By Top Music Attorney
5
22 ratings
The podcast currently has 153 episodes available.
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle dives into a heated controversy involving Drake's claim that Kendrick Lamar's hit "Not Like Us" was artificially inflated through the use of bots and manipulated streams. Drake's pre-action filing, filed through his company Frozen Moments LLC, accuses Universal Music Group and Spotify of conspiring to boost the song’s success unfairly. Miss Krystle breaks down the court document against UMG, shedding light on the allegations and exploring whether there’s evidence to support the claim. The discussion also touches on Spotify’s history of cracking down on fake streams, raising questions about potential hypocrisy within the platform’s policies.
Miss Krystle dissects Spotify’s partnership with Universal, which allegedly prioritizes major-label artists, and the ripple effects on independent creators. With over 900 million streams and Grammy nominations, the song’s success has sparked debates about legitimacy and fairness in the streaming era.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle provides a lawyer's reaction to the Drink Champs interview with producer/artist/entrepreneur Ryan Leslie, where Leslie offers invaluable advice for independent musicians. He emphasizes the direct to fan approach, discussing how being independent can be more lucrative than signing with a record label. Miss Krystle highlights key takeaways from the interview, including Leslie's revolutionary methods like selling tickets directly and controlling his own merchandise. This approach has allowed Leslie to maintain control over his career and maximize profits, showing independent artists the benefits of doing the same.
Miss Krystle gives insights from over a decade of experience in the music business. She explains how Leslie’s strategies, like reserving tickets and on-demand merchandise, can be applied to any artist's career to improve their financial outcomes. The episode also covers topics like data-driven decisions in the music industry and how artists can build businesses around their art. Whether you're a new artist or seasoned pro, this is a must-watch for those looking to take control of their careers.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle reacts to More Perfect Union's video "What Ticketmaster Doesn't Want You To Know: Concerts Were Cheap For Decades," offering a lawyer’s perspective on the struggles faced by small indie venue owners. Highlighting the example of Tom, a small venue owner in Tampa, how independent venues and concertgoers alike are getting squeezed by corporate giants like Ticketmaster and Live Nation. The video explores how these companies have transformed the concert industry, driving up ticket prices while offering diminishing returns for the people behind the shows.
This video also discusses the broader economic implications of these monopolies, drawing connections between the consolidation of the live music industry and the rising costs in other sectors like food, airline travel, and healthcare. From Pearl Jam's battle against Ticketmaster in the 90s to the rise of stadium shows in the 60s, Miss Krystle reacts the historical shifts that led to the current state of live music. This episode provides an in-depth look at how corporate monopolies are eroding the live concert experience for both fans and independent venues.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle
As a musician with years of experience, Miss Krystle shares the frustration of low streaming revenue and highlights the importance of understanding how organizations like the MLC work to ensure songwriters get paid. She emphasizes the value of direct-to-fan sales as an alternative way to monetize music, encouraging artists to explore this model to build a stronger fanbase and avoid some of the pitfalls of major platforms.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle, and Show/Music Producer, That Orko discuss Snoop Dogg’s shocking revelation about not getting paid for his early publishing rights despite writing iconic tracks like “Gin and Juice” and “Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang.” They explore Snoop’s journey from lacking knowledge of the music business to securing a major publishing deal with Reservoir Media, ensuring ownership of his legendary catalog. The discussion highlights how Snoop’s collaboration with Master P opened his eyes to the importance of owning music rights and diversifying income streams.
For artists and producers, this episode is a must-watch, as it covers critical topics like the difference between publishing and master royalties and the power of controlling your compositions. Miss Krystle also explores Snoop’s business moves with Death Row Records and how he is leveraging his catalog for sync placements. If you're looking to learn more about building your own publishing company or navigating the music industry, this episode " Snoop Dogg’s Music Publishing Horror Story – And How He Turned It Around." provides key insights into Snoop’s long-term strategy and success.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle gives a lawyer reacts to Tank The Tech's video, "Bands NEED To Stop Lying To Their Fans About Merch," diving into the controversial relationship between bands, venues, and merchandise fees. Miss Krystle breaks down the issues with unfair venue policies that exploit artists. MK discusses the importance of understanding contracts and the exploitation tactics that some venues use to take advantage of the artists bringing in revenue.
