
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The heated debate on prostate cancer screening boils down to one question: should men be routinely screened?
Two recent position statements from the UK’s national screening committee published in the BMJ show that screening decisions are steeped in complexity.
The benefits of screening may be easier to grasp, but the harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment are given less attention. Can we close the divide between the public and academic discourse?
Guest: Sian Taylor-Phillips is professor of population health at the University of Warwick and a member of the UK national screening committee.
Further Reading:
More interviews from the BMJ on our Youtube channel.
By The BMJ4.5
3232 ratings
The heated debate on prostate cancer screening boils down to one question: should men be routinely screened?
Two recent position statements from the UK’s national screening committee published in the BMJ show that screening decisions are steeped in complexity.
The benefits of screening may be easier to grasp, but the harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment are given less attention. Can we close the divide between the public and academic discourse?
Guest: Sian Taylor-Phillips is professor of population health at the University of Warwick and a member of the UK national screening committee.
Further Reading:
More interviews from the BMJ on our Youtube channel.

884 Listeners

377 Listeners

505 Listeners

50 Listeners

92 Listeners

4 Listeners

8 Listeners

7 Listeners

3 Listeners

1 Listeners

3 Listeners

9 Listeners

39 Listeners

14 Listeners

1 Listeners

54 Listeners

0 Listeners

6 Listeners

16 Listeners

100 Listeners

142 Listeners

82 Listeners

3 Listeners

25 Listeners

584 Listeners

3,812 Listeners

144 Listeners

23 Listeners

110 Listeners

2,060 Listeners

0 Listeners

103 Listeners

19 Listeners