.
SAMI
NELL
SAMI
A thought came to my mind, when you were all talking around, how you discussed like, the, like that cut that kind of linking up that you did with BLM Leeds. I think that’s a really interesting one. Because I think there’s, there’s often broadly like kind of two approaches that groups will take when they, if they’re like, if they notice that they tend to have like, drawn from a certain community. And so for example, like they’re quite a white group in a place that is not necessarily like a super white area, or things like that. And, and one of them, which it sounds like, isn’t the one that you’ve taken, is people will talk about, like diversifying the group and like trying to bring more people in that like, don’t match the demographics of the people in the group. And then there’s like another broad approach, which is around kind of like partnering and working with and in solidarity with other groups that you feel like represent the kind of like, where you feel like maybe some of the areas you’re not as strong on in your group are. And it sounds like you leaned more to like the second one of those two things in terms of like teaming up with BLM Leeds. Like is that, that this is maybe an assumption of mine so please do tell me if I’m off, if, if that’s off base. But I think that’s, I think it’s a really interesting one? And like, I’d be really interested to know, like, what, what was the thought process that like, led to that action? Like, how did that, how did that come about? How did you decide that that was the thing you were gonna do and like work with BLM Leeds? Is that a thing that anybody would be happy to speak to?
NELL
And yeah, it’s fair to say that we kind of went down that pathway of sort of working in solidarity, rather than trying to draw people in, because, you know, it just I don’t know, like, like, would would you feel comfortable getting into space where everyone’s different to you? Probably not. And like, we don’t want our space to be all white. But like, I didn’t want to, sort of I dunno, we didn’t want to, like, draw people in like that, like they’re assets, do you know what I mean? It just feels a little bit mean.
But at the same time, it will be great to have a more diverse group, because then you have such, you’d have a much broader range of perspectives, ideas, and sort of thoughts and connections going on. But yeah, so what we’re going to try and do is sort of think about our group structurally to try and make it a safer place for different people to join.
And so people, you know, from, like, black, if they’re black or brown can come in and know that they’ll be protected structurally in some sort of way. And hopefully that will help in the long run, sort of diversify our group a bit. I think we used to be more diverse. And then, I guess, I dunno, I think there must be like a process, like de-diversification going on.
I think I think if we went in early days, I don’t think we were aware about racial justice and stuff. This was like pre BLM; well, it wasn’t pre-BLM but it was pre the resurgence of BLM, pre George Floyd. And it totally wasn’t in my mind. So like, I don’t know, if I was the person who talked over, like brown members of our group, I hope I didn’t know you don’t know, do. And so yeah, it’s kind of yeah I don’t know if I can swear, but it’s a bit shit really. But I hope we can sort of, yeah, make it make our group, better allies and sort of improve, improve the way we work a little bit more.
SAMI
ALI
MARTHA
But we’ve also worked with like various other groups, for example, like we did a feast in the street in the summer, where we worked with other climate groups, such as GALBA, which is against the Leeds Bradford airport expansion, and Care for Calais, which deal with migrants from, that have come over to the UK from Calais and housed in Leeds and the COP26 coalition. So I think we just strive towards a kind of coalition of groups within Leeds.
ALI
Yeah, well, funnily enough, we had like, you know, once we were going up to COVID, there was this huge stupid ongoing debate of whether we should go back in person or not, because we have a few autistic people in our group, who would prefer it online but then everyone else prefers it in person. So it is a very, like, in terms of accessibility, that conversation went on for way too long, and in the end we’ve we’ve sort of got a bit of a balance going on at the moment where we do online meetings for three weeks and then on the fourth week, we’ll have an in person meeting which is like, the first one of the month in itself is quite exciting.
And so yeah, that’s, that’s one way that we’re sort of internalising our outward values. Let me thing, what else? I suppose like internal communications: like, we’ve been a little bit rubbish at those but we tried more recently to sort of make sure that every single person who might be attending meeting knows when the meeting is, which sounds like a very low bar but we often, because of COVID and stuff and everything’s all up in the air, rather than having like a regular meetup we basically we used to have like a regular time that we’d meet but now it’s a little chaotic. So, yeah, we usually try and make sure that everyone knows when the meeting is. Maybe, I dunno, it’s a pretty low bar for accessibility you can cut that out if you want to but if it if it if the conversation flows on from it then keep it in! [laughs]
ALI
[Music break by Kareem Samara]
Yeah, Sami, do you want to move us onto the next piece here?
SAMI
And, and I did actually have a follow up question on that on the on the chat earlier if that’s okay, Ali before we move on to on to the final question? Which is around: you mentioned, that you do a lot of work with like, like the COP26 coalition, and like BLM Leeds and Care for Calais and groups like that. And you said a little bit about like, trying to work in like a broad, maybe like informal coalition of like groups across Leeds and stuff. And I’m one I’m wondering why that is like, why do you feel like that is the thing that is useful for you to do? Why do you think that it’s good to work in like a coalition of lots of different local groups? What’s that? What’s the idea behind that?
MARTHA
NAOMI
SAMI
NAOMI
But also, if you’re an adult, and you want to come like first aid or steward on events, I think, you know, getting in contact with your local group is such an, like, simple way to do that. And it doesn’t necessarily take up much of your time, either. And then also, I think, if you’re inspired by what you’ve heard, it kind of, not necessarily to take direct action, which, of course, we would love you to do. But also in like, your everyday lives, you know, these choices that you make daily, you know, just kind of check yourself, check your privilege when you you know, in varying spaces.
