
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


For decades, string theory has been hailed as the leading candidate for the theory of everything in our universe. Yet despite its mathematical elegance, the theory still lacks empirical evidence.
One of its most intriguing, yet vexing, implications is that if all matter and forces are composed of vibrations of tiny strands of energy, then this allows for a vast landscape of possible universes with different physical properties, varieties of particles and complex spacetimes. How, then, can we possibly pinpoint our own universe within a field of almost infinite possibilities?
Since 2005, Cumrun Vafa at MIT has been working to weed out this crowded landscape by identifying which hypothetical universes lie in a ‘swampland’ with properties inconsistent with the world we observe. In this episode of The Joy of Why, Vafa talks to co-host Janna Levin about the current state of string theory, why there are no more than 11 dimensions, how his swampland concept got an unexpected lift from the BICEP array, and how close we may be to testable predictions.
By Steven Strogatz, Janna Levin and Quanta Magazine4.9
495495 ratings
For decades, string theory has been hailed as the leading candidate for the theory of everything in our universe. Yet despite its mathematical elegance, the theory still lacks empirical evidence.
One of its most intriguing, yet vexing, implications is that if all matter and forces are composed of vibrations of tiny strands of energy, then this allows for a vast landscape of possible universes with different physical properties, varieties of particles and complex spacetimes. How, then, can we possibly pinpoint our own universe within a field of almost infinite possibilities?
Since 2005, Cumrun Vafa at MIT has been working to weed out this crowded landscape by identifying which hypothetical universes lie in a ‘swampland’ with properties inconsistent with the world we observe. In this episode of The Joy of Why, Vafa talks to co-host Janna Levin about the current state of string theory, why there are no more than 11 dimensions, how his swampland concept got an unexpected lift from the BICEP array, and how close we may be to testable predictions.

756 Listeners

945 Listeners

321 Listeners

838 Listeners

566 Listeners

544 Listeners

231 Listeners

818 Listeners

1,065 Listeners

4,167 Listeners

2,367 Listeners

506 Listeners

251 Listeners

323 Listeners

18 Listeners

384 Listeners