Earth Wise
Download on the App Store

Earth Wise episodes

  • China And Plastic Waste
    In January 2018, China enacted its “National Sword” policy which banned the import of most plastics and other materials headed for that country’s recycling processors.  Those processors had handled nearly half of the world’s recyclable waste for the past quarter century.  China took this step because the deluge of soiled and contaminated materials was overwhelming its processing facilities and creating yet another environmental problem for the country, this time not even of its own making.

    Prior to China’s ban, 95% of the plastics collected for recycling in

    the European Union and 70% in the U.S. were sold and shipped to Chinese
    processors.  A combination of favorable
    rates for shipping in cargo vessels that carried Chinese goods abroad and low
    Chinese labor rates made it a very profitable enterprise.

    Before China’s ban, only 9% of globally discarded plastics were being

    recycled and 12% were burned.  The rest
    ended up in landfills or simply dumped into the environment.  Over the coming decade, as many as 11 million
    tons of plastic will have to find a new place to be processed or otherwise
    disposed of.  There is already evidence
    that plastic waste is accumulating in countries that are dependent on
    exporting.  In many places, including a
    number of American cities, there are curtailed collections and new restrictions
    on what kinds of plastics are accepted.

    Some experts are hopeful that China’s ban might actually have an

    upside if it leads to better solutions for managing the world’s waste.  North America and Europe need to expand
    processing capabilities and manufacturers need to make their products more
    easily recyclable.  Mostly, the Chinese
    ban should be a wake-up call to the world on the need to greatly reduce
    single-use plastics.

    **********

    Web Links

    Piling Up: How China’s Ban on Importing Waste Has Stalled Global Recycling

    Photo, posted August 8, 2017, courtesy of Sino-German Urbanisation Partnership via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • Fish And Ships
    Solutions to overfishing of certain tuna and shark populations have been hindered by some significant unknowns:  where the fishing is happening, and where the fish are.  But researchers from Stanford University have recently shed some light on this mystery. 

    According to a paper recently published in the journal Science

    Advances, the researchers have developed a map of shark, tuna, and ship
    movements that could help ocean managers identify regions of the sea where
    vulnerable species may be at risk. 

    The researchers’ work builds on a 2018 study in which four years of satellite vessel movement data was used to develop a machine learning algorithm that mapped the footprint of 70,000 different fishing vessels around the world.  In their paper, the researchers zeroed in on the activities of 900 vessels from 12 countries in the northeast Pacific Ocean to figure out to what degree fishing fleets, sharks, and tunas overlapped. 

    The researchers combined the vessel data with the ocean habitat

    preferences of sharks and tunas obtained from a decade-long tracking program
    called Tagging of Pacific Predators (or TOPP). 
    According to the IUCN, most of the 876 individuals tagged in TOPP belong
    to species that are either threatened or near-threatened.

    By synthesizing this data, researchers were able to map where sharks and tunas would have the highest overlap with commercial fishing vessels.  Increasing the transparency of where fish meets fleets will allow ocean managers to determine where international protections may be needed. 

    The United Nations is currently developing the world’s first legally

    binding treaty to protect international waters. 
    The Stanford University researchers hope their findings can help with
    this treaty’s formulation. 

    **********

    Web Links

    Tunas, sharks and ships at sea

    Photo, posted June 20, 2011, courtesy of Mike Baird via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • Growing Rocks To Store Carbon
    The US Geological Survey recently published a comprehensive review of geological carbon storage in sedimentary rocks through carbon mineralization.   That is the process by which carbon dioxide becomes a solid mineral, such as a form of carbonate.  Certain rocks undergo a chemical reaction when exposed to carbon dioxide and turn into different minerals as a result.

    The idea is to use carbon mineralization as a way to permanently store carbon dioxide that has been captured from power plant emissions, other industrial activities, or even directly from the atmosphere.

    Two basic approaches are injecting the CO2 deep underground or exposing it to crushed rocks at the surface.  The two types of rock best suited for mineralization through injection are basalt and various ultramafic rocks.  Pilot studies have shown that injection into basalt can lead to mineralization in under two years.

    Exposing carbon dioxide to crushed rock at the surface generally makes use of crushed mining waste.  Mineralization can be much faster in this case because there is more surface area on the crushed rock where mineralization occurs.  (However, the quantities of rock available at the surface are much less than what exists deep underground).

