Floresville ISD debates random drug testing for middle, high school extracurriculars

San Antonio Express News, By Melissa Manno, on June 24, 2024

https://www.expressnews.com/news/education/article/floresville-isd-considers-random-drug-testing-19508797.php?sid=6628c885020c5168ed00c05

The debate over implementing random drug testing for approximately one hundred students per year in Floresville Independent School District has sparked mixed reactions within the community. The proposed policy aims to curb drug use among students by enforcing punishments such as suspension from extracurricular activities and parking privileges upon testing positive. Parents' responses vary widely, highlighting concerns over invasion of privacy, allocation of funds, and efficacy compared to other community initiatives.

Proponents argue that such measures could deter drug use and identify students needing early intervention through counseling. However, critics, including panelists like Rob and Eli, argue against its punitive nature, questioning its effectiveness and potential harms. They emphasize that punitive measures may deter students from seeking help or disclosing drug use issues, potentially exacerbating rather than solving underlying problems.

The discussion also delves into legal and ethical dimensions, particularly regarding parental consent, students' rights, and the school's role in enforcing such policies. Kelly strongly opposes the policy, citing constitutional concerns, the focus on marijuana over other drugs, and questioning its effectiveness in addressing real issues faced by students.

Overall, while there is recognition of the need for addressing drug use among students, the panelists express reservations about the punitive nature of the proposed policy and suggest alternative approaches emphasizing support, education, and community involvement over enforcement.

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.28.4 featuring Jimmy Jr., Rob, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Oklahoma orders schools to teach the Bible 'immediately'

BBC News, By Bernd Debusmann Jr, on June 29, 2024

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjk35vv2ryjo 

In this segment discussing Oklahoma's recent educational policy changes, the focus is on Ryan Walters, the school superintendent, who has mandated integrating Bible studies into the state's classrooms. This move has sparked widespread debate over its constitutionality and educational implications. Walters argues that understanding the Bible is crucial for grasping the foundation of the United States, which has drawn criticism for potentially marginalizing non-Christian students.

Opposition to Walters' directive has been robust, with organizations like the Interfaith Alliance arguing that true religious freedom includes preventing the imposition of any single religious viewpoint on all students. Critics fear this move could violate the separation of church and state principles enshrined in the Constitution. The controversy has also garnered attention nationally, covered by various news outlets including BBC News.

Comparisons are drawn to similar debates in states like Louisiana, where laws mandating the display of religious texts in schools have raised similar constitutional concerns. The discussion reflects broader tensions between religious freedom, educational neutrality, and the role of government in shaping public education. As legal challenges loom and public opinion remains divided, the future of these policies and their impact on educational diversity and constitutional rights remains uncertain.

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.28.3 featuring Jimmy Jr., Rob, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Religious leader wants to display Indian scriptures in Louisiana public classrooms

WGNO ABC, By Keymonte Avery, on June 24, 2024

https://wgno.com/news/politics/louisiana-politics/religious-leader-wants-to-display-indian-scriptures-in-louisiana-public-classrooms/

Indians seek display of Gita verses along with Ten Commandments in Louisiana schools

 - IndiaPost NewsPaperIndia Post News Service, on June 29, 2024

https://indiapost.com/indians-seek-display-of-gita-verses-along-with-ten-commandments-in-louisiana-schools/

In Louisiana, a contentious new law has stirred debate over the intersection of religion and public education. The law mandates that any classroom receiving state funding must prominently display the Ten Commandments. This requirement has ignited a fierce legal and ideological battle, with proponents arguing for the importance of religious values in education and opponents raising concerns about constitutional violations regarding the separation of church and state.

Adding complexity to the issue, religious leaders, including representatives of the Hindu community such as Rajan Zed, have entered the fray. They have offered to fund displays of their own sacred texts, like the Bhagavad Gita, alongside the Ten Commandments. This gesture is seen as both a challenge to the law's perceived Christian favoritism and a call for broader religious inclusivity within educational settings.

