Bolo Da Producer's Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@UCSLA0Yao1arMgA_ZBEL0Lgw 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses a recent video by Bolo Da Producer "I Got a Copyright Claim Using a Splice Sample" and her own experience of receiving a copyright strike from Splice. She breaks down the legal implications and what music creators need to know about sample licensing, Content ID, and potential retaliation.

Whether you're a beatmaker, producer, or artist using royalty-free sounds, this conversation sheds light on how copyright claims can still affect your work—and what you can do to protect yourself. Stay informed about music law, digital rights, and how to handle disputes in today’s content-driven world.

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#LawyerReacts #BoloDaProducer #SpliceCopyrightClaim

Download My Letter Here: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/lettertocongress

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses her letter to Congress urging greater oversight of the music royalty system—and why the current setup may be doing more harm than good. From performance rights organizations to the quiet power of music distributors, Miss Krystle unpacks a web of gatekeepers controlling how artists get paid.

As questions mount around transparency, regulation, and artist compensation, this conversation dives into the core of a growing industry-wide issue. With billions at stake, Miss Krystle outlines the hidden risks for independent creators and offers recommendations for much-needed reform.

I Wrote A Letter To Congress On Behalf Of Independent Artists

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS

#LetterToCongress #ArtistRights #LawyerReacts

🟢 (Free PDF) Switching Music Distributors Guide: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/switchingmusicdistributors 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Comparing The WORST Music Distributor Terms, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses what artists and producers need to know about  music distributors and the fine print that could be costing them money. From remix rights to royalty forfeiture, this breakdown covers some of the most surprising and overlooked clauses hidden inside the terms of service from major platforms like DistroKid, TuneCore, LANDR, Too Lost, Symphonic, and CD Baby.

Whether you're considering a new distributor or just want to make sure you’re not being taken advantage of, this episode takes a deep dive into real contract language and user obligations. If you're serious about protecting your music and your money, this is the conversation you can't afford to miss.

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

THEME / SHOW MUSIC BY:

#WorstMusicDistributor #BestMusicDistributor #MusicDistributorsExposed

My New Music Video https://youtu.be/qrkWrnN2FI8?si=MlA93p3bXXaDX7UZ 

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle reveals the key to unlocking rapid organic growth—so fast it feels illegal. Most artists and creators are just 1% away from breaking through, but they focus on the wrong solutions. Instead of chasing PR firms or record deals, the real unlock is about connecting with the right audience in a way that resonates. Miss Krystle shares content hacks to help you take action today and grow without relying on gatekeepers.

From building multiple brands—law firm, music business education, and artistry—Miss Krystle has tested and proven what works. If you’ve been stuck, this is the strategy you need to finally break through.

How To Grow ORGANICALLY So Fast It Feels ILLEGAL

5 BEST Ways To Grow ORGANICALLY | How To Promote Your Music Easily https://youtu.be/BXOuIpUd5hI?si=0fTaFku0IQzGyDM- 

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

🟢  (Free PDF) 35 Ways To Make Money From Music https://www.topmusicattorney.com/35moneymakingtactics

In this lawyer reacts episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses the PROBLEMS With DistroKid, one of the largest music distributors, and how it handles artificial streaming claims, copyright disputes, and artist payouts. With firsthand experience as both an artist and an entertainment lawyer, Miss Krystle breaks down the top issues artists face, including alleged streaming fraud, botted playlists, and lack of customer support. If you're using or considering DistroKid for your music distribution, this is a must-watch before you upload your next track.

Miss Krystle also dives into Distrokid’s terms of service, recent layoffs, and how these factors impact independent musicians. From account lockouts to disputes over royalties, this video provides crucial insights into navigating distribution challenges. 

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

🟢  (Free PDF) 35 Ways To Make Money From Music https://www.topmusicattorney.com/35moneymakingtactics

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses how a simple review of terms of service led to uncovering a major issue involving a music distributor and an AI remix app. With independent artists in mind, Miss Krystle breaks down how companies are making critical decisions about musicians' intellectual property—without proper consent. The conversation takes a deeper turn as Miss Krystle shares details from a call with a company's CEO, revealing what’s really happening behind the scenes.

As platforms continue to expand their reach, the question remains: are artists actually benefiting, or are their rights being overlooked? Miss Krystle dives into the implications of these deals, the fine print artists should be aware of, and what this means for the future of music distribution. If you're serious about protecting your work and making money from your music, this is a conversation you don't want to miss.

I Called Out This Music Distributor And This Is What Happened...

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

🟢  (Free PDF) 35 Ways To Make Money From Music https://www.topmusicattorney.com/35moneymakingtactics

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle dives into recent changes at Spotify that have raised serious concerns about the future of music on the platform. As new features roll out and business practices evolve, the question of artist control and fair compensation becomes more pressing than ever. With a major update on the horizon, MK unpacks what this could mean for independent musicians and why it’s making them reconsider their place on Spotify.

Beyond streaming royalties, there’s a bigger conversation about the shifting landscape of the music industry. From new tiers to unexpected policy changes, artists may need to rethink how they navigate these platforms. Is this just another business move, or something that could fundamentally alter the way music is shared and monetized? 

Why I Might Leave Spotify…

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

In this episode titled "AI Is DESTROYING UK Copyright Law," from the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses the UK government's proposed changes to copyright laws in light of the growing AI sector. The government is looking to make it easier for tech companies to use copyrighted material for AI training, but many creators are concerned about the implications. The proposed changes could significantly impact how creators protect their work, both in the UK and internationally, including in the U.S.

This episode covers the potential consequences of these changes for the creative industry and how the debate is unfolding. With voices from various sectors weighing in, Miss Krystle breaks down what this could mean for creators moving forward and the future of copyright law in the UK and beyond.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

Spotify's latest update is setting a dangerous precedent, and the full impact hasn't even hit yet. In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle breaks down the TERRIFYING Spotify Update and what it means for artists. With changes to how music is used on the platform, including new remix and mashup features, many artists have unknowingly agreed to terms that could reshape their careers. Major distributors like DistroKid, TuneCore, CD Baby, and Too Lost are already involved, and the industry is shifting in ways that could leave independent musicians at a serious disadvantage.

And Spotify isn’t the only one—other platforms are now following suit. With the introduction of a Deluxe Premium tier and direct deals being struck with major labels, royalties are being diluted, and the traditional streaming model is evolving in ways that may not favor creators. Are artists losing control of their music without even realizing it?

0:00 Coming Up

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.

In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle, and Show/Music Producer, That Orko discuss Deadmau5’s recent $55 million catalog sale. Which includes and the Mau5trap label catalog. They break down what this means for artists looking to sell their own catalogs, how deals like this are structured, and the key factors that determine the value of a music catalog. From stream revenue to sync licensing, they explore the different ways catalogs generate income and what artists need to prepare before considering a sale.

They also dive into the challenges of transferring ownership, the importance of retaining rights, and how joint ventures—like Deadmau5’s deal—can offer long-term revenue opportunities. Whether you’re an independent artist with a growing catalog or just curious about how these multi-million dollar deals work, this episode covers everything you need to know about selling your music catalog and maximizing its value. Is Deadmau5's Catalog Sale A Blueprint for Indie Artists? 

Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.