Wheat's On Your Mind

By Kansas Wheat CommissionBusiness Science Education How To

Wheat's On Your Mind episodes

June 23Kansas Wheat Harvest: Smaller Crop, Bigger Stakes
Kansas wheat farmers are facing a mixed harvest, fragile margins, and fertilizer markets that are finally easing but still hard to pencil.
Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin are joined by Mike O’Dea and Josh Linville of StoneX for a wide-ranging market discussion on Kansas harvest progress, hard red winter wheat quality, export competitiveness, fertilizer prices, and crop-input security. They cover what low yields and variable protein may mean for basis, why U.S. wheat is finding new export opportunity, and how producers can think through nitrogen purchases with so much uncertainty still in the market.
Key takeaways:
Kansas harvest started early, stalled with rain and humidity, and is showing wide differences in yield and protein.

Hard red winter wheat has become more competitive in some export channels, including Mexico.

Lower urea prices are helpful, but weak grain prices still make fertilizer decisions difficult.

Buying fertilizer in layers may help spread risk in a confusing market.

U.S. food security depends heavily on imported crop inputs, especially nitrogen, phosphate, and potash.
Timestamped rundown
00:00 — Opening clips
Mike O’Dea previews wheat export competitiveness, while Josh Linville frames the fertilizer market: prices are down, but grain prices are still painful.
00:24 — Episode introduction
Aaron Harries introduces the StoneX roundtable with Mike O’Dea, Josh Linville, and Kansas Wheat CEO Justin Gilpin.
00:42 — An unusual Kansas harvest
The group discusses an early harvest start, test cutting before Memorial Day, delays from rain and humidity, and combines beginning to roll statewide.
01:54 — Field reports on yield and quality
O’Dea shares early Kansas harvest observations, including low protein in parts of central and southern Kansas, stronger numbers farther west, and wide yield variation.
03:00 — USDA numbers and crop size expectations
The conversation turns to harvested acres, USDA yield adjustments, and the possibility of a hard red winter wheat crop around the 490-million- to 500-million-bushel range.
04:14 — Wheat spreads and production history
The group discusses Kansas City-Chicago relationships and compares the current hard red winter wheat situation with previous drought-impacted years.
05:41 — Export competitiveness returns
O’Dea explains how lower Kansas City futures have made U.S. wheat more competitive in some channels, including Mexico, while Black Sea and French values remain key comparisons.
06:33 — Nigeria and global buyers
Gilpin notes recent conversations with a Nigerian trade group and how quickly U.S. wheat competitiveness has changed in just a few weeks.
07:33 — Europe, Russia, and global wheat quality
O’Dea outlines possible quality concerns in southern Russia, heat risk in Western Europe, and the importance of milling versus feed wheat spreads later in the year.
08:18 — Minneapolis wheat contract changes
The discussion shifts to spring wheat, Minneapolis contract changes, and how those changes could affect futures, basis, and spreads.
09:38 — Spring wheat tour outlook
The Wheat Quality Council spring wheat tour is highlighted as a useful event to watch, especially with attention on spring wheat quality.
10:30 — Urea prices fall sharply
Linville explains that NOLA urea has dropped hard from recent highs, but weak grain prices still make the fertilizer-to-grain ratio difficult for producers.
12:23 — Nitrogen demand destruction
Linville says global nitrogen demand likely has been trimmed by a few percentage points, which can still represent a major tonnage shift worldwide.
13:37 — Fertilizer buying advice
The key advice: keep communicating with suppliers, follow both fertilizer and grain prices, and consider buying fertilizer in layers.
15:11 — Crop inputs and food security
The group discusses how U.S. food security depends on imported fertilizer and why that reality is drawing more attention from policymakers.
16:49 — Nitrogen, phosphate, and potash strategy
Linville argues for more domestic nitrogen production, stronger long-term phosphate relationships with allies, and maintaining strong potash trade with Canada.
20:23 — Final wheat market outlook
O’Dea says wheat futures may stay rangebound without a new production or quality problem, but he believes short-term lows may be in.
21:31 — Closing
The episode wraps with thanks to StoneX and a reminder to subscribe and share the podcast.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
23 min
June 16Farmer-Owned Bread: Keeping Wheat Value Local
A farmer-owned wheat, milling, and bakery project in Goodland could change how Kansas wheat reaches the grocery shelf.
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Aaron Harries talks with Brian Linin and Alan Townsend, co-founders of Golden Waves Grain, about their plan to receive wheat directly from farmer-owners, mill it into flour, and bake it into bread in one integrated facility. They explain how the model could create new value for wheat producers, strengthen rural jobs, improve traceability, and deliver fresher bread through a different grocery distribution system.
Top 10 takeaways
Golden Waves Grain wants to close the gap between wheat farmers and bread consumers. The project would receive wheat, mill flour, and bake bread in one Goodland facility.

The model is farmer-owned in part. Producer shares include a delivery commitment, giving farmers both an investment role and a grain-supply role.

The facility only needs a portion of local wheat production. The guests say the project would use about 2 million bushels a year, while Sherman County produces far more than that.

The payoff for farmers is both ownership and premium opportunity. Producer investors would receive above-local-market premiums tied to their delivery commitments.

Distribution is central to the business case. The project aims to reduce costs by delivering bread through a warehouse distribution model rather than the traditional bread-truck system.

Freshness is part of the product story. Lennon emphasizes using fresh wheat and fresh flour rather than grain and flour that have been stored for long periods.

