
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In the 1910s, a relatively unknown cancer researcher named Maud Slye announced the first results of a study with the loftiest ambitions: to identify what causes cancer. To answer that question, the University of Chicago geneticist had bred tens of thousands of mice, enough to fill a three-story building. She carefully documented their ancestry and their morbidities and performed autopsies. And to Slye, her findings were clear: vulnerability to cancer was hereditary. If we wanted to, we could eliminate it. But Slye made some crucial mistakes along the way—and a number of enemies.
By Lost Women of Science4.8
272272 ratings
In the 1910s, a relatively unknown cancer researcher named Maud Slye announced the first results of a study with the loftiest ambitions: to identify what causes cancer. To answer that question, the University of Chicago geneticist had bred tens of thousands of mice, enough to fill a three-story building. She carefully documented their ancestry and their morbidities and performed autopsies. And to Slye, her findings were clear: vulnerability to cancer was hereditary. If we wanted to, we could eliminate it. But Slye made some crucial mistakes along the way—and a number of enemies.

43,825 Listeners

43,607 Listeners

26,259 Listeners

6,889 Listeners

1,253 Listeners

3,663 Listeners

6,434 Listeners

2,248 Listeners

4,203 Listeners

24,575 Listeners

2,182 Listeners

16,486 Listeners

5,120 Listeners

2,304 Listeners

1,743 Listeners