The pros and cons of investing your retirement assets 100% in equity, including half in international stocks. Why the 4% spending rule is too aggressive.

• Why historical asset class return studies that use only U.S. data are biased
• How researchers build a broader database to study retirement outcomes and spending rates
• How a 100% stock portfolio performed compared to balanced portfolios and target date funds
• Why investors should have half their assets in international stocks
• Why a 4% spending rule is too high, and what is the alternative

Sponsor

NetSuite – Get your free KPI checklist

Insiders Guide Email Newsletter

Get our free Investors' Checklist when you sign up for the free Money for the Rest of Us email newsletter

Our Premium Products

Asset Camp

Money for the Rest of Us Plus

Show Notes

Beyond the Status Quo: A Critical Assessment of Lifecycle Investment Advice by Aizhan Anarkulova, Scott Cederburg, and Michael S. O'Doherty—SSRN

The Safe Withdrawal Rate: Evidence from a Broad Sample of Developed Markets by Aizhan Anarkulova, Scott Cederburg, Michael S. O'Doherty, and Richard W. Sias—SSRN

Related Episodes

421: Beware of Survivorship Bias When Investing

326: The New Math of Retirement Spending and Investing

254: Should You Be 100% Invested In Stocks?

250: Investing Rule One: Avoid Ruin

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.