Or from a, like climate change and environmental perspective, you know, how is your impact influencing our environment, our own surroundings, obviously, but acknowledging the fact that, you know, you’re not, you’re not to blame for this climate change issue. Yeah. But also, whilst we want government and corporational change, it’s also just making sure it’s individuals and you kind of reflect your beliefs and kind of portray what you want in the for the future.
NELL
But like, if you really, if you really, really want to make change, it’s like, you need to join a group. You know, like we were talking before about groups themselves joining together into larger groups like coalitions and stuff. It’s the same on an individual level, like if you join with other human beings, you have such a bigger impact. Like, it’s all about networks, isn’t it? Like, the more the more people join up, and like, work on something together, the bigger and better it will be. So. And yeah, if you want to change and team up with someone else!
SAMI
And there are some there’s some other questions that have like come to my mind in the course of the thing, but has not really been a great a great point to ask them. So would you mind if, if they were asked now? Who knows, maybe we’ll edit them back into the main body of the stuff.
One is like a thing, which I’m always intrigued by. And that we, me and Ali and others in our group will often like discuss with groups is like, basically: Why do you do the things that you do? Like why do you choose the tactics that you choose in like, whatever struggle you’re a part of? And obviously, like, the, the history of your group is very, like strikes-based. And so the question that I wonder is like, what do you see as the value of like, strikes as a tactic? Because you’ve said, even though you’ve said that, like, you’re doing less of them now maybe because COVID and things like that, then you were previously like, it does sound like you are still, like, doing strikes and strike-like events and things like that. So like, was it, what is it that you see is the benefit of, like, strikes versus something else that you could be doing some of those other things you might also be getting? But like, why strikes?
NELL
And also I think it’s quite exciting to sort of, to strike I think that’s one of the allures of it really, is that you’re sort of skipping school, but in a good way. And it’s still kind of education as well, because there’s a lot of learning and sort of political engagement, you do a strike, so that’s quite cool. And I think I think it feels a little bit rebellious, doesn’t it? That’s why kids like it. You get to sort of go against the head teacher and stuff. Get into trouble. And that’s also one of the criticisms because like, if you’re a kid that gets into trouble a lot, which often is disproportionately, like black and brown people because of like, and structural racism and all that. That means that the strikes are inaccessible to a lot of people. So it’s a very it’s a very strong tactic, I think strikes, it’s got a lot of very good pros, very good things about it, and a lot of very bad things about it as well. So yeah, a bit of a tricky one.
MARTHA
SAMI
Great, thank you. And I could just keep chatting indefinitely. At some point we’re probably gonna Well, yeah, I guess I had one more question. Which was, you mentioned, you used the term, which I wouldn’t have expected you to use it, which is why I want to ask about it, like you talked about, like a need to do like, think more about, like, safeguarding and stuff. And I think of I work in a charity. And I think of, like, people talking about safeguarding: it’s quite like, quite like a formal term. And, and I think it’s really interesting, because you’re talking a little bit it sounded like there’s, you’re concerned about, like the power dynamics that could come into play in your group, when you’ve got like, maybe like 20 year olds working with 15 year olds, and like, the kind of like issues that can bring up and the kind of like risks that can come with that kind of work. And I’m just wondering if you could just speak a little bit more about like, what your what’s your kind of thinking in terms of like, how you’re going to negotiate those like potential power imbalances, which are like one of I imagine a form of a lot of different power imbalances that could exist in your group. Like, what are you thinking about them in terms of how to safeguard or whatever?
NAOMI
So these have been like, I’ve been doing this alongside Youth for Climate Leeds. So what I saw was like a visible difference in kind of the media consent forms, the parental consent forms, like the safeguarding documents I’ve received for this other project compared to like Youth for Climate Leeds.
And I think, you know, I watched – not like a lecture or a panel discussion earlier this year about kind of Extinction Rebellion’s activism, its kind of interaction with youth, especially going from kind of more educational contexts where you have to fill out a form, you know, to walk across the road. Whereas to climate movements, we’ve got 13 year olds, like doing road blocks: I think it’s kind of a shocking thing. And you have to kind of, from my perspective, it was definitely something new that I saw and kind of like this big difference, even though the actions that were going on, all had the same motivation.
So for me, I kind of raised this point earlier this year, kind of like mid year. And I think what can, so we’ve kind of what we’ve changed and like working towards is a power dynamic thing is, so we’re creating like safeguarding documents. Which there’s, there’s so many resources online and courses about safeguarding. So those outline, like, the interaction between groups. So we’re going to create like a guideline document, which means: let’s say if we work with a group in Leeds, we’ll send these across as kind of a formal perspective and for something to read through. So maybe it’s going to outline that you need to be mindful of the nature of us being teenagers, and you have to be mindful of the fact you know, we’re a lot of us are in full time education. So what our time dedication may be less than yours, but you need to be mindful of that we are still contributing as much as we can. Resource wise, stuff like that.
And then kind of like an internal comms kind of like safeguarding is just having an kind of just having a set structure of kind of consent forms for media. So outward communications, and then consent forms, which will be kind of age dependent (none of its decided) but also like our dues for contact details, and having the space for like any members to pass on their concerns to a formal body, because obviously, there will be a safeguarding board and lead. So we’re creating documents kind of that outline this, emphasise this, so if any severe incidents occur, we do have the capacity to pass them on, and it is a safe space for young people. And I think this also kind of really reinforces the idea that we want young people there. Just because a lot of us are, like, later teens now. So it kind of shows that we’re encouraging younger children and like early teens to get involved in a safe and kind of like, the more focus on welfare.
