
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Copyright law is complicated, especially when it comes to visual art. So there was a lot of fanfare around the Supreme Court’s May ruling involving a celebrity portrait photographer, the pop artist Andy Warhol, and an orange silk screen of the late musician Prince. Would the decision give us some clarity around what’s ‘infringing’ in the world of appropriation art?
Lauryn Guttenplan, former deputy general counsel for the Smithsonian, walks us through some high-profile copyright cases from the past, as well as the Supreme Court’s decision.
See the artwork we discussed:
Obama “Hope” Portrait by Shepard Fairey, original photo by Mannie Garcia
“Canal Zone” Collage by Richard Prince, original photo by Patrick Cariou
“Orange Prince” by Andy Warhol
Prince Portrait by Lynn Goldsmith
By National Portrait Gallery4.8
201201 ratings
Copyright law is complicated, especially when it comes to visual art. So there was a lot of fanfare around the Supreme Court’s May ruling involving a celebrity portrait photographer, the pop artist Andy Warhol, and an orange silk screen of the late musician Prince. Would the decision give us some clarity around what’s ‘infringing’ in the world of appropriation art?
Lauryn Guttenplan, former deputy general counsel for the Smithsonian, walks us through some high-profile copyright cases from the past, as well as the Supreme Court’s decision.
See the artwork we discussed:
Obama “Hope” Portrait by Shepard Fairey, original photo by Mannie Garcia
“Canal Zone” Collage by Richard Prince, original photo by Patrick Cariou
“Orange Prince” by Andy Warhol
Prince Portrait by Lynn Goldsmith

38,454 Listeners

3,017 Listeners

1,478 Listeners

6,891 Listeners

1,258 Listeners

2,485 Listeners

1,292 Listeners

3,948 Listeners

6,412 Listeners

3,009 Listeners

2,231 Listeners

393 Listeners

693 Listeners

1,730 Listeners

651 Listeners