Critics of the law, including some Christian leaders like Reverend Jeff Sims, are also vocal. They argue that while promoting religious values can be beneficial, mandating specific religious texts in publicly funded classrooms crosses a constitutional line. Their concerns extend to the potential for government endorsement of a particular religion, which could lead to legal challenges that might ultimately reach the Supreme Court.

The situation in Louisiana reflects ongoing national debates over the appropriate role of religion in public institutions, especially in educational contexts supported by taxpayer funds. It raises fundamental questions about religious freedom, government neutrality in matters of faith, and the boundaries set by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. As legal challenges and public opinions evolve, the outcome in Louisiana could have broader implications for similar laws and policies across the United States, shaping the future landscape of religious expression in public education.

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.28.2 featuring Jimmy Jr., Rob, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Civil religion as a gateway to Christian nationalism

Religion News Service, By Beau Underwood and Brian Kaylor, on June 25, 2024

https://religionnews.com/2024/06/25/civil-religion-as-a-gateway-to-christian-nationalism/

The discussion begins by questioning the significance of Christianity in American life. Historically, politics and Christianity were intertwined, but the conversation aims to explore whether this remains true today or if it ever really was. Eli Slack introduces the concept of civil religion, which refers to the quasi-religious loyalty and rituals found in American political life.

A pivotal moment highlighted is from 1954 when President Dwight Eisenhower signed legislation to add "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance. This change, inspired by Reverend George Dougherty's sermon, aimed to distinguish American Christian democracy from Soviet atheism. Dougherty controversially labeled atheists as "spiritual parasites," yet today, 21% of Americans claim no religious affiliation. This significant shift points to a growing divergence from traditional religious adherence in American society.

The conversation delves into the notion of civil religion, emphasizing how government rituals and hierarchies mirror those of religion. Eli and Rob discuss the similarities between American politics and Christianity, particularly the authoritative structures and rules. They ponder the intertwining of these ideologies and question if the fundamental values of Christianity truly align with American ideals of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Rob reflects on America's founding, noting that many settlers fled religious persecution to practice their faith freely. The framers of the Constitution emphasized the separation of church and state to avoid the religious conflicts they escaped. Despite this, there remains a continuous push to redefine America through a religious lens, often ignoring the Constitution's intent.

Kelly points out the evolving relationship between Christianity and non-religious Americans. The percentage of Americans unaffiliated with any religion has grown significantly, indicating a shift away from traditional religious influence. This change challenges the idea that Christianity is fundamental to American identity, as proposed by Dougherty in his sermon.

Eli discusses the misuse of religious rhetoric by politicians to score political points, despite their understanding of the establishment clause. This manipulation often appeals to Christian constituents who view their faith as superior and exempt from constitutional restrictions. This approach fosters division rather than unity.

The panel debates the role of religion in society, with Rob asserting that while religion has historically carved a place for itself, society can function ethically without it. He highlights the importance of compassion and genuine human connection over dogmatic adherence. The misuse of religious influence for political gain, as seen in Dougherty's sermon, perpetuates power imbalances and societal division.

Kelly raises concerns about the rise of Christian nationalism and its impact on American politics. He notes that any movement to integrate religion into government is now tainted by nationalist extremism, making coherent religious advocacy difficult. This shift highlights the need for liberal Christians to ally with secularists to combat extremist ideologies.

The discussion concludes with reflections on patriotism and loyalty to one's country. Eli emphasizes the importance of recontextualizing patriotism to focus on caring for fellow citizens rather than blind nationalism. The panel agrees that fostering compassion and understanding is crucial in bridging societal divides and countering extremist views.

Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complex and evolving relationship between Christianity and American identity, highlighting the need for dialogue, compassion, and a commitment to the principles of the Constitution in navigating these challenges.


The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.28.1 featuring Jimmy Jr., Rob, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

How a Network of Nonprofits Enriches Fundraisers While Spending Almost Nothing on Its Stated Causes

ProPublica, By Ellis Simani, on June 18, 2024

https://www.propublica.org/article/political-nonprofits-fundraising-ftc-irs-527s-pacs 

A network of connected political nonprofits, such as the American Breast Cancer Coalition and National Coalition for Disabled Veterans, has been discovered funneling over 90% of donations to fundraisers rather than their stated causes. Despite being fined over $58 million and banned from charitable fundraising, the perpetrators found a loophole in political fundraising. 

