
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21102,110 ratings
Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,033 Listeners

38,484 Listeners

6,795 Listeners

30,727 Listeners

25,791 Listeners

8,764 Listeners

9,197 Listeners

3,985 Listeners

5,098 Listeners

775 Listeners

111,863 Listeners

7,226 Listeners

16,366 Listeners

15,815 Listeners

620 Listeners