
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Following an earlier episode in which Murray suggested that warfare was often conceived as frontal and honourable, Peter writes in with a response. He reflects on the idea that outflanking an opponent may once have been seen as poor form, even cowardly or lacking heroic virtue, and asks when outflanking became a tactical innovation deliberately employed in battle.
Join us on Patreon patreon.com/ancientwarfarepodcast
By The History Network4.3
526526 ratings
Following an earlier episode in which Murray suggested that warfare was often conceived as frontal and honourable, Peter writes in with a response. He reflects on the idea that outflanking an opponent may once have been seen as poor form, even cowardly or lacking heroic virtue, and asks when outflanking became a tactical innovation deliberately employed in battle.
Join us on Patreon patreon.com/ancientwarfarepodcast

3,211 Listeners

4,311 Listeners

4,405 Listeners

1,863 Listeners

1,867 Listeners

1,254 Listeners

4,814 Listeners

4,055 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

5,256 Listeners

3,362 Listeners

533 Listeners

1,906 Listeners

269 Listeners

354 Listeners