NELL
And it’s just like, yeah, we’ve only just started thinking like, wait, maybe we should have some boundaries because like, we can’t do all this! It’s been a problem that we’ve had for like two years that we just keep taking on everything requests of us. And we don’t we’re literally kids that go to high school and stuff. Like I remember and in college I got so like it was it was ridiculous, really like, school was second my activism was first thing. I would flunk off to do these things that people were expecting of me. So yeah, it’s it’s quite an interesting power dynamic, really. And, yeah. I just wanted to add that in: the world of activism is a, it’s an odd place.
SAMI
And I think it’s, it’s really telling of like, an approach that people have where like, the second that there’s like a group of young people, people are like, “Ah, you should also do things like we do and take on a million requests and like, be really busy all the time and that kind of thing.” I’m not sure that’s one of the things that should be passed on and continued. I think that work ethic, I think it’s terrible! And Martha looks like you got a thing to say and then maybe we can probably wrap up because we’ve we’ve taken a lot of your time, as and don’t want to take the piss given that we’re talking about how much time things can take up! [laughs]
MARTHA
And I think I think Youth 4 Climate has become a lot healthier within like the last year following the COVID lock downs of dispersing and not increasing responsibility in any one person. I think it’s become a lot better. I think, obviously, there’s still places, like, way to go. But I think that it’s kind of died down quite a lot.
ALI
And I feel like what you’re saying there around, like, trying to change everything as an individual really isn’t healthy. And I think what was said before around, like, the way to change things is to come together as a group. And I think that absolutely makes sense. It’s like: yeah, being in a group, thinking about how you can do things together in a healthy way, is just, feels so much more sustainable, and so much more like healthy as the way to go.
Yeah, just want to say thank you for speaking to us today. It’s been a real pleasure. And one of the things I’ll be taking from it is that if you want to change anything, go join a group, that could definitely be our tagline for our organisation. So definitely, definitely supporting that. But yeah, appreciating the time you’ve taken speak to us. And yeah, it’s been a real real pleasure. Thanks. Thanks very much.
MARTHA
NELL
ALI
You can follow them on Facebook, they are Leeds Youth 4 Climate and on Twitter: they’re Youth 4 Climate Leeds, or @YLeedsUK.
As always, Big thanks to Klaus and Kareem Samara for letting us use their music as backing tracks and interludes.
Thanks for listening and catch you next time!
Season 2 episode 7 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we talk about maintenance meetings: a meeting you hold for the overall health of your group.
‘It’s a space to focus on the maintenance of your group, rather than waiting until the car breaks down. It’s like a regular MOT’
Some example elements of a maintenance meeting:
If you would find it helpful, you can also use a version of a maintenance meeting agenda and slide template that we’ve used within R+R.
Perennial resources:
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
Hello, welcome back to another episode of the toolbox, which is an element of the Resist+Renew podcast. For the past three episodes, we’ve been talking about conflict in a more general sense: about frames and understandings. Now, from here on, we’re going into tools, baby. And the first tool we’re starting with is a maintenance meeting, which is a tool that can be put in place within groups. We’ll explain what it is, its pros and cons and do our top takeaways. Sami, what is a maintenance meeting?
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
And we’re talking mainly today in the context of you doing a maintenance meeting within a group as a whole. But obviously, this works at lots of different levels of group, like, this could be a thing you’re do in a whole group; this could be a thing you do within like a, like an establish working group within a whole group; it could be a thing that you do within like you and you and another person who like regularly work together as a pair; it could be like a reflection space you just built yourself or whatever.
And just one more note, in terms of purposes, it’s basically what it’s trying to do is it’s trying to create like a feedback loop, like a mechanism by which you and your group can know and you can like monitor, when there could be things that that could cause your group problem,s before the point where they have caused your group problems. So, like, thinking of it as that kind of like it’s a feedback loop, it’s a way of your group monitoring your group so that your group can do something about your group. Said the word group too many times, maybe let’s flesh it out with an example. [Laughs] Katherine, take it away.
KATHERINE
But just to share a little bit about sort of the way we would hold a maintenance meeting in Resist+Renew. As Sami was saying, we build it into our regular meeting cycles, so we know when it’s going to be happening. And then have a list of kind of options or modules, if you like, or like ways of holding the space in the maintenance meeting. So some things that we have done in the past are: having a capacity check in a maintenance meeting. So just asking everyone in the group where they’re at with capacity in terms of their commitments, both within R+R within Resist+Renew, but also perhaps in other workload, other areas of their life. Just so we have a sense of, like, where people are at more generally with capacity.
We’ve also done specific invitation around difficulties. So asking the group: what’s one thing that’s a bit difficult for you at the moment that you think it would be good to discuss with the whole collective. And then people might share some of those ideas. And we would work out what one we wanted to go into, and what we will do with the ones that we didn’t manage to discuss in that meeting time.
We’ve had a general check in sometimes using spectrum lines, because Sami loves spectrum line, see season one, on the toolbox. And on some of the spectrum lines, we’ve included, are: ‘How much are you enjoying working with r&r at the moment?’ and people can choose like ‘very much’ to ‘not very much’, and we see where people land, and then have a discussion about it. It could be a question like, ‘how connected are you feeling to others in the group?’ and then again, do a spectrum line from ‘very connected’ to ‘not very connected’. And then depending on where people land on those spectrum lines is then really useful as a way to have that discussion, start opening up that discussion. And if, for example, there might be one person who’s not feeling that connected in, it’s a really good thing for the group to then notice that and maybe have that discussion about why that might be happening, what might need to shift in the group culture and so on.
So really, it’s just thinking of: what tools can you use to open up some of that more reflective space on how it feels to be in the group, how the group is doing? And these are just some of the ways that we have tried to do that in R+R, to give you some specific examples.