The bread process matters. The team is focused on sponge-and-dough baking, a slower method they believe can improve flavor, texture, and eating quality.

Traceability could help farmers tell their story. Consumers may be able to connect the bread back to the farmer-owners who grew the wheat.

The project could be a major rural economic driver. Lennon says the plant is projected to create 141 jobs in the Goodland area.

Golden Waves Grain could create new wheat-quality feedback loops. Townsend says the plant may help identify wheat varieties and production practices that perform best in milling and baking.
Detailed timestamped rundown
00:00–01:52 — Opening and guest introductions
Aaron Harries introduces Brian Linin and Alan Townsend of Golden Waves Grain, a Goodland-based project built around growing wheat, milling it, and baking it into bread in one place.
01:52–04:08 — The Golden Waves Grain elevator pitch
Brian explains the plan: farmer-owners deliver wheat, the facility mills it into flour, and the flour is immediately baked into bread and buns. He outlines the scale, including two bread lines and distribution through Associated Wholesale Grocers.
04:08–06:49 — How the idea started
Alan traces the concept back to 2020 and his experience with 21st Century Bean Processing, a farmer-delivery, value-added model that inspired the wheat project. He also explains how partners including Tony Adams, Dave Owen, Brian Linin, and others came together.
06:49–11:07 — Farmer ownership and capital structure
Brian describes the producer-share model, delivery commitments, wheat premiums, strategic investors, equity raise, bank financing, projected construction cost, and hoped-for timeline to begin baking bread by January 2028.
11:07–13:34 — Why the distribution model matters
Alan explains how the project is designed around reducing costs in the supply chain, especially by moving bread through warehouse distribution instead of the traditional bread-truck model.
13:34–14:52 — Why no one has done this before
Alan says one of the hardest parts is organizing producers around a new value-added wheat model. He compares the future potential of Golden Waves Grain to how the bean company evolved over time.
14:52–18:18 — Product quality and fresh bread
Brian explains why the team believes the bread itself will stand out: fresh wheat, fresh flour, sponge-and-dough fermentation, and a focus on eating experience rather than simply shaving pennies from production cost.
18:18–20:02 — Whole wheat, mids, and byproducts
Alan and Brian discuss mill byproducts and how adding more whole wheat flour into bread formulas could keep more of the wheat kernel in food products rather than sending it out as feed.
20:02–21:16 — Traceability and farmer identity
Alan describes the consumer-facing story: farmers are proud of what they grow, and this project could make them the face behind the bread.
21:16–23:40 — Rural community impact and water realities
Brian and Alan talk about Goodland, job creation, the loss of past rural industries, the Ogallala Aquifer, dryland wheat, and why value-added wheat matters for the long-term future of western Kansas.
23:40–25:44 — Jobs and workforce model
Brian says the project is projected to create 141 jobs and explains the planned shift structure, with 12-hour shifts that could help attract workers from a broader region.
25:44–27:45 — What success looks like
Brian defines success as a profitable, efficient plant that is a reliable bread supplier and a top workplace. Alan adds that success includes making farmers more sophisticated about wheat varieties, baking quality, and production practices.
27:45–28:45 — Kansas support and local companies
The guests discuss support from the state of Kansas and the use of Kansas-based or regional companies involved in construction, milling, flour handling, and bakery systems.
28:45–30:36 — How to learn more
Brian directs interested farmers and investors to Golden Waves Grain’s website, and Aaron closes the episode.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
31 min
June 02Wheat, Fiber, and the Food Pyramid
Wheat is being pulled into bigger national conversations about dietary guidelines, school meals and ultra-processed foods.
In this episode, Aaron Harries talks with Erin Ball, executive director of the Grain Foods Foundation, and Leah Johnston, director of nutrition strategies and communications with Wildhive Strategic Communications. They explain how the grain foods industry is responding to changing nutrition guidance, why wheat’s fiber and nutrient contributions matter, and how farmers can help tell a clearer story about wheat’s role in healthy, practical diets.
Key takeaways:
Wheat contributes fiber, plant protein, B vitamins, folic acid, magnesium and other nutrients that are often overlooked.

Grain foods advocates are watching how new dietary guidance could affect school meals, food costs and student acceptance.

The ultra-processed food debate is complicated, and Ball says the science is still unsettled.

Johnston argues the wheat message should focus on nutrition, real meals and consumer relevance—not defensiveness.

