On Market Measures, Nick, Bat, and Kai test 72 variations of 0DTE iron condor management to see if being more active actually improves results.
The data shows a consistent theme—targeting around 25% profit delivers the best balance, while higher targets reduce performance and lower targets leave too much premium behind. When it comes to adjustments, closing the put side offers only a slight edge, call-side management adds no benefit, and managing both sides performs the worst as trades become more directional.
Across all scenarios, win rates stay nearly the same, meaning outcomes are driven more by how much premium is captured than how often positions are adjusted.