Companies like Office Edge LLC, owned by Thomas Berkenbush, and others have raised millions under the guise of supporting admirable causes but have spent minimal amounts on actual political activities. These groups, categorized as 527 organizations, operate with lax oversight from the IRS, making it difficult for the public to track their activities. 

The connections between these nonprofits are evident in shared web designs, payment systems, and overlapping donors and contractors. For donors like retiree Laurence Eggers, who gave to these causes believing they were supporting the needy, this revelation is a betrayal. This investigation exposes the dark side of fundraising where money meant for good causes ends up enriching a few at the expense of genuine charitable efforts.

  #PoliticalManipulation #PoliticalCorruption  

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.27.4 featuring Phoebe Rose, Infidel64, and Jason Friedman.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Robert Morris warned sex abuse accuser she could be prosecuted for seeking compensation, emails show

NBC News, By Mike Hixenbaugh, on June 21,2024

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/robert-morris-gateway-church-sex-abuse-emails-rcna158349 

In a recent episode of unsettling church misconduct, Robert Morris, a prominent church leader, has been accused of committing adultery with a 12-year-old. This egregious violation of trust and moral principles highlights a severe breach in the sanctity of religious leadership. The church's attempt to refer to the victim as a "young lady" only underscores the deception and dishonesty prevalent within the institution. The hypocrisy of advocating for Christian morality while engaging in such abhorrent behavior raises significant questions about the integrity and accountability of religious institutions.

As the details unfold, it becomes evident that the church was aware of Morris's actions yet chose to shield him rather than protect the vulnerable. This case is not an isolated incident but part of a disturbing pattern of abuse and cover-ups within religious communities. The culture of forgiveness and secrecy in the church often allows perpetrators to evade justice, perpetuating a cycle of abuse. The close ties between religious figures and political power further complicate the issue, providing abusers with additional protection and influence.

Victims of such abuse, like the 12-year-old in Morris's case, suffer immensely, often dealing with lifelong trauma. The church's failure to address these issues effectively and transparently only exacerbates the problem. The need for stringent legal reforms and a cultural shift towards accountability and transparency in religious institutions is imperative. Protecting the vulnerable and ensuring justice for the victims should be the primary focus, rather than preserving the reputation of the church or its leaders.

The broader societal implications of such scandals are profound. They erode public trust in religious institutions and undermine the moral authority they claim to possess. It is crucial to address these issues head-on, dismantling the structures that enable such behavior and fostering an environment where victims can come forward without fear of retribution or disbelief. The fight against such deep-seated corruption and hypocrisy requires collective action and unwavering commitment to justice and integrity.

#ChurchScandals  #JusticeForVictims  #EndAbuse 

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.27.3 featuring Phoebe Rose, Infidel64, and Jason Friedman.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

They took part in Apache ceremonies. Their schools expelled them for satanic activities

The Guardian, By Nicolle Okoren, on June 24, 2024

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jun/24/apache-students-school-reservation

The podcast episode delves into the persistent and evolving issues surrounding the treatment of Indigenous people and their cultures, particularly in the context of education and religious freedom. The hosts take a historical journey back to the 1820s and beyond, examining how colonial attitudes and policies aimed at erasing Native American culture are still prevalent today. They highlight the relentless oppression and marginalization that Indigenous communities face, tracing this legacy back to the days of colonization and Christian missionary work.

The discussion touches on the hypocrisy of certain Christian groups who condemn Indigenous rituals as blasphemous while engaging in their own religious ceremonies. This hypocrisy is exemplified in the treatment of Indigenous children in schools, where they are often penalized for participating in cultural practices. The hosts share personal anecdotes, including one about a child being labeled a Satanist and facing physical attacks for expressing non-religious and queer identities, emphasizing the extent of religious overreach in public education.

