
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
4.6
20882,088 ratings
Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
4,997 Listeners
4,226 Listeners
32,202 Listeners
2,252 Listeners
785 Listeners
26,359 Listeners
2,382 Listeners
10,682 Listeners
889 Listeners
6,755 Listeners
808 Listeners
730 Listeners
15,180 Listeners
8,592 Listeners
283 Listeners