    Like all carbon capture and storage approaches, the key consideration is cost.  The USGS study estimates that underground injection would cost around $30 per metric ton of CO2.  The crushed rock approach might only cost $8 per metric ton, but that assumes the crushed rock is already available.  If it must be newly mined, the costs would obviously go up significantly.  To put this into perspective, a typical car produces around 4 metric tons of CO22 per year.  So, it would cost somewhere between $30 and $120 a year to eliminate the emissions from one car.  Perhaps that is a price we need to pay until we ditch gasoline cars.

    **********

    Web Links

    How Growing Rocks Can Help Reduce Carbon Emissions

    Photo, posted October 17, 2011, courtesy of Glen Bledsoe via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • More Antarctic Warming
    East Antarctica is the coldest place on Earth.  It makes up two-thirds of the continent, is home to the South Pole, and has vast ice sheets that have been around for tens of millions of years and are nearly three miles thick in places.  Temperatures there hover around 67 degrees below zero.  In 2010, a few spots on East Antarctica’s polar plateau reached a record-breaking 144 degrees below zero.

    But almost unbelievably, parts of the East Antarctic seem to be

    melting.

    Scientists are seeing worrying signs of ice loss in the East

    Antarctic.  Glaciers are starting to move
    more quickly and are dumping their ice into the Southern Ocean.  Satellite images show the fast-moving
    ice.  The biggest glacier – the Totten
    Glacier – alone contains enough ice to raise global sea levels by over 12 feet.

    The Antarctic as a whole contains about 90% of the planet’s ice.  In theory, if it all melted, it would raise

    global sea levels by an average of 200 feet.

    The growing concerns about eastern Antarctica are not that its

    interior plateau will soon start to melt. 
    It is still extremely cold there and should stay that way for a long
    time.  But its edges, which are in
    contact with warming ocean waters, are the real worry.  As the region’s ice shelves, which float atop
    the Southern Ocean, erode, the vast glaciers behind them could rapidly
    accelerate their slide into the sea.

    Today, satellites show huge glaciers moving rapidly toward the coast,

    with wide rivers of ice sometimes moving several miles a year.  In the face of rapid change and limited data,
    it is difficult to predict what the Antarctic will do in the future.  But it doesn’t look good.

    **********

    Web Links

    Polar Warning: Even Antarctica’s Coldest Region Is Starting to Melt

    Photo, posted January 3, 2013, courtesy of Christopher Michel via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • Earth Day
    Today is Earth Day.  On April 22, 1970, millions of Americas took to the streets in peaceful demonstrations in favor of environmental reform.  Since that first time, Earth Day has now become a global event each year.  Estimates are that as many as a billion people in 192 countries take part in Earth Day events.

    This year, the theme for Earth Day is “Protect our Species.”  The focus is on the fact that the world is facing the greatest rate of extinction since the demise of the dinosaurs more than 60 million years ago.

    But unlike the extinctions from that time that were linked to

    so-called acts of god like asteroid collisions, the rapid extinction of species
    in our world today is mostly the result of human activity.

    The global destruction and rapid reduction of plant and wildlife

    populations are directly linked to climate change, deforestation, habitat loss,
    trafficking and poaching, unsustainable agriculture, pollution, and pesticides.

    In order to stem the tide of destruction, the Earth Day Network is asking people to help raise awareness about the accelerating rate of extinction of millions of species and the causes and consequences of this phenomenon.  We need to push for the creation of policies that protect broad groups of species as well as individual species and their habitats.  There needs to be a global movement that embraces nature and its values. And we need to eat less meat and curtail the use of pesticides and herbicides.

    We share the planet with many species, and we need them to be here in

    order to sustain our own species. 
    Something to remember on Earth Day 2019.

    **********

    Web Links

    Earth Day Network

    Photo, posted January 24, 2012, courtesy of Jonas Bengtsson via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • Making Coal To Fight Climate Change
    Coal is the most harmful fossil fuel for the environment and, furthermore, for human health.  Its use has stubbornly persisted because it is so plentiful and, therefore, cheap.  As a result, a big part of efforts to fight climate change is finding a way to remove the carbon dioxide dumped into the atmosphere by the combustion of coal.

    Researchers at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology in Australia have developed a remarkable technology that in effect reverses the process that has led to soaring CO2 levels in the atmosphere.  They have found a way to pull carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and turn it into coal, after which it can be stored cheaply and safely underground.

    Most previous carbon capture and storage technologies have focused on compressing carbon dioxide gas into a liquid form and then pumping it into rock formations.  Such techniques are rather expensive, require lots of energy, and pose risks that the liquid CO2 could escape from its underground storage sites.  More recently, research on solid metal catalysts has led to the possibility of turning CO2 into solid carbon, but most of these reactions require very high temperatures and use a lot of energy.

