
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Listen if you need to know which guru frameworks actually deliver in Act Three.
Part 2 of our Screenplay Gurus series takes the same lens from Part 1 — Vogler, Snyder and Hauge — and points it at the two highest-grossing original films of 2013: GRAVITY and FROZEN. No franchise, no sequel. Just the two films that audiences went to see in the biggest numbers that year, and the question of what their scripts actually look like when you run them against the guru formulas.
The short answer is: both films cleave much more closely to these structures than the award-season dramas we looked at in Part 1. Which is interesting — but not as interesting as how they deviate when you look more carefully.
GRAVITY maps onto Vogler's Hero's Journey in surprising depth: the umbilical tether as threshold crossing, Matt Kowalski as Obi-Wan, the hallucinated ghost in the pod giving the "use the Force" instruction. The structure isn't just present — it's legible, almost mythological. FROZEN brings a genuine dual-protagonist puzzle (who is actually driving the story — Anna or Elsa?) and a third act that plays out under its own rules rather than anybody's formula.
What starts to emerge is that the frameworks are more useful at some points than others. Vogler has real things to say about Act 3; Snyder's "finale — finish it" turns out to be pretty thin guidance for actually generating that emotional hit. And as Chas lands at the end of the episode: the three-act model itself might not be the useful unit. Sequences might be. Though you'll have to wait quite a few episodes until we tackle them!
The craft questions in this episode:
We also go deep on the frameworks' different coverage of the Dark Night of the Soul — which Stu argues is less a formula beat and more a question every writer should be able to answer for their character. What is the lowest point? What does it take to get out of it? That turns out to be something these frameworks are, and aren't, equipped to help with.
As always: SPOILERS ABOUND and all copyright material used under fair use for educational purposes.
LIKE THIS EPISODE?
Thanks to our Patrons, especially Khrob, Theis, Sandra, Jesse, Randy, Paulo, Thomas, Jennifer, Malay, Alexandre and Lily.
→ Read the transcript for this episode.
———
"I think as soon as you are stretching them in any way, they're losing their value as a rigid tool." — Chas Fisher @ 00:00:57
———
CHAPTERS
FILMS
SCRIPTS
LINKS
EPISODES IN THE SCREENPLAY GURUS SERIES
———
More Draft Zero is brought to you by our awesome Patreons.
If you enjoy the show, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts, a rating on Spotify, or a review on Podchaser.
We are @stuwillis, @mehlsbells and @chasffisher on Twitter. You can find @draft_zero and @_shotzero on Instagram and Twitter.
Full show notes at: https://draft-zero.com/2014/dz-02/
Download episode: DZ-02.mp3
By Chas Fisher and Stuart Willis4.8
114114 ratings
Listen if you need to know which guru frameworks actually deliver in Act Three.
Part 2 of our Screenplay Gurus series takes the same lens from Part 1 — Vogler, Snyder and Hauge — and points it at the two highest-grossing original films of 2013: GRAVITY and FROZEN. No franchise, no sequel. Just the two films that audiences went to see in the biggest numbers that year, and the question of what their scripts actually look like when you run them against the guru formulas.
The short answer is: both films cleave much more closely to these structures than the award-season dramas we looked at in Part 1. Which is interesting — but not as interesting as how they deviate when you look more carefully.
GRAVITY maps onto Vogler's Hero's Journey in surprising depth: the umbilical tether as threshold crossing, Matt Kowalski as Obi-Wan, the hallucinated ghost in the pod giving the "use the Force" instruction. The structure isn't just present — it's legible, almost mythological. FROZEN brings a genuine dual-protagonist puzzle (who is actually driving the story — Anna or Elsa?) and a third act that plays out under its own rules rather than anybody's formula.
What starts to emerge is that the frameworks are more useful at some points than others. Vogler has real things to say about Act 3; Snyder's "finale — finish it" turns out to be pretty thin guidance for actually generating that emotional hit. And as Chas lands at the end of the episode: the three-act model itself might not be the useful unit. Sequences might be. Though you'll have to wait quite a few episodes until we tackle them!
The craft questions in this episode:
We also go deep on the frameworks' different coverage of the Dark Night of the Soul — which Stu argues is less a formula beat and more a question every writer should be able to answer for their character. What is the lowest point? What does it take to get out of it? That turns out to be something these frameworks are, and aren't, equipped to help with.
As always: SPOILERS ABOUND and all copyright material used under fair use for educational purposes.
LIKE THIS EPISODE?
Thanks to our Patrons, especially Khrob, Theis, Sandra, Jesse, Randy, Paulo, Thomas, Jennifer, Malay, Alexandre and Lily.
→ Read the transcript for this episode.
———
"I think as soon as you are stretching them in any way, they're losing their value as a rigid tool." — Chas Fisher @ 00:00:57
———
CHAPTERS
FILMS
SCRIPTS
LINKS
EPISODES IN THE SCREENPLAY GURUS SERIES
———
More Draft Zero is brought to you by our awesome Patreons.
If you enjoy the show, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts, a rating on Spotify, or a review on Podchaser.
We are @stuwillis, @mehlsbells and @chasffisher on Twitter. You can find @draft_zero and @_shotzero on Instagram and Twitter.
Full show notes at: https://draft-zero.com/2014/dz-02/
Download episode: DZ-02.mp3

670 Listeners

2,434 Listeners

749 Listeners

1,485 Listeners

5,409 Listeners

6,197 Listeners

1,084 Listeners

4,756 Listeners

5,716 Listeners

977 Listeners

1,123 Listeners

58,195 Listeners

1,696 Listeners

1,121 Listeners

12,466 Listeners