Farmers can help by explaining that wheat is a plant-based food that supports better diet quality.
00:00–01:10 — Aaron Harries opens the episode and introduces guests Erin Ball of the Grain Foods Foundation and Leah Johnston of Wildhive Strategic Communications.
01:10–03:44 — Erin explains the Grain Foods Foundation’s mission, its origins during the Atkins-era carbohydrate backlash, and its shift toward investing in nutrition science and consumer communications.
03:44–05:21 — Leah gives the elevator pitch for wheat nutrition, calling wheat an overlooked nutritional powerhouse because of fiber, plant protein, vitamins, minerals and enrichment benefits.
05:21–09:30 — Erin discusses the new dietary guidance and “inverted food pyramid” concern, including research being developed to model nutrition and cost impacts.
09:30–12:22 — Leah explains the communications challenge: rather than arguing with a federal visual, grain foods advocates need to reframe the conversation around real meals, practical benefits and consumer choices.
12:22–16:52 — Erin describes school meal concerns, including cost, cafeteria equipment limitations, student acceptance and the risk of overly limiting grain servings.
16:52–18:19 — Justin Gilpin thanks Erin and Leah, praises the Grain Foods Foundation’s work and raises the issue of ultra-processed foods.
18:19–22:42 — Erin digs into the UPF debate, saying the science is unsettled, definitions remain difficult and the conversation should return to nutrients of concern such as added sugar, sodium and saturated fat.
22:42–24:36 — Leah adds that processing level alone does not tell the full nutrition story and points to research looking at nutrient-dense “healthy grains,” including both whole and refined grain foods.
24:37–28:43 — Erin offers advice for wheat farmers: start with the basics, explain that wheat is a plant, lean into wheat’s plant-based protein story and show how grain foods help people eat more balanced meals.
28:43–29:31 — Aaron closes the episode and directs listeners to subscribe and find past episodes at Wheat’s On Your Mind.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
30 min
May 19Farm Program Changes Kansas Farmers Need
Kansas wheat producers have several farm program changes to keep on their radar, from higher wheat reference prices to 2026 ARC/PLC elections, new base acre opportunities and disaster relief payments.
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Aaron Harries talks with David Schemm, state executive director for the USDA Farm Service Agency in Kansas, about how USDA is implementing recent farm program changes and what Kansas producers should watch next. Schemm explains why the updated wheat reference price matters, how 2025 ARC/PLC payments differ from the 2026 election process and why landowners should watch their mail for base acre notices. He also covers Farmer Bridge Assistance, Supplemental Disaster Relief Program payments, farmers.gov tools and how Kansas FSA is thinking about staffing and service in a time of low commodity prices and high input costs.
A key message for producers: stay connected with your county FSA office, make sure landowners are aware of base acre communications and get familiar with farmers.gov for faster access to records, forms and program information.
Key takeaways:
The 2025 ARC/PLC process is different from 2026, when producers will need to make an annual election.

New base acre opportunities are tied to the land, so landowners and tenant farmers need to communicate.

Subsequent crop situations may require a decision about which crop receives updated base acres.

Disaster relief and bridge assistance programs are moving quickly, so producers should check with their county FSA office.

Farmers.gov and login.gov can help producers access records, acreage reports and other USDA tools online.
Timestamped Rundown
00:00 — Opening clip from David Schemm about tight timelines for producers reviewing base acres.
00:12 — Aaron Harries introduces the episode and identifies Schemm as state executive director for USDA Farm Service Agency in Kansas.
00:57 — The conversation opens with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and what it means for Kansas farmers.
01:16 — Schemm explains the importance of the updated statutory reference price, especially for ARC and PLC payments.
02:23 — Schemm reflects on past farm bill testimony and his long-running push for a higher wheat reference price.
03:07 — Aaron notes the new $6.35 wheat reference price and connects it to high input costs.
03:44 — Schemm explains that 2025 ARC/PLC payments are handled differently, while 2026 will require producers to make an election.
04:40 — Discussion of why ARC/PLC payments are delayed until the marketing year average can be finalized.
05:50 — Aaron shifts to new base acres and asks about eligibility and process.
06:07 — Schemm explains FSA’s review of 2019–2023 planted acres and the national process for allocating available base acres.
07:30 — Schemm explains that 30 million additional base acres nationwide will likely be prorated because demand exceeds available acres.
08:30 — Discussion turns to Kansas cropping changes, especially in western Kansas where acreage has intensified beyond old wheat-fallow systems.
09:30 — Schemm says landowners should begin watching for base acre notices around the June 1 timeframe mentioned in the episode.
10:05 — He explains that notices are expected to be structured around opting out, because the default assumption is that eligible acres would be added.
10:20 — Schemm explains the “subsequent crop” issue, where landowners may need to choose between wheat acres and a later crop planted in the same crop year.
11:42 — Aaron emphasizes the need for tenants to communicate with absentee landowners.
12:31 — Schemm clarifies that this process is about adding base acres, not reallocating existing base acres.
13:08 — The conversation moves to the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program and how quickly payments were delivered.
14:28 — Aaron asks about the Supplemental Disaster Relief Program and Stage Two assistance for 2023 and 2024 losses.
15:20 — Schemm explains the SDRP top-up payment, Stage Two focus on shallow and quality losses and possible documentation needs.
16:30 — Schemm notes Kansas was heavily affected by 2023 and 2024 drought losses.
17:00 — Aaron shifts to technology, including “one farmer, one file,” farmers.gov and coordination between FSA, NRCS and RMA.
17:19 — Schemm describes USDA’s modernization push and how login.gov and farmers.gov can reduce trips to the FSA office.
19:15 — Schemm shares an example of a producer pulling FSA-578 acreage records online and sending them directly to a crop insurance agent.
21:00 — Aaron asks how technology connects to USDA reorganization and Kansas FSA staffing.
21:25 — Schemm discusses retirements, staffing needs, workload tools and hiring efforts for county offices, county executive director trainees and farm loan officer trainees.
25:58 — Aaron asks why it is important for farmers to stay in touch with FSA offices during low commodity prices and high input costs.
26:13 — Schemm encourages producers to stay connected because farm program changes, CRP opportunities and new tools are continuing to roll out.
28:40 — Aaron encourages listeners to bookmark farmers.gov.
29:06 — Schemm closes by emphasizing USDA’s focus on serving producers and encouraging farmers to contact county offices or use farmers.gov.
29:58 — Aaron wraps the episode and directs listeners to wheatsonyourmind.com, Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
31 min
May 12Drought Tests Kansas Wheat Genetics
Kansas wheat producers are heading into harvest with drought, freeze injury, possible abandonment, and seed supply questions all on the table. In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, Aaron Harries talks with Justin Gilpin, CEO of Kansas Wheat, and Bryson Haverkamp, CEO of the Kansas Wheat Alliance, about what they are hearing from the field, how newer wheat varieties are holding up, and why growers should start seed conversations earlier than usual.
The discussion also covers wheat streak mosaic virus, the Wheat Quality Council’s Hard Winter Wheat Tour, K-State wheat field days, experimental varieties in the pipeline, and the importance of the next K-State wheat breeder. For producers, the practical message is clear: scout carefully, pay attention to variety performance under stress, talk with seed dealers now, and stay plugged into research and Extension updates before fall planting.
Key takeaways:
Drought and late freeze injury are pressuring hard red winter wheat across Kansas and the broader Southern Plains.

