In this episode, Seth Yalcin argues that every belief we have is implicitly framed as the answer to a question, and that at different times we're considering different questions.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, we talk to Brian Leiter about why the writings of Karl Marx are helpful for understanding the current situation of the working and middle class in America, the 2016 Presidential election, and related topics!

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Josh Knobe discusses a series of experiments that try to tease out what we implicitly assume about who a person really is, deep down.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Miranda Fricker argues that the purpose of blaming someone is to communicate to them your sense of why what they did was wrong.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Agnes Callard explains why she thinks aspiration is the process of moving from one set of values to a new set of values in the way you live your life.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Steven Nadler discusses Benedict de Spinoza's unique reason-centric conception of what it is to live a good life and be free.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Jennifer Lackey discusses both how you can get things factually wrong and do something morally wrong by trusting people more than they deserve to be trusted.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Meghan Sullivan argues that if it's irrational to sacrifice long-term benefits for short-term gain, then it's also irrational to prefer for bad experiences to have already happened.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Nic Koziolek offers an account of what thought, belief, and reasoning are in terms of what knowledge is.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Zed Adams argues that philosophers are in an irresolvable debate about whether colors are real because they inherited multiple conflicting conceptions of what color is from previous generations.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.