
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The federal government tells the high court in U.S. v. Skrmetti that the 14th Amendment means Tennessee can't ban doctors from providing hormones or puberty blockers to transgender adolescents. But if the justices agree that this is what "equal protection of the laws" means, would their ruling have consequences for other controversies, including about women's sports?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal4.2
27172,717 ratings
The federal government tells the high court in U.S. v. Skrmetti that the 14th Amendment means Tennessee can't ban doctors from providing hormones or puberty blockers to transgender adolescents. But if the justices agree that this is what "equal protection of the laws" means, would their ruling have consequences for other controversies, including about women's sports?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1,724 Listeners

4,362 Listeners

1,644 Listeners

1,525 Listeners

5,181 Listeners

4,876 Listeners

674 Listeners

1,450 Listeners

2,026 Listeners

2,834 Listeners

6,065 Listeners

1,322 Listeners

8,750 Listeners

605 Listeners

151 Listeners

145 Listeners

166 Listeners