
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The bad news about Justice Clarence Thomas of the US Supreme Court is getting worse with more revelations of Justice Thomas keeping a secret that he has received hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of gifts from a billionaire political donor suspected of buying votes on issues that are, or soon may be, considered by the Court. The latest bad news is about Justice Thomas receiving from that political donor some round-trip private jet travel between various destinations in the US and once even to Indonesia for an 8-day yachting vacation, courtesy of the ever-generous political donor. None of which did Justice Thomas disclose in his personal financial reports the Justices have pledged to disclose. The reason we know about it is that the US Congress is investigating money gifts to members of the Court, and the media, and a few members of Congress, are asking questions that have embarrassed the Court into creating, oh reluctantly, the first Supreme Court code of ethics in 200 years. There is strong language in the code requiring Justices to itemize the gifts they receive and whom they’re from, but very weak language on how to enforce the code. For almost 200 years, the Court avoided a code until now it’s created a great code of ethics that seems to be unethical.
Walter Jacobson gives his Perspective:
4.8
66 ratings
The bad news about Justice Clarence Thomas of the US Supreme Court is getting worse with more revelations of Justice Thomas keeping a secret that he has received hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of gifts from a billionaire political donor suspected of buying votes on issues that are, or soon may be, considered by the Court. The latest bad news is about Justice Thomas receiving from that political donor some round-trip private jet travel between various destinations in the US and once even to Indonesia for an 8-day yachting vacation, courtesy of the ever-generous political donor. None of which did Justice Thomas disclose in his personal financial reports the Justices have pledged to disclose. The reason we know about it is that the US Congress is investigating money gifts to members of the Court, and the media, and a few members of Congress, are asking questions that have embarrassed the Court into creating, oh reluctantly, the first Supreme Court code of ethics in 200 years. There is strong language in the code requiring Justices to itemize the gifts they receive and whom they’re from, but very weak language on how to enforce the code. For almost 200 years, the Court avoided a code until now it’s created a great code of ethics that seems to be unethical.
Walter Jacobson gives his Perspective:
9,165 Listeners
38,527 Listeners
7,647 Listeners
90,686 Listeners
37,890 Listeners
16,517 Listeners
36,517 Listeners
43 Listeners
32,106 Listeners
225,767 Listeners
14 Listeners
434 Listeners
102 Listeners
9 Listeners
1 Listeners
35 Listeners
1,166 Listeners
4 Listeners
86,596 Listeners
110,655 Listeners
10 Listeners
51 Listeners
59,214 Listeners
11,791 Listeners
20 Listeners
45 Listeners
45,527 Listeners
6 Listeners
0 Listeners
1 Listeners
10,508 Listeners
10 Listeners
4 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners