
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this session, we look at the so-called ‘affective turn’ in the humanities and social sciences since the late 1990s. We consider the multiple forms which this ‘turn’ to affect has taken, in both political terms (from libertarian accelerationists to radical communists) and disciplinary ( from film theory to geography), asking how Spinozan it all is, and whether that matters anyway.
This is part of our series ‘From Marx to Spinoza’. For more information see: https://culturepowerpolitics.org/from-marx-to-spinoza-affect-ideology-materiality/
If you can support us with a small regular donation, please do so here.
If you’d like to make a one-time donation, please do so here.
By Jeremy Gilbert4.7
2121 ratings
In this session, we look at the so-called ‘affective turn’ in the humanities and social sciences since the late 1990s. We consider the multiple forms which this ‘turn’ to affect has taken, in both political terms (from libertarian accelerationists to radical communists) and disciplinary ( from film theory to geography), asking how Spinozan it all is, and whether that matters anyway.
This is part of our series ‘From Marx to Spinoza’. For more information see: https://culturepowerpolitics.org/from-marx-to-spinoza-affect-ideology-materiality/
If you can support us with a small regular donation, please do so here.
If you’d like to make a one-time donation, please do so here.

292 Listeners

1,449 Listeners

171 Listeners

1,569 Listeners

210 Listeners

581 Listeners

179 Listeners

557 Listeners

53 Listeners

199 Listeners

278 Listeners

18 Listeners

347 Listeners

27 Listeners

24 Listeners