There are quite a lot of strengths and weaknesses to this particular tool. And so I’m wondering, Ali, if you want to kick us off with one of the strengths maybe?
SAMI
So for example, if I remember correctly, one of the things that came up in a maintenance meeting we had within Resist+Renew, was that like that myself, and Katherine hadn’t actually facilitated like a workshop together. And like, hadn’t planned a workshop together. And so, like, off the back of those conversations, we were like, oh, let’s try work on this thing together, then that one ended up falling through. So now me and Katherine are like, oh, let’s try and facilitate this thing together. So like, it’s it’s like a space where you can like create those, like, you can identify where there could be areas you can focus on before you’re like, Oh, God, I’ve never talked to Katherine, I don’t even know who she is, or whatever. Sorry, that was just, I’ll, I’ll stop.
KATHERINE
ALI
SAMI
KATHERINE
And I think as we said, in like earlier episodes, not all of us like have good experiences of being in maybe challenging or critical or conflict-related feedback loops. And so having these opportunities regularly to be in that practice of shifting the way that we’re working with feedback, sharing feedback, hearing feedback, can just be really, really useful. And actually, that can work like across levels of the group. So, like, full group is one space for that can work really, really well. But also, if you’re working on a project with like a couple of members of your group, having maintenance meetings on those projects, like we have a maintenance meeting at the full R+R level, but we also have a maintenance meeting for the podcast crew. And so we get to check in with each other on how we’re finding working with each other and have that space held so that we can share it. And even one to one as well can be a really good way to to keep up the practice.
ALI
SAMI
And so like, classic example, like to think of a work example, like, if you’ve got a hypersensitive manager, or something like you wouldn’t be the one probably to suggest like, let’s do a maintenance meeting, where then they’d have the opportunity to tell you off, but you’d never be able to respond because you wouldn’t feel able to or whatever. So like, thinking about how this would actually work within within this specific space that you want to set it up in is important. Like, it’s not a magic tool that will allow people to solve all problems.
So: some preconditions could be that like, that feedback hasn’t been like historically shamed when it’s been shared, or people haven’t been like, individually blamed for things which are structural problems regularly and things like that, like maybe what things you could see as preconditions to thinking that doing this is a good idea. And that doesn’t mean that you’d never do this in your group if those preconditions don’t hold, but maybe you would want to focus on different interventions, rather than a maintenance meeting. If you think of it as like a maturity thing. Like maybe your group’s not at that point yet, but maybe there’ll be at that point, if you do six months, or 12 months of another thing, or whatever it is.
ALI
And I guess that’s gonna vary depending on how often your group meets. Because if your group doesn’t meet more than once a month anyway, then you’re not that tight and don’t have that many interactions. So maybe it’s less important. So it could could could be like once every six months or a year, if it’s like a loose thing. But if you’re working with someone every day, maybe you want to do it every couple of weeks and just have a can be just like quite more check in thing that happens more frequently.
KATHERINE
And I think also like noticing, who is the one that often is raising things, as someone who raises things, often, there can be a bit of a role that you can fall into, of like ‘the one that raises the difficult thing’. And sometimes people or other people in the group know that you do that role. And so they might not necessarily raise their own stuff, because they wait for the person who raises the difficult things to do that. So just being mindful, if you’re having maintenance meetings in your cycle, are there people who more regularly bring difficult things? Why are they doing that? But it might also be that that person is taking up quite a lot of the space. And so what would support the people that are not bringing anything to genuinely share something if they did have it. So kind of being mindful of who’s doing what, in the space around these maintenance meetings can help the whole group feel like they’re able to participate.
ALI
SAMI
So, for example, like Katherine mentioned before, like, we’ll do a maintenance meeting on the level of like, R+R, and then maybe we’ll have specific ones within like projects, but then we’ll also do like a debrief after we do specific, like run a workshop together, like two facilitators will do a debrief after that. And there’ll be other like feedback mechanisms and spaces to have discussions and things like that. So like, it’s important to have this as like, a suite of different things.
And that could include really explicitly reflecting on: Where do I feel like the group sat? And like, if I think this won’t work? What are the reasons I think this won’t work? And then what could I do about those reasons instead, which obviously, like with all things is probably best done. It’s like, not an individual reflection, but like working with other people to discuss stuff, even if it’s only like certain allies in the group or whatever.
KATHERINE
ALI
SAMI
But I guess one thing that is like, worth stating is like, explicitly not a purpose of a maintenance meeting is like, it’s the intention is not that it will like mean that there’ll never be conflict in your group.
Like, as we said, in one of the earlier episodes, like, conflict is like a really normal thing that happens in groups and in spaces and like conflict can be a thing that is like, either really challenging, or could be, like beneficial, depending on like, what the conflict is around how explicitly it’s done, how it’s handled, and all this kind of stuff. So it’s not a it’s not a thing that will like, stop anyone ever arguing with each other or disagreeing with each other in the future. The intention is almost the opposite. It’s to intentionally draw out disagreement and make more happen. It’s the going back to the forest fire example we use before, it’s like, more in line with the indigenous fire practices of making sure you do smaller regular burns in a forest rather than waiting, trying to avoid there being any burns, and then suddenly, the whole forest burns down. I’m going to keep using that example again, because I love I love it.
ALI
KATHERINE
ALI
KATHERINE
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
So I think like, I guess what it’s really important to say links to that is like the meeting, the content of the meeting should like should be really tailored to your group and where it’s at. And it probably will be true that what you want to do in one maintenance meeting, may not be the same agenda that you want to have for exactly the same maintenance meeting one year on, because what are the relevant things in your group that you want to respond to maybe different. Like maybe you’ve had some struggles with capacity, maybe capacity, what you want to focus on, or you’ve not been feeling connected? So whatever, like, it should be, it should be really, you should iterate it to make sure it matches what you’re doing. Ali?
