
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In a 6-3 decision, the Justices abolish "Chevron deference," a doctrine that told judges to defer to regulatory agencies on the meanings of ambiguous laws. Does this really spell the end of expertise in Washington, as Justice Elena Kagan argues in dissent? Plus, the Supreme Court sends back to lower judges two laws in Florida and Texas that regulate social-media websites.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal4.2
27172,717 ratings
In a 6-3 decision, the Justices abolish "Chevron deference," a doctrine that told judges to defer to regulatory agencies on the meanings of ambiguous laws. Does this really spell the end of expertise in Washington, as Justice Elena Kagan argues in dissent? Plus, the Supreme Court sends back to lower judges two laws in Florida and Texas that regulate social-media websites.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1,722 Listeners

4,356 Listeners

1,639 Listeners

1,524 Listeners

5,177 Listeners

4,866 Listeners

674 Listeners

1,448 Listeners

2,031 Listeners

2,831 Listeners

6,072 Listeners

1,322 Listeners

606 Listeners

151 Listeners

1,059 Listeners

146 Listeners

165 Listeners