    The new technique developed at RMIT uses a new class of catalysts based on metal alloys.  With a small jolt of electricity applied at room temperature, CO2 can be converted into solid carbon – basically, coal.

    If this technique can be industrialized economically, it would be like

    turning back the clock by taking carbon dioxide that entered the atmosphere by
    the combustion of coal and turning it back into coal and putting it back
    underground.  It seems like excellent
    environmental justice.

    **********

    Web Links

    Scientists Turn Atmospheric CO2 Into Coal

    Photo, posted March 16, 2015, courtesy of Will Fisher via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • The Price of Chocolate
    The Ivory Coast has lost more than 80% of its forests in the last 50 years, mainly as a result of cocoa production.

    The Ivory Coast is a West African country the size of New Mexico and it produces more than a third of the world’s cocoa.  But around 40% of the country’s cocoa crop – supplying more than a tenth of the world’s chocolate bars – is grown illegally in the country’s national parks and 230 supposedly protected government-owned forests. 

    Over the decades, as many as one million landless people from

    drought-stricken places like Mali and Burkina Faso moved into national parks
    and protected forests and started farming cocoa.  The Marahoue National Park alone has 30,000
    illegal inhabitants.

    Most cocoa is grown in monocultures of what is known as the full-sun

    system, which requires the removal of all surrounding trees.  As a result, many allegedly protected areas
    have been completely converted into farms. 
    Most of the cocoa in the Ivory Coast is grown on small farms, typically
    plots of 7 to 10 acres.  The farmers are
    caught in an exploitative and corrupt system of cocoa trading and land
    appropriation, and most earn less than a dollar a day.  Meanwhile, government agencies charged with
    protecting the forests are more interested in collecting bribes than
    safeguarding woodlands.

    The Ivory Coast government is unveiling a plan to actually remove protection from most of its remaining forests and hand them over to the world’s chocolate traders.    The claim is that this will protect other forests by improving cocoa productivity in already deforested areas.  Needless to say, conservation groups are dubious that the new plan will positively impact an already terrible situation.

    **********

    Web Links

    The Real Price of a Chocolate Bar: West Africa’s Rainforests

    Photo, posted April 17, 2015, courtesy of Tom Coady via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • Weather-Responsive Traffic Signals
    We all spend time sitting at red lights – sometimes it seems like a whole lot of time.  There is a fair amount of science applied in the design of traffic signals that at least has the aim of easing congestion and improving traffic safety.

    Signals in modern cities are timed using optimization models that

    analyze multiple factors including traffic volume and speed with the goal of
    safely getting as many vehicles as possible through intersections.  It sure doesn’t seem that way in many places,
    but that is the intent in any case.

    But a real problem with these models is that they assume normal

    conditions including weather conditions. 
    In places that experience real winter conditions, the assumptions of
    traffic models fail.  If the road surface
    is covered with snow and ice and visibility is poor, variables like speed and
    stopping distances become very different.

    Researchers at the University of Waterloo in Canada collected data from

    real-world intersections and ran computer simulations to determine the effects
    of adjusting traffic signal behavior in bad weather (as well as in the presence
    of other conditions such as accidents or construction.)  They found that such adjustments could reduce
    traffic delays by as much as 20%.   

    Cities with computerized signal systems are already equipped to

    remotely and inexpensively adjust the timing of traffic lights.  To gain the benefits of smarter signals,
    there would need to be video cameras and a certain amount of artificial intelligence
    software that would be able to automatically tweak the timing of lights in
    response to traffic changes caused by weather, accidents or construction. 

    It sounds like a great idea.

    **********

    Web Links

    Weather-responsive intersections could ease traffic congestion

    Photo, posted September 22, 2009, courtesy of Tristan Bowersox via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • Trees And The Future Of Cities
    The shade of a single tree is a welcome source of relief on a hot summer day.  But even a relatively small patch of woods can have a profound cooling effect.  A new study at the University of Wisconsin-Madison looks at the role trees play in keeping towns and cities cool.

    According to the study, the right amount of tree cover can lower

    daytime temperatures in the summer by as much as 10 degrees.  The effects are noticeable from neighborhood
    to neighborhood and even on a block-by-block basis.

    Cities are well-known to be hot spots due to the urban heat islanding effect.  Using trees to keep temperatures more comfortable in cities can make a big difference for the people who live and work there.