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
To find out more about Resist+Renew as a training and facilitation collective, check out our website, resistrenew.com. We are on all the socials. And we’re also on Patreon if you want to support the production of this podcast. That’s it for this week. Thanks for listening and catch you next time. Bye bye
Season 2 episode 6 of the Resist + Renew podcast, where we interview Kadeem, Nirad and Zahra from No More Exclusions.
“It goes back to how the teacher stands at the front. The students act to passively receive. We don’t want to reproduce that amongst ourselves”
“Whether the law changes, and then the culture has to catch up, or whether we make it unconscionable to exclude and then the law catches up whenever it does. We don’t mind ultimately. School exclusions will be abolished in this country in our lifetime”
No More Exclusions Twitter, Instagram and Facebook + their website.
NME have a shop, a crowdfunder, a newsletter. Check out the work they’re doing on a moratorium on school exclusions.
And also, the Soul Shack that Kadeem mentions!
We now have a Patreon! Please help keep the podcast going, at patreon.com/resistrenew. If not, there’s always the classic ways to support: like, share, and subscribe!
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
KATHERINE
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
ALI
SAMI
They are an abolitionist grassroots coalition movement, focused around education. Their mission is to bring about an end to the persistent race disparities in school education in the next five years, and to effect change at legal policy, practice and cultural levels in education and society as a whole over the next 10 years – bold aims – and they want an education system that works for everybody.
So, not a small task. It’d be great if you can all introduce yourselves. Now, Kadeem, you good to kick us off?
KADEEM
SAMI
NIRAD
And it was really during that time, I was introduced, or at least that thought I was introduced to abolition. But it was really without the these past years of being part of No More Exclusions, as well as other groups. I wouldn’t have developed an understanding of abolition, as it applies to the UK and as it applies to the so called education system.
SAMI
ZAHRA
SAMI
And so Kadeem, can you kick us off? What what is what’s going on with exclusions in the UK at the moment? Like, what is the situation that you are, as a collective, facing?
KADEEM
SAMI
ZAHRA
In terms of the generics I know there’s, there is some, there is some false information. In particular, I’ve seen trolls on Twitter that kind of like spreading, basically, what is fake news. You know, these like, ‘I’ve made up a chart myself, there is no such thing as a race disparity in you know, in school exclusions,’ actually, white kids are more excluded, well, they would be more excluded because the majority of population is white. So nobody’s saying that, but we’re talking about disproportionalities, right? So we’re talking about the ratio.
And we’re talking about something that is really long standing, I want people to know that this is decades long. It’s not a new problem is not something that suddenly happened the last few years. It’s not just because of austerity, although austerity has made it worse. It’snot just because of the pandemic that we’ve seen exclusions, do you know what I mean?
This is something that is historically posited, and very deeply rooted in the way this society is structured and the way education functions in this country. So yeah, that’s I hope that gives a bit of of the of the context. But what if I can, because it’s really important to kind of, since I’ve described the I made that comparison, black pupils so that everyone listening knows, are more likely to be disciplined more frequently and more harshly for less serious behaviour. This is all research based, there’s plenty of evidence, and we can provide tonnes of links people interested, less likely to be praised than other pupils, treated in differential ways that can be observed very early on in, in child’s education.
Even Akala in his Natives book, chapter three, talks about this. More likely to be excluded for violent incidents, stereotyped as threatening, expected to be worse behaved and perceived as a greater threat and challenge by teachers. And when you put all of that together, the differential treatment is, is whether it’s intentional intention… because people often talk about, ‘well, you know, unconscious bias is not intentional.’ To me, I first of all, I don’t believe in unconscious bias anymore. Because at this stage now, as I often say, anyone who’s still unconscious must be comatose! There’s no reason for anyone to not be aware of what’s going on in terms of, in education I’m talking about – anyone who’s got an interest in education. In terms of curriculum in terms of, you know, policy, anything like that. The people in power and authority know, they know exactly what’s going on. The reviews have been done, and again and again. And so this is willful, institutional neglect. Really, what’s going on?
SAMI
ZAHRA
Also: less likely to have poor attendance, less likely to have a criminal record or to be in care. So a lot of those disadvantages, right, that you see with the excluded average white child don’t aren’t necessarily visible or apparent. So again, you know, what does that signal?
SAMI
KADEEM
So from secure schooling, to special provisions and alternative provision, obviously, surveillance, surveilling young people is generally the overarching theme. And on there’s cameras on every corner, not to mention on site; and in some academies, police on site. So, I don’t think that does well, for vulnerable young people to have that feeling. And neurodiverse people as well, of always being watched. I don’t think it does well, but just how you view crime and, just just controlling discipline in general, and how averse you are to punishment.
So yeah, that’s what I mean by state violence, because I feel like it’s on a state of mind that’s kind of engineered with young people. So that’s, that’s my view on that. And maybe why I was excluded.
SAMI
KADEEM
No, because obviously, when you’re a young person being excluded, it is is easier for the teacher to kind of, um, yeah, create create a false narrative and and get a few other teachers complaining about minor thing. Kind of authorise those exclusions and yeah. I think I answered your question somewhat.
SAMI
KATHERINE
NIRAD
Even the people who are here today, there’s a difference in age amongst all of us. And that not only brings a different experience, right? Schooling in the 70s versus schooling now. But it also brings a different sense of how we were formed to face the struggles that we face. Right, the current situation is affecting someone who’s a lot younger than someone a lot older. And that changes how they approach the situation. And so that’s why the decentralised structure kind of works for us, because it means that people are able to add to and ask questions of, even if we don’t always recognise it, we’re always able to ask questions of each other in a very creative way, because of that structure.