The episode also critiques the current state of education for Indigenous children, pointing out the substandard conditions of Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) schools compared to mainstream public schools. They argue that the separate and unequal education system perpetuates a cycle of ignorance and marginalization, echoing the historical injustices of the Trail of Tears and other oppressive policies. The conversation underscores the need for a unified and equitable education system that respects and preserves Indigenous cultures rather than trying to erase them.

The hosts express their frustration with the normalization of Christian dominance in American society, noting how this mindset allows for continued discrimination against non-Christian practices. They draw parallels between the historical treatment of Native Americans and contemporary issues of religious intolerance, warning that the increasing boldness of Christian nationalist rhetoric poses a threat to religious freedom and cultural diversity.

In conclusion, the episode serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing struggles faced by Indigenous communities in preserving their heritage and resisting cultural erasure. It calls for greater awareness and action to address these injustices and protect the rights and identities of all people.

 #IndigenousRights   #ManifestDestiny #ChristianNationalism 

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.27.2 featuring Phoebe Rose, Infidel64, and Jason Friedman.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

The Supreme Court upholds a gun control law intended to protect domestic violence victims

AP NEWS, By Mark Sherman, on June 21, 2024

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence-d63ee828e51911cc5e5a01780820f224

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld a federal gun control law designed to protect victims of domestic violence. The ruling, decided 8 to 1, reinforced the 1994 ban on firearms for individuals under restraining orders, reversing a prior decision by the New Orleans Federal Appeals Court. This ruling highlights the ongoing battle between gun rights and victim protection. The case, reported by Mark Sherman from AP News, emphasizes the court's stance on maintaining safety for those at risk of domestic violence.

Clarence Thomas stood alone in dissent, continuing his trend of opposing gun control measures. His predictable stance raises questions about his broader judicial philosophy and its implications for public safety. Despite the law's intent to protect potential victims, the dissent points to a deeper debate about the balance between constitutional rights and preventative measures.

Jason, reflecting on his experience as a gun owner in Texas, voiced concerns about the implications of restraining orders on gun rights. He highlighted the variability in the standards for obtaining such orders and the potential for misuse. This perspective underscores the tension between protecting individual rights and ensuring community safety.

The discussion also delved into broader issues of gun control and public safety. Infidel, while acknowledging the necessity of some gun regulations, pointed out the complex dynamics at play, including the role of the drug war in militarizing police forces and escalating gun violence. The conversation revealed the intricate layers of the gun debate, from legal principles to societal impacts.

Phoebe, bringing a perspective from outside the US, questioned the American obsession with firearms. She drew comparisons to countries like the UK and Australia, where strict gun control has led to significantly lower rates of gun violence. This international viewpoint highlighted the potential benefits of more stringent gun regulations.

The dialogue also touched on the role of restraining orders in protecting victims while considering the potential for bias and misuse. Jason and Infidel both recognized the challenges in ensuring fair and effective implementation of these orders. The conversation underscored the need for a nuanced approach to gun control, one that balances individual rights with public safety.

Overall, the Supreme Court's ruling marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over gun control and domestic violence. It reaffirms the importance of protecting victims while highlighting the complex interplay of legal, social, and cultural factors in the American gun debate.

#SupremeCourt  #DomesticViolence #ClarenceThomas
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.27.1 featuring Phoebe Rose, Infidel64, and Jason Friedman.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

19% of U.S. adults report frequently or always feeling lonely, new Yahoo/YouGov poll finds. Here's why — and which age group is affected most.

Yahoo Life, By Erica L. Green, on May 20, 2024

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/19-of-us-adults-report-frequently-or-always-feeling-lonely-new-yahooyougov-poll-finds-heres-why--and-which-age-group-is-affected-most-090036452.html

Human beings are inherently social creatures, yet the phenomenon of loneliness is an undeniable reality that can strike even when surrounded by others. Jimmy delves into the essence of loneliness, exploring how different age groups might define and measure it uniquely. This exploration is sparked by an article titled "19% of U.S. Adults Report Frequently or Always Feeling Lonely," which immediately brings social media to mind. The pervasive role of social media in our lives creates an ironic twist, where the digital age fosters connectivity yet amplifies feelings of isolation.

