Unveiling Mormonism

Welcome back to the pod! Today we’re covering Acts 19, so open your Bibles. Here’s the question we’ll answer: What Is the Right Response to Sin?

--

The PursueGOD Truth podcast is the “easy button” for making disciples – whether you’re looking for resources to lead a family devotional, a small group at church, or a one-on-one mentoring relationship. Join us for new episodes every Tuesday and Friday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

Q. What Is the Right Response to Sin?

• We all sin; it’s our response to sin that matters most
• See 10 Sinful Responses to Sin
• Minimizing Sin: “It’s no big deal.”
• Rationalizing Sin: “He deserved it.”
• Blame-Shifting: “She made me.”
• Codifying Sin: “It’s a condition, not a sin.”
• Worldly Grief: “Sorry I got caught.”
• Today in our text (Acts 19) we’re going to see two groups of people
• Who were confronted with their sin problem and had a choice to make 
• One group is an example of what to do
• The other group, what NOT to do
• The context for the chapter is one particular sin: sorcery
• But the lessons apply to everyone, everywhere

Acts 19:11-12 (NLT) 11 God gave Paul the power to perform unusual miracles. 12 When handkerchiefs or aprons that had merely touched his skin were placed on sick people, they were healed of their diseases, and evil spirits were expelled.

• We’re in Ephesus, a renowned center of occult practices in the ancient Greco-Roman world.
• To the secular world, miracles look like magic
• We saw this with Peter and his shadow (Acts 5), Philip and Simon Magus (Acts 8) 
• The point: Jesus>magic (understatement)

Acts 19 (NLT) 13 A group of Jews was traveling from town to town casting out evil spirits. They tried to use the name of the Lord Jesus in their incantation, saying, “I command you in the name of Jesus, whom Paul preaches, to come out!” 

• Note: they weren’t followers of Jesus, but they were using his name as an incantation.
• Reminiscent of the "Ephesian Letters" (Greek: Ἐφέσια γράμματα, Ephesia grammata) – a set of words or symbols believed in antiquity to possess magical power. These were often inscribed on amulets, statues, or other objects. 
• The exact content of the Ephesian Letters is debated, but ancient sources suggest they were a group of six mystical words: Askion, Kataskion, Lix, Tetrax, Damnameneus, Aisia
• These words were considered meaningless in everyday language but were thought to hold esoteric significance, potentially tied to ancient rituals or the invocation of supernatural powers. Some scholars believe they were connected to the worship of Artemis of Ephesus, the city's patron goddess.
• These Jewish exorcists were using Jesus’ name like it was one of these six mystical words.

Acts 19:14-16 (NLT) 14 Seven sons of Sceva, a leading priest, were doing this. 15 But one time when they tried it, the evil spirit replied, “I know Jesus, and I know Paul, but who are you?” 16 Then the man with the evil spirit leaped on them, overpowered them, and attacked them with such violence that they fled from the house, naked and battered.

• The Sons of Sceva attempted to invoke the name of Jesus without genuine faith in Jesus, treating it as a magical formula for their own gain. They did not believe in Jesus or recognize His authority as Lord; instead, they saw His name as a tool to enhance their reputation as exorcists.
• Essentially "taking the Lord's name in vain" (from the Third Commandment, Exodus 20:7)
• Acts 19:17 (Pillar New Testament Commentary) The ignominious defeat of the Jewish exorcists by the demon showed the Ephesians that 'Jesus' is a power that cannot be controlled: 'he will not act as a lackey for anyone who calls on his name.'

So that’s the backdrop for our two groups today. Magic vs. Miracles in Ephesus. Let’s meet our first group.

Acts 19:17-19 (NLT) 17b A solemn fear descended on the city, and the name of the Lord Jesus was greatly honored. 18 Many who became believers confessed their sinful practices. 19 A number of them who had been practicing sorcery brought their incantation books and burned them at a public bonfire. The value of the books was several million dollars. 20 So the message about the Lord spread widely and had a powerful effect.

• Acts 19:18 (Pillar New Testament Commentary) Apparently they were moved by the exposure and overcoming of the exorcists to realize that their own previous involvement with the magic arts now needed to be acknowledged. Perhaps they had kept scrolls in which spells were written as an insurance policy, in case their new-found faith proved to be inadequate in some situation! Burning the scrolls was a way of repudiating what they contained and represented a greater trust in God to deliver them from trouble and supply their needs.

Let’s summarize this group’s response to sin:

• They feared the Lord.
• We talked about this back in Acts 4: The fear of the Lord is a reverent awe of God.
• (acknowledged power and sovereignty)
• They confessed and disclosed their sin.
• I know the NLT say “confessed”, but the original Gk expands on it:
• exomologoumenoi kai anangellontes, 'confessing and disclosing'
• Confessed = to say the same thing (as God)
• Disclosed = exposed it to the light, truth. They didn’t…
• Minimize it: “It’s no big deal.”
• Rationalize it: “He deserved it.”
• Codify it: “It’s a condition, not a sin.”
• Blame-Shift: “She made me.”
• They disclosed it. Admitted it. Put it out there. 
• They destroyed their old ways. 
• Militant! This is war!
• Burned the incantation books in a bonfire
• These might have been the mysterious and magical “Ephesian Letters”. 
• Wasn’t just Worldly Grief: “Sorry I got caught.”
• They did something about it. 
• I have decided to follow Jesus… No turning back, no turning back.

The result:

Acts 19:20 So the message about the Lord spread widely and had a powerful effect.

• The word of the Lord grew
• Mightily
• And it prevailed.  It overcame.  It tore down strongholds.  It grew.  It spread.

The second group we meet begins in verse 24.

Acts 19:23-27 (NLT) 23 About that time, serious trouble developed in Ephesus concerning the Way. 24 It began with Demetrius, a silversmith who had a large business manufacturing silver shrines of the Greek goddess Artemis. He kept many craftsmen busy. 25 He called them together, along with others employed in similar trades, and addressed them as follows: “Gentlemen, you know that our wealth comes from this business. 26 But as you have seen and heard, this man Paul has persuaded many people that handmade gods aren’t really gods at all. And he’s done this not only here in Ephesus but throughout the entire province! 27 Of course, I’m not just talking about the loss of public respect for our business. I’m also concerned that the temple of the great goddess Artemis will lose its influence and that Artemis—this magnificent goddess worshiped throughout the province of Asia and all around the world—will be robbed of her great prestige!”

Notice their response:

• Instead of fearing God, they feared losing money. 
• Instead of confessing their sin, they pointed fingers.
• Paul’s the problem, not us 
• Paul persuaded and turned away…….
• Instead of disclosing their sin, they defended it.
• Vs 27  Temple of the great goddess, Artemis will be regarded as worthless and be dethroned if we don’t do something
• Instead of destroying their old way, they worshiped it even more.
• Acts 19:28 (NLT) 28 At this their anger boiled, and they began shouting, “Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!”
• Took action to maintain idols rather than destroy them.

The result:

Acts 19:32 (NLT) 32 Inside, the people were all shouting, some one thing and some another. Everything was in confusion. In fact, most of them didn’t even know why they were there.

