
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In the 1910s, a relatively unknown cancer researcher named Maud Slye announced the first results of a study with the loftiest ambitions: to identify what causes cancer. To answer that question, the University of Chicago geneticist had bred tens of thousands of mice, enough to fill a three-story building. She carefully documented their ancestry and their morbidities and performed autopsies. And to Slye, her findings were clear: vulnerability to cancer was hereditary. If we wanted to, we could eliminate it. But Slye made some crucial mistakes along the way—and a number of enemies.
By Lost Women of Science4.8
261261 ratings
In the 1910s, a relatively unknown cancer researcher named Maud Slye announced the first results of a study with the loftiest ambitions: to identify what causes cancer. To answer that question, the University of Chicago geneticist had bred tens of thousands of mice, enough to fill a three-story building. She carefully documented their ancestry and their morbidities and performed autopsies. And to Slye, her findings were clear: vulnerability to cancer was hereditary. If we wanted to, we could eliminate it. But Slye made some crucial mistakes along the way—and a number of enemies.

91,052 Listeners

21,967 Listeners

43,944 Listeners

32,091 Listeners

43,702 Listeners

1,267 Listeners

1,292 Listeners

12,175 Listeners

6,381 Listeners

2,177 Listeners

16,251 Listeners

6,427 Listeners

5,174 Listeners

1,718 Listeners

1,670 Listeners