Self-assessment has become one of the most widely embraced practices in education. We want students to reflect on their learning, understand success criteria, monitor their progress, and take ownership of their growth. But what if we've underestimated how difficult self-assessment actually is? In this episode, Tom and Natalie explore the idea that students don't become effective self-assessors simply because we provide rubrics, post success criteria, or ask reflective questions. Instead, they argue that the ability to recognize quality (what researchers call evaluative judgment) must be intentionally developed through exposure, comparison, discussion, and calibration.

Together, they unpack why success criteria often fall short, how expert blind spots can unintentionally create barriers for learners, and why exemplars, feedback, and calibration conversations are so critical to helping students see quality more clearly. Along the way, they share practical strategies educators can use immediately to strengthen students' ability to judge their own work, use feedback more effectively, and become more independent learners. If you've ever wondered why students struggle to revise, self-assess, or accurately gauge the quality of their work, this episode offers a fresh perspective and a practical path forward.

The Grading Reform Leadership Lab Description

Book a Call with Tom to discuss participating in the Grading Reform Leadership Lab

Check Out Edsby Destinations

Feedback Flow Mini-Course

Assess THAT on YouTube!

🍁 CANADIAN ASSESSMENT CENTRE

Join our mailing list for assessment strategies, new podcast episodes, upcoming events, and all things Canadian Assessment.

JOIN HERE

NEW BOOK FROM TOM & NAT

CONNECT WITH TOM & NATALIE

• • Natalie on IG