First, the plaintiff brings his neighbor to court. He claims the defendant put a metal bed frame and box spring against a tree on the sidewalk for garbage collectors to pick up. He says wind knocked the frame into his car, causing damage. He’s suing for the cost of damage. The defendant argues he left the bed flat on the ground, not against a tree. He doesn’t think he owes anything.

Then, the plaintiff gave the defendant nearly 90 items to sell at his consignment shop. He claims the defendant sold all of it but never called him about how much money he would get. The plaintiff is suing for what he thinks he’s owed. The defendant argues it took several months for him to sell everything. He says he told the plaintiff how much his proceeds would be, so he doesn’t owe.

Plus, the plaintiff found the defendant an apartment that the defendant ended up renting. She claims she’s still owed a finder’s fee, so she’s suing for what she’s owed. The defendant argues the plaintiff told her not to worry about the broker’s fee, so she doesn’t think she needs to pay her anything.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to fix her roof. She claims the defendant stole an envelope of money from her, then left. She’s suing for stolen money and the cost of a polygraph test. The defendant argues the plaintiff handed him the envelope, and he told her it didn’t have the correct amount in it. He agreed to a polygraph test already and it didn’t prove a thing. He’s countersuing for loss of work, a tarp, and wood supplies.

Then, the plaintiff says her neighbor fell asleep on her couch and broke off the arm. She’s suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant argues she doesn’t weigh enough to break the couch, whereas she thinks the plaintiff could.

Plus, the plaintiff moved out of apartment that he rented from the defendant. He says they did a walk-through together and there wasn’t any damage, but then the defendant sent him a letter saying he wouldn’t get his security deposit back due to the condition of the apartment. He’s suing for the money he thinks he’s owed. The defendant argues the apartment was in terrible condition with chicken bones strewn around and broken appliances.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant. She says the home was dirty and didn’t have any working heat. The plaintiff claims the defendant threatened her, then asked for a sexual favor. She’s suing for a return of her security deposit, and pain and suffering. The defendant claims the plaintiff never paid a deposit. He’s countersuing for unpaid rent and security deposit.

Then, the plaintiff brought her designer pants to the defendant’s shop to get them hemmed. She claims the defendant ruined them, so she’s suing for the cost of a new pair. The defendant argues he gave the plaintiff two options for hemming the pants, and he even redid it three times. He thinks the plaintiff won’t be pleased no matter what he does.

Plus, the plaintiff’s brother was engaged to the defendant. She says she loaned the defendant money, but the defendant hasn’t paid her back. She’s suing for what she owes. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s brother owes her thousands of dollars in back child support. She claims she paid the plaintiff in full.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff brings her daughter to court. She says her daughter asked her to cash a check, but it ended up being a bad check. She’s suing for what she’s owed. The defendant argues she never asked her mom to cash it. She thinks the plaintiff is lying.

Then, the plaintiff and defendant met through mutual friends. The plaintiff says he has loaned the defendant money on several occasions, and he always paid back. This time, however, the defendant still needs to cough up the money. He’s suing for the amount of the loan, plus interest. The defendant argues the plaintiff is a crooked loan shark. He says he paid the plaintiff in full, so he doesn’t owe.

Plus, the plaintiff was pulling out of a parking lot when the defendant crashed his bike into his car. He says the defendant was biking carelessly and didn’t intend to stop. He’s suing for the cost of car repairs and damages. The defendant argues he had the right of way. He thinks the plaintiff is at fault.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff met the defendant at a doughnut shop and ended up paying for a furniture set AND modeling school for her, which she never even attended. He soon realized he was duped and is suing her for his money back. The defendant says the furniture was a gift, and the plaintiff made advances toward her, which made her uncomfortable. She doesn’t believe she owes him anything.

Then, the plaintiff works at JFK airport, and says the defendant attacked him, sending him to the hospital. The defendant was arrested, and the plaintiff is suing him for missed work and pain and suffering. The defendant says the plaintiff started the altercation by placing his hands on him and trying to throw the guy out. He is countersuing for broken property and missed work.

