
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Based on Podcast App listening data
Raymond Ibrahim argues that conquest, forced conversion, and the jizya tax helped reshape formerly Christian and Hindu lands. Patrick presses him on why resistance failed and how empires expanded so quickly. From Egypt to India, the discussion confronts a brutal history behind religious demographic change.
Raymond Ibrahim contrasts the Quran's Meccan and Medinan revelations, arguing that changing power shaped its teachings on peace and warfare. He explains abrogation, recounts a tense exchange with a colleague, and cites Christian persecution under ISIS. What happens when religious authority gains power?
Raymond Ibrahim says Saudi funding shaped how Islam was taught at Georgetown and recounts conflict that led him to leave. Patrick questions what Qatar and China expect from billions flowing into U.S. universities. Are foreign donors supporting education, or buying influence over what students learn?
Why do migrants choose some European countries over others? Raymond Ibrahim argues that benefits, immigration policy and cultural accommodation shape their destinations. Patrick Bet-David asks how the West compares with China, Japan and India.
How should immigration policy address extremism without treating an entire religion as a threat? Patrick Bet-David presses Raymond Ibrahim on the percentage of extremists, his risk analogy and the distinction between ordinary Muslims and people who commit violence.
Is the conflict with Iran about religion or geopolitics? Raymond Ibrahim challenges the framing of US alliances with Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Patrick Bet-David presses him on Sunni-Shia history, regional threats and whether Saudi reforms signal genuine change.
Was Vlad the Impaler a hero or a monster? Raymond Ibrahim separates the Wallachian ruler from Bram Stoker’s Dracula, discussing Ottoman captivity, brutal punishments and the propaganda that shaped his reputation. Patrick Bet-David asks about the man behind the legend.
Can you support capitalism and still want slower AI development? Jacob Coxon explains his libertarian leanings, responds to Marc Andreessen and David Sacks, and argues that AI’s benefits could arrive without an uncontrolled race toward increasingly powerful systems.
“I’ve always been scared.” Jacob Coxon explains why he joined OpenAI despite fearing AI since his teens. He reflects on money, status and personal incentives, then argues that competition between AI companies could push development faster than safety research can keep up.
Are AI researchers building their own replacements? Former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon says employees anticipate eventual automation. He discusses expectations of support at Anthropic and asks what happens to workers outside the company.
From the publisher's feed
Ranked by our users in the last 21 days

227,479 Listeners

3,894 Listeners

32,773 Listeners

13,977 Listeners

33,450 Listeners

4,692 Listeners

4,454 Listeners

2,295 Listeners

2,302 Listeners

46,079 Listeners

7,574 Listeners

4,235 Listeners

806 Listeners

15,926 Listeners

301 Listeners