    The man-made structures of cities – roads, sidewalks, and buildings –

    absorb heat from the sun during the day and slowly release it at night.  Trees, on the other hand, not only shade
    those structures from the sun, but they also transpire -or release water in the
    air through their leaves – which helps to cool things down.

    According to the study, to get maximum cooling benefits, tree canopies

    must exceed forty percent, meaning that city blocks need to be nearly halfway
    covered by tree branches and leaves.  To
    get the biggest bang for the buck, cities should start planting more trees in
    areas that are already near the forty percent threshold.  But

    trees can’t just be in parks. 

    They need to be in places where people are active.

    If we want the places where we live to be more comfortable and

    resilient in a warming world, we need to plant more trees.

    **********

    Web Links

    Study suggests trees are crucial to the future of our cities

    Photo, posted May 26, 2012, courtesy of Mislav Marohnic via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min
  • Drugs In The Water
    According to a new study published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, concentrations of pharmaceuticals in rivers and lakes have dramatically increased across the globe over the past 20 years.

    Traces of medicines get passed into waterways through the excretion of

    active drugs in human waste, the disposal of unused medicines down drains, and
    runoff from livestock farms.

    The study looked in detail at two specific drugs:   carbamazepine, an anti-epileptic drug, and

    ciprofloxacin, an antibiotic.   The study
    found that the risk of ecological damage from the residue from these two drugs
    was 10 to 20 times higher in 2015 than in 1995.

    Chronic exposure to carbamazepine, for example, has been shown to

    alter feeding behavior and reduce egg viability in zebrafish, as well as reduce
    reproductive success in crustaceans. 
    Antibiotics can alter major nutrient cycles and decrease the
    effectiveness of bacteria-based wastewater treatment systems.

    The study, led by researchers from the Netherlands, created a new model estimating concentrations of the two drugs over a 20-year period in 449 aquatic systems around the globe.  The model predicts a relatively high environmental risk in densely populated and dry areas such as the Middle East. 

    When the researchers compared the model’s results to samples from four river systems in various locations, they found that the actual drug concentrations were even higher than model results, in some cases by a factor of 10 to 100. 

    The new model should act as a guide for a more thorough investigation into pharmaceutical residues in waterways, which pose significant environmental risks all over the world.

    **********

    Web Links

    Concentrations of Pharmaceuticals in Freshwater Increasingly Globally

    Photo, posted March 22, 2012, courtesy of Rajeev Rajagopalan via Flickr.

    Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

    2 min

About Earth Wise

From the publisher's feed

From green business and new environmental legislation to how nature impacts our environment in ways never before considered, Earth Wise offers a look at our changing environment.

More shows like Earth Wise

Stuff You Should Know by iHeartPodcasts

Stuff You Should Know

78,288 Listeners

Freakonomics Radio by Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Freakonomics Radio

31,931 Listeners

Planet Money by NPR

Planet Money

30,645 Listeners

Hidden Brain by Hidden Brain, Shankar Vedantam

Hidden Brain

43,334 Listeners

Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! by NPR

Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!

38,642 Listeners

Living on Earth by World Media Foundation

Living on Earth

465 Listeners

Science Quickly by Scientific American

Science Quickly

1,390 Listeners

Nature Podcast by Springer Nature Limited

Nature Podcast

772 Listeners

BirdNote Daily by BirdNote

BirdNote Daily

1,256 Listeners

The Academic Minute by Academic Minute

The Academic Minute

29 Listeners

Science Magazine Podcast by Science Magazine

Science Magazine Podcast

814 Listeners

Science Friday by Science Friday and WNYC Studios

Science Friday

6,430 Listeners

The Book Show by Joe Donahue

The Book Show

33 Listeners

Everything Explained by WAMC

Everything Explained

20 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

111,767 Listeners

The Media Project by Rex Smith

The Media Project

39 Listeners

The Roundtable by Joe Donahue, Sarah LaDuke

The Roundtable

158 Listeners

51 Percent by WAMC

51 Percent

14 Listeners

A New York Minute in History by WAMC

A New York Minute in History

49 Listeners

The Capitol Connection by David Guistina

The Capitol Connection

22 Listeners

The Legislative Gazette by David Guistina

The Legislative Gazette

11 Listeners

Short Wave by NPR

Short Wave

6,583 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

16,044 Listeners

The Atlas Obscura Podcast by SiriusXM and Atlas Obscura

The Atlas Obscura Podcast

1,736 Listeners