What our organisation is about is, I think Zahra was saying, three, three years old this year, is that right Zahra? Three and a half, four – three years. So it’s been it came out of a moment of crisis, one that is is particularly intense now. Whether we look at the international war-baiting that the UK is trying to get involved in, and actively being a part of, or we see the very the speculation that is causing a lack of fuel, or lack of food to more people than it was before: it’s a moment of crisis.
But they’re more than that, NME’s about developing some kind of power. So if you develop power is not just a one way process. It also means that power has to be taken away from people, people who currently have it. I’m thinking about these gurus, who are either self anointed or anointed by their government. And I can’t just get past the fact that ‘guru’ is another word appropriated from Hindi, appropriated from Punjabi, I mean, used to signify some kind of natural… NME’s about destruction. It’s about saying that no, that’s not natural, whether it’s a race, that’s not a natural way of organising ourselves. It’s also not a progressive or not progressive way of organising ourselves, human to human. However, we end up framed here. So it’s about disruption, about being intergenerational and creative, and it’s also about recognising that we’re in a crisis. And that that’s the essence.
KATHERINE
KADEEM
[GAP??]
NIRAD
SAMI
KADEEM
SAMI
So, thank you so much for that. Um, so I mean, we’re kind of transitioning over to the next question we were going to ask you anyway, which is around like, could you talk a little bit about what are the projects that you do have, like, going on? Like, what are you focusing on in your work? And why that thing?
You mentioned, like, doing some culture stuff as maybe a thing you’re gonna start doing more of, but maybe there’s a lot of other things going on, I get the vibe that No More Exclusions does a lot of stuff. Kadeem, do you wanna start?
KADEEM
And obviously, being a part of No More Exclusions, obviously. So I used to, for I’d say it’s escapism. I’m a gamer. I’m a gamer by profession. So I studied game design, creative media, but I guess being involved with No More Exclusions, and understanding root causes and getting confirmation as well, for something that I would have been gaslighted to not believe before, or maybe would have been isolated enough for being a part of the collective. It kind of kind of brought some of those things to the surface a bit more. And I was going somewhere else with the end of that, but I think that’s a good, good place just to end up going here.
SAMI
ZAHRA
SAMI
ZAHRA
So you know, so really important that we look at, who can we work with, and build those alliances and building those partnerships. A lot of my time is actually spent strengthening relationships and caring for other people: checking in, meeting people, talking to if I can, talking to people, finding out what we can do for them and, you know, how they can help us and, and how can we build power together? What you know, discussing strategies, tactics, and so a lot of the work is relational. And a lot of the work is centred around care, like what do people need is, you know, there’s a lot of – Kadeem’s touched upon mutual aid, you’ve touched about this earlier, a lot, a lot of us are, you know, affected ourselves. But a lot of the systems of oppressions that we’re fighting against. So a lot of us are in precarious work, a lot of us are out of work, a lot of us are, you know, dealing with like, heightened threat of like, because of chronic diseases and illnesses that we’ve got, and so on. And we’re not, we know the state isn’t taking care of that. And so we have to take care of each other, in whatever way we can.
So that’s how a lot of the time is spent. And for example, just today, just to give an example, I was talking to children and young people at a mental health centre, who have got similar concerns to us like we are really, I’ll talk about the moratorium in a sec, but we’re really concerned about the state of children – of everybody -but particularly the state of children and young people’s mental health right now, like that is a huge concern of ours. As a as a coalition, moving in education. And the government doesn’t really seem to give a shit about that. So we have to give a shit.
Yeah, so just talking to, you know, our friends and supporters within the mental health fields, you know, psychologists who themselves, I’m hearing terrible stories of how themselves, their workload is through the roof. The level of need has never been seen before. You’re not hearing these narratives, because they’re getting suppressed. And they’re not you know, people like educational psychology are supposed to look after children in schools, or families can’t cope. And they come to us, some of them have come to us because their own children are getting excluded because they’re not coping. So it’s, it’s tough is really, really tough. And that’s what we do.
So: relational work, building partnership, checking in on each other, trying to help each other with meeting our basic needs and beyond. Because we’re not just about basic needs. We’re not just about survival. But a lot of our work is often centred around survival, I have to say, and like trauma, trauma care, dealing with it. Because it’s trauma, like, being out of work is traumatising, like poverty is traumatising and not being able to leave your house because you’re still really worried about catching this virus, you know all these things are really difficult. Having lost like my own family – two members – all these things are really hard. And I don’t think we are being – not we as a community but – I’d like like the state isn’t been honest with us and about the scale of it you know? They just want us to get on with it. You know, the ‘stiff upper lip’ get-on-with-it. “Yes, we’re not really looking after anyone. So what? You know, everyone’s going to get herd immunity soon”-kind of thing. But it’s not going to happen. And we don’t want it to happen because we that no one’s disposable like that.
SAMI
ZAHRA
If and if they can’t cope with it, maybe, you know, I see this openly, and everywhere I go, I will keep saying it: you know, like, teaching is a massive, massive privilege. So if people aren’t willing, teachers aren’t willing to keep learning, and change and grow, then they need to get the fuck away from children. Like seriously, really quickly, as well. So if we keep doing, you know, if we keep getting the same outcomes, and the changes that have been the so called changes, the reforms that are being implemented aren’t helping, then maybe we need to do things differently, you know, which is why we are pushing for radical change, as opposed to reformist change.
