
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21062,106 ratings
Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,148 Listeners

30,650 Listeners

5,102 Listeners

784 Listeners

2,438 Listeners

1,511 Listeners

902 Listeners

795 Listeners

7,070 Listeners

728 Listeners

32 Listeners

546 Listeners

824 Listeners

16,082 Listeners

8,781 Listeners