
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Part 4 shifts from merger talk into the part of grading nobody likes to say out loud.
It starts with the “I’ve heard stories” framing, then draws a hard line between pre Nat Turner ownership and post Nat Turner, including the point that Collectors inherited liabilities and has paid out on mistakes from earlier eras. From there, the panel gets into why the hobby quietly benefits from inconsistency, even while asking for standardization.
And then the episode drops the best real world illustration of the entire debate: a card that graded 5.5 on a Beckett raw card review, then later came back as a BGS 9.5. Same card, same grader ecosystem, wildly different outcome.
Highlights in Part 4 include:
The “I’ve heard stories” disclaimer and why some things get talked around, not stated
Pre Turner vs post Turner: inherited liability, payouts, and where blame actually belongs
The uncomfortable truth: if grading was consistent, resubmissions would collapse
Is there a tipping point where collectors stop paying for the slab number and start paying for the card
The “record sale” culture and why nobody flexes a record low
Big money entering the hobby and the moment investors realize how the sausage is made
The raw card review story: 5.5 to 9.5, and what that says about grading as a product
The ethics question: if you sell a card that jumped grades, what do you owe the buyer
Reholder without regrade: should a card be reassessed every time it passes through the facility
Old standards vs new standards: should an older PSA 7 stay a 7 even if it would grade lower today
The health inspector analogy that nails the point: same item, changed condition, unchanged label
Buyer beware vs “protect the hobby”: how those two ideas collide in the content era
The practical takeaway: advanced collectors hunt lower grades with stronger eye appeal, not the other way around
Part 4 is basically the grading debate in its purest form: what people say they want, what they actually reward, and what happens when reality shows up.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Cloud104.4
4747 ratings
Part 4 shifts from merger talk into the part of grading nobody likes to say out loud.
It starts with the “I’ve heard stories” framing, then draws a hard line between pre Nat Turner ownership and post Nat Turner, including the point that Collectors inherited liabilities and has paid out on mistakes from earlier eras. From there, the panel gets into why the hobby quietly benefits from inconsistency, even while asking for standardization.
And then the episode drops the best real world illustration of the entire debate: a card that graded 5.5 on a Beckett raw card review, then later came back as a BGS 9.5. Same card, same grader ecosystem, wildly different outcome.
Highlights in Part 4 include:
The “I’ve heard stories” disclaimer and why some things get talked around, not stated
Pre Turner vs post Turner: inherited liability, payouts, and where blame actually belongs
The uncomfortable truth: if grading was consistent, resubmissions would collapse
Is there a tipping point where collectors stop paying for the slab number and start paying for the card
The “record sale” culture and why nobody flexes a record low
Big money entering the hobby and the moment investors realize how the sausage is made
The raw card review story: 5.5 to 9.5, and what that says about grading as a product
The ethics question: if you sell a card that jumped grades, what do you owe the buyer
Reholder without regrade: should a card be reassessed every time it passes through the facility
Old standards vs new standards: should an older PSA 7 stay a 7 even if it would grade lower today
The health inspector analogy that nails the point: same item, changed condition, unchanged label
Buyer beware vs “protect the hobby”: how those two ideas collide in the content era
The practical takeaway: advanced collectors hunt lower grades with stronger eye appeal, not the other way around
Part 4 is basically the grading debate in its purest form: what people say they want, what they actually reward, and what happens when reality shows up.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

122 Listeners

75 Listeners

99 Listeners

366 Listeners

120 Listeners

24 Listeners

172 Listeners

111 Listeners

1,029 Listeners

46 Listeners

35 Listeners

44 Listeners

33 Listeners

24 Listeners

11 Listeners