SAMI
ZAHRA
SAMI
ZAHRA
So it would be dishonest to say, well, you know, we don’t engage with like, legal change. But as long as it’s, as long as we don’t pin our hopes for liberation on the law, I think that’s okay. So we wanted to change the law, the currently as it stands, the law that the mandate that stipulates that it’s headteachers who have the right to exclude it’s only headteachers, it’s not deputy heads, it’s not teachers themselves. I’m talking about permanent exclusion, by the way, because there’s a myriad ways in which you can exclude people, you know, exclusionary practices of, you know, but we’re talking about, you know, your Outs. Which is the most extreme form of school of punishment that you can apply to young people in education. It used to be caning, you know, I suppose, physical sanctions, but now it’s this, you know, you just physically remove someone.
And, and all that that entails, you know, like, deprive them of the sense of belonging, ostracization, all research and what that does to animals, when you take them away from their peer groups and the social groups: the harm is long term damage. It actually physically changes the structure of your brain. People experience physical pain when they’re taken away from their peers, all of that.
So, that’s why the law is really important, I think it’s more of an acknowledged because, because also we are aware that laws exist, and they are routinely ignored. So, you know, you could change the law and then schools could still exclude, right? So again, we’re not fooling ourselves into thinking that if we ever get there (when we get there), that will fix everything. It won’t. Hence why we also need to do work on policy. In in that is means at institutional level, like trying to influence the way the field works, the way academics work, teachers work, trainers work, teacher, education, universe, all of that. And ultimately schools, right?
And then the biggest thing is cultural: unless we see a cultural shift, we unless we, we grow in, you know, within an environment that culturally actually deems it to be unacceptable, unthinkable, abhorrent, nothing will change, you can change the policies and the laws you like, the culture is the bottom line. But the question is, does the culture need to change first? Or does the law? Which comes first, right? We don’t mind and we don’t care, we’re going for all of it! Right. But one way or another, whether the law changes, and then the culture has to catch up, or whether we make it unconscionable to exclude and then the law catches up whenever it does. We don’t mind ultimately. School exclusions will be abolished in this country in our lifetime. And way sooner than that.
SAMI
ZAHRA
And then and then they have the audacity to say, those are ‘hard to reach families.’ Really? ‘Hard to reach’? or just, you know, or just you don’t give a damn about, and you would rather not hear from them, you know, so. Yeah, so the, like, developing parent power is really important.
And the curriculum, I mean, like, I can’t go into it. And but the curriculum is key as well, because kids are bored! Students are bored! Like school is just irrelevant to a lot of young people. They’re just like, you know, what the knowledge and skills we need for life, we aren’t being taught, and you’re just teaching us lies. And you’re teaching us to be like, you’re teaching us to be competitive with each other, and to, you know, to value ourselves according to what grades we get. And then two summers in a row exams have been cancelled. And everybody’s saying, well, it’s no big deal? But you’ve you’ve literally taught us for 16 years, 18 years that is all about exams, and suddenly decided exams are unimportant. So there’s a lot of cognitive dissonance pieces we need to pick up after the pandemic in relation to: what is education for, you know, who is it for? What do we do with it? Yeah, we could go on and on talk about the purpose of education. But yeah.
KATHERINE
ZAHRA
KATHERINE
And, yeah, a lot of social justice groups, a lot of abolitionist groups are really values-driven. And we’re really wanting to hear a bit about how you practice some of those values in terms of the way that you you organise sort of within within no more exclusions. I’m just wondering if, if someone would like to share. It would be great to hear from you about about that in terms of values in practice.
NADIR
That’s the benefit of having the organisation; at the same time I realised I haven’t been doing that. After this, I can go and find someone, probably someone who’s slightly older than myself to be like, in that moment, what’s the best way to intervene, because you also don’t want to, again, imply that, that that young person hasn’t made a set of choices in response to stuff that people have already told them. So it’s not about doubling down, in the hope that if you keep grinding and grinding will happen, but I’m kind of waffling. Communication is the essence. And it goes back to how the teacher stands at the front. The students act to passively receive. We don’t want to reproduce that amongst ourselves.
KATHERINE
ZAHRA
So for us, I think the, but it’s not, I don’t want to give like a like a romanticised version of that, because it can be challenging. Like, we’ve all been raised in hierarchical, whether it’s the family structure, whether it’s schools, whether it’s church, mosque, community, whatever, there’s always seems to be somebody in charge, in control. And, oh, we can be briefly in control or think we are in control. But there’s always somebody above, right. So really, I think there’s what we’re trying to do with, with, with with our decentralised structure, is to constantly work on like, communication is key, because if we’re not talking to each other about how we feel, and the process of unlearning, and how difficult that is? Because it’s so entrenched, you know, this idea that somebody said, somebody above me that will take care of it or be responsible for something. We are all responsible for each other, and for all of the work. It doesn’t mean we all do everything, obviously not. But it just means that that it doesn’t work like that. And also the, the the within that there has to be an element of like fairness. Otherwise, it’s not really social justice.
So, you know, the ones who have more time have less kind of like, are less impacted by these systems of oppression, you know, allies within the collective and so on, you know, for them to think about, like we do a lot of work on positionality from the start, we get people to think about when they’re joining us. Right. Okay. What what is your positionality? How, what are your principles coming in? And how do those principles and values align with NME like, have you read the website? Are you, are you sure you know what you’re getting into? Because we centre the voices of young black people who’ve been excluded. Like, that’s who we centre. They even have a final say in decision-making, actually. When, when we, you know, we can’t come up to consensus.
