Let me ask you a real question:
If you’re liberal, would you ever consider voting conservative?

Because it doesn’t seem like it.

This episode dives into party loyalty, political bias, and why so many people refuse to even listen to conservative ideas — no matter what those ideas actually are. I talk about how leadership suddenly becomes “acceptable” or “brilliant” depending on the party label, not the policies behind it.

I break down incentive, taxation, work ethic, and why punishing success eliminates motivation — not just for individuals, but for entire countries. We get into why investment leaves, why people stop trying, and why voting based on results matters more than voting based on team colors.

And if you don’t vote at all?
Then no — you don’t get to complain.

This isn’t about blind loyalty.
It’s about outcomes, effort, and common sense.

Highlights

• Would liberals ever vote conservative — honestly?

• Party loyalty vs real policy discussion

• Why leadership is judged differently by party

• Incentive, taxation, and work ethic

• Why punishing success kills motivation

• Investors leaving Canada

• Results over labels

This episode starts with something simple: trying to get internet set up.
And somehow turns into a full breakdown of modern life.

I talk about how unnecessarily difficult internet companies make everything, why relying on other people sucks, and how expensive it is just to exist on your own in Canada right now. Bills, rent, groceries, gas, tools — it all adds up fast.

From there, things take a turn. I touch on a disturbing crime in Calgary, why living with your parents isn’t shameful anymore, and how the cost of living has completely changed what “normal” looks like.

And somehow… we end up talking about flying porta potties and whether you’d rather survive or die in one.

It’s a bit of a roller coaster — frustration, dark humor, reality checks, and random thoughts — but it all ties back to one thing: life doesn’t need to be this complicated.

Highlights

• Why internet companies are infuriating

• Trying to live independently in Canada

• The real cost of “adulting”

• Living with your parents (no shame)

• A shocking Calgary crime

• Cost of groceries, gas, tools, and bills

• A very unnecessary porta-potty thought experiment

I’ve always believed that forcing everyone to earn the same amount, regardless of effort, will never work. But this episode isn’t just a rant — it’s a thought experiment.

I walk through the idea of whether fairness could exist if effort itself were measurable. What if exhaustion, mental strain, and workload could be calculated? What if everyone was required to contribute the same level of effort — not the same job, not the same outcome — but the same input?

I don’t support that system, and I explain why. But I explore it honestly, because it’s the only version of “equal pay” that even begins to make sense. From there, I contrast that with the conservative view: free will, personal responsibility, and rewards that scale with effort.

This isn’t about attacking people for their choices. It’s about understanding incentives, sustainability, and why punishing ambition always backfires.

Highlights

• Why equal outcomes always fail

• A hypothetical system based on measurable effort

• Why government-controlled income still breaks free will

• Effort vs. entitlement

• Why ambition needs incentive

• Conservative logic vs. forced fairness

• Short-term grind vs. long-term freedom

I genuinely don’t understand why people dislike Pierre as much as they do.

From my perspective, he’s one of the few leaders actually arguing for personal freedom, common sense, and accountability — yet people seem determined to shut him down without really listening to what he’s saying. In this episode, I try to figure out whether the problem is Pierre himself… or if it’s simply the party label attached to him.

I talk about leadership versus power, why accomplishments look different when you’re not in office, and how likability has somehow become more important than logic. I also touch on why the same ideas get praised or dismissed depending on who says them, and why honesty is often mistaken for arrogance.

This isn’t blind loyalty to a politician — it’s frustration with how shallow political judgment has become.

Highlights

• Why Pierre triggers such strong reactions

• Freedom vs. likability in modern politics

• Party loyalty over logic

• Why opposition leaders get blamed for not having power

• Intelligence, honesty, and being “unlikable”

• Why common sense doesn’t sell anymore

After hearing someone claim that conservatives would support sending $2.5 billion to Ukraine if it came from their leader, I had to set the record straight.

This episode isn’t about hating Ukraine — it’s about understanding what being conservative actually means. Conservatives aren’t against helping people. We’re against spending money we don’t have, especially when Canadians are barely staying afloat.