• In Gk: “The assembly was in confusion”
• Assembly = ekklēsia
• Same word as church elsewhere in Acts!
• When you respond to sin with more sin…
• you join a different group, a different “church”: the world
• They have their own beliefs, values etc
• They go against God’s word, and anything goes
• The result: confusion 

Q. What Is Your Response to Sin?

• Like the second group:
• Pointing fingers
• Defending your sin
• Ending up confused and in the world
• Or like the first group: 
• Fearing God
• Confessing and disclosing your sin
• Destroying your old way
• Experiencing the “powerful effect” of the message of Jesus

We're re-running the incredible story of Bo and KD, co-hosts of this podcast who came to faith just over two years ago!

--

The Unveiling Mormonism podcast pulls back the curtain on Mormon history, culture and doctrine. Join us for new episodes every Monday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org/mormonism.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

In this episode, Bryan, Bo and KD talk about the Mother in Heaven LDS Gospel Topic.

Find the article here.

--

The Unveiling Mormonism podcast pulls back the curtain on Mormon history, culture and doctrine. Join us for new episodes every Monday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org/mormonism.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

The "Mother in Heaven" doctrine in Mormon theology, which teaches the existence of a divine mother alongside God the Father, has been a subject of discussion and controversy within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church). While the LDS Church officially affirms this doctrine, it remains somewhat vague and underdeveloped in official teachings. Several key arguments against or critiques of the "Mother in Heaven" doctrine are as follows:

Critics argue that the concept of a "Mother in Heaven" is not explicitly taught in the Bible or the Book of Mormon. There are no direct references to a divine mother figure in these scriptures. While some Latter-day Saints cite passages that imply a heavenly mother (such as references to the "Heavenly Father" and his "children"), these passages are not specific to a maternal deity. Critics contend that the doctrine is an extrapolation based on theological assumptions rather than scriptural foundation.

The doctrine of a Mother in Heaven has not been systematically developed or defined in LDS teachings. Official statements by church leaders are rare and often vague, leading to concerns about its theological and doctrinal clarity. Some critics argue that the lack of detailed teaching about her nature, role, and relationship to God the Father makes it difficult for members to fully understand or engage with the doctrine.

There is a practical concern about the limited role that the Mother in Heaven plays in LDS worship and rituals. Critics argue that while her existence may be acknowledged, she is not directly involved in the faith practices of members, such as prayer or temple rituals. This leads to questions about her relevance within the broader framework of Mormon worship and theology, raising concerns that her role might be more symbolic than substantive.

Historically, early LDS leaders (including Joseph Smith) did not explicitly teach about a Mother in Heaven, and the concept was rarely mentioned for many years. The doctrine became more prominent in the 20th century but remains less central than other aspects of LDS theology. Critics argue that this historical silence and inconsistency undermine the claim that the concept is an essential or deeply rooted part of Mormon belief.

Some critics view the doctrine as reinforcing traditional gender roles by placing women in a subordinate position to God the Father. They argue that, by emphasizing the distinction between the Father and the Mother in Heaven, the doctrine may inadvertently reinforce ideas of patriarchal hierarchy. Others contend that it fails to offer a robust theological vision of women’s equality with men, especially given the traditional gender roles often ascribed to women in the LDS Church.

In traditional Christian theology, God the Father is often portrayed as the singular, omnipotent deity, without the need for a divine consort. Some critics argue that introducing a Mother in Heaven diminishes the monotheistic view of God, potentially complicating the relationship between God and humanity. This can be seen as problematic from a Christian theological standpoint, where God is typically understood as a single, indivisible entity.

Given the lack of clear, authoritative teachings about the Mother in Heaven, some argue that it can lead to speculative ideas and even heretical notions. For example, there have been occasional theological and social debates about the role of heavenly mother, which could distract from core doctrines of salvation, Jesus Christ’s role, and the focus on God the Father in worship.

While the doctrine of a Mother in Heaven is acknowledged in some Mormon circles, critics highlight issues related to its lack of scriptural foundation, doctrinal ambiguity, historical inconsistency, gender implications, and theological coherence. Many believe that it is more of a speculative or peripheral teaching rather than a central tenet of the LDS faith.

In this episode, Jordan and Becca share their story of leaving the Church of Christ -- a high control religion similar to Mormonism. Wherever you're at in your faith, this is a powerful and encouraging episode you won't want to miss!

--

The Unveiling Mormonism podcast pulls back the curtain on Mormon history, culture and doctrine. Join us for new episodes every Monday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org/mormonism.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

Every human life, from conception to natural death, is inherently valuable and deserving of protection. Life begins at conception, as this marks the start of a unique human organism with its own DNA, potential, and future.

--

The PursueGOD Truth podcast is the “easy button” for making disciples – whether you’re looking for resources to lead a family devotional, a small group at church, or a one-on-one mentoring relationship. Join us for new episodes every Tuesday and Friday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

• We’re in part 3 of our Kingdom Politics series. 
• Today we’ll answer the question: Q. What Does the Bible Say about Abortion?
• This is an emotionally charged topic
• Maybe some of you want to swipe up, put up walls, run away
• Because you have personal hurts around this topic
• Or because you just want to stick your head in the sand
• I encourage you to resist that temptation
• There’s something here for everyone
• I’ll try to speak the truth in love…
• Such an important topic that I’ve written this episode twice
• I want to make sure I get it right, which means I need to make sure I understand the opposing view
• Why are so many people in favor of this? Even some Christians? 
• 
  
• Let’s start with…

See the argument for and against pro-life | Lex Fridman Podcast

• Pro-Choice Argument #1: Bodily Autonomy - A fundamental principle of human rights is that individuals have the right to control their own bodies. Pregnancy profoundly affects a person's body, health, and life, and no one should be compelled to undergo it against their will.
• Pro-Choice Argument #2: Gender Equality - Denying access to abortion disproportionately affects women and those who can become pregnant, limiting their ability to participate equally in society by controlling their reproductive choices and futures.
• Pregnancy changes women in a way that it cannot change men, so it’s a form of sex discrimination to make women go through with an unwanted pregnancy. 
• From an article by a Christian Latina Mom: “Yes, the anti abortion movement has its lens focused solely on birth, but I think they've lost Jesus in the process. How are we protecting all God's creatures beyond gestation? What is being done to help people out of poverty? When will we get mandated paid parental leave? When will we stop aiding wars that lead to the death of many innocent people? When will our maternal health system be fixed so women, especially Black women, don't have to worry about whether or not they are going to survive childbirth in this country? This fight is not about "protecting life" it is about control — controlling women, to be exact. And that's a fight I cannot get behind. I think God understands that and loves me just the same.”
• History lesson: In the United States, eugenic sterilization laws were passed in many states (popularized in 1920’s), disproportionately targeting Black women, Indigenous women, and immigrants. These sterilizations were often carried out without informed consent.
• 1907: Indiana passes the first eugenic sterilization law in the United States, targeting those deemed "unfit" to reproduce (e.g., individuals with disabilities or mental illness).
• 1919: Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, writes about controlling the reproduction of people she considered "unfit," which included those with mental or physical disabilities, as well as impoverished groups, immigrants, and minorities. Here’s the title of the article: "Birth Control and Racial Betterment" 
• 1925: Hitler’s ideas about racial purity, Aryan superiority, and the need to eliminate "undesirable" traits outlined in his book Mein Kampf.
• 1927: The Supreme Court upholds forced sterilization laws in Buck v. Bell. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously writes, "Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
• 1933: Hitler implements eugenic policies on a national scale, starting with the Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring. This law legalized forced sterilization for individuals with conditions such as mental illness, epilepsy, and physical disabilities.
• 1973: Roe v. Wade legalizes abortion in the U.S., with abortion services often concentrated in low-income and minority communities, raising concerns about systemic targeting.
• Pro-Choice Argument #3: Personhood - Many argue that personhood and the associated rights develop gradually and that early-stage embryos do not yet possess the qualities (e.g., consciousness or viability) that confer full moral status.
• SLED acronym: Pro-choice advocates often argue that personhood is not established until certain criteria are met:
• Size: Some argue that the unborn’s small size makes them less of a person. The idea is that a tiny embryo cannot hold the same moral status as a fully grown human.
• Level of Development: Pro-choice proponents frequently claim that personhood is tied to cognitive development. Since the unborn cannot think, feel pain, or exhibit consciousness in the early stages of pregnancy, they argue that the fetus is not yet a person.
• Environment: It is often asserted that life inside the womb is fundamentally different from life outside it. Until a baby is born and separates from the mother, some argue, it cannot be considered fully human.
• Degree of Dependency: Pro-choice advocates may contend that the unborn’s complete reliance on the mother for survival makes them less than a person. They might equate this dependency with a lack of individual autonomy, which they see as essential for personhood.

Pro-Life Argument #1: Intrinsic Value of Human Life - This is the crux of the pro-life argument. Every human life, from conception to natural death, is inherently valuable and deserving of protection. Life begins at conception, as this marks the start of a unique human organism with its own DNA, potential, and future. (Winger - It’s a living, whole human)

Genesis 1:27 Genesis 1:27 (NLT) 27 So God created human beings in his own image. In the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.

• Pillar 2 of God and Govt from week 1 of this series: God, Not the Government, Gives Rights to Every Human Being.
• That’s why this whole argument hinges on whether babies in the womb are human! 
• They’re not “potential human beings”, but “human beings with potential” 
• Not once in the history of humanity, did a pregnant mother give birth to a monkey or a fish or a tree. Every single time a human being came out! 

Exodus 21:22-25 (NLT) 22 “Now suppose two men are fighting, and in the process they accidentally strike a pregnant woman so she gives birth prematurely. If no further injury results, the man who struck the woman must pay the amount of compensation the woman’s husband demands and the judges approve. 23 But if there is further injury, the punishment must match the injury: a life for a life, 24 an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth….”

• Exodus 21 (New Bible Commentary) In the case of murder the death penalty was invoked, not out of indifference for human life, but rather because each human life is of tremendous value (Gn. 9:6).
• 
  
• Exodus 21 (New Bible Commentary) The distinctiveness of the biblical laws is apparent when one compares them with other Ancient Near Eastern laws. In the earlier Laws of Hammurabi, a murderer was required to make only financial compensation to the victim’s family. This contrasts sharply with the biblical insistence of a life for a life. On the other hand, the non-biblical laws apply the death penalty to breaking and entering, looting at a fire, and theft. These examples reveal that in other cultures financial loss was sometimes treated more seriously than loss of life. The biblical laws consistently emphasize that human life is of greater value than material possessions.

Psalms 139:13-16 (NLT) 13 You made all the delicate, inner parts of my body and knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14 Thank you for making me so wonderfully complex! Your workmanship is marvelous—how well I know it. 15 You watched me as I was being formed in utter seclusion, as I was woven together in the dark of the womb. 16 You saw me before I was born. Every day of my life was recorded in your book. Every moment was laid out before a single day had passed.

• Friends, if you’ve bought into the pro-choice narrative, you’ve been gaslit
• “My body, my choice” is a lie
• That baby in the womb has its own body with its own DNA
• To elevate a woman’s right to choose above the level of a baby’s right to live is simply not biblical or logical. 
• This next verse shows us something more…

Luke 1:41 (NLT) 41 At the sound of Mary’s greeting, Elizabeth’s child leaped within her, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit.

Pro-Life Argument #2: Moral Responsibility to the Vulnerable The unborn baby, as the most vulnerable and defenseless member of the human family, deserves special protection. Society has an ethical obligation to advocate for those who cannot speak for themselves.

Proverbs 31:8-9 (NLT) 8 Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves; ensure justice for those being crushed. 9 Yes, speak up for the poor and helpless, and see that they get justice.

• Some of you have stayed silent on this issue because it’s unpopular
• Some are silenced because of your empathy for women
• Hear this, please: in the vast majority of cases, women are not the vulnerable ones here
• The unborn are the helpless ones. They are “those being crushed”. 
• The bible commands us to speak up for them. 

Pro-Life Argument #3: Pro-Life, Not Just Pro-Birth – advocating for comprehensive support for the pregnant mother and the child after it’s born 

• Pro-Moms: advocating for the health and support of moms who bear the burden of pregnancy
• Women matter to God just as much as babies in the womb.
• Pro-Family: advocating for mom and a dad in the home
• Pro-Dads: advocating for a return to biblical masculinity
• A culture that devalues life often stems from broken views of manhood. Men must reject the cultural narratives of irresponsibility and self-indulgence. 
• One of the greatest tragedies in the abortion debate is the silence of men. While women bear the physical burden of pregnancy, men often bear moral and relational responsibility. Research consistently shows that a significant percentage of women who have abortions feel unsupported or pressured by the men in their lives. When men fail to step up, women are left to make heart-wrenching decisions alone.
• The abortion issue is not just a women’s issue; it is a human issue and, more importantly, a gospel issue. Men need to take the lead, but every follower of Jesus has a part to play. 
• Moses’ final words to the Israelites on their way in to the Promised Land:
• Deuteronomy 30:19 (NLT) “Today I have given you the choice between life and death, between blessings and curses. Now I call on heaven and earth to witness the choice you make. Oh, that you would choose life, so that you and your descendants might live!”

Last week we learned that we are citizens of heaven first, and that should impact our participation in this great country (where we are foreigners and exiles). We’re not meant to stand back and let America wander away from the biblical principles it was founded on. Here’s the takeaway for this issue, three practical steps that I hope you’ll pray about so you can honor God in this area: 

1. Adopt: Some of you will be led to take this life-long leap of faith. This is one of the most practical ways to be a light on this dark issue.
2. Support: Partner with organizations that provide emotional, financial, and practical support to pregnant women.
3. Disciple: Walk with someone who’s struggling to understand a biblical worldview on this. Parents: disciple your kids on this topic, or the world will. Remember the first two types of governance we talked about last week: self-governance and family governance. If we lead in this, policies in civil government will follow.

Some modern day religions claim to be Christians...but are they really? Go through this series with a small group or mentor, and let's take a closer look at some religions that may actually be cultish. This week: Seventh Day Adventists.

--

The Unveiling Mormonism podcast pulls back the curtain on Mormon history, culture and doctrine. Join us for new episodes every Monday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org/mormonism.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

• William Miller (1782–1849): A Baptist preacher who studied Bible prophecy, particularly the books of Daniel and Revelation. Based on his calculations of Daniel 8:14, Miller predicted that Christ would return to earth around 1843–1844.
• The Great Disappointment (October 22, 1844): When Jesus did not return on the predicted date, many of Miller’s followers abandoned the movement. However, a small group believed the date was correct but misunderstood the nature of the event (we will get into this more when we discuss some of the false doctrines they promote).

• The Sabbath Movement: A group led by Joseph Bates and others began emphasizing the importance of observing Saturday (the biblical Sabbath) as a day of worship, based on the fourth commandment.
• The Sanctuary Doctrine: After the Great Disappointment, followers like Hiram Edson taught that Jesus did not return to earth but instead entered the heavenly sanctuary to begin a new phase of His ministry (the “investigative judgment”).
• Ellen G. White (1827–1915): Considered a prophetess by Adventists, she played a central role in shaping SDA beliefs and practices. Her visions and writings helped unify the movement and promote distinctive doctrines.

• 1863: The Seventh-day Adventist Church was officially organized in Battle Creek, Michigan, with approximately 3,500 members.
• Expansion: By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the SDA Church grew rapidly, emphasizing evangelism, education, and healthcare.

• Global Reach: The SDA Church has grown into a worldwide denomination with over 21 million members.
• Focus Areas: It emphasizes education, healthcare, and missionary work while holding to its unique doctrines.

• The belief in the Trinity
• The humanity and deity of Christ (but there is a little twist here)
• Salvation by grace through faith (but we will discuss this)
• Authority of Scripture (but we will discuss this as well)
• The Second Coming of Christ
• Resurrection of the Dead

While there are many similarities in the beliefs between SDA and orthodox Christianity, there are some disturbing differences that Christians need to be aware of when considering SDA’s. 

• This is pretty deep. They firmly believe that the 4th commandment to observe the Sabbath is still enforced today and this part of the law was not “fulfilled” in Christ. 
• SUNDAY LAW: They associate Sunday worship with the Mark of the Beast. They largely derive this from an interpretation of Bible prophecy. They interpret the beast in Revelation 13 as a system of false religion or false worship, mainly the Roman Catholic church. 
• SDAs believe the Roman Catholic Church is the beast in Revelation, Sunday worship is the “mark of the beast,” and a future Sunday law will test whether people are loyal to God (by keeping the Sabbath) or to human authority (by observing Sunday).
• Since the RCC was instrumental in establishing Sunday as the official day of worship as opposed to Saturday, those who partake of Sunday worship instead of Sabbath worship in the future will be guilty of taking the mark of the beast or pledging their allegiance to this false system of worship. 
• How do they view Sunday worshiping Christians?
• SDAs believe that the "mark of the beast" will only apply in the future, when Sunday worship is enforced by law as a global religious mandate. Until then, they view Christians who worship on Sunday as sincere but misinformed about God’s Sabbath command.
• Ignorance of the Truth: They teach that many Christians worship on Sunday out of tradition or lack of knowledge about the Sabbath. In such cases, God does not hold them accountable (Acts 17:30).
• SDAs feel a duty to inform Sunday-keeping Christians about the biblical Sabbath. They see this as part of their mission to call people out of "Babylon" (Revelation 18:4), which they interpret as false religious systems, including Sunday worship.
• They often present the Sabbath as a test of loyalty to God and obedience to His commandments.
• What does Ellen G. White Say?
• "The Sabbath is the golden clasp that unites God and His people." (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 6, p. 351)
• “Christ is the sinner’s only hope. By His death, He brought salvation within the reach of all.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 131).
• SDAs use quotes like this to argue that White did not teach salvation by works or Sabbath-keeping alone.
• In Testimonies for the Church, she stated:“It means eternal salvation to keep the Sabbath holy unto the Lord.”
• Statements like this can lead to a legalistic mindset where believers feel their salvation depends on rigid obedience to laws, which undermines the gospel of grace.
• 
  
• What Does The Bible Say?
• Scripture References:
• Not mentioned as a command to observe in the entire new testament. Not only that but the opposite is mentioned. 
• Romans 14:5-6: “One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. The one who observes the day, observes it in honor of the Lord.”
• FOCUS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF REST
• Colossians 2:16-17: “Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.”
• Galatians 4:9-10: “But now that you have come to know God... how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elementary principles of the world... You observe days and months and seasons and years!”

• What is it?
• What Was the Great Disappointment?
• In 1844, many Christians followed a preacher named William Miller, who said Jesus would return on October 22, 1844.
• When Jesus didn’t return, it was called the Great Disappointment because people were devastated.
•  Trying to Understand What Happened
• Some of Miller’s followers thought the date was right, but they misunderstood what was supposed to happen.
• A man named Hiram Edson had a new idea. He said that instead of Jesus coming back to earth, He did something important in heaven.
• A New Explanation
• Edson said Jesus entered the Most Holy Place in heaven (based on Daniel 8:14) on October 22, 1844.
• He based this on the Old Testament idea of the Day of Atonement, when priests would cleanse the temple of sins.
• Ellen G. White: Her visions affirmed this interpretation, and it became foundational for SDA theology.
• The Investigative Judgment
• They believed Jesus started a new work in heaven, called the Investigative Judgment:
• Jesus is now reviewing the lives of all believers to decide who will be saved.
• This is like a heavenly courtroom where records are checked.

Outcome:

• The faithful who remain obedient are confirmed as saved.
• Those who turn away from God are judged unworthy and will not be resurrected to eternal life.
• Criticisms of the Investigative Judgment

Lack of Clear Biblical Support:

• Many argue that Daniel 8:14 refers to the restoration of the Jerusalem temple, not a heavenly judgment.
• Hebrews 10:12 states that Christ’s sacrifice was "once for all," implying no additional phase of atonement is needed.

Salvation by Works?:

• Critics say the doctrine emphasizes human effort and obedience, potentially undermining salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9).

Conflict with Assurance of Salvation:

• Mainstream Christianity teaches that believers can have full assurance of salvation in Christ (Romans 8:1), while the Investigative Judgment may lead to uncertainty.

How This Differs from Mainstream Christianity

• Completed Atonement: Christians believe Christ’s work on the cross was finished and fully sufficient for salvation (John 19:30, Hebrews 10:10-14).
• Hebrews 10:14: "For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy."
• Judgment After Second Coming: Mainstream Christians teach that judgment occurs after Christ’s return, not as an ongoing process since 1844.

Points for Discussion with SDAs

• Christ’s Finished Work:
• Ask: "If Jesus said 'It is finished' (John 19:30), why is another phase of atonement necessary?"
• Assurance of Salvation:
• Highlight verses like 1 John 5:13, which assure believers of eternal life.
• Interpretation of Daniel 8:14:
• Explore whether the prophecy could refer to the earthly temple and historical events, not a heavenly sanctuary.

• Who Was She?
• Ellen G. White (1827–1915) was one of the founders of the SDA Church. She claimed to have received over 2,000 visions and dreams, which she shared through books, articles, and sermons.
• Her writings, such as The Great Controversy and Steps to Christ, are considered inspired by God.
• Her Role in SDA Theology:
• While not officially considered equal to Scripture, her writings are referred to as the "lesser light" that leads to the "greater light" of the Bible.
• She is seen as a fulfillment of Revelation 12:17 and Revelation 19:10, which SDAs interpret as God raising up a prophet for the end times.
• Scope of Influence:
• White’s writings address doctrinal issues (e.g., Sabbath-keeping, the investigative judgment) and practical matters (e.g., diet, education, health).
• Many SDA doctrines are rooted in or affirmed by her writings.
• The SDA Position on Prophecy
• Seventh-day Adventists (SDA) view prophecy as an ongoing tool for divine guidance, with Ellen G. White regarded as a modern-day prophetess. While her writings are considered a "lesser light" pointing to the Bible, they are heavily relied upon to shape doctrine and practice. SDAs believe her visions and teachings fulfill biblical prophecies, such as those in Revelation 12:17 and 19:10, and serve as authoritative guidance for the end times. This elevated role often leads to her writings being treated as a lens through which Scripture is interpreted, raising concerns about undermining the sufficiency of the Bible.
• The Orthodox Christian Position on Prophecy
• Completed Revelation:
• Christianity teaches that God’s revelation is complete through Jesus Christ and the Scriptures (Hebrews 1:1-2, 2 Timothy 3:16-17).
• Scripture References:
• Hebrews 1:1-2: “Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son.”
• 2 Timothy 3:16-17: “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.”
• Revelation 22:18: “I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book.”
• Prophecy in the New Testament primarily functioned to authenticate the early church and ceased with the apostolic era.
• The Bible as the Final Authority:
• Mainstream Christians affirm sola scriptura (Scripture alone) as the ultimate authority for faith and practice.
• Additional revelations or prophecies are not required for guidance or doctrine.
• How to Lovingly Engage SDAs on This Issue
• Affirm Common Ground:
• Acknowledge their desire to follow God and their respect for Scripture.
• Example: “It’s clear you care deeply about knowing God’s will. Let’s explore what the Bible says about prophecy.”
• Point to the Sufficiency of Scripture:
• Use verses like 2 Timothy 3:16-17 to show that Scripture is sufficient for all aspects of faith and practice.
• Ask: “If the Bible is complete and sufficient, why would we need additional revelations?”
• Test Prophecies Biblically:
• Highlight Deuteronomy 18:22 and 1 Thessalonians 5:21-22, which teach that prophecies must be tested and verified.
• Ask: “If even one prophecy is inaccurate, should we consider the person a true prophet?”

• Highlight shared beliefs with SDAs, such as:
• Belief in Jesus as fully divine and the Savior.
• The authority of Scripture.
• The hope of Jesus’ Second Coming.
• This helps foster understanding and a respectful tone while distinguishing key doctrinal differences.

• Recap major theological concerns, such as:
• Sabbath and Salvation: Stress that salvation is by grace through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9), not tied to keeping the Sabbath or other works.
• Investigative Judgment: Affirm that Jesus’ work on the cross was complete, and there’s no need for a separate judgment to determine salvation (Hebrews 10:14, John 19:30).
• Prophecy and Ellen G. White: Remind viewers that Scripture is the final authority (2 Timothy 3:16-17), and any extra-biblical claims must be tested carefully.

• Urge Christians to respond with truth and grace when engaging SDA members:
• Speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15).
• Ask thoughtful questions to challenge their assumptions without attacking their beliefs.
• Focus on the gospel and the assurance of salvation in Christ.

• Reinforce the sufficiency of Jesus’ sacrifice:
• “For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy” (Hebrews 10:14).
• Remind viewers of the joy and freedom found in Christ:
• “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28).

• Encourage the audience to study Scripture deeply for themselves and to know God’s Word:
• “Let’s commit to growing in our understanding of the Bible so we can stand firm in truth and share the gospel with those who are seeking.”

Soul Sleep:

• SDAs teach that when people die, their souls do not go to heaven or hell immediately. Instead, they enter an unconscious state referred to as "soul sleep," awaiting the resurrection at Christ’s return.
• Death is likened to a deep, dreamless sleep where the person has no awareness of the passage of time (Ecclesiastes 9:5, John 11:11-14).
• Refuting Soul Sleep
• These verses suggest that the soul remains conscious after death:
• Luke 16:19-31 (The Rich Man and Lazarus):
• Jesus describes the rich man and Lazarus experiencing conscious realities immediately after death—one in torment and the other in comfort.
• This story undermines the idea of unconsciousness after death.
• Philippians 1:23-24:
• Paul writes, "I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far."
• This indicates that being "with Christ" happens immediately after death, not after an unconscious waiting period.
• 2 Corinthians 5:8:
• "We are confident, I say, and would prefer to be away from the body and at home with the Lord."
• Suggests a direct transition from physical death to being in the presence of the Lord.
• Revelation 6:9-10:
• Souls of martyrs under the altar cry out to God, asking how long until judgment.
• Demonstrates that souls are conscious and aware before the resurrection.

Annihilationism:

• SDAs reject the idea of eternal torment in hell. They believe that the wicked will be resurrected for judgment but will ultimately be destroyed (annihilated) rather than suffer eternal punishment.
• This destruction is seen as the "second death" (Revelation 20:14-15), where the wicked cease to exist entirely.
• Refuting Annihilationism
• Matthew 25:46:
• "Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."
• The same word "eternal" is used for both punishment and life, showing parallel everlasting duration.
• Revelation 14:10-11:
• "They will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment will rise forever and ever."
• Indicates eternal, ongoing torment for those who worship the beast.
• Daniel 12:2:
• "Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt."
• Describes eternal consequences for both the righteous and the wicked.
• Mark 9:47-48:
• Jesus speaks of hell as a place "where the worms that eat them do not die, and the fire is not quenched."
• Indicates unending suffering rather than annihilation.

• SDA Belief:
• SDAs promote a vegetarian or plant-based diet and discourage the consumption of "unclean" meats listed in Leviticus 11 (e.g., pork, shellfish).
• They advocate for abstaining from alcohol, tobacco, and caffeine as part of living a holy and healthy life.
• Health is viewed as a spiritual obligation, tying physical well-being to faithfulness to God.
• Ellen G. White’s Influence:
• White wrote extensively on health, calling the body the "temple of the Holy Spirit" and teaching that a vegetarian diet was God's ideal for humanity.
• In The Ministry of Healing, she stated, "Grains, fruits, nuts, and vegetables constitute the diet chosen for us by our Creator."
• White also claimed that avoiding "unclean" meats and harmful substances is essential for moral and spiritual clarity.
• Holistic Living:
• The SDA Church operates many hospitals, clinics, and wellness centers worldwide, emphasizing the connection between health and spirituality.
• Their Health Message is central to their outreach, and they see it as...

