
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In the 1910s, a relatively unknown cancer researcher named Maud Slye announced the first results of a study with the loftiest ambitions: to identify what causes cancer. To answer that question, the University of Chicago geneticist had bred tens of thousands of mice, enough to fill a three-story building. She carefully documented their ancestry and their morbidities and performed autopsies. And to Slye, her findings were clear: vulnerability to cancer was hereditary. If we wanted to, we could eliminate it. But Slye made some crucial mistakes along the way—and a number of enemies.
By Lost Women of Science4.8
261261 ratings
In the 1910s, a relatively unknown cancer researcher named Maud Slye announced the first results of a study with the loftiest ambitions: to identify what causes cancer. To answer that question, the University of Chicago geneticist had bred tens of thousands of mice, enough to fill a three-story building. She carefully documented their ancestry and their morbidities and performed autopsies. And to Slye, her findings were clear: vulnerability to cancer was hereditary. If we wanted to, we could eliminate it. But Slye made some crucial mistakes along the way—and a number of enemies.

90,955 Listeners

21,957 Listeners

43,907 Listeners

32,034 Listeners

43,615 Listeners

1,259 Listeners

1,292 Listeners

12,206 Listeners

6,412 Listeners

2,228 Listeners

16,376 Listeners

6,548 Listeners

5,151 Listeners

1,733 Listeners

1,682 Listeners