
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When choosing a charity, the go-to idea is to give to an entity that helps the most people/pets/places, etc. But is that always the right move? New York Times business features writer Emma Goldberg joins host Krys Boyd to discuss hyper-efficiency in philanthropy — attracting donors by promising the most bang for their buck — and why this leaves smaller nonprofits behind. Plus, we’ll ponder the question: Should multiplying our dollars be the only reason we give? Her article is “What if Charity Shouldn’t Be Optimized?
By KERA4.7
894894 ratings
When choosing a charity, the go-to idea is to give to an entity that helps the most people/pets/places, etc. But is that always the right move? New York Times business features writer Emma Goldberg joins host Krys Boyd to discuss hyper-efficiency in philanthropy — attracting donors by promising the most bang for their buck — and why this leaves smaller nonprofits behind. Plus, we’ll ponder the question: Should multiplying our dollars be the only reason we give? Her article is “What if Charity Shouldn’t Be Optimized?

21,954 Listeners

43,837 Listeners

32,246 Listeners

38,430 Listeners

6,881 Listeners

30,609 Listeners

43,687 Listeners

38,950 Listeners

9,238 Listeners

4,022 Listeners

10,387 Listeners

6,467 Listeners

339 Listeners

4,696 Listeners

16,512 Listeners