
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The heated debate on prostate cancer screening boils down to one question: should men be routinely screened?
Two recent position statements from the UK’s national screening committee published in the BMJ show that screening decisions are steeped in complexity.
The benefits of screening may be easier to grasp, but the harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment are given less attention. Can we close the divide between the public and academic discourse?
Guest: Sian Taylor-Phillips is professor of population health at the University of Warwick and a member of the UK national screening committee.
Further Reading:
More interviews from the BMJ on our Youtube channel.
By The BMJ4.5
3232 ratings
The heated debate on prostate cancer screening boils down to one question: should men be routinely screened?
Two recent position statements from the UK’s national screening committee published in the BMJ show that screening decisions are steeped in complexity.
The benefits of screening may be easier to grasp, but the harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment are given less attention. Can we close the divide between the public and academic discourse?
Guest: Sian Taylor-Phillips is professor of population health at the University of Warwick and a member of the UK national screening committee.
Further Reading:
More interviews from the BMJ on our Youtube channel.

876 Listeners

379 Listeners

506 Listeners

49 Listeners

90 Listeners

4 Listeners

9 Listeners

6 Listeners

3 Listeners

2 Listeners

3 Listeners

9 Listeners

41 Listeners

14 Listeners

1 Listeners

50 Listeners

0 Listeners

6 Listeners

15 Listeners

103 Listeners

133 Listeners

79 Listeners

3 Listeners

26 Listeners

589 Listeners

3,767 Listeners

143 Listeners

23 Listeners

95 Listeners

2,040 Listeners

0 Listeners

94 Listeners

13 Listeners