
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In the first of a multi-part topic, Dr. Steve Wood and Dr. Bill Kanasky, Jr. discuss irrational thinking patterns. Steve and Bill describe how the brain makes connections that may or may not be connected in reality and how that type of irrational thinking can impact witness performance, requiring cognitive reframing to correct these irrational thinking patterns. Bill and Steve have identified 13 cognitive distortions that are crippling your witnesses and cover four of these distortions in this episode:
1) Polarized thinking - this type of thinking occurs when your witness feels they have to be perfect as a witness;
2) Mental filtering - when a witness magnifies negative aspects of the case and ignores or discounts positive facts;
3) Overgeneralization - this happens when your witness focuses on a single negative event from the past and makes an extreme conclusion that all other events in the future will be negative;
4) Jumping to conclusions - your witness is convinced that there is no chance at obtaining a favorable trial verdict or settlement.
Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/ImG
By litpsych4.5
2626 ratings
In the first of a multi-part topic, Dr. Steve Wood and Dr. Bill Kanasky, Jr. discuss irrational thinking patterns. Steve and Bill describe how the brain makes connections that may or may not be connected in reality and how that type of irrational thinking can impact witness performance, requiring cognitive reframing to correct these irrational thinking patterns. Bill and Steve have identified 13 cognitive distortions that are crippling your witnesses and cover four of these distortions in this episode:
1) Polarized thinking - this type of thinking occurs when your witness feels they have to be perfect as a witness;
2) Mental filtering - when a witness magnifies negative aspects of the case and ignores or discounts positive facts;
3) Overgeneralization - this happens when your witness focuses on a single negative event from the past and makes an extreme conclusion that all other events in the future will be negative;
4) Jumping to conclusions - your witness is convinced that there is no chance at obtaining a favorable trial verdict or settlement.
Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/ImG

22,014 Listeners

32,090 Listeners

227,699 Listeners

30,660 Listeners

375 Listeners

461 Listeners

507 Listeners

87,143 Listeners

112,467 Listeners

56,388 Listeners

186 Listeners

5,749 Listeners

16,072 Listeners

48 Listeners

585 Listeners