
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, we bring you the full oral arguments from the Supreme Court case Bost v. Illinois Board of Elections (Docket No. 24-568). At the heart of this dispute lies a critical question about voting rights, state election procedures, and the constitutional boundaries of electoral oversight. The Justices engage with counsel on whether Illinois' ballot access rules impose undue burdens on candidates and voters, testing the balance between state authority and federal protections under the Constitution.
Listen as the arguments unfold — a window into how the nation's highest court examines questions that shape the future of democratic participation in America.
#SupremeCourt #BostvIllinois #VotingRights #OralArguments #USConstitution #ElectionLaw #SCOTUS #Democracy #CivilRights #Podcast
By R. Scott Reisch4.5
482482 ratings
In this episode, we bring you the full oral arguments from the Supreme Court case Bost v. Illinois Board of Elections (Docket No. 24-568). At the heart of this dispute lies a critical question about voting rights, state election procedures, and the constitutional boundaries of electoral oversight. The Justices engage with counsel on whether Illinois' ballot access rules impose undue burdens on candidates and voters, testing the balance between state authority and federal protections under the Constitution.
Listen as the arguments unfold — a window into how the nation's highest court examines questions that shape the future of democratic participation in America.
#SupremeCourt #BostvIllinois #VotingRights #OralArguments #USConstitution #ElectionLaw #SCOTUS #Democracy #CivilRights #Podcast

8,470 Listeners

841 Listeners

1,161 Listeners

600 Listeners

1,550 Listeners

2,397 Listeners

1,148 Listeners

2,136 Listeners

859 Listeners

814 Listeners

311 Listeners

37 Listeners

159 Listeners

697 Listeners

43 Listeners