
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message.
In this episode, Mike discusses the Manitoba Court of Appeal decision R. v. Miller, 2025 MBCA 48 where police arrested a man after receiving a tip from a confidential informer, finding drugs and cash in his possession. The question to ponder was whether or not the police had the necessary grounds to make the arrest using the 3 C's — Was the information COMPELLING? Was the source CREDIBLE? And was the information CORROBORATED? Listen to learn how the Court of Appeal applied the test. You might just want to follow along to bolster your understanding in this area of law.
Other case mentioned in the podcast upholding mandatory breath testing — R. v. Wright, 2025 SKCA 52.
Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at [email protected]
By LIIPProvide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message.
In this episode, Mike discusses the Manitoba Court of Appeal decision R. v. Miller, 2025 MBCA 48 where police arrested a man after receiving a tip from a confidential informer, finding drugs and cash in his possession. The question to ponder was whether or not the police had the necessary grounds to make the arrest using the 3 C's — Was the information COMPELLING? Was the source CREDIBLE? And was the information CORROBORATED? Listen to learn how the Court of Appeal applied the test. You might just want to follow along to bolster your understanding in this area of law.
Other case mentioned in the podcast upholding mandatory breath testing — R. v. Wright, 2025 SKCA 52.
Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at [email protected]

229,611 Listeners

37,416 Listeners

41,365 Listeners

28,049 Listeners

4,687 Listeners

10,995 Listeners

6,486 Listeners

1,239 Listeners

80 Listeners

1,699 Listeners

47,472 Listeners

46,500 Listeners

87 Listeners

77 Listeners

32 Listeners