Tank The Tech also analyzes the specifics of a band called Movements, who publicly called out a venue for unfair practices, explaining the legal and contractual elements at play. They discus how booking agents and contracts are crucial in determining how these situations unfold and stresses the need for bands to know their rights and agreements ahead of time, especially when it comes to merch cuts, tips, and unfair revenue-sharing practices in the music industry.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
In this lawyer reacts episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle, and Show/Music Producer, That Orko dive deep into the trademark dispute between the legendary hip-hop duo OutKast and the rising EDM duo ATLiens. The discussion centers around OutKast's recent lawsuit against ATLiens for trademark infringement, highlighting key issues surrounding the use of the name "ATLiens," which was originally coined by OutKast in their 1996 album. The episode provides insights into the complexities of trademark law, particularly how it applies to artists and producers, and why it's crucial for creators to protect their brand identities.
Listeners will get a detailed breakdown of the case, including the history of OutKast's influence in the music industry and the potential implications for ATLiens. They also explore how this case might affect other artists and what it means for those who haven't secured their trademarks. Whether you're a fan of OutKast, a music law enthusiast, or an independent artist looking to understand the legal landscape, this episode is packed with valuable information and expert analysis.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
#DirectToFans #MusicBusinessPodcast #AIInMusic
The episode also explores the growing role of AI in music creation and distribution. Miss Krystle shares how AI is becoming a game-changer, from generating melodies to designing cover art, and what this means for copyright in this new era. The discussion underscores the importance of artists embracing technology and new business models while staying true to their art. Are we seeing The Death Of The Music Industry?
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
VIDEO SHOT AND EDITED BY:
THEME / SHOW MUSIC BY:
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle reacts to Rick Beato's video "isn't this just stealing" discussing interpolations in music. Miss Krystle delves into the concept of interpolation, explaining how it differs from sampling and covers, and why it's a critical issue in copyright law. She provides insights into how some artists manage to use identical melodies without crediting the original songwriters, raising important questions about rights and permissions in the music industry.
As a seasoned lawyer with 10 years of experience, Miss Krystle breaks down the legal nuances of interpolation, using Beato's examples of Miley Cyrus's "Prisoner" and Dua Lipa's "Break My Heart" to illustrate her points. She also shares her own experience in court, arguing that even when melodies are re-recorded, artists still need to obtain licenses. Miss Krystle emphasizes the importance of understanding copyright laws in this reaction video.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
Rick Beato's Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@RickBeato
🟡Become Your Own Record Label:
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
VIDEO SHOT AND EDITED BY:
THEME / SHOW MUSIC BY:
#RickBeatoReaction #Interpolation #MusicBusinessPodcast
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses the lawsuit Miley Cyrus is facing over her song "Flowers," which allegedly infringes on Bruno Mars' hit "When I Was Your Man." Miss Krystle breaks down the details of interpolation, explaining how it differs from sampling and cover songs, and why it's central to this case. The complaint was filed by Tempo Music Investments, a company that owns a portion of the copyright for Bruno Mars' song, claiming there are significant similarities between the two tracks. Miss Krystle also dives into the business side of music ownership and how major labels and investment firms use infringement claims as a strategy.
Miss Krystle also examines how copyright infringement cases hinge on proving access, substantial similarities, and intent. She explains how these types of cases can result in massive payouts for plaintiffs, with statutory damages potentially reaching up to $150,000 per infringement. The lawsuit could force Miley Cyrus to publicly reveal the inspiration behind her song, sparking even more interest in the case. Tune in for a detailed breakdown and analysis, plus insights on how artists can protect their work in the ever-evolving music industry.
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
VIDEO SHOT AND EDITED BY:
THEME / SHOW MUSIC BY:
#mileycyruslawsuit #mileycyrusbrunomars #CourtDocumentBreakdown
The podcast currently has 153 episodes available.
9,690 Listeners
70 Listeners