
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A November 10, 2020 Discovery Order from a California federal judge says "asked and answered" objections are improper speaking objections. Jim Garrity says the ruling is clearly wrong, because "asked and answered" is a proper form objection with origins in at least two federal rules of evidence (403 and 611). Listen to Garrity's analysis of the ruling and the rules.
 By Jim Garrity
By Jim Garrity5
9898 ratings
A November 10, 2020 Discovery Order from a California federal judge says "asked and answered" objections are improper speaking objections. Jim Garrity says the ruling is clearly wrong, because "asked and answered" is a proper form objection with origins in at least two federal rules of evidence (403 and 611). Listen to Garrity's analysis of the ruling and the rules.

32,106 Listeners

30,635 Listeners

43,567 Listeners

16,345 Listeners

462 Listeners

26,397 Listeners

9,477 Listeners

56,383 Listeners

185 Listeners

5,759 Listeners

15,991 Listeners

48 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,788 Listeners

8,397 Listeners