Some modern day religions claim to be Christians...but are they really? Go through this series with a small group or mentor, and let's take a closer look at some religions that may actually be cultish. This week: Jehova's Witnesses.

--

The Unveiling Mormonism podcast pulls back the curtain on Mormon history, culture and doctrine. Join us for new episodes every Monday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org/mormonism.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

In the last episode we talked about what is a cult (how to identify a cult, etc.). If you missed that one, be sure and go and check that out. In today’s episode we will focus our attention on a group that claims to be the real Christians, but as we will show today the Jehovah’s Witnesses are not Christians. 

The Jehovah’s Witnesses originated in the late 19th century with Charles Taze Russell, an American preacher deeply interested in Bible prophecy. Here’s a concise history of the organization:

• Charles Taze Russell (1852–1916): Russell was influenced by Adventist teachings, particularly their focus on Christ’s second coming. Disillusioned with mainstream Christianity, he began his own Bible study group in the 1870s in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
• 1870s The group now known as Jehovah’s Witnesses was initially called Bible Students or International Bible Students Association (IBSA) during its early years. This name reflected their focus on studying the Bible and disseminating their teachings.
• Publication of Zion’s Watch Tower (1879): Russell launched this magazine to spread his interpretations of the Bible, emphasizing end-time prophecies and the imminent return of Christ.
• Why was it called Watchtower? 
• The name "Watchtower" comes from the Bible, where watchtowers were used as places to keep watch and warn of danger. In ancient times, people would stand in tall towers to look out for enemies or protect their vineyards from animals.
• Jehovah's Witnesses use the name Watchtower because they believe they are like spiritual watchmen. They think their job is to warn people about the coming of God’s Kingdom and the end of the current world system (what they call Armageddon). They see themselves as sounding the alarm and helping people prepare for what they believe is God’s judgment.
• The name also reflects their focus on being alert and vigilant about spreading their teachings, which they view as essential for saving others. The magazine The Watchtower became their main way to share these warnings and spread their message worldwide.

• Incorporation as the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society (1884): Russell formally organized his followers under this name, focusing on mass publication and distribution of literature.
• Today’s Stats and Organizational Structure
• 8.6 million members today (2023)
• Governing Body: A centralized leadership that claims exclusive authority in interpreting the Bible.
• Emphasis on door-to-door evangelism, distribution of "Watchtower" and "Awake!" magazines.
• Rutherford’s Leadership (1916–1942): After Russell’s death, Rutherford took control. He rebranded the movement, introducing the name “Jehovah’s Witnesses” in 1931 to distinguish it from other groups. He centralized authority, increased door-to-door evangelism, and solidified distinct doctrines, such as rejecting political involvement and military service.
• Failed Prophecies: Under both Russell and Rutherford, numerous end-of-the-world dates were predicted and failed, including 1914, 1925, and later dates.

• Prediction: Charles Taze Russell, the founder, taught that Jesus Christ returned invisibly in 1874 to begin ruling spiritually.
• Outcome: This claim was later adjusted to fit their evolving theology, and they eventually moved the "invisible return" date to 1914.

• Prediction: Russell taught that the end of the current world system (Armageddon) would occur in 1914.
• Outcome: When nothing happened, the Watch Tower Society claimed Jesus began ruling invisibly in 1914 and that World War I was part of the fulfillment of prophecy.

• Prediction: Joseph Rutherford, the second leader, predicted that Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and other faithful men of old would be resurrected in 1925 to rule over the earth.
• Outcome: When this did not happen, the prophecy was quietly dropped. A mansion in California (called Beth Sarim) that was built to house these resurrected patriarchs was eventually sold.

• Prediction: Rutherford suggested that Armageddon was very near, specifically during or shortly after World War II.
• Outcome: The war ended, but Armageddon did not occur.

• Prediction: The Watch Tower Society heavily implied that the end would come in 1975, linking it to their calculation of 6,000 years since the creation of Adam.
• Outcome: Many Jehovah's Witnesses sold their homes and quit their jobs in anticipation. When nothing happened, the leadership blamed the members for "misinterpreting" their teachings.

• Credibility Issues: According to Deuteronomy 18:22, a false prophecy is a sign that the message is not from God. Jehovah's Witnesses' repeated failed predictions have led many to question their claim of being God’s sole channel of communication.
• Impact on Members: These predictions caused emotional and financial strain on members who made life-altering decisions based on them.
• Shift in Teachings: After each failure, Jehovah's Witnesses adjusted their theology or blamed misunderstandings to maintain credibility and control over followers.

• The Bible: Jehovah’s Witnesses use the New World Translation (NWT), a version modified to align with their doctrines.
• Divergence: Mainstream Christians consider the NWT unreliable due to alterations like John 1:1 ("the Word was a god") and Colossians 1:16 (inserting "other" to suggest Jesus is a created being).
• Supplemental Texts: Publications like The Watchtower and Awake! magazines, as well as books like What Does the Bible Really Teach? serve as authoritative teaching tools.
• Divergence: These writings are considered equal to, or sometimes above, Scripture in authority by Jehovah's Witnesses.

• Jehovah’s Witnesses: Jehovah is the one true God, the Father, distinct and separate from Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
• Divergence: Reject the Trinity, which is a core doctrine of mainstream Christianity. Christians believe in one God existing in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

• Jehovah’s Witnesses:
• Jesus is a created being, the first and greatest creation of Jehovah. He is identified as Michael the Archangel.
• Jesus is not co-equal or co-eternal with God and was merely human during His earthly ministry.
• His resurrection was spiritual, not physical.
• Jesus’ death provides an opportunity for salvation, but works are required to earn it.
• Divergence:
• Mainstream Christianity teaches that Jesus is fully God and fully man (John 1:1, Colossians 2:9), eternally preexistent, and co-equal with the Father.
• Christians affirm the physical resurrection of Jesus (Luke 24:39, 1 Corinthians 15:4).

• Jehovah’s Witnesses: The Holy Spirit is not a person but an impersonal force or "God’s active power."
• Divergence: Mainstream Christianity teaches the Holy Spirit is a distinct person within the Trinity, co-equal with the Father and the Son (John 14:26, Acts 5:3–4).

• Jehovah’s Witnesses:
• Salvation requires faith in Jesus, adherence to the teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses, and participation in works like door-to-door evangelism.
• Only faithful Jehovah’s Witnesses will survive Armageddon and enter God’s Kingdom.
• Divergence: Mainstream Christianity teaches salvation by grace through faith alone, not by works (Ephesians 2:8–9, Romans 10:9–10).

• Jehovah’s Witnesses:
• The soul ceases to exist at death (annihilationism).
• Only 144,000 anointed believers go to heaven to reign with Christ.
• The rest of the faithful will live forever on a restored paradise earth.
• The wicked will be permanently destroyed, not eternally tormented.
• Divergence: Christians believe in eternal life with God for believers and eternal separation from God in hell for the wicked (Matthew 25:46, Revelation 20:10, 14–15).

