
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The Mexican government has won its appeal to bring a civil lawsuit against a number of American gun companies. Mexico, which has extremely restrictive gun laws, claims that the ‘deliberate’ business practices of these US firms results in the illegal flow of firearms into Mexico, contributing to the gun crime violence in the country. They are now seeking as much as ten billion dollars in compensation.
The gun companies, which include some of America’s oldest established names in the firearms business, deny any wrongdoing. Since 2005, these companies have being granted immunity from prosecution under the ‘Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act’. This law protects the firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. But Mexico’s argument is that PLCAA, as it’s also known, only applies within the United States and therefore doesn’t protect the companies from liability.
It’s a case which is also resonating with other Latin American countries who have been impacted by illegal gun trafficking from the United States. Some of these countries have supported Mexico’s claims in the courts. And they will be watching closely to see if Mexico’s lawsuit, the first by a sovereign state, can set a precedent.
So on this week’s Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Can Mexico win its battle with US gun companies?’
Contributors:
4.6
695695 ratings
The Mexican government has won its appeal to bring a civil lawsuit against a number of American gun companies. Mexico, which has extremely restrictive gun laws, claims that the ‘deliberate’ business practices of these US firms results in the illegal flow of firearms into Mexico, contributing to the gun crime violence in the country. They are now seeking as much as ten billion dollars in compensation.
The gun companies, which include some of America’s oldest established names in the firearms business, deny any wrongdoing. Since 2005, these companies have being granted immunity from prosecution under the ‘Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act’. This law protects the firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. But Mexico’s argument is that PLCAA, as it’s also known, only applies within the United States and therefore doesn’t protect the companies from liability.
It’s a case which is also resonating with other Latin American countries who have been impacted by illegal gun trafficking from the United States. Some of these countries have supported Mexico’s claims in the courts. And they will be watching closely to see if Mexico’s lawsuit, the first by a sovereign state, can set a precedent.
So on this week’s Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Can Mexico win its battle with US gun companies?’
Contributors:
7,689 Listeners
366 Listeners
522 Listeners
897 Listeners
1,045 Listeners
293 Listeners
5,441 Listeners
1,793 Listeners
952 Listeners
365 Listeners
962 Listeners
415 Listeners
417 Listeners
243 Listeners
842 Listeners
355 Listeners
69 Listeners
483 Listeners
241 Listeners
351 Listeners
229 Listeners
999 Listeners
323 Listeners
3,190 Listeners
65 Listeners
778 Listeners
998 Listeners
495 Listeners
615 Listeners
254 Listeners
260 Listeners
24 Listeners
32 Listeners
88 Listeners
6 Listeners