Courtroom Confidential

By Joshua Ritter

Courtroom Confidential, hosted by Joshua Ritter, is your weekly rendezvous with the latest updates in headline-making criminal cases nationwide. With his background as a former L.A. County prosecut

... more

163163 ratings

FAQs about Courtroom Confidential:

How many episodes does Courtroom Confidential have?

The podcast currently has 495 episodes available.

Best of Courtroom Confidential

The most played episodes among Podcast App listeners.

Number 1: Lindsay Clancy Trial: Closing Arguments Reaction & Analysis. Which Side Prevailed?
Lindsay Clancy’s fate is now in the hands of a Massachusetts jury. Live outside the courthouse, Joshua Ritter shares who he thinks prevailed in closing arguments as verdict watch continues. Lindsay Clancy is accused of killing her three young children, Cora, Dawson and Callan, inside the family’s Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023. Her defense does not dispute that she killed the children but argues that she was not criminally responsible because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors contend her actions were planned and deliberate. Give us a follow: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.tiktok.com/@joshuaritteresq https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support the show: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. #lindsayclancy #patrickclancy #lindsayclancytrial #murdertrial #lindsayclancyverdictwatch Support the show
August 28, 202621min
Number 2: Lindsay Clancy Trial Nears Closing Arguments. Which Side Has the Stronger Case? With Special Guest Randolph Rice
Did Lindsay Clancy hear a persistent male voice ordering her to kill her children, and if she did, does that establish that she was not criminally responsible? Trial attorneys and former prosecutors Joshua Ritter and Randolph Rice examine the testimony that could decide the case as closing arguments approach. Defense psychologist Dr. Paul Zeizel told jurors that Clancy had bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis and could not appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or conform her conduct to the law. The Commonwealth challenged the timing and corroboration of the alleged voice, while hospital chaplain Sheila Kavanaugh testified that Clancy described a persistent male voice during several visits. Plus, Josh and Randolph break down Karmelo Anthony’s motion for a new trial, including the disputed “gentleman’s agreement” over character evidence and whether restrictions on courtroom access violated his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. 0:00 The case jurors must decide 0:58 Joshua Ritter introduces Randolph Rice 3:31 Why the Lindsay Clancy case resonates 8:09 Dr. Zeizel gives his insanity opinion 9:17 Do voices prove legal insanity? 16:18 Chaplain says Clancy described a male voice 17:53 Why the missing notes matter 29:27 Closing arguments approach 30:10 Karmelo Anthony’s fight for a new trial 30:54 Why a new judge took over 33:27 The disputed “gentleman’s agreement” 38:53 Was Anthony denied a public trial? 47:35 Courtroom Confidential announcements 50:07 Upcoming trial coverage About Randolph Rice: Randolph Rice is the managing partner of Rice Law, an accomplished trial attorney, former Baltimore County prosecutor and nationally recognized legal analyst. He has more than 20 years of experience in criminal defense, civil litigation and personal injury and regularly appears on Court TV, Fox News, CNN, NewsNation and Nancy Grace: Crime Stories. Follow Randolph Rice: https://ricelawmd.com/attorneys/randolph-rice/ https://www.instagram.com/popular/randolph-rice/ About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #CourtroomConfidential #LegalAnalysis #KarmeloAnthony #AustinMetcalf Support the show
August 21, 202654min
Number 3: Lindsay Clancy Trial: Did Lindsay Know It Was Wrong, or Was She Unable to Stop?
The Lindsay Clancy murder trial is approaching its final stage as the Commonwealth presents rebuttal testimony challenging the defense’s claim that Clancy was experiencing postpartum psychosis when she killed her three children. The Commonwealth’s experts argue that Clancy was seriously depressed but not psychotic, and that she still understood the wrongfulness of her actions and retained control over her behavior. Under cross-examination today, one prosecution psychiatrist acknowledged that Clancy displayed symptoms associated with postpartum depression while continuing to reject a postpartum diagnosis and any evidence of psychosis. With closing arguments and jury deliberations approaching, the case comes down to one defining question: Did Lindsay Clancy understand that what she was doing was wrong, or did severe mental illness leave her unable to control her actions? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter is joined by attorney, Fox News contributor and retired NYPD Inspector Paul Mauro to break down today’s rebuttal testimony, the competing expert opinions and what the jury must ultimately decide about Clancy’s criminal responsibility. Join us LIVE for legal analysis, true crime updates and courtroom breakdowns. About Paul Mauro: Paul Mauro is an attorney, Fox News contributor and retired NYPD Inspector. During his career with the NYPD, he served as commanding officer of the department’s Legal Bureau and executive officer of its Intelligence Operations and Analysis Bureau. https://x.com/PaulDMauro https://www.instagram.com/the_ops_desk/ http://Opsdesk.org About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Support the show
