
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
When choosing a charity, the go-to idea is to give to an entity that helps the most people/pets/places, etc. But is that always the right move? New York Times business features writer Emma Goldberg joins host Krys Boyd to discuss hyper-efficiency in philanthropy — attracting donors by promising the most bang for their buck — and why this leaves smaller nonprofits behind. Plus, we’ll ponder the question: Should multiplying our dollars be the only reason we give? Her article is “What if Charity Shouldn’t Be Optimized?
4.7
862862 ratings
When choosing a charity, the go-to idea is to give to an entity that helps the most people/pets/places, etc. But is that always the right move? New York Times business features writer Emma Goldberg joins host Krys Boyd to discuss hyper-efficiency in philanthropy — attracting donors by promising the most bang for their buck — and why this leaves smaller nonprofits behind. Plus, we’ll ponder the question: Should multiplying our dollars be the only reason we give? Her article is “What if Charity Shouldn’t Be Optimized?
697 Listeners
9,118 Listeners
3,880 Listeners
2,278 Listeners
38,167 Listeners
1,021 Listeners
930 Listeners
327 Listeners
245 Listeners
43,482 Listeners
6,635 Listeners
4,609 Listeners
15,964 Listeners
15,313 Listeners
1,434 Listeners