I break down why:

• conservatives would be upset no matter who sent that money

• Canada is not financially or economically healthy enough to give billions away

• uncontrolled immigration is directly impacting housing, groceries, and cost of living

• helping others should never come at the expense of your own citizens

• government spending should focus on what Canadians can’t do for themselves — not foreign wars

If you want to support Ukraine, you should be free to do that voluntarily. What you shouldn’t have is the government deciding for you while Canadians struggle to afford food, rent, and gas.

Before helping anyone else, Canada needs to get its own house in order.

Gaslighting has become one of those words that gets thrown around constantly — and honestly, I think it’s gotten ridiculous.

In this episode, I break down what I was told gaslighting actually means, why people take it way too seriously, and how teasing, joking, and normal human interaction keep getting mislabeled as abuse. I talk about intent vs. impact, why words aren’t the same as violence, and why learning to regulate how much you let things affect you matters more than inventing new labels.

This isn’t about denying that words can hurt — it’s about recognizing when people are choosing to be offended instead of choosing resilience. If everything is abuse, then nothing means anything anymore.

Sometimes it’s not trauma.
Sometimes it’s just teasing.
And sometimes, people need to toughen up a little.

Highlights

• What “gaslighting” supposedly means — and why it’s overused

• Teasing vs. actual manipulation

• Why intent matters more than labels

• Words, offense, and personal responsibility

• Why filtering every sentence is exhausting and pointless

• Toughness, resilience, and choosing what affects you

I don’t understand coffee culture. At all. If something tastes awful the first ten times, why force yourself to like it—especially when it turns into a daily dependency people can’t function without?

This starts as a rant about coffee (and why hot chocolate wins every time) and turns into a very honest spiral about addiction, habits we never question, why people pretend they know things they don’t, and how half of adulthood is just confidently guessing. I get into spelling, words everyone acts like they understand, conspiracy theories, government corruption, and why questioning things doesn’t make you crazy—it just makes you curious.

It’s unfiltered, self-aware, and all over the place in the best way.

Highlights

• Why coffee tastes terrible and people pretend otherwise

• Forcing yourself to like things that become addictions

• Coffee vs. hot chocolate (this isn’t even close)

• Why spelling, big words, and English in general are a mess

• Arrogant vs. ignorant (still unclear)

• What “conspiracy theorist” actually means

• Questioning authority without losing your mind

In this episode, I talk openly about vaccines, why I think they’re necessary in some cases, and why I’m uncomfortable with how many are given at once, especially to infants.

I’m not a doctor. I’m not pretending to be one.
This is about logic, common sense, and personal experience, not medical advice.

I explain:

• How vaccines work in simple terms

• Why I believe timing and quantity matter

• How the immune system still has limits

• Why vulnerability during immune response gets ignored

• A personal experience that made me question the “it’s just a coincidence” explanation

I’m not anti-science. I’m not anti-medicine.
I’m pro asking questions, understanding pros and cons, and not pretending everything is risk-free just because it’s common.

This isn’t meant to convince anyone.
It’s just how I see it — and why.

In this episode, I go straight at freedom of speech and why the idea of arresting people over words is completely insane.

I talk about why offense is subjective, why you can’t legally police opinions, and why actions — not feelings — are the only thing that should ever be criminal. I use real-life examples from work, hiring, everyday conversations, and preferences that people love to label as “racist” or “sexist” even when they’re not.

I also get into:

• Why being offended doesn’t make you right

• The difference between preference and hate

• Why experience should matter more than race or gender

• How free speech exists because people disagree

• Why society keeps pretending progress never happened

This isn’t polished. It’s not safe.
It’s just honest.

If that bothers you — that’s kind of the point.

I break down why the idea that trillionaires should simply give away their money sounds compassionate, but collapses once you actually run the numbers. I walk through what happens when wealth is redistributed in theory versus in real life, why free money doesn’t solve structural problems, and how quickly incentives and behavior change when effort is removed from the equation.

From there, I get into risk, responsibility, and why success gets treated like something that needs to be punished instead of understood. This isn’t about idolizing billionaires or dismissing people who are struggling—it’s about questioning easy moral answers that ignore economics, human nature, and long-term consequences.

Highlights

Blunt, analytical, and uncomfortable by design.

• Why “just give it away” fails the moment math enters the room

• What actually happens when everyone suddenly has free money

• Risk, reward, and why outcomes aren’t evenly distributed

• The difference between generosity and obligation

• Why taxing success doesn’t create fairness—just distortion