Courtroom Confidential

By Joshua Ritter

Courtroom Confidential, hosted by Joshua Ritter, is your weekly rendezvous with the latest updates in headline-making criminal cases nationwide. With his background as a former L.A. County prosecut

... more

163163 ratings

FAQs about Courtroom Confidential:

How many episodes does Courtroom Confidential have?

The podcast currently has 500 episodes available.

Best of Courtroom Confidential

The most played episodes among Podcast App listeners.

Number 1: Lindsay Clancy Trial: Closing Arguments Reaction & Analysis. Which Side Prevailed?
Lindsay Clancy’s fate is now in the hands of a Massachusetts jury. Live outside the courthouse, Joshua Ritter shares who he thinks prevailed in closing arguments as verdict watch continues. Lindsay Clancy is accused of killing her three young children, Cora, Dawson and Callan, inside the family’s Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023. Her defense does not dispute that she killed the children but argues that she was not criminally responsible because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors contend her actions were planned and deliberate. Give us a follow: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.tiktok.com/@joshuaritteresq https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support the show: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. #lindsayclancy #patrickclancy #lindsayclancytrial #murdertrial #lindsayclancyverdictwatch Support the show
August 28, 202621min
Number 2: Lindsay Clancy Mistrial: Can the Commonwealth Win a Retrial? | Legal Q&A
After Lindsay Clancy’s 11-1 mistrial, the questions are shifting from what happened during the first trial to what the Commonwealth and defense must do differently in a retrial. Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter explains whether double jeopardy applies, why prosecutors changed their portrayal of Clancy, whether planning rules out legal insanity and how another impartial jury could be selected. Josh also answers viewer questions about Barry Morphew’s reported bond trouble, D4vd’s request for a public defender, victim-rights counsel in the Tyler Robinson case, Caleb Flynn’s 911 call, the Laura Owens plea deal, missing witnesses, jury deadlocks and more. 0:00 Welcome! 2:27 Can states eliminate the insanity defense? 7:11 Do televised trials harm victims? 9:34 Jury selection and speculation about Patrick Clancy 17:50 What happens when a star witness disappears? 26:55 Why prosecutors changed their Lindsay Clancy strategy 34:15 Laura Owens plea deal explained 42:06 Could a manslaughter verdict be appealed? 48:19 How long can a jury remain deadlocked? 54:19 Reddington, the lone juror and post-trial comments 57:25 Would Clancy have benefited from a bench trial? 1:04:29 Does double jeopardy prevent a retrial? 1:08:41 Does planning disprove legal insanity? 1:12:11 Why Tyler Robinson’s victim has an attorney 1:15:28 Courtroom clothing, grooming and jail meals 1:24:58 Can D4vd qualify for a public defender? 1:35:14 Barry Morphew’s alleged bond violation 1:42:02 Selecting an impartial jury for a Clancy retrial 1:48:23 Caleb Flynn’s revealing 911 call Summer Merch Collection: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/collections/summer-collection Want to ask Josh your true crime legal question for next Sunday Funday? Get your questions in before 11:59pm PT Friday! Click the tab on the right side here: https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Sunday Funday Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiteA2x_mfo3H6cFS91S0tBu600tjCeFJ&si=Afeir78gpaWnjK8K Courtroom Confidential: Live Trials - https://www.youtube.com/@CCLiveTrials Become a CC Crew member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQVmA_wratr69AQdmWtRLAw/join Give us a follow: https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.tiktok.com/@joshuaritteresq https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyMistrial #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancyVerdict #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #LauraOwens #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TrueCrime #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtroomConfidential Support the show
September 08, 20261h 59min
Number 3: Lindsay Clancy Trial: Psychiatrist Reacts as Final Expert Says She “Had Control” With Special Guest Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring
The Lindsay Clancy murder trial has reached its final stage, with testimony concluding and closing arguments expected Thursday. The Commonwealth’s final forensic psychiatrist told jurors that Clancy acted methodically, exercised control and remained capable of distinguishing right from wrong when she killed her three children. The defense challenged that conclusion, emphasizing Clancy’s severe mental-health decline, repeated efforts to obtain help, medication history and its claim that she was experiencing postpartum psychosis and obeying a commanding voice. East Idaho News Courtroom Insider reporter Grace Wong joins criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter to recap the final day of testimony, examine how the evidence may have landed with jurors and preview the cases both sides must make during closing arguments. Then, board-certified psychiatrist and former FDA medical officer Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring breaks down the final psychiatric battle, including: • Whether organized or methodical actions rule out psychosis • How command hallucinations can affect judgment and behavior • Whether someone can be psychotic but still legally responsible • What Clancy’s medication history and severe insomnia may reveal • The difference between a psychiatric diagnosis and the legal standard for criminal responsibility • What each side’s experts may have overstated or left unanswered With the jury about to receive the case, what must the Commonwealth establish to prove Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible, and has the defense created reasonable doubt about whether she could understand or control her actions? About Grace Wong: Grace Wong is a reporter with Courtroom Insider at East Idaho News who has been covering the Lindsay Clancy trial and other major criminal cases. https://www.youtube.com/@Eastidnews https://x.com/EastIDNews https://www.instagram.com/eastidahonews/ https://www.facebook.com/EastIdahoNews https://www.eastidahonews.com/ About Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring: Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring is a board-certified psychiatrist, former FDA medical officer and host of the Dr. Josef - Taper Clinic YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/@taperclinic https://x.com/DrJosefWD https://www.instagram.com/drjosefwittdoerring/?hl=en https://www.tiktok.com/@drjosefwittdoerring About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #lindsayclancy #lindsayclancytrial #patrickclancy Support the show
August 27, 20261h 44min
Number 4: Lindsay Clancy Verdict Watch: Is a Mistrial Coming?
The Lindsay Clancy jury remains in deliberations after reporting that it could not reach a unanimous verdict. Then a woman was arrested outside Plymouth Superior Court after allegedly filming jurors, leading to a warning from the judge and individual questioning of every juror. Reporting from outside the courthouse, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter explains why the jury’s silence may suggest movement, what happens if jurors again say they cannot agree, and when Massachusetts’ Tuey-Rodriguez instruction could lead to a verdict or mistrial. Later, Josh breaks down the decision ordering Tyler Robinson to stand trial for the killing of Charlie Kirk and why the death penalty remains on the table. 0:00 Live outside Plymouth Superior Court 2:22 Lindsay Clancy verdict watch 2:28 Why jurors requested the knife and pill bottles 3:15 Jury reports it cannot reach a verdict 5:08 Judge issues a warning 6:04 Woman arrested after allegedly filming jurors 8:33 Every juror questioned individually 10:35 Why the jury’s silence may signal movement 14:03 What a “dynamite charge” means 16:50 Tyler Robinson ordered to stand trial 21:24 Final updates and show schedule About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancyVerdictWatch #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk Support the show
September 03, 202625min
Number 5: Lindsay Clancy Mistrial: The 11-1 Split and What Happens Next
The Lindsay Clancy murder trial has ended in a mistrial after seven days of deliberations and more than 36 hours without a unanimous verdict. Clancy’s defense says 11 jurors were prepared to acquit her, while one holdout juror prevented the panel from reaching a verdict. After the judge declined to remove that juror and the jury reported that it remained deadlocked, a mistrial was declared. What caused the impasse? Did the holdout juror properly apply the law, and will the Commonwealth put Lindsay Clancy through a second trial? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter breaks down the dramatic conclusion, the fight over the lone holdout and what could happen next. About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancyMIstrial #LindsayClancyVerdict Support the show
September 05, 202640min