
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of our Safety Perspectives From the Dallas Region podcast series, shareholders John Surma (Houston) and Frank Davis (Dallas) discuss pending litigation regarding the constitutionality of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) administrative law judges (ALJs). Frank and John review the arguments supporting the claim that the current system for handling workplace safety disputes is unconstitutional. They specifically highlight issues such as the absence of the right to a jury trial, improper appointments of judges, restrictions on the president’s authority to remove judges, and an insufficient number of OSHRC members to adequately review cases.
By Ogletree Deakins4.6
5151 ratings
In this episode of our Safety Perspectives From the Dallas Region podcast series, shareholders John Surma (Houston) and Frank Davis (Dallas) discuss pending litigation regarding the constitutionality of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) administrative law judges (ALJs). Frank and John review the arguments supporting the claim that the current system for handling workplace safety disputes is unconstitutional. They specifically highlight issues such as the absence of the right to a jury trial, improper appointments of judges, restrictions on the president’s authority to remove judges, and an insufficient number of OSHRC members to adequately review cases.

43,576 Listeners

14 Listeners

2,448 Listeners

14,936 Listeners

69,535 Listeners

9,210 Listeners

208 Listeners

145 Listeners

17 Listeners

47,997 Listeners

3,865 Listeners

12,599 Listeners

0 Listeners

5,394 Listeners

1,651 Listeners