Plus, the plaintiffs say they rented a condo from the defendant, only to find on arrival that it was under construction. The terrace was even closed due to all the drilling. They have proof the defendant knew about the construction before they were to move in, and want a partial refund. The defendant claims the plaintiffs knew about the construction, which is why they got a bargain on the place. The construction caused only a few minor inconveniences, and it wasn’t a big deal.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant as a DJ for her wedding, and claims her special day was ruined because he didn’t follow any of the details they went over beforehand. She is suing for her money back. The defendant says he’s been in the business for 20 years, and this bride in particular was a challenge. He says she sent the police to his house two hours before he was even scheduled to be at her reception, scaring his daughter. He earned his money and he’s keeping it.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant was her tenant, and it was not a great relationship. In fact, another tenant of hers moved out because of several loud fights the defendant got into. When he moved out, he left quite a bit of damage and did not pay his rent in full, so she’s suing him. The defendant says he has no idea why he’s being sued, because he is not at fault for the things she claims he is.

Plus, the plaintiff paid the defendant half the cost of a car, telling him she’d have the other half once she got her tax return. Unfortunately, it got delayed, so she asked the defendant if she could finance the rest. He got nasty and she decided to not do business with him. She is suing for the return of the money she already spent. The defendant says he held the car for 52 days after she paid for half of it, and then she just changed her mind. She refused to work with him and it doesn’t make sense to him.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff took out a loan on a motorcycle for the defendant, who made payments to her for two years before stiffing her on the rest of the payments. She is suing for the rest of the money she is owed. The defendant claims it was the plaintiff who insisted on buying the bike for him, as she needed to build her credit to buy a house. He says she took the bike back and he owes her nothing.

Then, the plaintiff says he bought some vintage flooring from the defendant, but when he got home and unwrapped it, he discovered he’d been scammed. His firewood pile looked better than what the defendant had sold him. He is suing to get his money back. The defendant had told the plaintiff he was happy to take the flooring back if it wasn’t damaged, but it had fallen off the plaintiff’s truck, so it was all out of shape. He is countersuing for storage fees.

Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant backed into her car one night and promised to pay for the damages. As expected, those payments never happened, and the plaintiff is tired of going back and forth with the defendant. She is suing for the money she needs to fix her car. The defendant says the plaintiff is seriously overcharging for the cost of repairs and is just trying to make money off of her.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says she purchased a dog from the defendant’s store, only to discover a few days later that the dog had a serious medical condition that could not be easily fixed. She is suing the defendant for the amount she spent on the dog. The defendant says he did not hear about this for two months, and still offered to give her a new one, or refund her money, when he did. Instead, she insisted on an operation that wasn’t even guaranteed to fix the issue.

Then, the plaintiff says he purchased a house the defendant was renting at the time, and it became clear that she wasn’t going to pay the rent or the utilities. He began the eviction process and is suing her for back rent. The defendant says she made plans to leave the moment he bought the house, and claims he is suing her for rent she doesn’t owe because he wasn’t her landlord at the time.

Plus, the plaintiff bought a car from the defendant and proceeded to have lots of issues with it. A mechanic discovered the insides were rusted out and she is suing the defendant for the money she spent on the car. The defendant says he told the plaintiff the car needed work when he sold it to her and is not at fault for the damages.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says she agreed to allow her dog to mate with the defendant’s female dog, and now the defendant won’t pay her the agreed-upon stud fees. She is suing to get what she is owed. The defendant says her dog had a complication with the birth, required surgery, and the plaintiff changed her mind about purchasing one.

Then, the plaintiff says she’s known the defendant for nine years and purchased a car from him. After she got sick while out of state and missed a payment, the defendant flipped out, reported the car stolen to the cops, and took it back. She is suing him for the money she already paid on the car. The defendant says the plaintiff was bad at making payments and had told the defendant to take it back because she did not have the money to pay him.

Plus, the plaintiff says she lived with the defendant for two years, who now refuses to pay the cost of damages after moving out. She says the defendant would have friends over and partake in activities that caused damage to the unit. The plaintiff is suing for the damages. The defendant says she did not hear about any damages until 10 months after she moved out and is not at fault for them.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says she performed a laser treatment on the defendant. The defendant put a stop payment on the check for the service, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues she wasn’t happy with the plaintiff’s work, so she’s not paying her a penny.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant ran into his car, so he’s suing for damages. The defendant argues the accident was the plaintiff’s fault.

Plus, the plaintiff rented a home from the defendant, but she’s withholding her security, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says she doesn’t owe a dime because the plaintiff never returned the key, and she had to have the locks redone.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices