
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In a 6-3 decision, the Justices abolish "Chevron deference," a doctrine that told judges to defer to regulatory agencies on the meanings of ambiguous laws. Does this really spell the end of expertise in Washington, as Justice Elena Kagan argues in dissent? Plus, the Supreme Court sends back to lower judges two laws in Florida and Texas that regulate social-media websites.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal4.2
27362,736 ratings
In a 6-3 decision, the Justices abolish "Chevron deference," a doctrine that told judges to defer to regulatory agencies on the meanings of ambiguous laws. Does this really spell the end of expertise in Washington, as Justice Elena Kagan argues in dissent? Plus, the Supreme Court sends back to lower judges two laws in Florida and Texas that regulate social-media websites.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1,716 Listeners

4,422 Listeners

1,651 Listeners

1,538 Listeners

5,188 Listeners

4,909 Listeners

686 Listeners

1,448 Listeners

2,035 Listeners

2,834 Listeners

6,115 Listeners

717 Listeners

1,322 Listeners

8,451 Listeners

585 Listeners

151 Listeners

149 Listeners

1,109 Listeners

181 Listeners