🟢 Free Case Evaluation: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/freecaseevaluation 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle breaks down a powerful method that independent artists are using to generate real income before their music ever hits streaming platforms. Learn why relying solely on Spotify can limit your earning potential and how shifting your strategy could be the key to finally making consistent money from your music. This approach has already helped artists with small and large followings build stronger fan connections, sell directly, and grow their audience more intentionally.

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#DirectToConsumerMusic #SellBeforeYouStream #MusicIndustryPodcast

🟢 Free Case Evaluation: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/freecaseevaluation 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle breaks down CapCut’s latest Terms of Service and what they really mean for creators. From sweeping licenses over your face and voice to waiving your rights to privacy, moral rights, and even legal recourse, the fine print is worth your attention. If you use CapCut to edit videos, this breakdown may change the way you think about uploading content to the platform.

0:00 Coming Up...

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#capcutupdate #lawyerreacts #capcutexposed

🟢 Free Case Evaluation: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/freecaseevaluation 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses how artists are actually making money and why so many independent artists are missing out on the money they’ve already earned and what to do about it. This video breaks down the real reasons artists aren’t getting paid and what steps you can take right now to avoid the same fate. There’s a lot of confusion out there around royalties, deals, contracts, and distribution. Let's clear it up.

0:00 Introduction

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#CollectMusicRoyalties #DirectToConsumerMusic #HowArtistsMakeMoney

Join The Fight (As Plaintiff or Supporter): https://www.indieailawsuit.com 

PRESS INQUIRIES

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses her recently filed class action lawsuit against Suno and Udio on behalf of independent artists. She breaks down the broader fight for creator rights in the age of AI, how copyright law is being tested, and what it means when major tech platforms admit to using copyrighted music to train their models. Also, discussing the allegations involving Timbaland ingesting independent artists' music into Suno.

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

Delgado Entertainment Law: https://www.delgadoentertainmentlaw.com/ 

🟡Become Your Own Record Label:

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#SunoClassAction #SunoUdioClassAction #IndependentArtistRights

Join The Fight (As Plaintiff or Supporter): https://www.indieailawsuit.com 

Entertainment Attorney/Independent Artist, Miss Krystle discusses the new class action lawsuits against Suno and Udio for copyright infringement on behalf of independent artists, songwriters, and producers. These companies unlawfully used millions of songs to train their AI, and Miss Krystle with her law firm, Delgado Entertainment Law and EKSM are fighting for creators to receive compensation and recognition.

Delgado Entertainment Law: https://www.delgadoentertainmentlaw.com/ 

PRESS INQUIRIES

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

🟢 Free Case Evaluation: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/freecaseevaluation 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses a major shift in how artists can earn from their music, following a controversial update from Landr. New restrictions on monetization through platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram are raising serious concerns. With changes targeting AI-generated content, licensed samples, and non-paying users, many independent artists may find themselves shut out of revenue they previously depended on.

As Landr tightens its rules around content eligibility and access, this move could signal a broader trend in music distribution. Are creators being priced out of their own royalties? Or is this a necessary step toward higher industry standards? Stay tuned as we break down what this means for the future of music monetization.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses a groundbreaking move by the New York City Council that could mean more money for artists, producers, and music creators. With billions in royalties flowing through platforms like Spotify and Apple Music, a new resolution might open the door to an entirely new stream of revenue and possibly a fairer system for everyone.

Miss Krystle breaks down what the Living Wage for Musicians Act could mean for your royalties, how this changes the role of distributors, and what concerns still remain. If you're serious about turning your music into a real business, this is one update you can't afford to miss.

0:00 Introduction

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

🟢 Free Case Evaluation: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/freecaseevaluation 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses the controversy surrounding Timbaland’s newly launched AI record label, Stage Zero, and the debut of AI artist TaTa. The video explores how AI-generated music—dubbed "A-Pop"—is rapidly evolving and what that means for traditional artistry, creativity, and ownership. From public backlash and critique to comparisons with animated acts like Gorillaz, Miss Krystle unpacks the heated debates around authenticity, ethics, and innovation in the age of artificial music.

Also discussed the growing divide between pro-AI and anti-AI camps, the legal gray areas of AI training, and why major labels are suing companies like Suno and Udio. As AI continues to blur the line between human and machine-made content, raising the important questions: Is music becoming just a product? Can AI truly replicate human emotion? And what does all of this mean for independent artists navigating a tech-driven future?

0:00 Introduction

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

🟢 (Free PDF) AI Music Legal Guide:  https://www.topmusicattorney.com/legalmusicaiguide

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses what happens when artists get caught using AI, whether it’s for music or cover art. She breaks down how platforms like UDIO are embedding digital fingerprints into songs, raising concerns about privacy, ownership, and long-term value. We also dive into what this means legally if you're planning to sell your music or use AI art on your next release.

Miss Krystle reacts to Stereogum's report on Kesha’s backlash over her AI-generated cover for “Delusional,” and looks at how fans responded when major artists and bands like Dropkick Murphy's and Gin Blossoms used AI visuals. This conversation explores how AI use is viewed across different generations of artists and why understanding copyright laws around AI-generated work is more important than ever.

Major Artists Are Facing BACKLASH After Getting Caught Using AI

0:00 Introduction

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#KeshaAi #ArtistsGettingCaughtUsingAi #AiBacklash

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle, discusses the rising issue of hijacked Spotify artist pages, where fake AI-generated music is appearing under artists’ names without their consent. This increasingly common problem leads to confusion for fans and potential royalty losses for artists. Miss Krystle explains how these issues often arise through fake profiles or unauthorized uploads, a situation that many independent artists are now facing. She also highlights the challenges of dealing with music distributors who don’t have systems in place to prevent these issues from happening, leaving artists to handle the aftermath on their own.

Miss Krystle shares practical advice for artists dealing with this problem, including how to report it directly to Spotify and work with distributors to resolve the issue. She also emphasizes the importance of legal protection and how artists can protect their brand and royalties when faced with impersonation or misattribution. Whether you're an emerging artist or an established name, understanding these issues and knowing the steps to take is essential in maintaining control over your music and your brand.

0:00 Introduction

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#SpotifyExposed #SpotifyFakeArtists #LawyerReacts