Seed supply could tighten in some areas, so producers should contact local seed dealers and certified seed producers early.

Newer varieties including Providence, Bill Snyder, Territory, KS Homestead CL+, KS Tradition and KS Flintlock are worth watching in stressed fields.

Wheat streak mosaic virus may not be the main yield story this year, but it remains a major long-term threat.

K-State field days and the Wheat Quality Council tour give producers a chance to compare varieties and understand regional crop risk before harvest.
Timestamped rundown
00:00–00:35 — Opening and setup
Aaron Harries introduces Justin Gilpin of Kansas Wheat and Bryson Haverkamp of the Kansas Wheat Alliance for a timely roundtable ahead of a difficult Kansas wheat harvest.
00:35–02:26 — A difficult crop year takes shape
Justin explains how drought, warm winter conditions and late freeze events have changed the outlook for the crop. Unlike 2023, the stress is not limited to western Kansas; it stretches across a larger hard red winter wheat region.
02:26–04:06 — Variety performance under stress
Bryson shares what Kansas Wheat Alliance is hearing from seed producers and breeders. He notes that Providence, Bill Snyder, Territory, KS Homestead CL+, KS Tradition and KS Flintlock are showing promising performance in tough conditions.
04:06–05:44 — Wheat streak is still a major threat
The group discusses wheat streak mosaic virus, triticum mosaic virus and high plains virus. Even if drought and freeze are the dominant issues this year, Justin stresses that virus pressure remains a serious long-term challenge for breeders, researchers and producers.
05:44–07:24 — Seed supply and fall planning
Bryson explains that seed supply concerns are growing in the Southern Plains and beginning to surface in Kansas. His recommendation to farmers is practical: contact local seed dealers and certified seed producers early so growers can secure preferred varieties and help dealers gauge demand.
07:24–09:19 — Wheat Tour expectations
Justin and Aaron discuss the Wheat Quality Council tour, USDA crop estimates, scouting for freeze damage, disease and abandonment. The key issue may not be only yield per acre, but how many acres are actually harvested.
09:19–12:39 — Why the Wheat Tour matters
Justin explains the history and value of the Wheat Quality Council tour. Beyond the crop estimate, the tour connects millers, bakers, breeders, farmers and industry leaders directly with Kansas wheat fields and rural communities.
12:39–14:14 — Field days and Extension resources
Bryson encourages farmers to attend K-State and county Extension wheat field days. These events give producers a chance to see varieties, talk with specialists and compare how wheat is handling local stress.
14:14–15:50 — New experimental lines to watch
The group discusses upcoming and experimental wheat lines, including KS Tradition, KS Flintlock, KS150167-17, 21H36 and 22HD158. Bryson points to these as part of the ongoing variety pipeline.
15:50–16:52 — Breeding progress in a tough year
Justin and Bryson emphasize the value of continued investment in public wheat breeding. Even in a hard production year, the survival and performance of some fields show the progress being made in genetics.
16:52–20:56 — The next K-State wheat breeder
The conversation turns to Alan Fritz’s retirement and the search for the next K-State wheat breeder. Justin compares the role to hiring a head coach because the wheat breeder touches research, Extension, farmers, industry partners and the future of Kansas wheat.
20:56–22:05 — Breeders as the face of wheat
Bryson and Justin note that wheat breeders are often the people farmers see at field days, even though those appearances go beyond their formal job descriptions. That producer connection remains essential.
22:05–23:23 — Final message to farmers
Justin closes by acknowledging the tough production and economic environment. He emphasizes the importance of export relationships, farm safety net tools and continued advocacy for producers and rural communities.
23:23–23:53 — Closing
Aaron thanks Justin and Bryson and directs listeners to previous episodes at Wheat’s On Your Mind.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
24 min
April 28Wheat Lessons From The East Coast
Maryland wheat farmers juggle humidity, disease pressure, poultry markets, and tighter nutrient rules, yet Jason Scott says there is still room to raise strong wheat and make smart management decisions.
In this episode, Aaron Harries visits with Jason Scott, a sixth-generation farmer from Maryland’s Eastern Shore who grows soft red winter wheat alongside corn, soybeans, malted barley, and sweet corn.
Scott breaks down the Mid-Atlantic production calendar, explains how mandatory nutrient management affects fertilizer timing and recordkeeping, and shares how local poultry demand, flour mills, export markets, and variety selection all shape the economics of wheat in his region.
For Kansas listeners, it is a useful look at what changes when wheat is grown in a humid environment with tougher regulation and a very different end-use market.
Key takeaways:
Maryland wheat is typically planted in mid-October and harvested by mid-June, which helps open the door for earlier, better double-crop soybeans.

