
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Law professor Daniel Ho says that the law is ripe for AI innovation, but a lot is at stake. Naive application of AI can lead to rampant hallucinations in over 80 percent of legal queries, so much research remains to be done in the field. Ho tells how California counties recently used AI to find and redact racist property covenants from their laws—a task predicted to take years, reduced to days. AI can be quite good at removing “regulatory sludge,” Ho tells host Russ Altman in teasing the expanding promise of AI in the law in this episode of Stanford Engineering’s The Future of Everything podcast
Have a question for Russ? Send it our way in writing or via voice memo, and it might be featured on an upcoming episode. Please introduce yourself, let us know where you're listening from, and share your question. You can send questions to [email protected].
Episode Reference Links:
Connect With Us:
Chapters:
(00:00:00) Introduction
Russ Altman introduces Dan Ho, a professor of law and computer science at Stanford University.
(00:03:36) Journey into Law and AI
Dan shares his early interest in institutions and social reform.
(00:04:52) Misconceptions About Law
Common misunderstandings about the focus of legal work.
(00:06:44) Using LLMs for Legal Advice
The current capabilities and limits of LLMs in legal settings.
(00:09:09) Identifying Legislation with AI
Building a model to identify and redact racial covenants in deeds.
(00:13:09) OCR and Multimodal Models
Improving outdated OCR systems using multimodal AI.
(00:14:08) STARA: AI for Statute Search
A tool to scan laws for outdated or excessive requirements.
(00:16:18) AI and Redundant Reports
Using STARA to find obsolete legislatively mandated reports
(00:20:10) Verifying AI Accuracy
Comparing STARA results with federal data to ensure reliability.
(00:22:10) Outdated or Wasteful Regulations
Examples of bureaucratic redundancies that hinder legal process.
(00:23:38) Consolidating Reports with AI
How different bureaucrats deal with outdated legislative reports.
(00:26:14) Open vs. Closed AI Models
The risks, benefits, and transparency in legal AI tools.
(00:32:14) Replacing Lawyers with Legal Chatbot
Why general-purpose legal chatbots aren't ready to replace lawyers.
(00:34:58) Conclusion
Connect With Us:
Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything Website
Connect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / Mastodon
Connect with School of Engineering >>>Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook
4.8
127127 ratings
Law professor Daniel Ho says that the law is ripe for AI innovation, but a lot is at stake. Naive application of AI can lead to rampant hallucinations in over 80 percent of legal queries, so much research remains to be done in the field. Ho tells how California counties recently used AI to find and redact racist property covenants from their laws—a task predicted to take years, reduced to days. AI can be quite good at removing “regulatory sludge,” Ho tells host Russ Altman in teasing the expanding promise of AI in the law in this episode of Stanford Engineering’s The Future of Everything podcast
Have a question for Russ? Send it our way in writing or via voice memo, and it might be featured on an upcoming episode. Please introduce yourself, let us know where you're listening from, and share your question. You can send questions to [email protected].
Episode Reference Links:
Connect With Us:
Chapters:
(00:00:00) Introduction
Russ Altman introduces Dan Ho, a professor of law and computer science at Stanford University.
(00:03:36) Journey into Law and AI
Dan shares his early interest in institutions and social reform.
(00:04:52) Misconceptions About Law
Common misunderstandings about the focus of legal work.
(00:06:44) Using LLMs for Legal Advice
The current capabilities and limits of LLMs in legal settings.
(00:09:09) Identifying Legislation with AI
Building a model to identify and redact racial covenants in deeds.
(00:13:09) OCR and Multimodal Models
Improving outdated OCR systems using multimodal AI.
(00:14:08) STARA: AI for Statute Search
A tool to scan laws for outdated or excessive requirements.
(00:16:18) AI and Redundant Reports
Using STARA to find obsolete legislatively mandated reports
(00:20:10) Verifying AI Accuracy
Comparing STARA results with federal data to ensure reliability.
(00:22:10) Outdated or Wasteful Regulations
Examples of bureaucratic redundancies that hinder legal process.
(00:23:38) Consolidating Reports with AI
How different bureaucrats deal with outdated legislative reports.
(00:26:14) Open vs. Closed AI Models
The risks, benefits, and transparency in legal AI tools.
(00:32:14) Replacing Lawyers with Legal Chatbot
Why general-purpose legal chatbots aren't ready to replace lawyers.
(00:34:58) Conclusion
Connect With Us:
Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything Website
Connect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / Mastodon
Connect with School of Engineering >>>Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook
4,283 Listeners
177 Listeners
1,273 Listeners
32,283 Listeners
1,036 Listeners
331 Listeners
3,998 Listeners
1,438 Listeners
38 Listeners
259 Listeners
147 Listeners
106 Listeners
262 Listeners
120 Listeners
491 Listeners
46 Listeners