
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Following an earlier episode in which Murray suggested that warfare was often conceived as frontal and honourable, Peter writes in with a response. He reflects on the idea that outflanking an opponent may once have been seen as poor form, even cowardly or lacking heroic virtue, and asks when outflanking became a tactical innovation deliberately employed in battle.
Join us on Patreon patreon.com/ancientwarfarepodcast
By The History Network4.3
526526 ratings
Following an earlier episode in which Murray suggested that warfare was often conceived as frontal and honourable, Peter writes in with a response. He reflects on the idea that outflanking an opponent may once have been seen as poor form, even cowardly or lacking heroic virtue, and asks when outflanking became a tactical innovation deliberately employed in battle.
Join us on Patreon patreon.com/ancientwarfarepodcast

3,196 Listeners

4,312 Listeners

4,404 Listeners

1,867 Listeners

1,855 Listeners

1,261 Listeners

4,791 Listeners

4,029 Listeners

6,308 Listeners

5,239 Listeners

3,358 Listeners

537 Listeners

1,920 Listeners

269 Listeners

350 Listeners