In episode #331, Ben breaks down the true financial and economic differences between a SaaS company and an AI company. Inspired by a tweet claiming that “SaaS metrics are broken” and that AI companies generate more absolute profit per customer, Ben puts the theory to the test using real financial modeling.
This episode walks through detailed revenue, gross margin, EBITDA, pricing power, TAM dynamics, and unit economics scenarios to determine whether AI companies actually outperform SaaS businesses.
Why investors are questioning traditional SaaS metrics when evaluating AI companiesThe importance of recurring revenue fundamentals, whether the company is SaaS or AIA side-by-side comparison of a $1M SaaS company versus a $1M AI companyGross margin profiles: 80 percent SaaS vs. 55 percent AIHow EBITDA changes when OpEx is held constantThe revenue scale required for an AI company to match SaaS gross profitThe revenue scale required for an AI company to match SaaS EBITDAWhy AI companies need a TAM that is 6x largerHow pricing power tied to labor displacement can shift AI unit economicsModeling ARPA increases to see when AI gross profit matches SaaSWhy the underlying P&L structure does not change, but the inputs doHow founders should think about forecasting and financial strategy when building AI-native productsFounders embedding AI into SaaS productsAI-native startups modeling their financial futureCFOs and FP&A leaders forecasting revenue, cash, and marginsInvestors evaluating early-stage AI companiesOperators building long-term company valuation strategiesBen emphasizes that the P&L, revenue streams, cost structure, and core KPI’s still apply. What changes are the inputs—gross margin profile, pricing power, TAM, ACV, and scalability assumptions.
Full blog post with financial modeling examples: https://www.thesaascfo.com/the-real-economics-of-saas-versus-ai-companiesSaaS metrics course: https://www.thesaasacademy.com/the-saas-metrics-foundation