
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Many lawyers are still struggling to find just the right guidelines or protocols for taking or defending remote depositions. The opportunities for deposition misconduct are many in the absence of binding agreements about who's going to be where doing what. In this episode, Jim Garrity spotlights two decisions, one just five days old, in which the courts approved excellent, detailed protocols for conducting depositions remotely. The two cases are cited in the show notes. If for some reason you can't access them, email our staff at [email protected], and we'll gladly send you copies of both decisions at no charge.
As always, thanks for listening, be sure to leave us a five star review wherever you get your podcast. It literally takes less than 10 seconds, and means a great deal to us.
SHOW NOTES:
Old Republic General Insurance Corporation v. Amtrust International Underwriters Ltd., et al., Case No. 1:20-CV-00778-NONE-JLT, 2021 WL 1164426 (E. D. Cal. March 26, 2021)
Richard Dennis, et al v.. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al., No. 16-CV-06496 (LAK), 2020 WL 5658624, at *1–7 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2020)
 By Jim Garrity
By Jim Garrity5
9898 ratings
Many lawyers are still struggling to find just the right guidelines or protocols for taking or defending remote depositions. The opportunities for deposition misconduct are many in the absence of binding agreements about who's going to be where doing what. In this episode, Jim Garrity spotlights two decisions, one just five days old, in which the courts approved excellent, detailed protocols for conducting depositions remotely. The two cases are cited in the show notes. If for some reason you can't access them, email our staff at [email protected], and we'll gladly send you copies of both decisions at no charge.
As always, thanks for listening, be sure to leave us a five star review wherever you get your podcast. It literally takes less than 10 seconds, and means a great deal to us.
SHOW NOTES:
Old Republic General Insurance Corporation v. Amtrust International Underwriters Ltd., et al., Case No. 1:20-CV-00778-NONE-JLT, 2021 WL 1164426 (E. D. Cal. March 26, 2021)
Richard Dennis, et al v.. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al., No. 16-CV-06496 (LAK), 2020 WL 5658624, at *1–7 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2020)

32,090 Listeners

30,638 Listeners

43,570 Listeners

16,353 Listeners

461 Listeners

26,395 Listeners

9,484 Listeners

56,391 Listeners

186 Listeners

5,759 Listeners

16,030 Listeners

48 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,779 Listeners

8,393 Listeners