
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A candid hour on consumer self-defense. We open with iOS 26’s unknown-caller screening and a New York Times crime reporter nearly duped by a “Chase Bank” spoof—lesson: don’t trust caller ID, don’t transact with inbound callers, verify via the number on your card or the bank app, and remember spoofed numbers make simple blocking imperfect. Listeners jump in: a Rule of 55 correction (not 72(t)/72(q)), plus a sharp TSP/Roth asset-location play—keep core market cap in TSP, use Roth for small-value tilt (e.g., AVUV). Then the consumer beat: Florida HVAC sticker shock and why three bids matter. Scam watch flags Smart Lab International’s “AI” sports-betting/trading scheme and crypto funding as Ponzi-ish red-flags. We close on the fiduciary fog—why “certified fiduciary” labels can hide annuity sales—and reject structured notes/buffer ETFs in favor of a simple, low-cost balanced portfolio that matches risk to need.
1:07 New iPhone feature screens unknown callers
1:58 Scam calls and “scam du jour” routine
3:05 NYT crime reporter nearly falls for Chase/Zelle spoofing scam
6:23 Why scams work when people let their guard down
7:00 Don’t trust caller ID, best practices for bank contacts
8:24 Zelle vs. Venmo debate and practical use cases
9:34 Caller correction on Rule 55 vs. 72Q/72T
10:58 Listener Brian on TSP allocation and AVUV tilt
13:07 Tom’s buffer/puffer joke flop
13:44 Advice on blocking spoofed numbers and safer verification
15:00 Segue into consumer issues beyond investing
16:06 History of Florida’s heat and AC dependency
16:43 Air conditioning repair and wild $11k vs. $4.7k quotes
19:22 Tom’s ongoing heat pump saga
21:10 Bob Cratchit fireplace joke
21:14 Listener Q&A from Nibley, Utah about Smart Lab “AI trading” scheme
24:28 What Smart Lab claims to do (AI sports betting + trading)
26:23 Company origins in Malta, Seychelles, now Ho Chi Minh City
27:57 Ponzi-like structure and risks with crypto-based platforms
29:16 Closing advice: don’t nibble on Smart Lab
29:27 Caller John on fiduciary standards and insurance sales
32:28 Exposure of “Certified Financial Fiduciary” designations and insurance sales tactics
34:46 Caller Rajiv on structured notes vs. buffer ETFs
36:02 Simplicity of balanced portfolios over complex gimmicks
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Don McDonald4.5
711711 ratings
A candid hour on consumer self-defense. We open with iOS 26’s unknown-caller screening and a New York Times crime reporter nearly duped by a “Chase Bank” spoof—lesson: don’t trust caller ID, don’t transact with inbound callers, verify via the number on your card or the bank app, and remember spoofed numbers make simple blocking imperfect. Listeners jump in: a Rule of 55 correction (not 72(t)/72(q)), plus a sharp TSP/Roth asset-location play—keep core market cap in TSP, use Roth for small-value tilt (e.g., AVUV). Then the consumer beat: Florida HVAC sticker shock and why three bids matter. Scam watch flags Smart Lab International’s “AI” sports-betting/trading scheme and crypto funding as Ponzi-ish red-flags. We close on the fiduciary fog—why “certified fiduciary” labels can hide annuity sales—and reject structured notes/buffer ETFs in favor of a simple, low-cost balanced portfolio that matches risk to need.
1:07 New iPhone feature screens unknown callers
1:58 Scam calls and “scam du jour” routine
3:05 NYT crime reporter nearly falls for Chase/Zelle spoofing scam
6:23 Why scams work when people let their guard down
7:00 Don’t trust caller ID, best practices for bank contacts
8:24 Zelle vs. Venmo debate and practical use cases
9:34 Caller correction on Rule 55 vs. 72Q/72T
10:58 Listener Brian on TSP allocation and AVUV tilt
13:07 Tom’s buffer/puffer joke flop
13:44 Advice on blocking spoofed numbers and safer verification
15:00 Segue into consumer issues beyond investing
16:06 History of Florida’s heat and AC dependency
16:43 Air conditioning repair and wild $11k vs. $4.7k quotes
19:22 Tom’s ongoing heat pump saga
21:10 Bob Cratchit fireplace joke
21:14 Listener Q&A from Nibley, Utah about Smart Lab “AI trading” scheme
24:28 What Smart Lab claims to do (AI sports betting + trading)
26:23 Company origins in Malta, Seychelles, now Ho Chi Minh City
27:57 Ponzi-like structure and risks with crypto-based platforms
29:16 Closing advice: don’t nibble on Smart Lab
29:27 Caller John on fiduciary standards and insurance sales
32:28 Exposure of “Certified Financial Fiduciary” designations and insurance sales tactics
34:46 Caller Rajiv on structured notes vs. buffer ETFs
36:02 Simplicity of balanced portfolios over complex gimmicks
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1,987 Listeners

455 Listeners

808 Listeners

1,315 Listeners

452 Listeners

521 Listeners

5,486 Listeners

753 Listeners

539 Listeners

672 Listeners

595 Listeners

345 Listeners

810 Listeners

14 Listeners

188 Listeners

865 Listeners