So: sociocratic elements in what we do, you know, decisions about consensus; work strands, decentralisation, local chapters, but generally just a lot of relational, kind of, we, like we’re all in this together, and we all chip in where we can. So there is no departmentalization of roles. In that way, we all have a focus in, like, things that we can bring and things that we’ve gotten interested in. But then if somebody needs help with finding a space, or running a session, or writing a submission, because we’re doing a submission to policy, our work is really varied like day to day, week to week. And this is really quite beautiful, the way it comes together, but it’s really difficult to, to, to illustrate, and to explain, even when you’re in it, you know? It’s difficult: it’s really organic, is really rhizomatic, you know, if you can think of like, lots of sprouting roots everywhere, and ideas and actions coming from all over.
But yeah, the, and the solidarity part is so important, solidarity with each other, solidarity with families, and solidarity with – there is there’s a lot of good teachers out there who are really suffering in the profession, because they’re having to, they’re having to embody very oppressive policies. And they, and they can’t, that’s why CARE was born, you know, the Coalition of Anti-Racist Educators, because we will get contacted all the times by teachers who are like, “I can’t quit my job, but I fucking hate it. You know, so I’m like, I love the kids. But you know, I, you know, what’s happening to me? They literally changing my identity as an educator, I feel like I’m a state agent, or a, you know, a cop or something.” And so we really want to rescue education from carcerality. Really, that’s what we need to do. And, and so solidarity with educators, solidarity with struggles that are not directly seemingly linked to education, whether it’s immigration struggles, whether it’s workplace struggles, whether it’s struggles against the police, and like, do you know what I mean? Like, they’re all linked, by the way anyone who’s listening. They are absolutely intimately linked. But it might not always be obvious. And like, we want to make those connections obvious. So that, yeah, we stand side by side, really.
So those, those are the things that we do. And so, when you if you look at the newsletter, if you look at our socials, but also if you’re part of the collective, you kind of see how that solidarity works. And we bring different things to meetings, or post share with each other, like we need to support this family now, like they need help now. It’s like the campaign is a good example for Osime Brown and his deportation. And, like, we were honoured to be able to support that family. And it was an issue that became a case that became a cause. Because it kind of shows the full breadth of that school to prison to deportation pipeline. And so it’s, I’m so happy that we were able to halt that deportation, but that’s just one case. Right? And he’s still trying to just clear his name, just the basics. You know, like, as always, people of colour are fighting for the basics. He’s trying to clear his name because that’s not, it wasn’t, you know, he was convicted of something he didn’t do. Anyways, I could talk forever as you can see, that’s one of the occupational hazards of being a recoveringteacher, I warned you at the start.
SAMI
And so I mean, amazing. So then, okay, so to, to play us out to wrap us up. And as you said before, like obviously, like the the deportation case that you supported on: successfully resisting like, as you said, it’s just one case, right? And there’s always going to be more things like that in the future. And the best way to resist things like that is to get involved and to like to be involved in organisations like yours. So: what can people do if they’re inspired by what you’ve heard? Or if they’d like to get involved in like, the 27 different projects that you’re running? Like, what can people do?
NIRAD
KADEEM
SAMI
I always feel weird buying like merch for groups. I’m not a part of because it’s like, why would I do this, but I feel like now I’ve talked to you this is less weird. So I’m gonna get involved. I’m gonna buy some. Amazing, thank you so much. Zahra. Anything else to add?
NIRAD
SAMI
NIRAD
SAMI
ZAHRA
SAMI
Yeah, I mean, it’s all been said to be only the key things have been said, in addition to what’s been said. Like, we need more people to join, of course, our day to day organising. But also we need friends and supporters who might not have the time. To give, you know, to do internal organising or day to day organising, but can support in other ways that can be really, really powerful. So I want people to think about what power, what influence they have. Where they are, and how can they help build power and, and for coalitional work. For example, by amplifying, by inviting including uplifting, centering lived experience. Not exploiting it, but not being extractive with it, you know? How can you build parent peer support where you are, if you’re a parent, for example, be mindful of positionality because, you know, your positionality as a as a white, middle class, non disabled person will be different to you know, the positionality of someone who’s, you know, got English as a second language, migrant from a, you know, working class, you know, with a precarious job background, etc. So to think about that, when you’re pulling together resources and groups, but definitely think about that. I also want people to, especially educators it’s particularly for educators, teachers, to speak up. I know it’s scary, but to actually be courageous because education, young people, children like need, they don’t need saviours, but they need us to use our voice right now. Education in particular, all spheres of our social lives are under assault, but particularly education, and authoritarianism has no place in the classroom. And we really need to use our voice and oppose and resist, call it out. And don’t go and reinvent shit. Like, if you want to help with a particular cause, whether it’s police in school, whether it’s prison, school exclusion, go and figure out who is already doing the work and support them.
And finally, yeah, please help us with the moratorium, we really need a ban on exclusions in the wake of the pandemic. Like, the last thing children young people need right now is to be kicked out of school. So help us to disrupt the narratives and you know, to shift the frame of like, who is deserving of care, love and education ultimately,
SAMI
ZAHRA
SAMI
ZAHRA
SAMI
So thank you so much. Zahra, Kadeem, Nirad for joining. It has been a genuine pleasure. And feel free to to unmute now and say goodbye.
ZAHRA, KADEEM and NIRAD together:
ALI
To find out more about No More Exclusions, check out their website: Nomoreexclusions.com and Instagram, Twitter and Facebook are all in the shownotes so check them out there. And find out more about resist renew as a facilitation and training collective. Our website is resistrenew.com We are on all the socials. And if you want to support the production of this podcast, check us out on patreon.com/resistrenew. That’s all for this week. Catch you next time!
The podcast currently has 31 episodes available.
16,080 Listeners
1,014 Listeners