Loneliness is not a one-size-fits-all experience; it varies across demographics. Older adults might experience it differently than younger individuals, with each group facing unique challenges and triggers. For some, loneliness stems from a lack of physical interaction, while for others, it’s an emotional void that digital interactions fail to fill. The statistics are stark: nearly one in five adults frequently or always feels lonely, highlighting a critical societal issue.

The modern epidemic of loneliness is often exacerbated by social media, which promises connection but can leave users feeling more isolated. The constant comparison and curated perfection seen online can deepen feelings of inadequacy and solitude. However, loneliness is not just a byproduct of the digital age; it’s a timeless issue that has affected people throughout history, though its manifestations may have evolved.

Jimmy’s comments underscores the importance of understanding and addressing loneliness. It's a silent struggle that many endure, often unnoticed and unspoken. Bringing this issue to light is crucial for fostering empathy and finding solutions. From the statistical realities to personal experiences, the narrative sheds light on the multifaceted nature of loneliness, urging society to recognize and mitigate its impact.

#Loneliness  #DigitalAge #MentalHealth

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.26.4 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jimmy Jr., and Cindy Plaza

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Justice Alito Caught on Tape Discussing How Battle for America ‘Can’t Be Compromised’

Rolling Stone, By Tessa Stuart and Tim Dickinson , on June 10, 2024

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/samuel-alito-supreme-court-justice-recording-tape-battle-1235036470/

The recent Rolling Stone article featuring a recording of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's candid thoughts has sparked significant controversy. In the recording, Alito discusses political polarization, the role of the Supreme Court, and his views on America's moral direction. His comments underscore his firm stance within the court's conservative faction, contrasting sharply with Chief Justice John Roberts' more measured responses at the same event. This revelation has profound implications for the judiciary's perceived impartiality and the broader landscape of American democracy.

Alito expressed a pessimistic view on the possibility of compromise between opposing political sides, claiming that the ideological rift is irreparable. This stance is reflective of a broader conservative perspective that is often seen as detached from reality by its critics. Alito's comments suggest a desire to uphold laws and ideas that many consider outdated, pointing to a deeper issue within the American political system. The recording sheds light on the challenges faced by the Supreme Court in navigating a polarized society and maintaining its role as an impartial arbiter of justice.

Chief Justice Roberts, in contrast, emphasized the importance of impartiality and secular principles in judicial decision-making. His approach suggests a commitment to the spirit of the Establishment Clause, which seeks to separate church and state. This difference in perspective between Roberts and Alito highlights the internal divisions within the Supreme Court and the broader implications for its role in American society. The contrasting views of these two justices underscore the ongoing debate over the court's function and the influence of personal beliefs on judicial rulings.

Historically, the Supreme Court has been tasked with interpreting the Constitution in a way that reflects contemporary society. However, the court's current composition, with a conservative majority, raises questions about its ability to fulfill this role effectively. Alito's comments reveal a tension between upholding traditional values and adapting to modern realities. This tension is further exacerbated by the influence of religious beliefs on some justices' decision-making processes, which critics argue undermines the court's impartiality.

The broader implications of these revelations are significant. They highlight the potential for the Supreme Court to become a battleground for ideological conflicts, rather than a neutral arbiter of justice. This shift could erode public trust in the judiciary and undermine the foundational principles of American democracy. The recording of Alito's comments serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing the Supreme Court and the importance of maintaining its independence from political and religious influences.

As the nation grapples with these issues, it becomes increasingly clear that the Supreme Court's role in shaping America's future is more critical than ever. The court must navigate a complex landscape of competing ideologies and maintain its commitment to impartiality and justice. The revelations about Alito's views underscore the importance of transparency and accountability within the judiciary, as well as the need for ongoing dialogue about the court's role in a changing society.

#SupremeCourt   #AmericanDemocracy  #Alito

The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.26.3 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jimmy Jr., and Cindy Plaza

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.