Mandatory nutrient management plans and audits shape fertilizer decisions, but Scott says growers have still found ways to improve yields.

Much of the local grain economy revolves around the chicken industry, affecting where wheat, corn, soybeans, and manure all move.

Export promotion still matters to growers whose wheat is mostly consumed domestically because stronger demand lifts the whole wheat market.

Disease pressure, especially scab, remains one of the biggest drivers in wheat variety selection.
Detailed Rundown
00:00:00 - Opening and guest intro
Aaron Harries introduces Jason Scott, a sixth-generation farmer from Hurlock, Maryland, and outlines his farm, leadership roles, and work with U.S. Wheat Associates.
00:00:58 - Where Jason farms
Scott explains where his farm sits on the Delmarva Peninsula, between the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic, and why he considers the region Mid-Atlantic rather than New England.
00:01:43 - Climate and disease pressure
He describes a humid, rainy production environment where both northern and southern crop diseases can show up, making the region a unique place for agronomic challenges.
00:03:23 - Wheat calendar in Maryland
Scott walks through the soft red winter wheat season: mid-October planting, winter dormancy, spring fertilizer timing, and mid-June harvest, with a strong push to finish in time for double-crop soybeans.
00:05:24 - Nutrient management rules
He details Maryland’s long-running nutrient management system, including yield-based nitrogen limits, required plans, annual reporting, and the reality of on-farm audits.
00:07:24 - Yield expectations and cropping strategy
Scott says his farm averages around 90 bushels per acre on wheat and has improved performance by placing wheat on better ground while shifting barley onto sandier acres.
00:08:16 - Where the wheat and barley go
Barley is contracted to a Delaware craft malter when it makes grade, while wheat is split between the poultry industry and flour mills in southeastern Pennsylvania.
00:09:45 - Chicken manure as fertility
The conversation turns to poultry litter, which Scott describes as valuable, locally produced fertilizer even as it remains part of a larger environmental debate in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
00:11:04 - Corn, soybeans, and specialty markets
Scott explains that most local corn goes into the chicken industry, while his soybeans often go to a nearby crush plant, with Plenish high oleic beans earning an identity-preserved premium.
00:12:10 - Farm history, land values, and irrigation
He reflects on century-farm history, sharecropping roots, high land prices, urban pressure, and the major yield difference irrigation makes on sandy soils.
00:15:36 - Public education and policy engagement
Scott talks about speaking with garden clubs, educating urban neighbors, and pushing back on legislation shaped by people with limited understanding of modern crop production.
00:18:08 - Why export work still matters
Drawing on his U.S. Wheat Associates experience, Scott explains why export development helps all wheat classes, even when most Maryland wheat stays in domestic channels.
00:20:20 - Mexico travel story
He shares a side story about being stranded in Puerto Vallarta during cartel-related unrest and flight disruptions, and credits Corteva/Pioneer for getting the group home safely.
00:23:22 - Variety choices and disease management
Scott says Maryland growers rely heavily on private wheat varieties, with scab tolerance and disease package carrying major weight in seed decisions.
00:25:06 - Wrap-up
Aaron closes by thanking Scott for sharing a Mid-Atlantic perspective on wheat production, markets, and advocacy.

Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
26 min
April 14Hybrid Wheat In Kansas Soil - WOYM
Hybrid wheat has long been one of agriculture’s biggest “what ifs.”
In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, host Aaron Harries talks with Dan Wiersma of Corteva about why that may finally be changing — and why Kansas is expected to be the epicenter of the company’s planned hard red winter wheat launch in fall 2027.
Wiersma breaks down the science in plain language, from hybrid vigor and wheat genetics to Corteva’s non-GMO nuclear male sterility system and color-sorting process for seed production.
He also explains what farmers will care about most: yield, risk, grain quality, pricing, and whether hybrid wheat will fit current management systems.
With early products showing a reported 10 percent yield advantage — and up to 20 percent in water-limited environments — this conversation offers a first look at a technology that could reshape wheat production in the years ahead.

Top 10 takeaways
Corteva is targeting fall 2027 for an initial hard red winter hybrid wheat launch, with Kansas positioned as the center of that rollout.

Dan Wiersma says hybrid wheat matters because wheat has lagged behind crops like corn in innovation for decades.

The biggest historical barrier has been economical seed production, not just breeding.

Corteva’s system uses non-GMO nuclear male sterility, which the company says became possible after the wheat genome was published in 2018.

The process relies on a color-based seed sorting system to separate sterile and maintainer seed.

Wiersma says the first commercial products are showing a consistent 10 percent yield advantage.

In water-limited environments, he says the yield edge can rise to 20 percent over leading competitive varieties.

Corteva expects hybrid wheat to fit into current production systems without requiring major management changes at launch.

Pricing will matter, and Wiersma acknowledges farmers will compare hybrid wheat against the long tradition of saving wheat seed.