August 25, 20261h 3min
Number 4: Lindsay Clancy Trial: Did the “Mortal Sin” Question Cross the Line? With Special Guest Susan Constantine
One question from the Commonwealth prompted an immediate sidebar in the Lindsay Clancy trial. After confirming that Clancy’s mother-in-law was Catholic, the prosecutor asked whether murder is considered a “mortal sin.” Did that moment help establish that Clancy understood right from wrong, or did it risk turning jurors against the prosecution? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter is joined by jury consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine to analyze the controversial exchange, Clancy’s emotional reactions in court, the defense’s first witnesses and whether Clancy should testify. Justin Shepherd from JustInTheNickOfCrime also joins Josh to examine Dr. Paul Zeizel’s testimony about delusions and intrusive thoughts before breaking down the opening days of Duane “Keffe D” Davis’s trial for the murder of Tupac Shakur. 00:00 Lindsay Clancy Trial Day 15 01:03 Josh Reports From Plymouth 04:16 Jury Consultant Susan Constantine Joins 21:07 Prosecutor’s “Mortal Sin” Question 25:17 Will Lindsay Clancy Testify? 29:28 Justin Shepherd on the Clancy Defense 35:36 Dr. Zeizel on Delusions and Intrusive Thoughts 46:46 Keffe D Trial and Tupac Shakur’s Murder 50:41 Prosecution and Defense Opening Statements 57:28 Could Suge Knight Testify? 60:07 Is the Religion Question Grounds for Appeal? 64:23 Upcoming Trial Coverage and Show Schedule ABOUT SUSAN CONSTANTINE: Susan Constantine is a nationally recognized body language expert, jury consultant and media analyst with experience examining high-profile trials. She works with attorneys to identify nonverbal indicators, potential sway jurors, hidden biases and the individuals most likely to emerge as jury forepersons. https://susanconstantine.com/ https://www.youtube.com/@susanconstantineofficial https://x.com/bodylanguage01 https://www.instagram.com/susan.constantine.75/ https://www.facebook.com/TheHumanBehaviorLab ABOUT JUSTIN SHEPHERD: Justin Shepherd is the creator of JustInTheNickOfCrime and host of “Unheard: True Crime in Their Own Words,” covering major true crime cases and the people at the center of them. https://www.youtube.com/@JustInTheNickOfCrime https://www.instagram.com/justinthenickofcrime/?hl=en https://www.tiktok.com/@justinthenickofcrime https://www.facebook.com/justinthenickofcrime1/ ABOUT JOSHUA RITTER: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #LindsayClancy #CourtneyClenney #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #CourtroomConfidential #LegalAnalysis #Tupac #DuaneDavis #KeffeD Support the show
August 19, 20261h 8min
Number 5: Lindsay Clancy Trial: Psychiatrist Reacts as Final Expert Says She “Had Control” With Special Guest Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring
The Lindsay Clancy murder trial has reached its final stage, with testimony concluding and closing arguments expected Thursday. The Commonwealth’s final forensic psychiatrist told jurors that Clancy acted methodically, exercised control and remained capable of distinguishing right from wrong when she killed her three children. The defense challenged that conclusion, emphasizing Clancy’s severe mental-health decline, repeated efforts to obtain help, medication history and its claim that she was experiencing postpartum psychosis and obeying a commanding voice. East Idaho News Courtroom Insider reporter Grace Wong joins criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter to recap the final day of testimony, examine how the evidence may have landed with jurors and preview the cases both sides must make during closing arguments. Then, board-certified psychiatrist and former FDA medical officer Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring breaks down the final psychiatric battle, including: • Whether organized or methodical actions rule out psychosis • How command hallucinations can affect judgment and behavior • Whether someone can be psychotic but still legally responsible • What Clancy’s medication history and severe insomnia may reveal • The difference between a psychiatric diagnosis and the legal standard for criminal responsibility • What each side’s experts may have overstated or left unanswered With the jury about to receive the case, what must the Commonwealth establish to prove Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible, and has the defense created reasonable doubt about whether she could understand or control her actions? About Grace Wong: Grace Wong is a reporter with Courtroom Insider at East Idaho News who has been covering the Lindsay Clancy trial and other major criminal cases. https://www.youtube.com/@Eastidnews https://x.com/EastIDNews https://www.instagram.com/eastidahonews/ https://www.facebook.com/EastIdahoNews https://www.eastidahonews.com/ About Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring: Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring is a board-certified psychiatrist, former FDA medical officer and host of the Dr. Josef - Taper Clinic YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/@taperclinic https://x.com/DrJosefWD https://www.instagram.com/drjosefwittdoerring/?hl=en https://www.tiktok.com/@drjosefwittdoerring About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #lindsayclancy #lindsayclancytrial #patrickclancy Support the show
August 27, 20261h 44min