
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


2:23 vs 2:39? Which is a better result for a marathoner?
It would be easy to say the faster time, but Des Linden might disagree. She ran 2:39 in 2018 to win Boston. She also ran 2:23 in 2011 to place 2nd by just 2 seconds. Which is better now? Context matters. It's not necessarily about the time on the clock if you give your all. In this episode, I share 5 tactics for giving your all - for taking an amphorous concept and putting it into reality so that you can be proud of your races no matter what the clock says.
To redeem the offers from this episode's sponsors:
- For Care/Of: takecareof.com/runningrogue (50% off on your first order)
- For Better Help: betterhelp.com/runningrogue (10% off your first month)
By Chris McClung4.7
485485 ratings
2:23 vs 2:39? Which is a better result for a marathoner?
It would be easy to say the faster time, but Des Linden might disagree. She ran 2:39 in 2018 to win Boston. She also ran 2:23 in 2011 to place 2nd by just 2 seconds. Which is better now? Context matters. It's not necessarily about the time on the clock if you give your all. In this episode, I share 5 tactics for giving your all - for taking an amphorous concept and putting it into reality so that you can be proud of your races no matter what the clock says.
To redeem the offers from this episode's sponsors:
- For Care/Of: takecareof.com/runningrogue (50% off on your first order)
- For Better Help: betterhelp.com/runningrogue (10% off your first month)

1,504 Listeners

1,329 Listeners

2,047 Listeners

1,343 Listeners

4,131 Listeners

1,833 Listeners

497 Listeners

198 Listeners

1,880 Listeners

379 Listeners

464 Listeners

14 Listeners

368 Listeners

1,783 Listeners

365 Listeners