Grower interest is high, but so is skepticism — especially around price, quality, and real-world performance on their own farms.
Timestamped rundown
00:00–01:06 — Aaron Harries opens the episode, introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, and gives Dan Wiersma’s background from UW–Madison to Corteva’s global wheat leadership role.
01:15–02:58 — Wiersma explains his job: connecting science, breeding, seed production, marketing, and farmer trust around hybrid wheat.
03:16–04:22 — He lays out the commercial target: a small-scale hard red winter wheat launch in fall 2027, with Kansas as the epicenter.
04:40–05:41 — Wiersma frames hybrid vigor as the “holy grail” of breeding and explains why wheat has remained overwhelmingly non-hybrid.
05:42–07:39 — He dives into wheat biology, including its hexaploid genome, self-pollination, and why older sterility systems struggled economically. He says the 2018 wheat genome publication helped unlock a new approach.
07:40–09:09 — This is the most technical part of the episode: Wiersma explains Corteva’s nuclear male sterility system, blue seed marker, and color sorting process used to produce hybrid seed.
09:16–09:41 — Aaron zeroes in on the core problem: cost. Wiersma agrees and says wheat seed production also has to stay regionally close to where it will be planted.
09:50–11:19 — The headline performance segment: Wiersma says advanced products show about a 10 percent yield bump, with bigger advantages in tougher, water-limited environments.
11:25–12:28 — He outlines the path to launch: parent seed is in the ground, hybrid seed production fields follow, and commercial sale is planned for fall 2027.
12:28–13:22 — Wiersma says the initial rollout will move through the Pioneer brand and dealer network, backed by agronomic support.
13:22–15:03 — Pricing discussion: hybrid wheat will cost more to produce, but Corteva says pricing will be built around farmer value and long-term adoption.
15:03–16:03 — Wiersma shares early farmer reaction: strong interest, but also healthy skepticism about cost, grain quality, and whether the system pencils out.
16:03–16:58 — Looking backward, he reflects on how far wheat management has come through fungicides, plant growth regulators, fertility management, and yield-focused tools.
16:58–17:56 — Looking ahead, he says hybrid wheat is the main leap right now, but future opportunities include disease resistance, nitrogen efficiency, water use efficiency, and potentially stronger grain quality.
17:56–18:35 — Wiersma confirms public breeding programs and universities remain important collaborators in wheat germplasm and science.
18:35–19:32 — Farmers’ practical question gets answered: Corteva does not expect growers to need major management changes to plant hybrid wheat, though studies continue on seeding rates and fertility.
19:33–20:09 — Aaron asks about current resources. Wiersma says there is nothing substantial in print yet, but training, education, and marketing materials are being developed.
20:09–20:41 — The episode closes with a teaser to revisit the story as rollout gets closer.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
21 min
March 31New Leadership for Wheat’s Next Chapter - WOYM
Mike Spier, the new president and CEO of U.S. Wheat Associates, joins Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin to talk about the relationships, strategy, and boots-on-the-ground work behind U.S. wheat exports. Spier shares how his career took him from the West Coast grain trade to overseas posts in Egypt, the Philippines, and Singapore, and how those experiences shaped his view of global wheat demand, trade shifts, and customer trust.
The conversation covers strong hard red winter wheat export sales, the rise of private flour mills in markets like Egypt and Indonesia, new opportunities in places such as Bangladesh and Latin America, and how added USDA export promotion funding can help U.S. Wheat Associates expand staff, technical support, and market development. It is a timely look at why long-term relationships, farmer voices, and smart investment still matter in an increasingly competitive global wheat market.
Top 10 takeaways
Mike Spier brings deep overseas and merchandising experience into the top U.S. Wheat Associates role.

U.S. Wheat’s long-term relationships remain one of its biggest competitive advantages.

Global wheat trade has shifted from government buying toward privatized milling and more technical engagement.

Hard red winter wheat has been a major driver of improved export sales this marketing year.

Increased USDA promotion funding gives U.S. Wheat room to expand staff and try more ambitious market-development efforts.

Bangladesh stands out as a meaningful growth market for U.S. wheat. U.S. Wheat publicly announced a multiyear 700,000-metric-ton annual commitment.

Consumer-facing campaigns may become more important as wheat misinformation spreads online.

Logistics still matter: freight, rail competition, and landed cost all shape whether U.S. wheat wins business.

Sustainability matters to buyers, but wheat customers often want credible data before they want formal certification.

Farmer voices are still powerful in export markets because customers trust firsthand production perspectives.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:02–00:46
Aaron Harries opens the episode, introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, and welcomes Mike Spier, newly installed president and CEO of U.S. Wheat Associates, with Justin Gilpin joining the conversation.
00:46–01:55
Spier outlines his career path: starting in the grain trade, joining U.S. Wheat Associates in Portland, and later serving in overseas offices including Cairo, Manila, and Singapore.
01:55–02:44
He reflects on how overseas work was never the original plan, but became a defining part of his career and his passion for representing U.S. wheat farmers abroad.
02:44–03:09
Spier notes that U.S. Wheat Associates has 13 overseas offices and three U.S. offices: Portland, Arlington, and Manhattan. U.S. Wheat’s staff directory confirms Mike Spier as president and CEO and lists those major offices.
02:57–03:12
The group highlights milestone anniversaries for the Tokyo and Taipei offices, underscoring the long-term relationships U.S. Wheat has built with overseas customers.
03:12–05:22
Justin asks about mentors who shaped Spier’s career. Spier points to John Odes and Dick Prower as especially influential in teaching him both wheat marketing and the realities of working overseas.
05:22–07:25
The conversation turns to the changing global wheat trade. Spier explains how markets such as Egypt and Indonesia shifted from government buying toward privatized milling systems, creating more need for technical training and relationship-based market development.
07:25–09:13
Spier shares his early priorities as CEO: strengthen relationships, expand exports and market share, drive innovation, improve producer outreach, and make better use of new USDA funding.
09:13–10:55
He details staffing changes, including new technical and consulting roles in Brazil, Italy, Casablanca, Singapore, Mexico City, and the Philippines, plus communications support. U.S. Wheat’s current public materials and staff directory reflect the organization’s global structure and leadership team.
10:55–12:59
The group discusses misinformation about wheat and consumer perception. Spier says U.S. Wheat is looking at more consumption-focused campaigns in key markets, building on work in the Philippines and exploring similar efforts elsewhere.
12:59–14:31
Spier says export sales are up year over year, with hard red winter wheat accounting for much of the improvement, even as competition intensifies from Argentina, Canada, Australia, and Russia.
14:31–15:33
They talk about wheat’s diversified customer base and how that gives the industry resilience compared with commodities that depend heavily on just a few markets.
15:13–16:18
Spier credits grower groups and wheat organizations for advocating increased MAP and FMD funding, and says the additional support will allow more activity, more innovation, and more strategic risk-taking overseas. USDA’s export market development programs continue to underpin cooperator efforts, while U.S. Wheat has said recent agreements and outreach are helping expand demand.
16:18–18:14
The discussion shifts to emerging opportunities, including aquaculture feed in Central and South America and the Bangladesh market. U.S. Wheat announced a Bangladesh commitment of 700,000 metric tons annually, aligning with what Spier describes in the episode.
18:14–20:21
Logistics comes into focus, including ocean freight, landed price, and rail competition. Justin raises concerns about freight and transportation costs that ultimately hit wheat farmers’ returns.
20:21–21:45
They address sustainability. Spier says wheat buyers generally want science-based information more than formal certification, though some customers do require more detailed documentation.
21:45–23:49
The value of farmer leadership takes center stage. Spier explains why hearing directly from growers makes a stronger impression on customers than hearing the same message only from staff.
23:49–24:53
Spier recaps a recent trip to Washington, D.C., saying he came away encouraged by support for U.S. wheat farmers and by momentum around programs like Food for Peace.
24:53–25:54
The episode closes with optimism about the year ahead, an invitation to future U.S. Wheat meetings in Manhattan, and a brief salute to retiring Kansas wheat leader Cindy Falk.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
27 min
March 17The Farm Impact of World Conflict - WOYM
Global conflict is colliding with farm economics in this episode of Wheat’s on Your Mind. Host Aaron Harries is joined by Mike O’Dea, risk management consultant at StoneX, and Josh Linville, vice president of fertilizer at StoneX, to unpack the fast-moving fallout from the Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Together, they explain why wheat prices were already moving higher before the latest geopolitical shock, how crude oil is adding fresh volatility, and why current rallies may create marketing opportunities for producers.
The discussion also explores the fertilizer side of the equation in detail. Linville explains how much of the world’s urea and phosphate trade depends on the Middle East, why the spring import window matters so much for U.S. growers, and how delayed buying patterns could worsen supply problems. O’Dea connects those fertilizer risks back to wheat production, protein, corn acres, and broader crop competition, offering listeners a grounded look at how global events can quickly reshape decisions at the farm gate.
Top 10 takeaways
Wheat was already rallying before the Iran conflict due to fund short covering, and crude oil volatility added another layer of support.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global fertilizer trade, especially urea.

This is landing at the worst possible time for U.S. growers because April is the key fertilizer import arrival month.

Fertilizer risk is broader than nitrogen; phosphate supplies are also vulnerable because several major suppliers are constrained.

Higher fertilizer prices could reduce application rates, trim yields, and create protein concerns in wheat.

Delayed fertilizer buying by farmers, retailers, and distributors may worsen spring bottlenecks.

Even if the conflict eases quickly, logistics and manufacturing delays mean supply chains will not normalize overnight.

Grain rallies tied to fear can reverse quickly, which is why O’Dea frames this as a pricing opportunity rather than a guaranteed long-term bull market.

Crop acreage decisions could shift as producers weigh fertilizer costs, corn demand, soybean oil strength, and competition from canola and pulses.