In Jehovah’s Witnesses’ beliefs, the 144,000 are a select group of people who will go to heaven to rule with Christ. They don’t interpret it the same way Christians do who believe these are 12,000 Jewish evangelists from each of the 12 tribes. They interpret it symbolically. This teaching is based on a literal interpretation of Revelation 7:4 and 14:1-3, which mention 144,000 sealed servants of God.

1. Spiritual Anointing: Jehovah’s Witnesses believe these individuals have a special spiritual calling or "anointing" from God. This is not something they choose but something they believe God reveals to them.
2. Faithfulness: Members of the 144,000 are viewed as exceptionally faithful Jehovah’s Witnesses who dedicate their lives to serving God and spreading His message.
3. Time Period: They teach that the selection of the 144,000 began with Jesus’ apostles and continued into the early 20th century. By the mid-1930s, they believed that most of the 144,000 had already been chosen.

• Jehovah’s Witnesses teach that very few spots remain in the 144,000 because most were already chosen in the past.
• It is technically possible for someone today to believe they are part of the 144,000 if they experience a personal conviction of being "anointed."
• However, this claim is rare and often viewed with skepticism by the broader Witness community.

• The majority do not believe they will go to heaven. Instead, they look forward to living forever on a paradise earth under the rule of Christ and the 144,000.
• Witnesses who are not part of the 144,000 are referred to as the "great crowd" (based on Revelation 7:9).

• Mainstream Christians do not interpret the 144,000 in Revelation as a literal, exclusive group. Instead, many view this number symbolically, representing the 144,000 Jewish evangelists (12,000 from the 12 tribes of Israel) who spread the gospel during the tribulation. 
• Christians believe all who are saved through faith in Christ will reign with Him (2 Timothy 2:12, Revelation 20:6), not just a select few.

• Reject Holidays and National Symbols: Jehovah’s Witnesses do not celebrate Christmas, Easter, or birthdays and avoid pledging allegiance to national flags or serving in the military.
• Divergence: These practices are cultural, not doctrinal, in mainstream Christianity.
• Refuse Blood Transfusions: Based on their interpretation of Acts 15:28–29, they refuse blood transfusions, even when life-threatening.
• Divergence: Mainstream Christians do not interpret these verses as prohibiting medical blood transfusions.
• Evangelism Focus: Known for rigorous door-to-door evangelism and distributing literature.
• Divergence: Evangelism is a Christian practice, but mainstream Christians emphasize it as part of a broader relationship with Christ rather than as a requirement for salvation.
• Governing Body Authority: The Governing Body, based in Warwick, New York, is viewed as God's sole channel of communication.
• Divergence: Mainstream Christianity holds that all believers have access to God through Christ (Hebrews 4:16) and emphasizes the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).

• Be Kind and Respectful: Jehovah’s Witnesses are often trained to expect hostility. Being warm and genuine can open doors for deeper conversations.
• Show Interest: Ask about their beliefs and listen attentively. Avoid debates early on.
• Example: “Can you tell me more about why you believe this way?”

• Ask questions that encourage them to think critically about their beliefs without feeling attacked.
• About the Bible: “Why does the New World Translation render John 1:1 differently than most other Bible translations?”
• About Prophecies: “What should we think about an organization that predicts events that don’t come true? How does that fit with Deuteronomy 18:22?”
• About Salvation: “Why do we need works to be saved if Ephesians 2:8-9 says salvation is a gift from God?”

• Jehovah’s Witnesses have a distorted view of Jesus. Bring the conversation back to who Jesus is.
• Use John 20:28: Thomas calls Jesus “My Lord and my God.”
• Use Isaiah 9:6: Jesus is called “Mighty God.”
• Ask: “How can Jesus save us if He is not fully God?”

• Emphasize grace over works:
• Ephesians 2:8-9: Salvation is through faith, not by works.
• Romans 10:9-10: Confessing Jesus as Lord leads to salvation.
• John 14:6: Jesus is the only way to God.

• Highlight that the Bible warns against adding or subtracting from God’s Word (Revelation 22:18-19).
• Ask: “If the Governing Body is God’s channel, why have their teachings changed so much over time?”

• Stick to verses in their own Bible (New World Translation). They may dismiss other translations as corrupt.
• Cross-reference verses they know with others to show biblical consistency.

• Don’t expect immediate change. Many Jehovah’s Witnesses fear leaving because of family shunning.
• Continue to pray for them and share truth gently over time.

• If possible, share stories of former Jehovah’s Witnesses who found freedom in Christ. This can plant seeds of doubt about the organization and hope in the gospel.

• You: "Thank you for sharing your beliefs with me. I’ve always wondered—what does it mean for you to have a personal relationship with Jesus?"
• Jehovah’s Witness: "We believe Jesus is the way to Jehovah, but we worship Jehovah, not Jesus."
• You: "That’s interesting. In John 14:6, Jesus says He is the way, the truth, and the life. Do you think that means we can talk directly to Him too?"

The U.S. Constitution, finalized in 1787, is a cornerstone of governance and liberty. While it does not explicitly mention God, many of its principles align with biblical truths. These truths emphasize the role of moral law, the divine origin of human rights, and the purpose of government. In this episode we explore three pillars of God and government, enriched with Scripture to reveal how these principles reflect biblical teaching.

--

The PursueGOD Truth podcast is the “easy button” for making disciples – whether you’re looking for resources to lead a family devotional, a small group at church, or a one-on-one mentoring relationship. Join us for new episodes every Tuesday and Friday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

The Constitution assumes the existence of universal truths—principles that govern justice and fairness. This idea aligns with the Bible’s declaration:

• “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1, NLT)

By acknowledging a Creator, the foundation of the Constitution reflects an ordered world governed by divine laws. These moral laws are evident in the Ten Commandments, given to guide human behavior:

• “You must not steal. You must not testify falsely against your neighbor.” (Exodus 20:15-16, NLT)

The rule of law, central to the Constitution, echoes biblical justice. In God’s eyes, righteousness and impartiality are essential:

• “Judges must be impartial. They must hear the case of those who are poor just as they hear the case of those who are rich.” (Deuteronomy 1:17, NLT)

The Constitution reflects this concept by establishing a legal system grounded in objective, unchanging principles that mirror God’s moral law, ensuring fairness and accountability.

The Constitution’s protection of inalienable rights—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—rests on the belief that rights are given by God, not government. Scripture affirms this truth:

• “What are mere mortals that you should think about them, human beings that you should care for them? Yet you made them only a little lower than God and crowned them with glory and honor.” (Psalm 8:4-5, NLT)

Every human being possesses dignity and worth because they are created in God’s image:

• “So God created human beings in his own image. In the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” (Genesis 1:27, NLT)

This foundational truth underscores the Constitution’s emphasis on individual freedoms. By safeguarding these rights, the document reflects God’s design for humanity. Government’s role, then, is to protect these God-given freedoms, not to grant or revoke them.

