
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Wendy Netter Epstein, Professor of Law at DePaul University College of Law and Faculty Director of the Mary and Michael Jaharis Health Law Institute, discusses her article "Private Law Alternatives to the Individual Mandate," which will be published in the Minnesota Law Review. Epstein begins by briefly describing what the Affordable Care Act is and how it works, and the role the "individual mandate" played in the ACA. She then explains how the effective elimination of the individual mandate will affect the functioning of the ACA health care markets, by changing the incentives for marginal healthcare consumers. She observes that existing proposals to compensate for the loss of the individual mandate are unlikely to be effective and would have undesirable consequences. And she proposes several alternative approaches based on behavioral economics principles that could be more effective, including variable rate plans, lock-in contracts, return of premium policies, and appeals to altruism. Epstein is on Twitter at @ProfWEpstein.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By CC0/Public Domain4.9
9999 ratings
In this episode, Wendy Netter Epstein, Professor of Law at DePaul University College of Law and Faculty Director of the Mary and Michael Jaharis Health Law Institute, discusses her article "Private Law Alternatives to the Individual Mandate," which will be published in the Minnesota Law Review. Epstein begins by briefly describing what the Affordable Care Act is and how it works, and the role the "individual mandate" played in the ACA. She then explains how the effective elimination of the individual mandate will affect the functioning of the ACA health care markets, by changing the incentives for marginal healthcare consumers. She observes that existing proposals to compensate for the loss of the individual mandate are unlikely to be effective and would have undesirable consequences. And she proposes several alternative approaches based on behavioral economics principles that could be more effective, including variable rate plans, lock-in contracts, return of premium policies, and appeals to altruism. Epstein is on Twitter at @ProfWEpstein.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9,230 Listeners

3,538 Listeners

382 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

6,307 Listeners

5,882 Listeners

15,688 Listeners

5,851 Listeners

3,957 Listeners

1,444 Listeners

3,547 Listeners

65 Listeners

396 Listeners

745 Listeners

2,280 Listeners