The episode makes a strong case for more U.S. fertilizer production capacity, though cost and mineral access remain major barriers.
Detailed Timestamped Rundown
00:00–00:15 — Disclaimer
The episode opens with a reminder that it was recorded on March 11, 2026, and that market conditions may have changed since then.
00:16–01:05 — Episode setup
Aaron Harries introduces the show and guests Mike O’Dea and Josh Linville of StoneX, framing the conversation around grain markets, fertilizer markets, and uncertainty tied to the Iran conflict.
01:06–03:36 — Why wheat was already moving higher
O’Dea explains wheat had been rallying before the conflict due to fund short covering and seasonal tendencies. He notes crude oil volatility then added more upward pressure, even though wheat fundamentals still look bearish.
03:37–05:02 — Strait of Hormuz and fertilizer shock
Linville says the closure of the Strait is a major threat because such a large share of global urea exports and significant phosphate trade move through that region. He outlines sharp fertilizer price increases and stresses that this is not just a nitrogen problem.
05:03–05:53 — Why timing matters for U.S. imports
Linville highlights that April is the biggest arrival month for fertilizer imports into the U.S., and even if product were available immediately, shipping lead times mean deliveries would still lag well into April.
06:02–07:48 — China, Russia, Europe, and global supply distortions
The conversation turns to China’s export restrictions, Russia’s shifting fertilizer flows, and Europe’s reduced production capacity after losing access to cheaper Russian gas. The result is a much tighter and more politicized global fertilizer market.
07:49–09:20 — What high nitrogen prices could mean for wheat
Aaron asks how fertilizer costs and availability could affect wheat production globally. O’Dea says lower application rates could trim yields and create quality concerns, especially around protein.
09:21–10:08 — Will farmers delay or cut applications?
O’Dea says it is still early to know, but Linville adds that poor farm finances and delayed purchasing have already created a fragile just-in-time supply situation.
10:08–12:36 — Domestic production and North American options
Linville argues the situation should be a wake-up call for more domestic nitrogen production. He says the U.S. has gas, demand, and strong environmental standards, but new plants are costly and slow to build. He also explains why phosphate is harder to solve due to rock supply constraints.
12:37–14:57 — If the war ends quickly, how fast do markets react?
O’Dea says grain markets can correct fast when fear subsides, though logistics take longer to normalize. He also discusses funds turning net long in wheat and how hard assets may be attracting money.
15:07–16:34 — Why fertilizer may not stay cheap even after a reopening
Linville says a reopening of vessel traffic could trigger an immediate selloff, but the structural supply gap would remain. He expects the U.S. spring price floor has likely been raised regardless.
16:35–17:51 — Acre shifts and competition between crops
O’Dea says higher fertilizer costs and shifting margins could keep support under corn while also forcing a fight for acres among corn, beans, canola, pulses, and other specialty crops.
17:52–19:21 — What StoneX does for customers
The guests close by explaining StoneX’s role in risk management, fertilizer market education, and helping farmers and agribusinesses think beyond flat price toward margin and value relationships.
19:21–end — Wrap-up
Aaron thanks the guests and directs listeners to email Kansas Wheat with questions and find previous episodes online.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
20 min
March 03WOYM - 80 Harvests After the Dust Bowl
Don Keesling has lived through 80 Kansas wheat harvests, and he remembers when harvest was a full-family operation—kids hauling water, older siblings driving trucks, and every load requiring real muscle. In this special episode, Don and host Aaron Harries walk through how wheat harvest used to work, the machinery transitions that changed everything, and why the culture of neighbors helping neighbors feels different today.
Don also shares his decades promoting wheat—especially hard white winter wheat—where taste tests and proof mattered more than talking points. From wheat varieties like Jagger to lessons from the Dust Bowl and the long road to conservation practices like no-till, Don’s stories connect Kansas wheat history to the realities farmers face now: tight margins, changing programs, and the need for practical skills (and a little WD-40).
Top 10 takeaways
Harvest used to be a full-family system—everyone had a job, and it built responsibility fast.

Mechanization didn’t just speed harvest—it changed labor, logistics, and community rhythms.

Handling grain was brutally manual—small loads and lots of shoveling shaped how farms operated.

The “neighbor-helping-neighbor” era has faded, in part because fewer people and fewer kids stay on farms.

White wheat promotion required proof, not persuasion—taste tests and milling performance were the turning points.

Food aid is tied to politics and logistics, not just need; shipping requirements can limit outcomes.

Hybrids and innovations must earn trust—farmers need repeated evidence of ROI.

Variety selection is more than yield—shatter risk, grading quirks, and milling quality can make or break value.

No-till can work—but transition is risky and can be financially painful early on without good management.

Conservation is still “in recovery”—soil formation is slow, and losing good ground is hard to reverse.
Detailed timestamped rundown
00:00–01:00 Intro to Wheat’s On Your Mind; guest Don Keesling (Lyons, KS).
01:00–03:10 “How many harvests?” Don: 80; earliest harvest memories and family roles.
03:10–05:40 Keesling family roots in Kansas; early settlement, corn “was king,” land prices and homesteading era.
05:40–09:30 Harvest equipment evolution: early tractors, steel-to-rubber transition, threshers and early combines.
09:30–12:30 Grain handling realities: small loads, no lift beds, shoveling into bins; elevator deliveries.
12:30–16:10 First self-propelled combine (circa mid-1940s) and the “automatic transmission downhill” mishap.
16:10–19:30 Harvest culture: big meals, excitement until breakdowns; chores and family responsibilities.
19:30–23:30 “Biggest changes”: modern health care; shift away from neighbor-helping-neighbor traditions; fewer kids staying.
23:30–28:30 Don’s wheat promotion journey: love of wheat, milling school, feeding the world; international travel (former Soviet states).
28:30–31:20 Wheathearts, state fair booth, wheat jewelry, Wally Wheat costume story.
31:20–35:40 American White Wheat Growers: selling bread to consumers; proving value to millers/bakeries; taste matters.
35:40–39:30 Food aid, “keep food in food aid,” P.L. 480 and shipping constraints; Senator Dole “Mr. Whitewheat.”
39:30–45:10 Wheat evolution: hybrid wheat attempts (1980s), proving ROI; variety lessons (Wichita shatter).
45:10–50:40 Farming systems shifts: programs and rotations then vs now; adopting no-till and transition pains.
50:40–56:20 Variety stories: Red Chief strength vs milling quality; grading issues with Arkan; K-State variety legacy.
56:20–60:00 Dust Bowl reflections (born shortly after Black Sunday); conservation, soil loss, dams, long recovery.
60:00–62:10 Advice to young farmers: money, mechanical skills, frugality, and a supportive spouse; wrap and contact info.
Kansas Wheat
Wheats On Your Mind
39 min

About Wheat's On Your Mind

From the publisher's feed

Wheat's on Your Mind is the go-to podcast for anyone involved in the wheat industry, from farmers and agronomists to grain marketers and researchers.

Share Wheat's On Your Mind

Sign up to save your podcasts

Wheat's On Your Mind

Wheat's On Your Mind episodes

About Wheat's On Your Mind

More shows like Wheat's On Your Mind

Grain Markets and Other Stuff