The Constitution defines government’s purpose as protecting rights and maintaining order. The Bible reinforces this by teaching that government is a servant of God, tasked with promoting good and restraining evil:

• “The authorities are God’s servants, sent for your good. But if you are doing wrong, of course you should be afraid, for they have the power to punish you.” (Romans 13:4, NLT)

The preamble begins with the phrase, “We the People,” emphasizing that authority flows from the consent of the governed. This principle aligns with biblical teaching on appointing leaders:

• “Choose some well-respected men from each tribe who are known for their wisdom and understanding, and I will appoint them as your leaders.” (Deuteronomy 1:13, NLT)

However, the Constitution’s scope raises a question: do these rights extend only to citizens, or are they universal? Scripture challenges us to recognize that all people are valued by God, deserving of justice and dignity:

• “For God does not show favoritism.” (Romans 2:11, NLT)
• “Do not take advantage of foreigners who live among you in your land. Treat them like native-born Israelites, and love them as you love yourself.” (Leviticus 19:33-34, NLT)

These verses remind us that while the Constitution primarily governs its citizens, its principles reflect God’s heart for all people.

The U.S. Constitution is a remarkable reflection of biblical principles. It acknowledges a Creator who establishes moral law, affirms that human rights come from God, and defines government as a servant to protect those rights. As Christians, we can celebrate these truths while advocating for policies and practices that align more fully with God’s Word.

Ultimately, true liberty is found not in human governance but in submission to God’s eternal law. As Scripture reminds us:

• “For the Lord is our judge, our lawgiver, and our king. He will care for us and save us.” (Isaiah 33:22, NLT)

By living out these principles, we can encourage a nation that honors God and reflects His justice, mercy, and truth.

Tithing isn’t mandated by the New Testament, but Christians should be good stewards of their money by giving regularly, proportionately, and sacrificially.

--

The Unveiling Mormonism podcast pulls back the curtain on Mormon history, culture and doctrine. Join us for new episodes every Monday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org/mormonism.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

Tithing, the practice of giving 10% of your income to God, is a topic that Christians still talk about a lot. In the Old Testament, tithing is part of the Mosaic Law, but in the New Testament, people debate its place. Surprisingly, the word “tithe” (or its variations) only shows up four times in the New Testament. Before we dive into the New Testament, let’s quickly look at tithing in the Old Testament to understand what it tells us about the practice.

The Nebulous Nature of the Tithe in the Old Testament

In the Old Testament, the concept of the tithe is mentioned multiple times, but its exact application and scope were somewhat complex and varied. For example:

1. Levitical Tithe: Numbers 18:21-24 describes a tithe given to the Levites as compensation for their service in the Tabernacle. This tithe was based on agricultural produce and livestock, not monetary income.
2. Festival Tithe: Deuteronomy 14:22-27 outlines a tithe that was set aside for annual festivals. This tithe was consumed by the giver and their household in a celebratory feast before the Lord.
3. Charity Tithe: Deuteronomy 14:28-29 refers to a tithe given every third year to support the poor, including the foreigner, the fatherless, and the widow.

So, the “tithe” wasn’t a one-size-fits-all thing. It was actually a bunch of different obligations that served different purposes in ancient Israelite society. And guess what? It mostly applied to people who worked in farming, not to everyone who made money or had stuff. This is important to keep in mind when we think about how tithing might work in our modern world.

The Four Appearances of the Tithe in the New Testament

Now let’s dive into the four references to the tithe in the New Testament. Surprisingly, we never find Jesus or any New Testament author commanding us to tithe. Instead, the tithe serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting what NOT to do when it’s done with the wrong intentions.

1. Matthew 23:23

In Matthew 23:23, Jesus says to the Pharisees:

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill, and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy, and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former."

Jesus acknowledges the Pharisees’ strict tithing, even of garden herbs, but points out that they neglected more important things like justice, mercy, and faithfulness. He doesn’t say tithing is wrong, but he emphasizes the importance of having a pure heart and focusing on the bigger picture of living a godly life.

2. Luke 11:42

Luke’s Gospel includes a parallel to Matthew 23:23, where Jesus says:

"Woe to you Pharisees, because you give God a tenth of your mint, rue, and all other kinds of garden herbs, but you neglect justice and the love of God. You should have practiced the latter without leaving the former undone."

This passage echoes what Matthew said. The Pharisees were all about following the rules, especially about tithing, but they forgot to show God the love and justice that’s really important. Jesus said that just doing the right things on the outside, like tithing, isn’t enough.

3. Luke 18:12

In the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector, the Pharisee boasts:

"I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get."

This part of the Pharisee’s prayer is super self-righteous, and it’s a total contrast to the humble tax collector. Jesus is pointing out that the Pharisee is being too proud and thinks he’s all righteous because he tithes. But tithing, like any spiritual practice, is pointless if you don’t have a humble and repentant heart.

4. Hebrews 7:1-10

The Book of Hebrews references tithing in its discussion of Melchizedek and Abraham:

"This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him, and Abraham gave him a tenth of everything..."

The author of Hebrews uses this historical account to show how Melchizedek’s priesthood is better than any other, and it’s a picture of Christ’s eternal priesthood. Tithing here is like a way of honoring and recognizing spiritual authority. But this passage isn’t really about telling Christians how much to give, it’s about showing that Christ is our High Priest, the one who’s in charge forever.

A New Testament Approach to Giving

In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7), Jesus goes beyond the rules and teaches us to understand the true meaning behind them. For instance, He explains the deeper meaning of the commands against murder and adultery, not just by saying they’re wrong, but by saying that anger and lust are the root causes. This principle also applies to giving. Jesus says that we should give generously, not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it shows a changed heart. When our treasure is rooted in God’s kingdom, generosity flows naturally:

"Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.” Matthew 6:19-21

And consider the early church’s crazy generosity in Acts 2:44-45. They all shared everything they had, and they sold their stuff to help anyone who needed it. This is the spirit of giving in the New Testament—a heart that’s been changed by the gospel. The New Testament doesn’t make tithing a strict rule for believers. Instead, it encourages us to give generously, out of love and thanksgiving (2 Corinthians 9:7).

Takeaway

The four New Testament references to the tithe give us some important clues, but they don’t make tithing a strict rule for today’s Christians. Instead, they point to a higher standard of giving—one that comes from being fair, kind, loving, and generous. While Christians today don’t have to tithe the same way it was done under the Mosaic Law, we’re still called to be good stewards of the resources God has given us. 

A good rule of thumb is to make sure your giving is regular, proportionate, and sacrificial. It should be a regular spiritual discipline, whether weekly, monthly, or yearly. It should be in proportion to your income, whether 2%, 10%, or more. And it should be sacrificial, because we’re following a Savior who sacrificed his life to buy us the freedom we could never afford.

Some modern day religions claim to be Christians...but are they really? Go through this series with a small group or mentor, and let's take a closer look at some religions that may actually be cultish. This week: Mormons.

--

The PursueGOD Truth podcast is the “easy button” for making disciples – whether you’re looking for resources to lead a family devotional, a small group at church, or a one-on-one mentoring relationship. Join us for new episodes every Tuesday and Friday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at [email protected].

Donate Now

--

https://www.pursuegod.org/unveiling-mormonism/