
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Following an earlier episode in which Murray suggested that warfare was often conceived as frontal and honourable, Peter writes in with a response. He reflects on the idea that outflanking an opponent may once have been seen as poor form, even cowardly or lacking heroic virtue, and asks when outflanking became a tactical innovation deliberately employed in battle.
Join us on Patreon patreon.com/ancientwarfarepodcast
By The History Network4.3
526526 ratings
Following an earlier episode in which Murray suggested that warfare was often conceived as frontal and honourable, Peter writes in with a response. He reflects on the idea that outflanking an opponent may once have been seen as poor form, even cowardly or lacking heroic virtue, and asks when outflanking became a tactical innovation deliberately employed in battle.
Join us on Patreon patreon.com/ancientwarfarepodcast

3,223 Listeners

4,312 Listeners

4,403 Listeners

1,850 Listeners

1,869 Listeners

1,252 Listeners

4,785 Listeners

4,030 Listeners

6,232 Listeners

5,229 Listeners

3,370 Listeners

526 Listeners

1,895 Listeners

272 Listeners

339 Listeners